stressarN

stressarN — CS2 Stats

PROSINNERS EsportsNorth MacedoniaRiflerSettings & gear profile →

MK76561198304437116[U:1:344171388]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

5,278Tracked matches60%Win rate2020Tracked since
CSDB Rating7.8 StrongPositional Player
FaceitLevel 10 · 4,231 ELOTop 12.4% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanLegendary Eagle
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 22 Sep 2026 (2 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

0Faceit ELO · 4,231 → 4,231
+1Tracked matches · now 5,278
0.0ppWin rate · 60.0% → 60.0%
Track this profile

CSDB reads this profile's Premier rating from its tracked match history, and records Faceit ELO once on every day the page is viewed. 38 days played since 29 Mar 2026. Come back after the next session and the change shows above.

Is this you? Sign in with Steam to claim it and connect match tracking →

Rating over time

Faceit ELO: 4,231 +0 27 Aug22 Sept · 10 observations
4,2314,231peak 4,23127 Aug22 Sept
4,231Highest Faceit ELO seen on CSDB
38Days played since 2026-03-29

Faceit ELO

  • At peak — 4,231
  • 0 over 30 days · steady
  • Reached: 4,000 ELO · 3,500 ELO · 3,000 ELO · 2,500 ELO
  • 4,000 ELO first seen 2026-08-28
  • 3,500 ELO first seen 2026-08-28

Premier is CSDB’s own observation — it builds from the day a profile is first viewed and cannot be backfilled. Faceit ELO is CSDB’s own observation — no feed exposes ELO per match, so that line only has the days the profile was viewed and cannot be backfilled.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGstressarNFACEITLevel 10 · 4,231 ELOSTANDINGTop 12.4% of ranked30 DAYS0 ELOPEAK ELO4,231csdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim92
Positioning67
Utility64

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY51481Last 10051%Win rateLLLLWWLLWW

Last 10 vs previous 10: −30pp win rate · −0.03 avg rating · +2.3pp headshot accuracy · +13ms reaction

Win rate down 30pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — more than a 10-match window's normal noise (±20pp).

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 14 · 20% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 19%
  • Avg reaction 494ms

Last 10

  • 46 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 19%
  • Avg reaction 459ms

Last 20

  • 119 · 55% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 18%
  • Avg reaction 452ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Positional PlayerPositioning stands above the rest of this profile (+1.3 against its own average).

Aim9.2
Utility6.4
Positioning6.7
Opening Duels4.1
Clutch4.2

Sharp aimerStrong CT-side opener

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

NiKo

Plays most like NiKo 95% playstyle similarity

Most alike: positioning profile, aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Strengths

Aim. Aim score of 92 — the mechanical foundation is a clear strength.

Areas to improve

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 55% on CT to 36% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim9.2
Positioning6.7
Utility6.4
Mechanics7.5
Opening Duels3.9
Win Impact8.3

Composite 7.8/10 (Strong), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.05 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.01+0.01
first ⅓ avg -0.00 → last ⅓ avg 0.01
Reaction time458ms−37ms
first ⅓ avg 495ms → last ⅓ avg 458ms
Headshot accuracy19.4%−1.8%
first ⅓ avg 21.2% → last ⅓ avg 19.4%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.11Best match rating · 13–3 · ancient, 15 Apr
42%Best headshot accuracy · 3–8 · dust2, 13 May
320msFastest reaction time · 6–6 · inferno, 13 May
13–0Biggest win · inferno, 7 Aug

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

10Longest win streak
L4Current streak
1011In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
14Overtime games

Map breakdown

overpassBest map · 80% over 5infernoWeakest map · 31% over 13
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
dust2S2215768%0.01
mirageB2091145%-0.00
ancientB189950%-0.01
infernoD134931%0.01
cacheA116555%0.01
nukeC114736%0.01
overpassS54180%0.01

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Inferno is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (31% over 13). Start with the 6 essential Inferno lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

8,507Matches
57%Win rate
1.34Avg K/D
89.1ADR
49%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

41%1v1 clutch win
27%1v2 clutch win
15Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWLLLW

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage144061%1.3918.5
Ancient93561%1.3618.2
Dust262762%1.4618.5
Anubis62759%1.3417.6
Nuke13457%1.1616.5
Inferno12855%1.4216.8
Vertigo8955%1.3116.8
Overpass3456%1.6218.9

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Inventory

$4,267Inventory value9ItemsFull inventory breakdown →
★ StatTrak™ Butterfly Knife | Slaughter (Minimal Wear)$1,745M4A1-S | Blue Phosphor (Factory New)$921M4A4 | The Coalition (Minimal Wear)$899★ Specialist Gloves | Fade (Field-Tested)$300AK-47 | Vulcan (Field-Tested)$261USP-S | Printstream (Minimal Wear)$91

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

19.5%Headshot accuracy
41.1%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
47.5%Spray accuracy
83.6%Counter-strafing
10.0°Preaim
461msReaction time
36.2%T opening success
55.1%CT opening success
0.58Enemies flashed / flash
6.7%Flash assists
7.39HE damage / grenade
13.24Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 36.2183% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Inferno

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

31% win rate across 13 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Inferno callouts & strategyInferno grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
mirage10–130.0022%13 Sept
cache10–13-0.0227%13 Sept
dust27–13-0.0623%11 Sept
inferno10–130.039%11 Sept
inferno13–60.0013%11 Sept
dust213–20.0218%11 Sept
nuke17–19-0.0020%10 Sept
ancient2–13-0.1116%10 Sept
dust213–110.0526%10 Sept
cache16–130.0219%10 Sept
inferno6–130.0022%10 Sept
dust213–8-0.0117%10 Sept
ancient13–7-0.0011%9 Sept
dust214–20.0716%9 Sept
nuke11–130.0216%9 Sept
cache10–13-0.0113%9 Sept
mirage13–80.0530%9 Sept
ancient13–90.0414%9 Sept
mirage13–7-0.0113%7 Sept
ancient13–40.0619%7 Sept
ancient13–9-0.0123%6 Sept
cache13–11-0.0023%6 Sept
mirage13–30.0719%6 Sept
nuke13–30.0422%6 Sept
dust219–160.0416%6 Sept
dust213–100.0127%5 Sept
cache3–130.0133%4 Sept
dust213–50.1023%4 Sept
mirage5–130.0012%4 Sept
ancient13–160.0223%3 Sept
nuke6–130.0729%3 Sept
ancient13–11-0.0113%2 Sept
cache13–10-0.0116%2 Sept
inferno3–13-0.0122%2 Sept
mirage7–13-0.0622%29 Aug
cache9–130.0323%29 Aug
inferno13–9-0.0013%28 Aug
dust210–130.0618%28 Aug
mirage13–30.0318%28 Aug
cache16–12-0.0021%23 Aug
inferno13–3-0.0011%23 Aug
mirage11–13-0.0418%22 Aug
ancient13–70.0018%21 Aug
inferno6–130.0640%9 Aug
mirage19–17-0.0319%9 Aug
ancient7–13-0.0113%9 Aug
dust213–20.0919%8 Aug
cache13–20.0318%8 Aug
cache13–20.0318%8 Aug
cache10–13-0.0117%8 Aug
dust20–13-0.0941%8 Aug
dust213–30.0538%7 Aug
inferno13–00.0720%7 Aug
ancient3–13-0.0810%23 Jul
dust213–6-0.0413%23 Jul
mirage8–130.0324%23 Jul
ancient2–13-0.0421%3 Jul
mirage7–13-0.0228%3 Jul
dust22–12-0.0935%2 Jul
dust23–20.0540%2 Jul
ancient4–13-0.0615%1 Jul
inferno10–13-0.0226%3 Jun
ancient14–16-0.0014%3 Jun
overpass11–130.0439%2 Jun
nuke6–13-0.0312%2 Jun
ancient14–16-0.0520%2 Jun
dust25–13-0.0419%29 May
mirage11–130.0623%13 May
inferno1–8-0.0618%13 May
inferno6–60.0116%13 May
dust23–80.0242%13 May
overpass13–8-0.0322%13 May
mirage13–90.046%13 May
dust26–4-0.0429%13 May
inferno9–130.0327%12 May
mirage7–9-0.0829%12 May
mirage13–30.0112%8 May
dust213–60.0525%4 May
ancient13–90.0414%4 May
inferno17–19-0.0410%26 Apr
nuke13–100.0327%26 Apr
mirage13–110.013%26 Apr
dust213–9-0.0319%26 Apr
overpass13–110.0310%26 Apr
nuke13–50.0433%25 Apr
overpass13–50.0216%25 Apr
mirage13–16-0.0019%24 Apr
nuke20–22-0.0414%24 Apr
mirage10–13-0.0112%22 Apr
nuke9–13-0.0515%22 Apr
dust213–5-0.0116%22 Apr
dust26–13-0.0539%20 Apr
ancient7–13-0.0729%20 Apr
nuke13–90.0633%20 Apr
ancient13–30.1120%15 Apr
mirage13–9-0.0429%13 Apr
overpass13–11-0.0223%30 Mar
nuke11–130.0128%30 Mar
mirage13–16-0.0223%30 Mar
ancient16–140.0118%29 Mar

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

Faceit Level 103K ELO Club1,000 Matches10-Win StreakAim 90+
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →