[KDS]peggyPenx

[KDS]peggyPenx — CS2 Stats

DK76561198312861330[U:1:352595602]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

1,995Tracked matches47%Win rate2020Tracked since
CSDB Rating4.3 DevelopingSupport
Premier CS Rating16,321Purple band · top ~23.1% of ranked players (population est.)
FaceitLevel 5 · 1,186 ELOTop 67.6% of ranked FACEIT players
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 21 Sep 2026 (yesterday). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

No change since then. Play, then come back: the next observation lands here.

Track this profile

CSDB reads this profile's Premier rating from its tracked match history, and records Faceit ELO once on every day the page is viewed. 37 days played since 10 Aug 2026. Come back after the next session and the change shows above.

Is this you? Sign in with Steam to claim it and connect match tracking →

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 16,321 +1,321 10 Aug21 Sept · 37 days played
14,57817,254peak 17,25410 Aug21 Sept
17,583Peak Premier in tracked matches
1,186Highest Faceit ELO seen on CSDB
37Days played since 2026-08-10

Faceit ELO

  • At peak — 1,186
  • Next: Level 6 at 1,201 15 to go
  • Reached: Level 5 · Level 4 · Level 3 · Level 2

Premier CS Rating

  • 933 below peak (17,254)
  • +1,743 over 30 days · improving
  • Next: Pink band at 20,000 3,679 to go
  • Reached: Purple band · Blue band · Light Blue band

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do.

Share this profile

CSDB.GG[KDS]peggyPenxFACEITLevel 5 · 1,186 ELOSTANDINGTop 67.6% of rankedPREMIER16,321 · Purple bandPEAK ELO1,186csdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim47
Positioning48
Utility58

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY48502Last 10048%Win rateWWLWLLWWLW

Last 10 vs previous 10: +20pp win rate · −0.04 avg rating · −1.7pp headshot accuracy · −18ms reaction

Win rate up 20pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — more than a 10-match window's normal noise (±20pp). Average match rating moved the other way (−0.04), so results shifted more than performance did.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 32 · 60% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 6%
  • Avg reaction 531ms

Last 10

  • 64 · 60% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 6%
  • Avg reaction 542ms

Last 20

  • 1010 · 50% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 7%
  • Avg reaction 550ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: SupportUtility contribution stands above the rest of this profile (+1.7 against its own average).

Aim4.7
Utility5.8
Positioning4.8
Opening Duels1.7
Clutch4.2

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

NiKo

Plays most like NiKo 69% playstyle similarity

Most alike: utility contribution, positioning profile.

Where you differ: lower opening-duel success; lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Reaction time. 568ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Counter-strafing. Only 66% of shots are taken properly stopped — moving-shot inaccuracy is quietly taxing every duel.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim4.7
Positioning4.8
Utility5.8
Mechanics3.6
Opening Duels1.5
Win Impact3.9

Composite 4.3/10 (Developing), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.02−0.01
first ⅓ avg 0.03 → last ⅓ avg 0.02
Reaction time572ms+6ms
first ⅓ avg 566ms → last ⅓ avg 572ms
Headshot accuracy7.5%−0.9%
first ⅓ avg 8.5% → last ⅓ avg 7.5%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.18Best match rating · 9–13 · nuke, 30 Aug
20%Best headshot accuracy · 5–13 · inferno, 10 Aug
422msFastest reaction time · 13–10 · inferno, 8 Sept
13–2Biggest win · mirage, 30 Aug

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

3Longest win streak
W2Current streak
84In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
9Overtime games

Map breakdown

nukeBest map · 71% over 21dust2Weakest map · 14% over 7
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
anubisC2281436%0.03
nukeS2115671%0.05
ancientA1710759%0.03
mirageC1661038%0.03
infernoS96367%0.01
cacheD82625%0.01
dust2D71614%-0.01

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Dust 2 is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (14% over 7). Start with the 6 essential Dust 2 lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

35Matches
49%Win rate
1.14Avg K/D
77.2ADR
31%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

41%1v1 clutch win
29%1v2 clutch win
5Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWWLLW

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage771%1.3714.1
Inferno650%1.1615.8
Nuke540%0.9711.8
Overpass2100%1.5218.0
Ancient2100%1.4011.5
Dust2250%1.0319.5

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

7.3%Headshot accuracy
35.7%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
37.6%Spray accuracy
66.4%Counter-strafing
10.5°Preaim
568msReaction time
27.5%T opening success
42.0%CT opening success
0.64Enemies flashed / flash
3.7%Flash assists
5.74HE damage / grenade
13.85Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Best CS2 Crosshair

    Your shots are landing on bodies more often than heads — usually a crosshair-height and placement habit rather than raw aim.

    Headshot accuracy 7.3397% — below the 15% mark we flag

    Aim Training
  2. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 27.492% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Dust 2

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

14% win rate across 7 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Dust 2 callouts & strategyDust 2 grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
ancient13–10-0.074%21 Sept
inferno13–8-0.025%20 Sept
anubis6–13-0.047%19 Sept
nuke13–9-0.006%19 Sept
ancient4–130.107%18 Sept
cache3–13-0.109%17 Sept
inferno16–14-0.009%17 Sept
nuke13–100.024%16 Sept
mirage10–130.033%15 Sept
ancient13–11-0.005%15 Sept
dust27–13-0.0212%14 Sept
inferno13–100.097%8 Sept
cache6–130.007%8 Sept
nuke13–50.040%7 Sept
dust25–130.026%7 Sept
mirage5–13-0.014%7 Sept
ancient13–90.127%7 Sept
anubis4–13-0.0316%7 Sept
ancient11–130.049%6 Sept
nuke13–70.106%6 Sept
anubis13–50.0613%6 Sept
mirage8–130.016%5 Sept
mirage8–13-0.0213%5 Sept
anubis9–130.095%4 Sept
cache3–130.0011%4 Sept
anubis13–100.026%4 Sept
ancient3–13-0.046%3 Sept
ancient13–100.078%3 Sept
nuke10–130.008%2 Sept
inferno13–90.0412%2 Sept
ancient13–100.028%2 Sept
anubis10–13-0.026%2 Sept
nuke16–130.0212%2 Sept
anubis8–130.039%1 Sept
nuke13–110.0810%1 Sept
cache10–130.016%31 Aug
anubis13–7-0.0111%31 Aug
anubis7–130.0214%31 Aug
nuke13–7-0.058%31 Aug
ancient13–80.0510%31 Aug
nuke9–130.1811%30 Aug
mirage13–20.105%30 Aug
ancient13–90.034%30 Aug
cache3–130.076%30 Aug
anubis13–9-0.0011%29 Aug
ancient13–100.056%29 Aug
cache13–30.0510%29 Aug
ancient4–130.004%27 Aug
anubis11–130.047%27 Aug
nuke13–8-0.005%26 Aug
mirage9–130.059%26 Aug
nuke13–110.0617%26 Aug
anubis13–80.028%26 Aug
anubis10–130.036%25 Aug
mirage13–80.019%25 Aug
mirage13–80.094%25 Aug
anubis7–130.015%25 Aug
mirage13–60.066%24 Aug
nuke13–110.065%24 Aug
anubis13–100.019%23 Aug
nuke15–150.035%23 Aug
mirage13–100.0514%23 Aug
cache8–130.034%23 Aug
ancient9–130.077%23 Aug
inferno13–100.025%22 Aug
mirage10–13-0.035%22 Aug
mirage11–13-0.0512%22 Aug
nuke13–80.107%21 Aug
mirage9–130.089%21 Aug
inferno3–13-0.0510%21 Aug
anubis10–130.0114%20 Aug
mirage13–40.048%20 Aug
nuke16–140.099%19 Aug
anubis11–130.0410%19 Aug
dust27–13-0.0711%18 Aug
inferno13–100.017%18 Aug
dust21–13-0.0211%17 Aug
anubis10–130.0711%17 Aug
nuke13–70.066%17 Aug
mirage5–130.046%16 Aug
inferno8–130.016%16 Aug
nuke9–130.0011%16 Aug
anubis13–40.018%16 Aug
nuke13–80.088%16 Aug
mirage2–13-0.0313%15 Aug
nuke13–80.156%15 Aug
ancient16–140.047%15 Aug
ancient2–13-0.113%15 Aug
nuke8–130.047%15 Aug
anubis13–90.068%14 Aug
nuke13–16-0.009%13 Aug
dust213–90.0412%13 Aug
dust28–13-0.0111%12 Aug
ancient16–140.044%11 Aug
anubis5–130.118%11 Aug
ancient6–130.016%11 Aug
dust212–16-0.014%10 Aug
inferno5–130.0020%10 Aug
anubis15–150.028%10 Aug
cache13–70.012%10 Aug

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →