ken

ken — CS2 Stats

NO76561198299674907[U:1:339409179]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

2,913Tracked matches53%Win rate2020Tracked since
CSDB Rating7.4 StrongSupport
Premier CS Rating25,576Top 10% of 192,959 CSDB-tracked playersRed band · top ~2.7% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#15348 of 239426 tracked
FaceitLevel 10 · 2,531 ELOTop 12.4% of ranked FACEIT players
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 7 Sep 2026 (16 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

No change since then. Play, then come back: the next observation lands here.

Track this profile

CSDB reads this profile's Premier rating from its tracked match history, and records Faceit ELO once on every day the page is viewed. 29 days played since 17 Apr 2026. Come back after the next session and the change shows above.

Is this you? Sign in with Steam to claim it and connect match tracking →

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 25,576 -2,108 17 Apr7 Sept · 21 days played
25,47628,839peak 28,83917 Apr7 Sept
28,839Peak Premier in tracked matches
2,531Highest Faceit ELO seen on CSDB
29Days played since 2026-04-17

Faceit ELO

  • At peak — 2,531
  • Next: 3,000 ELO at 3,000 469 to go
  • Reached: 2,500 ELO · Level 10 · Level 9 · Level 8

Premier CS Rating

  • 3,263 below peak (28,839)
  • -3,263 over 90 days
  • Next: Gold band at 30,000 4,424 to go
  • Reached: Red band · Pink band · Purple band · Blue band

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGkenFACEITLevel 10 · 2,531 ELOSTANDINGTop 12.4% of rankedPREMIER25,576 · Red bandPEAK ELO2,531csdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim96
Positioning50
Utility64

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY55423Last 10055%Win rateLWLLLLWLWW

Last 10 vs previous 10: 0pp win rate · +0.01 avg rating · +3.8pp headshot accuracy · +48ms reaction

Win rate 0pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — within the normal variation of a 10-match window (±20pp), so no real shift yet.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 14 · 20% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 45%
  • Avg reaction 586ms

Last 10

  • 46 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 39%
  • Avg reaction 590ms

Last 20

  • 812 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 37%
  • Avg reaction 566ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: SupportUtility contribution stands above the rest of this profile (+1.1 against its own average).

Aim9.6
Utility6.4
Positioning5.0
Opening Duels4.6
Clutch5.2

Sharp aimer

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

device

Plays most like device 88% playstyle similarity

Most alike: aim profile, utility contribution.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Strengths

Aim. Aim score of 96 — the mechanical foundation is a clear strength.

Areas to improve

Positioning. Positioning trails aim by 45 points — deaths here waste a strong aim profile.

Utility. Utility contribution runs far behind the mechanical game — the cheapest rating gain on this profile is thrown, not aimed.

Reaction time. 571ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim9.6
Positioning5.0
Utility6.4
Mechanics8.3
Opening Duels3.2
Win Impact6.1

Composite 7.4/10 (Strong), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.05 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.02+0.02
first ⅓ avg -0.00 → last ⅓ avg 0.02
Reaction time581ms−14ms
first ⅓ avg 596ms → last ⅓ avg 581ms
Headshot accuracy35.7%+7.5%
first ⅓ avg 28.2% → last ⅓ avg 35.7%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.16Best match rating · 13–7 · dust2, 6 Jun
83%Best headshot accuracy · 13–7 · cache, 13 Jul
328msFastest reaction time · 0–13 · inferno, 23 Aug
13–0Biggest win · ancient, 13 Jul

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

7Longest win streak
102In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
10Overtime games

Map breakdown

dust2Best map · 87% over 15ancientWeakest map · 29% over 14
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
mirageC2081240%0.01
dust2S1513287%0.03
nukeS1512380%0.01
ancientD1441029%-0.01
cacheA138562%0.03
anubisB84450%0.04
infernoD72529%0.01
overpassD62433%-0.02
office110100%-0.04
vertigo110100%0.05

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Ancient is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (29% over 14). Start with the 6 essential Ancient lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

4,197Matches
51%Win rate
1.08Avg K/D
90.2ADR
53%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

46%1v1 clutch win
22%1v2 clutch win
9Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWLLWW

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Ancient4951%1.1318.5
Nuke4766%1.2419.7
Mirage4457%1.2820.1
Dust23951%1.1317.3
Train2157%1.1617.1
Inferno2152%1.2018.8
Anubis2143%0.9516.8
Overpass1173%1.3420.3

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

34.7%Headshot accuracy
38.7%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
49.1%Spray accuracy
87.3%Counter-strafing
9.4°Preaim
571msReaction time
37.3%T opening success
48.3%CT opening success
0.69Enemies flashed / flash
13.5%Flash assists
9.59HE damage / grenade
15.30Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 37.2813% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Ancient

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

29% win rate across 14 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Ancient callouts & strategyAncient grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
anubis9–13-0.0137%7 Sept
inferno13–1-0.0057%25 Aug
inferno0–13-0.0250%23 Aug
mirage10–130.0135%20 Aug
overpass6–130.0547%17 Aug
dust29–130.0338%17 Aug
office13–8-0.0427%17 Aug
anubis7–13-0.0031%17 Aug
vertigo13–80.0536%17 Aug
inferno13–50.0630%17 Aug
mirage13–80.0640%17 Aug
inferno9–130.0440%16 Aug
cache4–13-0.0631%16 Aug
anubis16–130.0622%15 Aug
cache5–130.0152%15 Aug
nuke7–130.0841%15 Aug
inferno6–13-0.0135%17 Jul
ancient8–13-0.0426%17 Jul
dust216–13-0.0526%17 Jul
nuke13–9-0.0335%17 Jul
dust213–7-0.0129%17 Jul
mirage3–13-0.0616%17 Jul
anubis16–130.0821%13 Jul
ancient13–0-0.0028%13 Jul
ancient13–11-0.0418%13 Jul
cache13–70.0783%13 Jul
dust216–120.0843%13 Jul
nuke13–30.0337%8 Jul
anubis13–100.0327%8 Jul
ancient6–130.0429%8 Jul
mirage13–40.0124%8 Jul
dust213–100.1439%8 Jul
nuke13–90.0249%8 Jul
overpass13–8-0.0533%29 Jun
mirage3–130.0439%29 Jun
dust213–110.0021%22 Jun
cache7–130.0427%20 Jun
mirage8–130.0848%20 Jun
dust213–70.1645%6 Jun
mirage10–130.1124%6 Jun
nuke16–12-0.0032%6 Jun
mirage13–100.0922%2 Jun
ancient13–160.0623%2 Jun
mirage2–13-0.1115%1 Jun
ancient8–13-0.0520%1 Jun
dust213–16-0.0940%1 Jun
mirage13–100.0145%1 Jun
inferno9–130.0434%1 Jun
anubis16–130.0729%1 Jun
anubis6–130.0418%28 May
mirage8–13-0.0228%28 May
overpass10–130.0425%28 May
nuke13–110.0631%28 May
mirage13–110.0530%2 May
ancient10–130.0124%2 May
nuke13–60.0437%2 May
mirage13–11-0.0442%1 May
nuke16–120.0247%1 May
cache11–70.0040%1 May
cache13–110.1349%1 May
cache12–120.0536%1 May
cache13–80.0540%1 May
cache13–4-0.0326%1 May
cache13–90.0548%1 May
cache13–70.0852%1 May
nuke13–1-0.0423%1 May
dust213–110.0230%1 May
cache12–12-0.0050%30 Apr
mirage11–130.0538%29 Apr
overpass0–13-0.0515%29 Apr
dust213–110.0629%29 Apr
cache13–10-0.0330%29 Apr
mirage10–130.0025%29 Apr
nuke13–110.0940%29 Apr
nuke13–70.0621%28 Apr
dust213–11-0.0227%28 Apr
ancient9–13-0.0328%27 Apr
nuke10–13-0.0631%27 Apr
mirage9–130.0134%27 Apr
dust213–20.0427%27 Apr
ancient7–13-0.0214%24 Apr
ancient11–130.0123%23 Apr
dust213–50.0123%23 Apr
nuke13–10-0.0421%23 Apr
mirage4–13-0.0129%23 Apr
inferno8–13-0.0225%22 Apr
nuke7–13-0.0542%22 Apr
ancient13–10-0.0230%22 Apr
anubis9–130.0342%22 Apr
ancient13–7-0.0634%21 Apr
mirage13–10-0.0127%21 Apr
dust213–50.0432%21 Apr
mirage13–7-0.0340%21 Apr
dust213–80.0426%21 Apr
overpass10–13-0.0823%21 Apr
ancient9–130.0519%18 Apr
mirage6–13-0.0114%18 Apr
nuke13–100.0429%18 Apr
overpass13–10-0.0520%17 Apr
ancient15–15-0.0122%17 Apr

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

Faceit Level 102.5K ELO1,000 MatchesAim 90+
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →