Fuqsuup

Fuqsuup — CS2 Stats

76561198298512257[U:1:338246529]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

320Tracked matches59%Win rate2020Tracked since
CSDB Rating6.6 SolidSupport
Premier CS Rating21,585Top 50% of 175,286 CSDB-tracked playersPink band · top ~6.8% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#54200 of 220909 tracked
FaceitLevel 7Top 42.3% of ranked FACEIT players
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 5 Sep 2026 (12 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

No change since then. Play, then come back: the next observation lands here.

Track this profile

CSDB reads this profile's Premier rating from its tracked match history, and records Faceit ELO once on every day the page is viewed. 19 days played since 28 Feb 2026. Come back after the next session and the change shows above.

Is this you? Sign in with Steam to claim it and connect match tracking →

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 21,585 +6,790 3 Jul5 Sept · 10 days played
14,79523,997peak 23,9973 Jul5 Sept
24,297Peak Premier in tracked matches
19Days played since 2026-02-28

Premier CS Rating

  • 2,412 below peak (23,997)
  • -2,412 over 30 days · declining
  • Next: Red band at 25,000 3,415 to go
  • Reached: Pink band · Purple band · Blue band · Light Blue band
  • Pink band first seen 2026-09-02
  • Purple band first seen 2026-09-02

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do. Faceit ELO is CSDB’s own observation — no feed exposes ELO per match, so that line only has the days the profile was viewed and cannot be backfilled.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGFuqsuupFACEITLevel 7STANDINGTop 42.3% of rankedPREMIER21,585 · Pink bandcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim70
Positioning60
Utility71

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

COLD54433Last 10054%Win rateWLLLWLLLWL

Last 10 vs previous 10: −30pp win rate · +0.01 avg rating · −0.7pp headshot accuracy · −73ms reaction

Win rate down 30pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — more than a 10-match window's normal noise (±20pp). Average match rating moved the other way (+0.01), so results shifted more than performance did.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 23 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 14%
  • Avg reaction 544ms

Last 10

  • 37 · 30% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 15%
  • Avg reaction 553ms

Last 20

  • 9101 · 45% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.00
  • Avg headshot accuracy 15%
  • Avg reaction 590ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: SupportUtility contribution stands above the rest of this profile (+1.8 against its own average).

Aim7.0
Utility7.1
Positioning6.0
Opening Duels2.8

Strong CT-side opener

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

Twistzz

Plays most like Twistzz 78% playstyle similarity

Most alike: opening-duel success, utility contribution.

Where you differ: lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 50% on CT to 29% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Reaction time. 578ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim7.0
Positioning6.0
Utility7.1
Mechanics7.3
Opening Duels2.5
Win Impact7.9

Composite 6.6/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.02 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.00−0.04
first ⅓ avg 0.04 → last ⅓ avg 0.00
Reaction time578ms−13ms
first ⅓ avg 591ms → last ⅓ avg 578ms
Headshot accuracy14.9%−0.2%
first ⅓ avg 15.1% → last ⅓ avg 14.9%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.19Best match rating · 13–1 · cache, 17 Jul
31%Best headshot accuracy · 13–7 · inferno, 4 Jul
422msFastest reaction time · 3–13 · dust2, 25 Jul
13–1Biggest win · cache, 17 Jul

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

6Longest win streak
67In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
5Overtime games

Map breakdown

infernoBest map · 67% over 24cacheWeakest map · 44% over 18
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
infernoS2416867%0.03
mirageA1811761%0.03
cacheC1881044%0.04
nukeA1811761%0.03
ancientC167944%0.00
anubis41325%0.04
dust21010%-0.10
train1010%0.03

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Faceit stats

Combat

626Matches
51%Win rate
1.14Avg K/D
ADR
34%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

1v1 clutch win
1v2 clutch win
10Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLWLLL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Inferno20%1.0616.5
Ancient250%0.6312.5
Mirage20%0.8413.0
Anubis1100%1.8322.0
Nuke1100%0.539.0

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

15.3%Headshot accuracy
35.9%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
40.1%Spray accuracy
82.8%Counter-strafing
11.0°Preaim
578msReaction time
29.2%T opening success
50.2%CT opening success
0.54Enemies flashed / flash
5.9%Flash assists
12.91HE damage / grenade
13.46Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 29.2061% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Cache

