[SPECK]Terry Bell

[SPECK]Terry Bell — CS2 Stats

76561198269682574[U:1:309416846]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

1,144Tracked matches66%Win rate2020Tracked since
CSDB Rating7.0 StrongSupport
Premier CS Rating16,808Purple band · top ~21.2% of ranked players (population est.)
WingmanGold Nova II
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 27 Sep 2026 (5 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

No change since then. Play, then come back: the next observation lands here.

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 16,808 +1,913 9 Aug – 27 Sept · 26 days played
12,16416,808peak 16,8089 Aug27 Sept
16,808Peak Premier in tracked matches
26Days played since 2026-08-09

Premier CS Rating

  • At peak — 16,808
  • +1,972 over 30 days · improving
  • Next: Pink band at 20,000 — 3,192 to go
  • Reached: Purple band · Blue band · Light Blue band
  • Blue band first seen 2026-09-03
  • Light Blue band first seen 2026-09-03

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do.

Share this profile

CSDB.GG[SPECK]Terry BellPREMIER16,808 · Purple bandcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim73
Positioning58
Utility69

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

HOT54–40–6Last 10054%Win rateWWWWWWWLWL

Last 10 vs previous 10: +30pp win rate · +0.01 avg rating · +1.6pp headshot accuracy · −43ms reaction

Win rate up 30pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — more than a 10-match window's normal noise (±20pp).

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 5–0 · 100% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 18%
  • Avg reaction 625ms

Last 10

  • 8–2 · 80% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.00
  • Avg headshot accuracy 20%
  • Avg reaction 588ms

Last 20

  • 13–7 · 65% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.00
  • Avg headshot accuracy 20%
  • Avg reaction 609ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Support — Utility contribution stands above the rest of this profile (+1.7 against its own average).

Aim7.3
Utility6.9
Positioning5.8
Opening Duels3.5
Clutch4.6

Excellent counter-strafingEffective flashes

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

NiKo

Plays most like NiKo 84% playstyle similarity

Most alike: utility contribution, positioning profile.

Where you differ: lower opening-duel success; lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Strengths

Flashes. 0.77 enemies blinded per flash — utility that consistently lands.

Areas to improve

Reaction time. 605ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim7.3
Positioning5.8
Utility6.9
Mechanics8.6
Opening Duels3.5
Win Impact10.0

Composite 7.0/10 (Strong), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.00+0.00
first ⅓ avg -0.01 → last ⅓ avg -0.00
Reaction time609ms−5ms
first ⅓ avg 614ms → last ⅓ avg 609ms
Headshot accuracy19.8%+0.8%
first ⅓ avg 18.9% → last ⅓ avg 19.8%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.12Best match rating · 13–5 · anubis, 5 Sept →
43%Best headshot accuracy · 13–2 · office, 5 Sept →
383msFastest reaction time · 13–5 · inferno, 28 Aug →
13–1Biggest win · ancient, 12 Aug →

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

7Longest win streak
W7Current streak
12–10In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
15Overtime games

Map breakdown

nukeBest map · 71% over 17anubisWeakest map · 23% over 13
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
ancientB189–950%-0.01
dust2B179–853%-0.00
nukeS1712–571%0.01
infernoA138–562%0.01
anubisD133–1023%-0.01
cacheC104–640%-0.02
mirageS96–367%0.02
office—22–0100%-0.01
overpass—11–0100%-0.01

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Anubis is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (23% over 13). Start with the 6 essential Anubis lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

61Matches
51%Win rate
1.05Avg K/D
72.3ADR
48%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

43%1v1 clutch win
41%1v2 clutch win
4Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWLWLL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage1953%0.9613.4
Ancient944%1.4917.3
Inferno771%1.0114.7
Anubis667%1.2816.5
Dust2617%0.8212.2
Nuke683%1.1115.5
Overpass540%0.6310.0
Cache30%0.9417.0

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

19.9%Headshot accuracy
34.2%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
33.2%Spray accuracy
88.6%Counter-strafing
10.0°Preaim
605msReaction time
37.1%T opening success
50.9%CT opening success
0.77Enemies flashed / flash
14.8%Flash assists
11.54HE damage / grenade
8.46Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 37.1436% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Anubis

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

23% win rate across 13 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Anubis callouts & strategy →Anubis grenade lineups →

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
dust213–11-0.0716%27 Sept →
dust213–110.0114%24 Sept →
mirage13–50.1027%24 Sept →
nuke13–100.0221%24 Sept →
inferno13–70.0215%24 Sept →
ancient10–70.0221%18 Sept →
overpass13–11-0.0126%15 Sept →
mirage9–13-0.029%15 Sept →
ancient13–40.0430%15 Sept →
ancient7–13-0.0925%14 Sept →
dust27–130.057%14 Sept →
mirage16–14-0.0016%14 Sept →
cache11–13-0.0418%10 Sept →
dust213–70.0218%10 Sept →
ancient13–10-0.0612%10 Sept →
inferno8–13-0.0628%10 Sept →
nuke3–13-0.0021%8 Sept →
inferno16–140.0324%8 Sept →
inferno13–70.0119%8 Sept →
anubis9–13-0.0223%8 Sept →
dust213–8-0.0231%8 Sept →
dust216–130.0025%7 Sept →
cache4–13-0.0915%7 Sept →
ancient15–150.0015%7 Sept →
cache13–4-0.0122%7 Sept →
ancient3–13-0.0327%6 Sept →
cache13–70.0320%6 Sept →
dust213–8-0.0321%6 Sept →
inferno5–13-0.0218%6 Sept →
nuke13–60.0320%6 Sept →
mirage13–60.0319%6 Sept →
mirage10–13-0.0711%6 Sept →
dust28–130.0919%5 Sept →
ancient15–150.0520%5 Sept →
anubis13–50.1217%5 Sept →
mirage13–70.0118%5 Sept →
mirage13–110.0128%5 Sept →
anubis11–130.0515%5 Sept →
ancient12–160.0216%5 Sept →
nuke13–8-0.0518%5 Sept →
anubis8–130.0721%5 Sept →
inferno11–13-0.0113%5 Sept →
dust213–90.0321%5 Sept →
office13–20.0043%5 Sept →
office13–7-0.0221%5 Sept →
nuke10–130.0333%5 Sept →
ancient13–90.0120%1 Sept →
nuke13–100.0421%1 Sept →
dust28–130.0113%1 Sept →
dust210–13-0.0019%1 Sept →
mirage13–90.0520%30 Aug →
nuke13–9-0.0128%30 Aug →
ancient7–13-0.117%30 Aug →
nuke19–15-0.0011%30 Aug →
nuke13–70.0213%30 Aug →
inferno13–110.0531%30 Aug →
anubis15–15-0.0721%28 Aug →
inferno13–60.0226%28 Aug →
inferno13–50.0217%28 Aug →
inferno13–100.0520%28 Aug →
ancient9–13-0.0218%27 Aug →
mirage15–150.0214%26 Aug →
anubis13–11-0.038%26 Aug →
cache11–13-0.0413%24 Aug →
anubis11–13-0.0818%23 Aug →
dust216–13-0.0022%23 Aug →
ancient13–11-0.0119%23 Aug →
anubis13–9-0.0120%23 Aug →
cache13–11-0.0528%23 Aug →
nuke13–60.0222%23 Aug →
ancient15–150.0018%23 Aug →
ancient13–110.0824%23 Aug →
cache6–13-0.0025%22 Aug →
nuke13–80.0221%22 Aug →
cache13–80.0024%22 Aug →
ancient13–100.0432%22 Aug →
dust214–16-0.0420%22 Aug →
inferno4–13-0.0628%22 Aug →
dust21–13-0.0710%21 Aug →
cache11–130.048%21 Aug →
inferno13–110.0427%21 Aug →
nuke13–90.1020%21 Aug →
ancient13–50.0119%21 Aug →
anubis8–130.0011%19 Aug →
nuke13–40.0222%19 Aug →
nuke14–160.0322%18 Aug →
dust211–13-0.0113%18 Aug →
inferno10–130.0434%18 Aug →
dust215–15-0.0510%17 Aug →
ancient5–13-0.0710%17 Aug →
nuke8–13-0.0516%17 Aug →
nuke13–20.030%16 Aug →
anubis8–13-0.098%16 Aug →
anubis13–16-0.0312%16 Aug →
anubis6–13-0.0224%16 Aug →
dust213–90.0021%16 Aug →
anubis11–13-0.0629%13 Aug →
cache8–13-0.0414%12 Aug →
ancient13–10.0127%12 Aug →
nuke2–13-0.035%9 Aug →

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →

This profile is built from public Steam data. If it is yours, you can remove it, or delete your CSDB account.