Nem0 — CS2 Stats

76561198296853154[U:1:336587426]

407Tracked matches54%Win rate2020Tracked since
CSDB Rating6.8 SolidAggressive Rifler
Premier CS Rating25,743Top 25% of 819 CSDB-tracked playersRed band · top ~2.6% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#1650 of 13685 tracked
FaceitLevel 8 · 1,743 ELOTop 31.2% of ranked FACEIT players
Ladder ranks via Leetify

Share this profile

CSDB.GGNem0FACEITLevel 8 · 1,743 ELOSTANDINGTop 31.2% of rankedPREMIER25,743 · Red bandcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim86
Positioning51
Utility55

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY53443Last 10053%Win rateWLWWWLWLTL

Last 10 vs previous 10: -10pp win rate · -0.03 avg rating

Player DNA

Primary style: Aggressive RiflerTakes opening fights often, backed by a strong aim profile.

Aim8.6
Aggression6.6
Utility5.5
Positioning5.1
Opening Duels2.9
Clutch4.2

Sharp aimerStrong CT-side opener

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

Twistzz

Plays most like Twistzz 92% playstyle similarity

Most alike: opening-fight frequency, opening-duel success.

Where you differ: lower utility contribution.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Strengths

Aim. Aim score of 86 — the mechanical foundation is a clear strength.

Areas to improve

Preaim. Mechanical aim is strong but the crosshair sits 10.8° off target when enemies appear — placement, not flicking, is the bigger win available.

Positioning. Positioning trails aim by 35 points — deaths here waste a strong aim profile.

Utility. Utility contribution runs far behind the mechanical game — the cheapest rating gain on this profile is thrown, not aimed.

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 49% on CT to 34% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim8.6
Positioning5.1
Utility5.5
Mechanics7.6
Opening Duels2.9
Win Impact6.2

Composite 6.8/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.05 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.01−0.02
first ⅓ avg 0.01 → last ⅓ avg -0.01
Reaction time580ms−91ms
first ⅓ avg 671ms → last ⅓ avg 580ms
Headshot accuracy29.5%+4.1%
first ⅓ avg 25.4% → last ⅓ avg 29.5%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.13Best rating — overpass 13–8
131Biggest win — dust2
5Longest win streak
87In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
13Overtime games

Map breakdown

dust2Best map · 65% over 26nukeWeakest map · 33% over 6
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
mirageB31151648%0.01
dust2S2617965%0.01
infernoA148657%-0.00
cacheC104640%-0.00
ancientA74357%-0.00
nukeD62433%-0.01
overpass330100%0.04
anubis2020%-0.03
train1010%-0.03

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Nuke is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (33% over 6). Start with the 6 essential Nuke lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

452Matches
54%Win rate
1.40Avg K/D
92.9ADR
39%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

41%1v1 clutch win
26%1v2 clutch win
12Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLWWWW

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Dust24166%1.5221.1
Mirage3653%1.4319.6
Ancient2055%1.0616.3
Inferno1553%1.5520.1
Overpass1457%1.9220.5
Nuke1050%1.2717.1
Train729%1.3622.4

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

29.3%Headshot accuracy
36.0%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
42.3%Spray accuracy
84.0%Counter-strafing
10.8°Preaim
590msReaction time
34.1%T opening success
49.4%CT opening success
0.52Enemies flashed / flash
6.6%Flash assists
9.83HE damage / grenade
9.44Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 34.0749% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Nuke

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

33% win rate across 6 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Nuke callouts & strategyNuke grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
mirage16–120.0621%28 Aug
mirage8–130.0124%28 Aug
mirage13–3-0.0264%27 Aug
dust213–40.0343%27 Aug
cache16–13-0.0328%24 Aug
dust28–130.0128%24 Aug
inferno13–7-0.0325%24 Aug
cache9–13-0.0635%24 Aug
inferno15–15-0.0525%23 Aug
dust21–3-0.140%23 Aug
mirage13–100.0037%23 Aug
inferno13–5-0.0219%23 Aug
inferno6–130.0135%23 Aug
cache5–13-0.0333%23 Aug
mirage10–130.0134%23 Aug
dust213–80.0532%23 Aug
dust213–6-0.0133%22 Aug
dust213–100.0328%22 Aug
dust213–100.0632%22 Aug
mirage8–13-0.0630%22 Aug
inferno13–7-0.0230%22 Aug
cache7–13-0.0633%22 Aug
cache13–110.0325%22 Aug
mirage7–13-0.0729%14 Aug
dust215–15-0.0528%13 Aug
nuke9–13-0.0221%13 Aug
mirage13–30.0630%13 Aug
nuke8–13-0.0125%12 Aug
mirage13–40.0527%12 Aug
inferno10–13-0.0118%12 Aug
mirage13–11-0.0619%12 Aug
dust213–90.0645%12 Aug
dust24–13-0.0235%11 Aug
mirage13–70.0141%11 Aug
anubis9–13-0.0229%11 Aug
inferno13–60.0527%11 Aug
mirage9–13-0.0134%11 Aug
inferno16–13-0.0013%8 Aug
mirage3–13-0.0712%8 Aug
dust216–140.0125%6 Aug
mirage6–130.0036%6 Aug
inferno13–30.0038%6 Aug
dust213–50.0217%6 Aug
mirage13–70.0638%5 Aug
cache13–60.1331%5 Aug
inferno13–110.0131%5 Aug
mirage6–13-0.0125%5 Aug
dust213–100.0133%5 Aug
mirage15–15-0.0240%5 Aug
anubis7–13-0.057%5 Aug
cache6–130.0026%5 Aug
mirage13–60.1344%5 Aug
nuke16–12-0.0130%5 Aug
ancient13–90.0621%5 Aug
cache5–13-0.0630%9 Jul
cache11–13-0.0323%9 Jul
cache13–70.0621%9 Jul
mirage16–130.0124%19 May
mirage9–130.0111%1 Oct
dust213–10.0323%9 Sept
mirage11–130.0231%8 Sept
ancient13–50.0832%6 Sept
ancient14–16-0.0232%5 Sept
nuke10–13-0.0033%5 Sept
inferno9–130.0433%1 Sept
dust211–13-0.0320%1 Sept
overpass13–80.1328%1 Sept
ancient13–40.0023%1 Sept
nuke9–13-0.0113%1 Sept
dust23–13-0.0117%1 Sept
dust213–90.0423%1 Sept
mirage7–130.0828%1 Sept
mirage10–130.0025%31 Aug
mirage10–13-0.0316%31 Aug
overpass13–80.0119%31 Aug
inferno6–13-0.0229%31 Aug
dust213–30.0832%30 Aug
dust216–19-0.0028%30 Aug
train10–13-0.0323%29 Aug
dust216–14-0.0123%28 Aug
mirage13–70.0514%28 Aug
mirage13–10.1029%27 Aug
dust211–130.0320%27 Aug
dust213–50.0167%27 Aug
ancient13–100.0120%24 Aug
ancient7–13-0.0432%23 Aug
mirage9–13-0.0214%22 Aug
mirage11–13-0.0125%22 Aug
mirage16–120.0326%22 Aug
overpass13–7-0.0137%22 Aug
dust213–70.0217%22 Aug
dust213–20.0630%21 Aug
dust213–50.0342%21 Aug
dust24–13-0.0023%21 Aug
mirage13–110.0435%20 Aug
inferno7–13-0.0616%19 Aug
mirage13–50.0738%18 Aug
nuke13–11-0.0018%18 Aug
ancient8–13-0.1013%17 Aug
inferno13–110.0924%16 Aug

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

100 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →