stoooj

stoooj — CS2 Stats

JP76561198290224464[U:1:329958736]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

2,679Tracked matches59%Win rate2021Tracked since
CSDB Rating6.7 SolidPositional Player
Premier CS Rating25,000Top 25% of 175,286 CSDB-tracked playersRed band · top ~3% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#18981 of 219991 tracked
FaceitLevel 10 · 2,288 ELOTop 12.4% of ranked FACEIT players
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 15 Sep 2026 (2 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

No change since then — still 2,679 tracked matches. Play, then come back: the next observation lands here.

Track this profile

CSDB reads this profile's Premier rating from its tracked match history, and records Faceit ELO once on every day the page is viewed. 28 days played since 15 Jul 2026. Come back after the next session and the change shows above.

Is this you? Sign in with Steam to claim it and connect match tracking →

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 25,000 +653 15 Jul15 Sept · 19 days played
23,70026,638peak 26,63815 Jul15 Sept
Faceit ELO: 2,288 +0 31 Aug15 Sept · 3 observations
2,2882,288peak 2,28831 Aug15 Sept
26,638Peak Premier in tracked matches
2,288Highest Faceit ELO seen on CSDB
28Days played since 2026-07-15

Faceit ELO

  • At peak — 2,288
  • Next: 2,500 ELO at 2,500 212 to go
  • Reached: Level 10 · Level 9 · Level 8 · Level 7
  • Level 10 first seen 2026-08-31
  • Level 9 first seen 2026-08-31

Premier CS Rating

  • 1,638 below peak (26,638)
  • +1 over 30 days · steady
  • Next: Gold band at 30,000 5,000 to go
  • Reached: Red band · Pink band · Purple band · Blue band
  • Red band first seen 2026-09-13
  • Pink band first seen 2026-08-31

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do. Faceit ELO is CSDB’s own observation — no feed exposes ELO per match, so that line only has the days the profile was viewed and cannot be backfilled.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGstooojFACEITLevel 10 · 2,288 ELOSTANDINGTop 12.4% of rankedPREMIER25,000 · Red bandPEAK ELO2,288csdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim84
Positioning59
Utility37

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY54415Last 10054%Win rateLWLLWWLWWW

Last 10 vs previous 10: 0pp win rate · −0.03 avg rating · +0.2pp headshot accuracy · +20ms reaction

Win rate 0pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — within the normal variation of a 10-match window (±20pp), so no real shift yet.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 23 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 26%
  • Avg reaction 508ms

Last 10

  • 64 · 60% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 23%
  • Avg reaction 500ms

Last 20

  • 128 · 60% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.00
  • Avg headshot accuracy 22%
  • Avg reaction 490ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Positional PlayerPositioning stands above the rest of this profile (+1.5 against its own average).

Aim8.4
Utility3.7
Positioning5.9
Opening Duels4.3
Clutch3.6

Strong CT-side openerLimited utility dependence

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

s1mple

Plays most like s1mple 89% playstyle similarity

Most alike: aim profile, positioning profile.

Where you differ: lower utility contribution; lower opening-duel success.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Utility. Utility contribution runs far behind the mechanical game — the cheapest rating gain on this profile is thrown, not aimed.

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 57% on CT to 29% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim8.4
Positioning5.9
Utility3.7
Mechanics6.5
Opening Duels3.4
Win Impact7.9

Composite 6.7/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.05 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.00−0.00
first ⅓ avg 0.01 → last ⅓ avg 0.00
Reaction time496ms−60ms
first ⅓ avg 556ms → last ⅓ avg 496ms
Headshot accuracy23.0%+1.2%
first ⅓ avg 21.9% → last ⅓ avg 23.0%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.13Best match rating · 13–4 · mirage, 27 Jul
60%Best headshot accuracy · 8–13 · mirage, 29 Jul
391msFastest reaction time · 7–13 · anubis, 1 Sept
13–2Biggest win · mirage, 23 Jul

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

6Longest win streak
99In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
16Overtime games

Map breakdown

nukeBest map · 67% over 6anubisWeakest map · 30% over 10
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
mirageA26161062%0.01
ancientA169756%0.03
infernoB157847%0.00
cacheB137654%0.00
dust2A138562%0.00
anubisD103730%-0.03
nukeS64267%0.02
overpass1010%0.05

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Anubis is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (30% over 10). Start with the 6 essential Anubis lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

1,306Matches
51%Win rate
1.16Avg K/D
80.4ADR
43%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

38%1v1 clutch win
20%1v2 clutch win
12Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLWWWL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage41950%1.2217.7
Inferno18649%1.1516.3
Ancient16353%1.0816.4
Anubis14347%1.1817.9
Dust212050%1.0815.4
Nuke7556%1.2417.8
Overpass5657%1.1116.1
Cache2148%1.1317.5

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

23.0%Headshot accuracy
34.4%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
33.3%Spray accuracy
79.1%Counter-strafing
8.0°Preaim
488msReaction time
29.5%T opening success
57.0%CT opening success
0.39Enemies flashed / flash
6.7%Flash assists
7.70HE damage / grenade
3.35Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Grenades & Utility

    Most of your flashes are blinding nobody. A handful of reliable pop-flash lineups fixes this faster than anything else.

    Enemies flashed per flash 0.3871 — below the 0.5 mark we flag

    Grenade Lineups
  2. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 29.4526% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Anubis

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

30% win rate across 10 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Anubis callouts & strategyAnubis grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
cache7–13-0.0523%3 Sept
cache13–90.0320%3 Sept
mirage7–13-0.0350%3 Sept
dust211–13-0.0318%3 Sept
anubis13–6-0.0219%3 Sept
ancient13–100.0426%3 Sept
anubis11–13-0.0517%2 Sept
ancient13–11-0.0223%2 Sept
inferno13–7-0.0215%2 Sept
cache13–50.0215%2 Sept
mirage6–13-0.0323%1 Sept
anubis7–130.0133%1 Sept
mirage8–130.0215%1 Sept
dust213–100.0114%31 Aug
ancient13–50.1022%31 Aug
inferno13–90.0320%31 Aug
mirage13–11-0.0229%31 Aug
inferno13–80.0514%31 Aug
inferno13–80.0631%31 Aug
mirage12–16-0.0322%30 Aug
mirage10–13-0.0117%30 Aug
inferno9–13-0.0333%30 Aug
mirage13–80.0114%25 Aug
cache13–80.0236%25 Aug
mirage13–110.0221%25 Aug
ancient8–13-0.0429%25 Aug
inferno15–150.0020%25 Aug
overpass5–90.0514%25 Aug
nuke13–40.1032%25 Aug
anubis14–16-0.0525%24 Aug
anubis13–5-0.0416%16 Aug
inferno13–110.0333%16 Aug
nuke13–50.0121%15 Aug
mirage13–9-0.0122%15 Aug
ancient5–130.0211%15 Aug
cache13–90.0218%14 Aug
ancient13–110.0214%14 Aug
anubis13–16-0.0720%14 Aug
dust213–5-0.0417%14 Aug
ancient25–230.0121%9 Aug
inferno13–80.0514%9 Aug
ancient10–130.0524%7 Aug
mirage13–70.1220%7 Aug
mirage13–50.0216%7 Aug
nuke1–13-0.0430%7 Aug
mirage13–70.0223%7 Aug
dust23–13-0.0938%3 Aug
cache6–130.0325%3 Aug
dust211–13-0.0515%2 Aug
ancient17–190.1225%2 Aug
anubis6–13-0.0225%1 Aug
ancient13–100.0720%1 Aug
inferno10–13-0.0623%1 Aug
dust25–13-0.0138%30 Jul
mirage13–5-0.016%30 Jul
anubis9–130.0126%29 Jul
mirage16–120.0320%29 Jul
mirage8–13-0.0960%29 Jul
mirage15–190.039%28 Jul
ancient11–130.025%28 Jul
mirage13–60.0420%28 Jul
dust213–60.0510%28 Jul
mirage13–80.0127%28 Jul
cache15–150.0218%28 Jul
mirage13–40.1324%27 Jul
ancient13–7-0.0020%26 Jul
mirage14–160.0114%26 Jul
nuke3–130.0418%26 Jul
inferno2–13-0.0614%26 Jul
cache11–130.0218%26 Jul
cache6–13-0.0717%25 Jul
inferno15–15-0.0616%25 Jul
cache13–90.0423%23 Jul
mirage13–20.1014%23 Jul
dust213–40.0516%23 Jul
ancient10–13-0.0120%23 Jul
mirage13–90.0322%23 Jul
dust213–90.0614%22 Jul
cache7–13-0.0013%22 Jul
dust214–160.0515%22 Jul
inferno19–170.0216%22 Jul
ancient19–17-0.0114%21 Jul
ancient10–130.0325%21 Jul
ancient13–80.0621%21 Jul
dust213–70.0119%20 Jul
mirage10–130.0116%20 Jul
nuke13–4-0.0345%20 Jul
dust213–70.0211%20 Jul
mirage13–11-0.0733%20 Jul
anubis13–50.0538%20 Jul
cache13–40.0129%20 Jul
dust213–80.0328%19 Jul
inferno15–15-0.0029%19 Jul
inferno9–13-0.0419%19 Jul
inferno15–150.0330%19 Jul
mirage13–90.0333%19 Jul
nuke13–100.0316%19 Jul
mirage7–13-0.0620%16 Jul
anubis4–13-0.1014%16 Jul
cache13–9-0.0546%15 Jul

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

Faceit Level 102K ELO1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →