priple — CS2 Stats

VE76561198309772411[U:1:349506683]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

2,909Tracked matches23%Win rate2020Tracked since

CSDB Rating5.1 DevelopingSupport

CSDB Leaderboard#79387 of 227430 tracked

FaceitLevel 7 · 1,320 ELOTop 42.3% of ranked FACEIT players

WingmanDistinguished Master Guardian

Ladder ranks via Leetify

Track this profile

CSDB reads this profile's Premier rating from its tracked match history, and records Faceit ELO once on every day the page is viewed. 41 days played since 4 Jun 2026. Come back after the next session and the change shows above.

Is this you? Sign in with Steam to claim it and connect match tracking →

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 19,781 +1,066 4 Jun – 2 Jul · 4 days played

19,781Peak Premier in tracked matches

1,320Highest Faceit ELO seen on CSDB

41Days played since 2026-06-04

Faceit ELO

At peak — 1,320
Next: Level 7 at 1,351 — 31 to go
Reached: Level 6 · Level 5 · Level 4 · Level 3

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do.

Share this profile

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim70

Positioning58

Utility67

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

COLD38–60–2Last 10038%Win rateLLWLWLLLLL

Last 10 vs previous 10: 0pp win rate · +0.04 avg rating · −2.0pp headshot accuracy · −45ms reaction

Win rate 0pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — within the normal variation of a 10-match window (±20pp), so no real shift yet.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

2–3 · 40% win rate
Avg rating 0.03
Avg headshot accuracy 13%
Avg reaction 531ms

Last 10

2–8 · 20% win rate
Avg rating 0.03
Avg headshot accuracy 16%
Avg reaction 510ms

Last 20

4–16 · 20% win rate
Avg rating 0.01
Avg headshot accuracy 17%
Avg reaction 533ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Support — Utility contribution stands above the rest of this profile (+1.3 against its own average).

Aim7.0

Utility6.7

Positioning5.8

Opening Duels5.2

Clutch3.8

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

Plays most like ZywOo 81% playstyle similarity

Most alike: utility contribution, positioning profile.

Where you differ: lower opening-duel success; lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Reaction time. 561ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim7.0

Positioning5.8

Utility6.7

Mechanics6.0

Opening Duels5.2

Win Impact0.0

Composite 5.1/10 (Developing), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×0.90 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.02−0.00

first ⅓ avg 0.02 → last ⅓ avg 0.02

Reaction time583ms+8ms

first ⅓ avg 575ms → last ⅓ avg 583ms

Headshot accuracy17.8%−0.7%

first ⅓ avg 18.5% → last ⅓ avg 17.8%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.18Best match rating · 13–0 · cache, 9 Jul →

38%Best headshot accuracy · 13–8 · anubis, 1 Aug →

367msFastest reaction time · 1–9 · eldorado, 27 Jul →

13–0Biggest win · cache, 9 Jul →

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

3Longest win streak

L2Current streak

3–9In matches decided by ≤2 rounds

9Overtime games

Map breakdown

anubisBest map · 67% over 15nukeWeakest map · 8% over 13

Map	Grade	Played	Record	Win rate	Avg rating
mirage	B	24	12–12	50%	0.03
anubis	S	15	10–5	67%	0.02
nuke	D	13	1–12	8%	0.03
inferno	D	12	1–11	8%	0.02
cache	C	11	4–7	36%	0.05
ancient	D	8	1–7	13%	-0.01
dust2	S	6	4–2	67%	0.01
poseidon	—	3	2–1	67%	0.08
debris	—	2	0–2	0%	0.06
vertigo	—	2	0–2	0%	-0.03
overpass	—	2	2–0	100%	0.05
eldorado	—	1	0–1	0%	-0.14
alpine	—	1	1–0	100%	-0.04

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Nuke is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (8% over 13). Start with the 6 essential Nuke lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

1,772Matches

50%Win rate

1.10Avg K/D

84.2ADR

47%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

39%1v1 clutch win

23%1v2 clutch win

16Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLWLWW

Map	Matches	Win rate	Avg K/D	Avg kills
Mirage	367	52%	1.12	16.9
Inferno	173	47%	1.10	17.1
Anubis	166	51%	1.17	17.1
Nuke	132	48%	1.22	17.5
Ancient	130	44%	1.14	16.8
Dust2	92	39%	1.02	15.4
Train	49	55%	1.21	16.1
Overpass	43	60%	1.13	17.1

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

18.1%Headshot accuracy

37.1%Accuracy (enemy spotted)

40.5%Spray accuracy

76.9%Counter-strafing

12.0°Preaim

561msReaction time

52.1%T opening success

49.3%CT opening success

0.58Enemies flashed / flash

6.4%Flash assists

9.05HE damage / grenade

15.20Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Spend your practice time on Nuke

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

8% win rate across 13 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Nuke callouts & strategy →Nuke grenade lineups →

Recent matches

Map	Score	Rating	HS%	Date
inferno	7–13	-0.05	12%	13 Sept →
mirage	8–13	0.11	14%	13 Sept →
anubis	13–3	0.00	8%	13 Sept →
cache	11–13	0.03	12%	13 Sept →
dust2	13–10	0.06	21%	8 Sept →
inferno	11–13	0.05	22%	8 Sept →
ancient	10–13	0.03	24%	8 Sept →
anubis	11–13	0.07	18%	6 Sept →
mirage	10–13	0.06	17%	4 Sept →
nuke	4–13	-0.05	16%	3 Sept →
mirage	10–13	-0.07	17%	3 Sept →
cache	8–13	-0.04	20%	2 Sept →
anubis	13–8	0.11	24%	1 Sept →
cache	19–16	-0.03	16%	30 Aug →
anubis	6–13	-0.03	14%	25 Aug →
cache	8–13	0.03	16%	25 Aug →
inferno	8–13	0.03	21%	25 Aug →
dust2	9–13	-0.01	24%	23 Aug →
anubis	3–13	-0.03	15%	23 Aug →
ancient	7–13	-0.06	15%	23 Aug →
nuke	7–13	0.01	14%	23 Aug →
ancient	6–13	0.00	6%	17 Aug →
inferno	8–13	-0.04	14%	16 Aug →
poseidon	9–3	0.14	15%	11 Aug →
debris	7–9	0.10	19%	11 Aug →
poseidon	5–9	-0.01	18%	11 Aug →
nuke	8–13	0.06	21%	9 Aug →
dust2	13–6	0.03	23%	8 Aug →
mirage	13–16	0.01	25%	6 Aug →
anubis	16–13	-0.01	15%	5 Aug →
vertigo	7–13	-0.09	18%	5 Aug →
mirage	7–13	-0.01	15%	2 Aug →
anubis	13–8	0.10	38%	1 Aug →
mirage	13–10	0.02	23%	30 Jul →
inferno	8–13	0.05	24%	30 Jul →
mirage	16–13	0.02	23%	30 Jul →
ancient	3–13	-0.04	28%	30 Jul →
mirage	13–8	0.04	19%	30 Jul →
mirage	13–4	0.11	16%	30 Jul →
dust2	0–7	-0.08	25%	29 Jul →
mirage	10–13	0.02	14%	29 Jul →
inferno	15–15	0.03	18%	29 Jul →
mirage	4–13	0.06	31%	29 Jul →
nuke	7–13	0.04	24%	29 Jul →
mirage	13–7	0.12	18%	29 Jul →
mirage	16–14	0.02	15%	29 Jul →
debris	6–9	0.01	32%	28 Jul →
poseidon	9–5	0.12	36%	28 Jul →
eldorado	1–9	-0.14	15%	27 Jul →
inferno	11–13	0.05	23%	27 Jul →
anubis	13–9	0.09	28%	27 Jul →
anubis	13–9	0.06	22%	27 Jul →
mirage	4–13	0.01	30%	27 Jul →
inferno	9–13	0.09	10%	27 Jul →
anubis	13–3	0.04	17%	22 Jul →
anubis	2–9	-0.09	21%	22 Jul →
mirage	13–8	0.07	20%	11 Jul →
ancient	11–13	-0.01	12%	11 Jul →
mirage	13–7	0.03	30%	10 Jul →
ancient	4–13	-0.07	22%	9 Jul →
dust2	13–11	-0.00	19%	9 Jul →
cache	13–0	0.18	15%	9 Jul →
nuke	13–16	0.11	25%	9 Jul →
cache	13–6	0.11	33%	7 Jul →
cache	12–12	0.00	22%	7 Jul →
cache	8–13	0.07	16%	7 Jul →
cache	13–4	0.11	13%	7 Jul →
anubis	13–6	0.02	4%	6 Jul →
nuke	9–13	0.03	30%	6 Jul →
ancient	8–13	0.00	17%	6 Jul →
mirage	10–13	0.08	11%	5 Jul →
nuke	9–13	-0.01	15%	5 Jul →
mirage	16–13	-0.02	17%	2 Jul →
mirage	13–10	0.03	17%	2 Jul →
mirage	13–11	-0.03	15%	2 Jul →
nuke	6–13	0.07	13%	1 Jul →
inferno	8–13	-0.01	8%	22 Jun →
anubis	1–13	-0.10	5%	22 Jun →
mirage	11–13	0.04	15%	22 Jun →
nuke	10–13	0.05	29%	21 Jun →
anubis	13–10	0.00	8%	20 Jun →
nuke	13–10	0.04	22%	20 Jun →
inferno	7–13	0.05	18%	20 Jun →
overpass	16–13	0.04	20%	12 Jun →
nuke	10–13	0.06	22%	11 Jun →
mirage	11–13	0.01	22%	10 Jun →
inferno	13–8	-0.03	24%	10 Jun →
dust2	13–6	0.04	34%	10 Jun →
nuke	8–13	-0.01	17%	10 Jun →
cache	3–13	0.10	24%	10 Jun →
vertigo	8–13	0.03	23%	9 Jun →
alpine	13–10	-0.04	24%	5 Jun →
mirage	13–9	0.04	23%	5 Jun →
cache	11–13	-0.01	12%	4 Jun →
overpass	13–8	0.06	18%	4 Jun →
anubis	13–5	0.05	20%	4 Jun →
mirage	5–13	-0.06	17%	4 Jun →
ancient	13–2	0.06	19%	4 Jun →
nuke	7–13	0.02	30%	4 Jun →
inferno	6–13	0.04	19%	4 Jun →