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

44% win rate across 18 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Cache callouts & strategy

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
mirage13–5-0.0114%5 Sept
cache13–16-0.0016%4 Sept
mirage4–13-0.0519%4 Sept
ancient14–160.0413%4 Sept
cache13–90.119%4 Sept
nuke9–13-0.0017%4 Sept
nuke8–130.028%4 Sept
nuke10–13-0.0319%31 Jul
mirage13–7-0.0214%31 Jul
cache11–130.0117%31 Jul
inferno13–20.0320%31 Jul
mirage13–110.0110%31 Jul
cache8–130.0212%31 Jul
nuke12–12-0.0520%31 Jul
cache9–13-0.0415%31 Jul
inferno13–80.0515%30 Jul
cache13–7-0.059%30 Jul
inferno13–90.0417%25 Jul
cache13–60.0514%25 Jul
inferno5–13-0.1322%25 Jul
nuke13–30.046%25 Jul
mirage13–40.1012%25 Jul
dust23–13-0.1025%25 Jul
ancient13–40.0119%25 Jul
ancient13–110.0018%18 Jul
cache16–130.0512%18 Jul
inferno16–13-0.0223%18 Jul
inferno13–30.0210%18 Jul
nuke13–10-0.0216%17 Jul
ancient4–130.0016%17 Jul
mirage13–70.0115%17 Jul
cache3–13-0.0210%17 Jul
inferno13–40.039%17 Jul
cache13–10.1925%17 Jul
mirage7–13-0.0510%17 Jul
inferno11–130.0516%17 Jul
nuke13–7-0.0411%16 Jul
cache11–13-0.0214%16 Jul
inferno13–110.0814%16 Jul
ancient13–11-0.045%16 Jul
inferno9–13-0.0213%16 Jul
mirage15–150.0218%15 Jul
ancient6–13-0.049%15 Jul
nuke13–90.0516%15 Jul
cache13–70.0921%15 Jul
cache13–10.1831%15 Jul
ancient13–8-0.0013%12 Jul
nuke13–60.0519%12 Jul
inferno13–20.0220%12 Jul
ancient7–13-0.0014%12 Jul
mirage3–13-0.0121%12 Jul
nuke13–100.0616%12 Jul
anubis6–130.0116%12 Jul
mirage13–50.1630%10 Jul
inferno13–80.0326%10 Jul
ancient13–100.006%10 Jul
cache11–130.0022%10 Jul
ancient5–13-0.088%10 Jul
inferno6–130.0727%4 Jul
nuke11–130.0313%4 Jul
ancient7–130.0115%4 Jul
inferno13–70.1431%4 Jul
cache10–130.0717%4 Jul
ancient13–60.0210%3 Jul
nuke10–130.0410%3 Jul
anubis10–130.0325%3 Jul
mirage13–80.0719%3 Jul
cache8–130.0922%3 Jul
inferno13–30.0018%3 Jul
nuke13–40.038%3 Jul
ancient9–130.0610%3 Jul
mirage13–60.1419%3 Jul
cache12–120.0413%13 Jun
nuke13–50.1117%13 Jun
nuke10–20.0424%13 Jun
train7–130.0317%13 Jun
anubis13–100.0511%13 Jun
inferno13–100.0316%13 Jun
cache13–60.0314%9 May
mirage10–130.0820%25 Apr
inferno13–70.1015%25 Apr
ancient4–130.0614%25 Apr
ancient13–110.013%25 Apr
inferno13–70.0214%25 Apr
nuke13–90.089%25 Apr
mirage13–10.0616%25 Apr
inferno13–10.0713%25 Apr
nuke10–13-0.0412%25 Apr
mirage13–110.0020%25 Apr
inferno11–130.0315%25 Apr
mirage9–130.0416%24 Apr
inferno4–13-0.039%24 Apr
nuke13–30.1313%24 Apr
ancient9–13-0.013%24 Apr
inferno5–13-0.0417%24 Apr
inferno5–130.0329%24 Apr
mirage13–40.0424%24 Apr
mirage9–130.0011%10 Apr
inferno13–30.0824%28 Feb
anubis10–130.0911%28 Feb

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

100 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →