bL4SEZ — CS2 Stats

JP76561198311857376[U:1:351591648]Steam profile ↗

2,440Tracked matches47%Win rate2020Tracked since

CSDB Rating6.9 SolidPassive Rifler

CSDB Leaderboard#4342 of 5311 tracked

FaceitLevel 10 · 3,511 ELOTop 12.4% of ranked FACEIT players

Ladder ranks via Leetify

Rating over time

3,511Peak Faceit ELO on CSDB

1Days observed since 2026-08-27

Faceit ELO

At peak — 3,511
Next: 4,000 ELO at 4,000 — 489 to go
Reached: 3,500 ELO · 3,000 ELO · 2,500 ELO · Level 10

CSDB's own observations — this history builds from the day a profile is first viewed and cannot be backfilled.

Share this profile

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim95

Positioning55

Utility60

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY63–37Last 10063%Win rateWLWWWLLLWW

Last 10 vs previous 10: +10pp win rate · -0.01 avg rating

Player DNA

Primary style: Passive Rifler — Aim-led profile without a single dominant tendency.

Aim9.5

Aggression4.2

Utility6.0

Positioning5.5

Opening Duels0.4

Clutch4.0

Sharp aimerStrong CT-side opener

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

Plays most like NiKo 97% playstyle similarity

Most alike: aim profile, opening-fight frequency.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Strengths

Aim. Aim score of 95 — the mechanical foundation is a clear strength.

Areas to improve

Preaim. Mechanical aim is strong but the crosshair sits 10.8° off target when enemies appear — placement, not flicking, is the bigger win available.

Positioning. Positioning trails aim by 40 points — deaths here waste a strong aim profile.

Utility. Utility contribution runs far behind the mechanical game — the cheapest rating gain on this profile is thrown, not aimed.

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 40% on CT to 23% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim9.5

Positioning5.5

Utility6.0

Mechanics8.2

Opening Duels1.3

Win Impact3.9

Composite 6.9/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.05 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.00−0.01

first ⅓ avg 0.01 → last ⅓ avg 0.00

Reaction time499ms−47ms

first ⅓ avg 546ms → last ⅓ avg 499ms

Headshot accuracy25.3%−0.3%

first ⅓ avg 25.5% → last ⅓ avg 25.3%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.14Best rating — inferno 13–9

13–0Biggest win — ancient

8Longest win streak

11–3In matches decided by ≤2 rounds

10Overtime games

Map breakdown

anubisBest map · 86% over 7cacheWeakest map · 40% over 5

Map	Grade	Played	Record	Win rate	Avg rating
dust2	S	36	25–11	69%	0.01
ancient	A	22	13–9	59%	-0.00
nuke	A	14	9–5	64%	0.02
inferno	A	11	6–5	55%	0.01
anubis	S	7	6–1	86%	0.03
cache	C	5	2–3	40%	-0.01
overpass	C	5	2–3	40%	0.02

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Faceit stats

Combat

2,210Matches

56%Win rate

1.28Avg K/D

81.9ADR

56%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

40%1v1 clutch win

27%1v2 clutch win

15Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLWLWL

Map	Matches	Win rate	Avg K/D	Avg kills
Dust2	310	63%	1.39	16.8
Anubis	299	57%	1.29	16.6
Nuke	206	55%	1.35	17.6
Inferno	171	58%	1.35	17.2
Ancient	83	42%	1.18	15.8
Overpass	63	67%	1.19	16.2
Vertigo	59	56%	1.55	19.1
Mirage	23	26%	0.98	14.8

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

24.9%Headshot accuracy

42.6%Accuracy (enemy spotted)

49.0%Spray accuracy

87.0%Counter-strafing

10.8°Preaim

498msReaction time

23.0%T opening success

40.2%CT opening success

0.53Enemies flashed / flash

11.6%Flash assists

6.95HE damage / grenade

14.73Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

Advanced Mechanics
You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.
T opening duels 23.0279% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Cache

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

40% win rate across 5 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Cache callouts & strategy →

Recent matches

Map	Score	Rating	HS%	Date
nuke	13–7	0.00	20%	27 Aug →
inferno	3–13	-0.01	40%	27 Aug →
dust2	13–9	0.08	19%	26 Aug →
anubis	16–12	0.06	25%	26 Aug →
dust2	13–8	0.00	14%	24 Aug →
dust2	13–16	-0.06	26%	24 Aug →
nuke	3–13	-0.10	17%	24 Aug →
ancient	6–13	-0.07	16%	24 Aug →
dust2	13–9	0.02	26%	24 Aug →
inferno	13–5	-0.02	32%	23 Aug →
dust2	7–13	-0.08	21%	23 Aug →
anubis	13–8	0.03	27%	23 Aug →
inferno	5–13	-0.01	20%	22 Aug →
dust2	7–13	0.04	22%	22 Aug →
nuke	10–13	-0.02	38%	21 Aug →
dust2	13–6	0.02	10%	21 Aug →
ancient	13–9	0.06	44%	21 Aug →
ancient	19–17	0.03	28%	19 Aug →
nuke	13–5	0.03	37%	19 Aug →
cache	5–13	-0.05	30%	11 Aug →
inferno	4–13	-0.02	30%	9 Aug →
dust2	11–13	-0.03	15%	9 Aug →
ancient	13–6	0.11	21%	9 Aug →
nuke	10–13	0.07	25%	9 Aug →
ancient	13–3	-0.04	29%	8 Aug →
inferno	13–5	0.03	29%	8 Aug →
ancient	10–13	-0.03	26%	7 Aug →
dust2	3–13	-0.04	19%	7 Aug →
cache	6–13	-0.06	13%	7 Aug →
dust2	4–13	-0.02	26%	7 Aug →
anubis	13–3	0.03	32%	7 Aug →
dust2	13–1	0.05	36%	7 Aug →
anubis	13–11	0.03	21%	5 Aug →
ancient	13–2	0.00	32%	5 Aug →
dust2	13–11	0.04	28%	4 Aug →
nuke	13–11	0.01	19%	3 Aug →
ancient	13–10	0.04	24%	3 Aug →
dust2	16–13	0.01	25%	2 Aug →
ancient	12–16	-0.03	20%	2 Aug →
nuke	13–11	-0.03	35%	2 Aug →
ancient	13–0	0.02	30%	2 Aug →
dust2	13–11	0.02	38%	2 Aug →
inferno	13–9	-0.00	19%	1 Aug →
dust2	13–8	0.02	25%	1 Aug →
ancient	9–13	0.06	36%	1 Aug →
cache	16–12	0.01	33%	31 Jul →
dust2	13–5	0.03	31%	31 Jul →
dust2	13–7	-0.01	31%	30 Jul →
anubis	13–3	0.09	31%	30 Jul →
dust2	13–3	0.06	36%	29 Jul →
ancient	13–8	-0.04	28%	29 Jul →
dust2	13–0	0.08	29%	28 Jul →
ancient	5–13	-0.07	35%	28 Jul →
nuke	5–13	0.01	10%	28 Jul →
cache	9–13	0.00	25%	17 Jul →
ancient	6–13	-0.05	27%	17 Jul →
dust2	16–13	0.02	22%	14 Jul →
inferno	13–11	0.02	22%	14 Jul →
dust2	9–13	-0.02	35%	13 Jul →
inferno	9–13	0.02	40%	13 Jul →
dust2	16–14	-0.03	19%	13 Jul →
inferno	13–8	0.02	25%	13 Jul →
dust2	13–4	0.04	20%	12 Jul →
ancient	13–7	-0.01	26%	12 Jul →
dust2	13–2	0.08	15%	12 Jul →
cache	13–6	0.06	22%	12 Jul →
ancient	16–12	-0.03	21%	11 Jul →
dust2	9–13	-0.05	17%	9 Jul →
ancient	4–13	-0.05	33%	9 Jul →
ancient	13–5	0.09	34%	5 Jul →
nuke	13–0	0.01	17%	5 Jul →
inferno	6–13	-0.01	25%	20 Jun →
dust2	7–13	-0.01	22%	20 Jun →
dust2	13–4	0.03	21%	18 Jun →
overpass	13–5	0.03	19%	18 Jun →
nuke	13–6	0.11	20%	16 Jun →
dust2	16–13	-0.04	22%	16 Jun →
ancient	10–13	-0.06	33%	16 Jun →
overpass	11–13	0.07	34%	14 Jun →
dust2	13–11	0.01	25%	14 Jun →
nuke	9–13	0.02	25%	14 Jun →
dust2	13–1	0.02	33%	13 Jun →
ancient	13–4	-0.02	33%	12 Jun →
nuke	13–8	-0.04	37%	12 Jun →
dust2	9–13	-0.00	31%	12 Jun →
overpass	7–13	-0.06	21%	12 Jun →
anubis	7–13	-0.01	17%	12 Jun →
dust2	13–4	0.07	34%	12 Jun →
anubis	13–5	0.01	8%	11 Jun →
ancient	8–13	-0.07	13%	11 Jun →
dust2	13–7	-0.01	18%	11 Jun →
overpass	9–13	0.02	25%	9 Jun →
nuke	13–6	0.08	31%	9 Jun →
dust2	13–7	0.04	36%	9 Jun →
ancient	13–8	0.05	24%	8 Jun →
nuke	13–11	0.07	33%	8 Jun →
overpass	13–10	0.04	23%	7 Jun →
inferno	13–9	0.14	30%	7 Jun →
dust2	11–13	-0.03	27%	7 Jun →
dust2	13–11	0.04	23%	7 Jun →