iamzao$

iamzao$ — CS2 Stats

BR76561198303869968[U:1:343604240]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

699Tracked matches57%Win rate2020Tracked since
CSDB Rating6.9 SolidSupport
CSDB Leaderboard#24993 of 238761 tracked
FaceitLevel 10 · 2,670 ELOTop 12.4% of ranked FACEIT players
Ladder ranks via Leetify
Track this profile

CSDB reads this profile's Premier rating from its tracked match history, and records Faceit ELO once on every day the page is viewed. 44 days played since 1 Feb 2026. Come back after the next session and the change shows above.

Is this you? Sign in with Steam to claim it and connect match tracking →

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 24,597 -910 6 Feb3 Jul · 4 days played
24,59725,893peak 25,8936 Feb3 Jul
26,111Peak Premier in tracked matches
2,670Highest Faceit ELO seen on CSDB
44Days played since 2026-02-01

Faceit ELO

  • At peak — 2,670
  • Next: 3,000 ELO at 3,000 330 to go
  • Reached: 2,500 ELO · Level 10 · Level 9 · Level 8

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGiamzao$FACEITLevel 10 · 2,670 ELOSTANDINGTop 12.4% of rankedPEAK ELO2,670csdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim88
Positioning55
Utility66

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

COLD5644Last 10056%Win rateLWLLLWLLWL

Last 10 vs previous 10: −50pp win rate · −0.00 avg rating · +0.0pp headshot accuracy · −75ms reaction

Win rate down 50pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — more than a 10-match window's normal noise (±20pp).

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 14 · 20% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 21%
  • Avg reaction 430ms

Last 10

  • 37 · 30% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.00
  • Avg headshot accuracy 21%
  • Avg reaction 490ms

Last 20

  • 119 · 55% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 21%
  • Avg reaction 528ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: SupportUtility contribution stands above the rest of this profile (+1.8 against its own average).

Aim8.8
Utility6.6
Positioning5.5
Opening Duels4.0
Clutch3.0

Sharp aimerEffective flashes

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

device

Plays most like device 92% playstyle similarity

Most alike: opening-duel success, utility contribution.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Strengths

Aim. Aim score of 88 — the mechanical foundation is a clear strength.

Flashes. 0.81 enemies blinded per flash — utility that consistently lands.

Areas to improve

Positioning. Positioning trails aim by 34 points — deaths here waste a strong aim profile.

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 49% on CT to 31% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim8.8
Positioning5.5
Utility6.6
Mechanics6.8
Opening Duels2.5
Win Impact7.2

Composite 6.9/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.02 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.01−0.01
first ⅓ avg 0.02 → last ⅓ avg 0.01
Reaction time523ms−58ms
first ⅓ avg 581ms → last ⅓ avg 523ms
Headshot accuracy21.0%−2.1%
first ⅓ avg 23.1% → last ⅓ avg 21.0%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.21Best match rating · 13–10 · vertigo, 20 Jul
42%Best headshot accuracy · 13–10 · mirage, 12 Feb
313msFastest reaction time · 7–13 · dust2, 16 Sept
13–2Biggest win · mirage, 2 Aug

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

8Longest win streak
118In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
7Overtime games

Map breakdown

mirageBest map · 64% over 58dust2Weakest map · 18% over 11
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
mirageA58372164%0.01
dust2D112918%0.01
ancientA116555%0.00
anubisC94544%0.02
nukeA74357%-0.02
vertigo110100%0.21
cache1010%-0.07
inferno110100%0.00
overpass110100%0.08

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Dust 2 is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (18% over 11). Start with the 6 essential Dust 2 lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

815Matches
58%Win rate
1.21Avg K/D
77.9ADR
49%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

35%1v1 clutch win
24%1v2 clutch win
32Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLLWLW

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage28158%1.1716.1
Ancient8847%1.1015.9
Dust25048%0.9915.5
Nuke4652%1.1215.4
Overpass2948%1.1516.9
Anubis2255%0.9714.8
Vertigo1173%1.1918.4
Train450%1.1217.0

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

21.1%Headshot accuracy
37.8%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
43.9%Spray accuracy
80.6%Counter-strafing
8.2°Preaim
520msReaction time
31.1%T opening success
49.2%CT opening success
0.81Enemies flashed / flash
7.3%Flash assists
8.26HE damage / grenade
13.00Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 31.1058% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Dust 2

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

18% win rate across 11 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Dust 2 callouts & strategyDust 2 grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
dust27–130.0126%16 Sept
mirage13–6-0.0115%12 Sept
mirage7–13-0.0120%8 Sept
mirage10–13-0.0823%30 Aug
dust29–130.0120%11 Aug
mirage13–90.0925%9 Aug
anubis9–13-0.0112%5 Aug
mirage6–130.0314%5 Aug
mirage13–110.0121%4 Aug
dust28–130.0133%4 Aug
mirage8–130.0529%4 Aug
nuke13–9-0.0433%2 Aug
mirage13–7-0.0524%2 Aug
ancient13–110.0126%2 Aug
mirage11–13-0.069%2 Aug
mirage13–7-0.0413%2 Aug
mirage13–20.0511%2 Aug
mirage13–70.1322%2 Aug
ancient13–40.0628%2 Aug
mirage13–8-0.0316%2 Aug
mirage13–50.0321%2 Aug
mirage13–30.0816%2 Aug
ancient13–110.0136%1 Aug
mirage17–190.0115%1 Aug
dust23–13-0.0128%28 Jul
vertigo13–100.2122%20 Jul
mirage10–13-0.0414%14 Jul
cache9–13-0.0716%14 Jul
anubis13–90.0426%14 Jul
nuke13–8-0.0023%13 Jul
anubis11–13-0.0219%6 Jul
mirage16–140.0129%5 Jul
nuke13–10-0.049%5 Jul
ancient5–2-0.040%3 Jul
mirage3–13-0.0217%2 Jul
mirage13–100.0618%27 Jun
mirage5–13-0.0419%26 Apr
nuke13–100.0029%26 Apr
mirage6–13-0.0617%26 Apr
mirage19–17-0.0021%26 Apr
dust29–13-0.0329%26 Apr
mirage6–13-0.0119%26 Apr
mirage5–13-0.0116%25 Apr
mirage11–13-0.0621%25 Apr
mirage13–30.0133%28 Mar
mirage13–80.0615%28 Mar
mirage13–40.0831%28 Mar
mirage9–130.0127%22 Mar
ancient8–13-0.0828%21 Mar
mirage13–60.0522%21 Mar
anubis13–100.0318%15 Mar
mirage6–13-0.0114%14 Mar
mirage16–130.0718%14 Mar
anubis13–90.0626%14 Mar
mirage13–11-0.0418%14 Mar
anubis6–130.0022%14 Mar
ancient13–110.0231%14 Mar
anubis13–20.0817%13 Mar
dust211–13-0.024%13 Mar
nuke11–130.0016%13 Mar
mirage4–90.1333%13 Mar
mirage13–11-0.0116%13 Mar
inferno13–70.0018%12 Mar
mirage13–9-0.0332%10 Mar
mirage9–13-0.0315%6 Mar
mirage13–30.0513%6 Mar
mirage13–70.0918%4 Mar
ancient11–13-0.0417%3 Mar
mirage13–90.0324%3 Mar
anubis9–13-0.0628%3 Mar
dust213–110.0216%1 Mar
mirage13–80.0932%1 Mar
mirage4–13-0.1015%25 Feb
mirage13–8-0.0320%22 Feb
mirage14–16-0.0130%22 Feb
ancient7–130.0211%22 Feb
dust28–13-0.0220%22 Feb
nuke21–250.0025%19 Feb
mirage13–6-0.0122%18 Feb
mirage4–13-0.0121%18 Feb
mirage13–110.0219%18 Feb
mirage19–170.0229%18 Feb
mirage13–80.0835%18 Feb
dust27–130.0020%17 Feb
mirage13–5-0.049%16 Feb
ancient6–13-0.0018%16 Feb
mirage13–40.0626%12 Feb
mirage13–100.0342%12 Feb
mirage10–13-0.0014%8 Feb
dust210–130.0116%8 Feb
ancient13–40.0219%8 Feb
mirage13–50.0518%8 Feb
nuke1–13-0.0335%6 Feb
dust213–100.1026%6 Feb
mirage13–70.0834%6 Feb
ancient5–130.0324%5 Feb
mirage8–10.0822%5 Feb
overpass13–70.0823%1 Feb
anubis10–130.0426%1 Feb
mirage13–40.0524%1 Feb

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

Faceit Level 102.5K ELO500 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →