☆Major☆Executie☆

☆Major☆Executie☆ — CS2 Stats

CH76561198318869243[U:1:358603515]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

2,342Tracked matches59%Win rate2020Tracked since
CSDB Rating7.1 StrongPositional Player
Premier CS Rating24,458Top 25% of 185,711 CSDB-tracked playersPink band · top ~3.6% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#25824 of 231812 tracked
FaceitLevel 9 · 1,991 ELOTop 20.7% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanLegendary Eagle Master
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 17 Sep 2026 (3 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

No change since then. Play, then come back: the next observation lands here.

Track this profile

CSDB reads this profile's Premier rating from its tracked match history, and records Faceit ELO once on every day the page is viewed. 22 days played since 17 Aug 2026. Come back after the next session and the change shows above.

Is this you? Sign in with Steam to claim it and connect match tracking →

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 24,458 -429 17 Aug17 Sept · 18 days played
21,26124,887peak 24,88717 Aug17 Sept
25,137Peak Premier in tracked matches
1,991Highest Faceit ELO seen on CSDB
22Days played since 2026-08-17

Faceit ELO

  • At peak — 1,991
  • Next: Level 10 at 2,001 10 to go
  • Reached: Level 9 · Level 8 · Level 7 · Level 6

Premier CS Rating

  • 429 below peak (24,887)
  • -429 over 30 days · declining
  • Next: Red band at 25,000 542 to go
  • Reached: Pink band · Purple band · Blue band · Light Blue band

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do.

Share this profile

CSDB.GG☆Major☆Executie☆FACEITLevel 9 · 1,991 ELOSTANDINGTop 20.7% of rankedPREMIER24,458 · Pink bandPEAK ELO1,991csdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim83
Positioning64
Utility41

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY49456Last 10049%Win rateTLWWWWWLWL

Last 10 vs previous 10: 0pp win rate · −0.00 avg rating · +1.0pp headshot accuracy · −8ms reaction

Win rate 0pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — within the normal variation of a 10-match window (±20pp), so no real shift yet.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 311 · 60% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.04
  • Avg headshot accuracy 28%
  • Avg reaction 519ms

Last 10

  • 631 · 60% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 23%
  • Avg reaction 531ms

Last 20

  • 1271 · 60% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 23%
  • Avg reaction 534ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Positional PlayerPositioning stands above the rest of this profile (+1.6 against its own average).

Aim8.3
Utility4.1
Positioning6.4
Opening Duels4.3
Clutch4.6

Limited utility dependence

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

iM

Plays most like iM 89% playstyle similarity

Most alike: positioning profile, opening-duel success.

Where you differ: lower utility contribution.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Strengths

T openings. 63% T opening-duel success — entries that actually open the round.

Areas to improve

Utility. Utility contribution runs far behind the mechanical game — the cheapest rating gain on this profile is thrown, not aimed.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim8.3
Positioning6.4
Utility4.1
Mechanics7.3
Opening Duels6.8
Win Impact7.9

Composite 7.1/10 (Strong), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.02 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.01−0.00
first ⅓ avg 0.01 → last ⅓ avg 0.01
Reaction time512ms+12ms
first ⅓ avg 501ms → last ⅓ avg 512ms
Headshot accuracy24.2%−0.8%
first ⅓ avg 25.0% → last ⅓ avg 24.2%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.14Best match rating · 13–2 · inferno, 24 Aug
44%Best headshot accuracy · 9–5 · inferno, 18 Sept
344msFastest reaction time · 2–9 · inferno, 25 Aug
13–0Biggest win · cache, 15 Sept

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

8Longest win streak
109In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
11Overtime games

Map breakdown

cacheBest map · 67% over 18ancientWeakest map · 43% over 21
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
infernoB28131546%0.02
ancientC2191243%0.00
cacheS1812667%0.02
anubisB158753%-0.01
dust2B84450%0.01
mirage31233%-0.02
overpass220100%0.11
train2020%-0.05
vertigo1010%-0.09
office1010%0.01
nuke1010%0.00

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Ancient is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (43% over 21). Start with the 6 essential Ancient lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

270Matches
59%Win rate
1.26Avg K/D
82.6ADR
46%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

43%1v1 clutch win
29%1v2 clutch win
11Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWWWWL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Ancient1947%1.1419.2
Inferno1580%1.5821.0
Anubis1362%1.2717.3
Dust2838%1.0316.0
Cache3100%1.3916.7
Overpass3100%1.4928.0
Mirage333%0.8114.3
Nuke1100%1.3117.0

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

24.1%Headshot accuracy
33.1%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
37.5%Spray accuracy
83.0%Counter-strafing
9.2°Preaim
524msReaction time
63.3%T opening success
51.3%CT opening success
0.49Enemies flashed / flash
7.6%Flash assists
6.85HE damage / grenade
2.46Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Grenades & Utility

    Most of your flashes are blinding nobody. A handful of reliable pop-flash lineups fixes this faster than anything else.

    Enemies flashed per flash 0.4911 — below the 0.5 mark we flag

    Grenade Lineups
Spend your practice time on Ancient

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

43% win rate across 21 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Ancient callouts & strategyAncient grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
inferno8–8-0.0231%18 Sept
vertigo5–9-0.0924%18 Sept
overpass9–60.1014%18 Sept
inferno9–50.0844%18 Sept
overpass9–50.1128%18 Sept
inferno9–10.1424%18 Sept
anubis13–8-0.0819%17 Sept
inferno5–13-0.0227%17 Sept
anubis13–110.0214%17 Sept
anubis3–13-0.069%17 Sept
anubis10–13-0.0124%17 Sept
cache13–110.0132%16 Sept
cache13–40.1214%16 Sept
inferno7–130.0125%16 Sept
ancient13–5-0.029%15 Sept
cache13–00.0215%15 Sept
dust213–10-0.0030%14 Sept
anubis13–90.0018%14 Sept
inferno10–130.0733%14 Sept
mirage10–13-0.0226%14 Sept
inferno10–13-0.0221%14 Sept
ancient13–8-0.0126%13 Sept
anubis13–5-0.0028%12 Sept
ancient13–70.0337%12 Sept
inferno13–11-0.0128%12 Sept
inferno5–130.0524%11 Sept
dust213–5-0.0027%11 Sept
anubis6–13-0.0420%11 Sept
ancient13–11-0.0321%11 Sept
anubis15–15-0.0215%11 Sept
cache13–7-0.0038%11 Sept
inferno14–16-0.0528%11 Sept
ancient9–130.0227%11 Sept
inferno13–90.0431%11 Sept
cache16–130.0327%11 Sept
ancient5–13-0.0423%11 Sept
anubis4–3-0.0243%11 Sept
cache6–13-0.0633%11 Sept
ancient13–8-0.0216%11 Sept
inferno13–90.0327%11 Sept
ancient0–13-0.0711%10 Sept
inferno6–13-0.0416%10 Sept
ancient9–130.0728%9 Sept
inferno13–80.0519%9 Sept
cache13–80.0331%9 Sept
inferno13–50.0832%9 Sept
cache13–60.0539%9 Sept
anubis13–110.0223%9 Sept
dust213–80.0121%9 Sept
anubis13–110.0129%8 Sept
cache13–110.0132%8 Sept
cache11–13-0.0227%8 Sept
dust24–13-0.0023%8 Sept
inferno16–140.0023%8 Sept
ancient7–13-0.0115%7 Sept
cache14–160.0530%7 Sept
dust29–13-0.0135%7 Sept
inferno13–3-0.0230%7 Sept
cache13–7-0.0221%3 Sept
office12–120.0111%3 Sept
ancient13–110.0216%2 Sept
ancient13–80.0525%2 Sept
inferno13–80.0118%2 Sept
ancient6–13-0.0524%26 Aug
inferno4–13-0.0033%26 Aug
ancient9–13-0.0320%26 Aug
cache13–80.0244%26 Aug
inferno10–13-0.0320%25 Aug
ancient13–60.0625%25 Aug
inferno15–15-0.0324%25 Aug
ancient12–16-0.0127%25 Aug
inferno2–9-0.1538%25 Aug
ancient11–130.0422%24 Aug
cache13–70.0341%24 Aug
inferno13–20.1433%24 Aug
mirage8–13-0.0714%24 Aug
ancient14–160.0124%24 Aug
anubis7–13-0.0323%24 Aug
cache7–130.0630%24 Aug
anubis3–13-0.0213%24 Aug
inferno13–70.0522%24 Aug
ancient9–130.0143%24 Aug
cache5–130.0135%23 Aug
anubis13–90.0124%23 Aug
cache13–100.0131%21 Aug
anubis8–130.0512%20 Aug
inferno15–150.0219%20 Aug
dust24–13-0.0713%20 Aug
ancient5–130.0440%20 Aug
inferno13–70.0726%20 Aug
nuke9–130.0017%20 Aug
dust213–40.1219%20 Aug
inferno11–130.0027%20 Aug
mirage13–80.0419%18 Aug
ancient13–10-0.0128%18 Aug
train12–12-0.0326%18 Aug
cache14–160.0233%17 Aug
dust210–130.0620%17 Aug
inferno14–16-0.0019%17 Aug
train11–13-0.0721%17 Aug

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →