vitt4o -

vitt4o - — CS2 Stats

BR76561198277419161[U:1:317153433]Steam profile ↗

4,517Tracked matches34%Win rate2020Tracked since
CSDB Rating5.5 SolidHybrid Rifler
Premier CS Rating18,755Purple band · top ~13.5% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#8931 of 17582 tracked
FaceitLevel 9Top 20.7% of ranked FACEIT players
Ladder ranks via Leetify

Rating over time

18,755Peak Premier on CSDB
1Days observed since 2026-08-28

Premier CS Rating

  • At peak — 18,755
  • Next: Pink band at 20,000 1,245 to go
  • Reached: Purple band · Blue band · Light Blue band
  • Purple band first seen 2026-08-28
  • Blue band first seen 2026-08-28

CSDB's own observations — this history builds from the day a profile is first viewed and cannot be backfilled.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGvitt4o -FACEITLevel 9STANDINGTop 20.7% of rankedPREMIER18,755 · Purple bandcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim68
Positioning63
Utility64

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY45541Last 10045%Win rateLLWWLLWWWL

Last 10 vs previous 10: +30pp win rate · +0.03 avg rating

Player DNA

Primary style: Hybrid RiflerAim-led profile without a single dominant tendency.

Aim6.8
Aggression6.8
Utility6.4
Positioning6.3
Opening Duels3.1
Clutch3.4

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

iM

Plays most like iM 91% playstyle similarity

Most alike: utility contribution, opening-fight frequency.

Where you differ: lower opening-duel success; lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim6.8
Positioning6.3
Utility6.4
Mechanics6.2
Opening Duels3.1
Win Impact0.0

Composite 5.5/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.02+0.00
first ⅓ avg 0.02 → last ⅓ avg 0.02
Reaction time528ms+1ms
first ⅓ avg 527ms → last ⅓ avg 528ms
Headshot accuracy16.4%+0.8%
first ⅓ avg 15.7% → last ⅓ avg 16.4%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.15Best rating — anubis 13–8
130Biggest win — mirage
5Longest win streak
L2Current streak
311In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
6Overtime games

Map breakdown

anubisBest map · 75% over 12nukeWeakest map · 25% over 8
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
infernoB22101245%-0.00
cacheC2181338%0.02
ancientC167944%0.01
mirageA169756%0.02
anubisS129375%0.03
nukeD82625%0.01
vertigo4040%0.05
dust21010%0.00

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Nuke is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (25% over 8). Start with the 6 essential Nuke lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

1,108Matches
50%Win rate
1.24Avg K/D
80.4ADR
38%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

37%1v1 clutch win
28%1v2 clutch win
8Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWWLLW

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Inferno7258%1.2116.9
Anubis7146%1.1216.1
Ancient3352%1.3316.2
Nuke3259%1.2617.1
Vertigo3152%1.2417.3
Mirage3139%1.0515.9
Dust21932%1.0614.8
Train1136%1.3017.4

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

16.2%Headshot accuracy
33.1%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
35.4%Spray accuracy
78.0%Counter-strafing
9.8°Preaim
527msReaction time
35.0%T opening success
49.7%CT opening success
0.65Enemies flashed / flash
5.9%Flash assists
8.88HE damage / grenade
14.87Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 34.9868% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Nuke

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

25% win rate across 8 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Nuke callouts & strategyNuke grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
cache13–160.0714%28 Aug
cache10–130.0413%25 Aug
anubis13–90.0635%25 Aug
anubis13–20.0114%24 Aug
vertigo3–130.0828%23 Aug
ancient7–13-0.078%22 Aug
mirage13–20.1435%22 Aug
nuke13–80.0326%22 Aug
inferno13–90.0511%20 Aug
mirage14–16-0.0613%20 Aug
mirage11–130.0123%19 Aug
cache5–13-0.0117%19 Aug
cache11–130.0314%18 Aug
nuke9–130.0016%17 Aug
inferno13–30.0810%17 Aug
cache12–16-0.039%16 Aug
ancient11–130.0010%16 Aug
inferno13–10-0.0020%16 Aug
mirage11–13-0.0212%13 Aug
ancient11–130.0219%13 Aug
cache15–150.0815%12 Aug
mirage5–130.0416%10 Aug
inferno13–90.0712%10 Aug
mirage9–13-0.0121%9 Aug
inferno13–80.0418%9 Aug
nuke7–13-0.0320%9 Aug
anubis4–13-0.048%9 Aug
ancient13–90.0214%8 Aug
inferno5–13-0.049%8 Aug
anubis6–13-0.0316%8 Aug
anubis2–13-0.0329%7 Aug
mirage13–40.1111%6 Aug
inferno4–13-0.097%6 Aug
ancient13–50.0650%4 Aug
vertigo10–130.0115%4 Aug
vertigo7–130.0219%3 Aug
vertigo3–110.0923%3 Aug
anubis13–8-0.0116%2 Aug
ancient9–130.0311%2 Aug
inferno11–130.024%2 Aug
nuke4–13-0.038%2 Aug
cache6–13-0.045%2 Aug
inferno8–13-0.0614%29 Jul
mirage16–14-0.0011%29 Jul
anubis13–110.0418%28 Jul
ancient13–50.1022%28 Jul
cache13–60.0517%28 Jul
dust28–130.0019%27 Jul
anubis13–90.0315%27 Jul
cache9–130.0511%26 Jul
inferno13–30.0216%26 Jul
ancient9–130.0419%26 Jul
inferno13–160.0116%25 Jul
cache13–100.039%25 Jul
nuke13–20.1011%25 Jul
ancient13–80.0526%25 Jul
inferno7–20.0013%25 Jul
mirage13–80.0212%25 Jul
mirage0–13-0.1367%25 Jul
mirage10–130.0310%24 Jul
inferno4–13-0.0618%24 Jul
cache2–13-0.0221%24 Jul
mirage13–40.0014%22 Jul
ancient5–13-0.0427%22 Jul
inferno8–13-0.039%20 Jul
mirage13–110.0025%20 Jul
mirage13–00.000%20 Jul
nuke10–13-0.0124%19 Jul
cache5–130.0526%19 Jul
anubis13–9-0.0214%19 Jul
cache13–50.0414%19 Jul
ancient13–100.0025%19 Jul
mirage13–50.066%19 Jul
cache11–130.0821%19 Jul
inferno11–13-0.0517%18 Jul
cache13–0-0.010%18 Jul
inferno13–50.0115%18 Jul
ancient8–13-0.0812%18 Jul
cache13–90.0315%17 Jul
anubis13–50.0810%17 Jul
inferno13–90.1313%16 Jul
cache13–10-0.0111%15 Jul
inferno10–130.0025%14 Jul
anubis13–100.0715%14 Jul
cache9–13-0.0313%13 Jul
cache13–50.0421%13 Jul
cache8–13-0.0321%12 Jul
ancient11–130.0219%12 Jul
ancient13–100.0315%12 Jul
inferno13–30.0510%12 Jul
mirage13–100.0918%12 Jul
anubis13–80.1520%11 Jul
inferno11–13-0.049%11 Jul
ancient13–50.0117%11 Jul
nuke9–130.0622%10 Jul
inferno1–13-0.1020%10 Jul
ancient4–11-0.0413%9 Jul
cache13–70.087%9 Jul
nuke4–13-0.0426%9 Jul
inferno4–13-0.073%9 Jul

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →