DEMONKING

DEMONKING — CS2 Stats

76561198256188589[U:1:295922861]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

3,010Tracked matches43%Win rate2020Tracked since
CSDB Rating6.0 SolidSupport
FaceitLevel 10 · 3,311 ELOTop 12.4% of ranked FACEIT players
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 6 Sep 2026 (16 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

0Faceit ELO · 3,311 → 3,311
+25Tracked matches · now 3,010
0.0ppWin rate · 43.3% → 43.3%
Track this profile

CSDB reads this profile's Premier rating from its tracked match history, and records Faceit ELO once on every day the page is viewed. 61 days played since 24 Sep 2024. Come back after the next session and the change shows above.

Is this you? Sign in with Steam to claim it and connect match tracking →

Rating over time

Faceit ELO: 3,311 +0 30 Aug6 Sept · 3 observations
3,3113,311peak 3,31130 Aug6 Sept
3,311Highest Faceit ELO seen on CSDB
61Days played since 2024-09-24

Faceit ELO

  • At peak — 3,311
  • Next: 3,500 ELO at 3,500 189 to go
  • Reached: 3,000 ELO · 2,500 ELO · Level 10 · Level 9
  • 3,000 ELO first seen 2026-08-30
  • 2,500 ELO first seen 2026-08-30

Premier is CSDB’s own observation — it builds from the day a profile is first viewed and cannot be backfilled. Faceit ELO is CSDB’s own observation — no feed exposes ELO per match, so that line only has the days the profile was viewed and cannot be backfilled.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGDEMONKINGFACEITLevel 10 · 3,311 ELOSTANDINGTop 12.4% of rankedPEAK ELO3,311csdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim86
Positioning46
Utility51

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

COLD5248Last 10052%Win rateLLLLLWLLLW

Last 10 vs previous 10: −10pp win rate · +0.02 avg rating · +5.2pp headshot accuracy · −31ms reaction

Win rate −10pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — within the normal variation of a 10-match window (±20pp), so no real shift yet.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 05 · 0% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 30%
  • Avg reaction 578ms

Last 10

  • 28 · 20% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.00
  • Avg headshot accuracy 33%
  • Avg reaction 531ms

Last 20

  • 515 · 25% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 30%
  • Avg reaction 547ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: SupportUtility contribution stands above the rest of this profile (+1.5 against its own average).

Aim8.6
Utility5.1
Positioning4.6
Opening Duels1.3
Clutch3.4

Sharp aimer

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

b1t

Plays most like b1t 91% playstyle similarity

Most alike: aim profile, positioning profile.

Where you differ: lower opening-duel success.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Strengths

Aim. Aim score of 86 — the mechanical foundation is a clear strength.

Areas to improve

Positioning. Positioning trails aim by 40 points — deaths here waste a strong aim profile.

Utility. Utility contribution runs far behind the mechanical game — the cheapest rating gain on this profile is thrown, not aimed.

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 41% on CT to 26% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim8.6
Positioning4.6
Utility5.1
Mechanics6.7
Opening Duels1.4
Win Impact2.8

Composite 6.0/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.05 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.00−0.01
first ⅓ avg 0.01 → last ⅓ avg -0.00
Reaction time550ms−25ms
first ⅓ avg 575ms → last ⅓ avg 550ms
Headshot accuracy32.0%+2.5%
first ⅓ avg 29.5% → last ⅓ avg 32.0%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.14Best match rating · 13–2 · dust2, 9 May
57%Best headshot accuracy · 2–13 · nuke, 23 Mar
352msFastest reaction time · 16–14 · train, 5 Dec
13–2Biggest win · dust2, 9 May

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

7Longest win streak
L5Current streak
143In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
13Overtime games

Map breakdown

dust2Best map · 71% over 24nukeWeakest map · 23% over 13
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
dust2S2417771%0.01
mirageB23111248%-0.00
ancientA2112957%-0.00
nukeD1331023%-0.00
anubisC104640%-0.00
trainA53260%-0.02
inferno31233%-0.00
warden110100%0.08

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Nuke is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (23% over 13). Start with the 6 essential Nuke lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

8,936Matches
53%Win rate
1.14Avg K/D
78.9ADR
66%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

37%1v1 clutch win
22%1v2 clutch win
16Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWLWWW

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage92656%1.0816.6
Ancient64054%1.0916.4
Dust243757%1.0715.4
Anubis28955%1.0515.7
Nuke27854%1.0916.3
Vertigo7752%1.2118.2
Train4353%1.1215.7
Cache1650%1.1116.9

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

31.6%Headshot accuracy
33.4%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
37.5%Spray accuracy
80.1%Counter-strafing
9.6°Preaim
544msReaction time
25.9%T opening success
41.0%CT opening success
0.63Enemies flashed / flash
4.1%Flash assists
5.06HE damage / grenade
7.37Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 25.8979% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Nuke

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

23% win rate across 13 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Nuke callouts & strategyNuke grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
ancient11–13-0.0328%6 Sept
nuke8–13-0.0425%26 Aug
mirage6–13-0.0036%26 Aug
mirage6–13-0.0036%26 Aug
nuke8–13-0.0425%26 Aug
mirage13–110.0533%25 Aug
nuke4–130.0439%25 Aug
dust28–13-0.0628%25 Aug
dust210–130.0131%5 Aug
mirage13–70.0349%2 Aug
anubis3–13-0.0526%18 Jul
ancient11–13-0.0016%12 Jul
nuke13–7-0.0220%8 Jul
ancient13–80.0238%7 Jul
inferno8–130.0119%20 Jun
nuke6–13-0.0246%13 Jun
mirage7–13-0.0425%9 Jun
mirage16–14-0.0223%24 May
nuke6–13-0.0629%13 May
anubis5–13-0.0435%13 May
dust219–17-0.0140%13 May
inferno13–60.0223%13 May
dust213–9-0.0236%13 May
nuke11–130.0634%12 May
anubis16–14-0.0621%12 May
dust24–13-0.0639%12 May
anubis13–100.0534%11 May
dust213–100.0341%11 May
dust213–20.1436%9 May
ancient13–60.0844%6 May
ancient10–130.0134%27 Apr
nuke4–130.0142%27 Apr
mirage13–11-0.0226%26 Apr
anubis13–40.0949%26 Apr
ancient7–13-0.0736%3 Apr
dust22–13-0.0246%1 Apr
nuke16–130.0730%31 Mar
mirage7–130.0339%31 Mar
dust216–140.0230%31 Mar
mirage8–13-0.0327%31 Mar
ancient19–16-0.0541%31 Mar
dust26–130.0734%23 Mar
nuke2–130.0257%23 Mar
ancient4–13-0.0534%22 Mar
dust213–70.0337%22 Mar
mirage13–90.0539%22 Mar
anubis7–13-0.0317%22 Mar
inferno6–13-0.0439%21 Mar
ancient13–11-0.0518%20 Mar
dust29–13-0.0517%20 Mar
nuke0–13-0.1015%20 Mar
nuke9–130.0430%9 Feb
ancient5–13-0.0517%1 Feb
dust23–13-0.0622%1 Feb
nuke13–100.0133%29 Jan
warden13–90.0841%29 Jan
ancient13–110.0336%17 Jan
ancient13–7-0.0350%13 Jan
mirage4–13-0.0532%13 Jan
mirage6–13-0.0524%4 Jan
train2–13-0.0337%4 Jan
dust213–11-0.0217%4 Jan
train17–8-0.0027%4 Jan
mirage8–13-0.0432%4 Jan
train7–13-0.0521%3 Jan
dust213–4-0.0027%3 Jan
ancient13–50.0426%3 Jan
dust213–7-0.0416%3 Jan
train13–9-0.0330%3 Jan
dust213–90.0236%1 Jan
mirage13–60.0417%15 Dec
dust213–5-0.0128%15 Dec
ancient7–13-0.0222%3 Dec
ancient13–50.0136%18 Nov
mirage9–13-0.0423%16 Nov
mirage9–13-0.0014%30 Oct
mirage13–100.0150%19 Oct
dust213–70.0314%28 Aug
mirage16–14-0.0420%14 May
anubis12–160.0117%6 May
ancient9–130.0225%5 May
anubis13–16-0.0133%3 May
mirage10–130.0530%3 May
dust213–20.0650%26 Apr
anubis3–130.0241%20 Apr
ancient13–60.0133%17 Apr
dust213–100.0834%19 Mar
dust213–30.1343%20 Feb
train16–140.0137%5 Dec
mirage13–100.0442%27 Nov
mirage13–100.0137%26 Nov
ancient8–130.0130%21 Nov
anubis13–100.0218%10 Nov
ancient13–11-0.0331%26 Oct
ancient13–110.0244%25 Oct
ancient13–60.0825%25 Oct
mirage10–130.0023%24 Oct
mirage16–12-0.0324%13 Oct
dust216–14-0.0520%24 Sept
dust213–80.0630%24 Sept

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

Faceit Level 103K ELO Club1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →