✪ Mistermaker

✪ Mistermaker — CS2 Stats

76561198254006197[U:1:293740469]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

5,759Tracked matches53%Win rate2020Tracked since
CSDB Rating7.2 StrongPositional Player
Premier CS Rating19,376Top 50% of 197,133 CSDB-tracked playersPurple band · top ~11% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#89221 of 245408 tracked
FaceitLevel 8 · 1,899 ELOTop 31.2% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanMaster Guardian Elite
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 23 Sep 2026 (3 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

No change since then. Play, then come back: the next observation lands here.

Track this profile

CSDB reads this profile's Premier rating from its tracked match history, and records Faceit ELO once on every day the page is viewed. 28 days played since 12 Aug 2026. Come back after the next session and the change shows above.

Is this you? Sign in with Steam to claim it and connect match tracking →

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 19,376 -520 12 Aug – 23 Sept · 21 days played
17,41019,896peak 19,89612 Aug23 Sept
20,124Peak Premier in tracked matches
1,899Highest Faceit ELO seen on CSDB
28Days played since 2026-08-12

Faceit ELO

  • At peak — 1,899
  • Next: Level 10 at 2,001 — 102 to go
  • Reached: Level 9 · Level 8 · Level 7 · Level 6
  • Level 9 first seen 2026-09-10
  • Level 8 first seen 2026-09-10

Premier CS Rating

  • 520 below peak (19,896)
  • +726 over 30 days · improving
  • Next: Pink band at 20,000 — 624 to go
  • Reached: Purple band · Blue band · Light Blue band
  • Purple band first seen 2026-09-10
  • Blue band first seen 2026-09-10

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do. Faceit ELO is CSDB’s own observation — no feed exposes ELO per match, so that line only has the days the profile was viewed and cannot be backfilled.

Share this profile

CSDB.GG✪ MistermakerFACEITLevel 8 · 1,899 ELOSTANDINGTop 31.2% of rankedPREMIER19,376 · Purple bandPEAK ELO1,899csdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim83
Positioning70
Utility57

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

HOT52–44–4Last 10052%Win rateWLLWWWWLWW

Last 10 vs previous 10: +30pp win rate · −0.01 avg rating · −3.6pp headshot accuracy · +10ms reaction

Win rate up 30pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — more than a 10-match window's normal noise (±20pp). Average match rating moved the other way (−0.01), so results shifted more than performance did.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 3–2 · 60% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 13%
  • Avg reaction 583ms

Last 10

  • 7–3 · 70% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 21%
  • Avg reaction 561ms

Last 20

  • 11–9 · 55% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 23%
  • Avg reaction 556ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Positional Player — Positioning stands above the rest of this profile (+1.9 against its own average).

Aim8.3
Utility5.7
Positioning7.0
Opening Duels4.1
Clutch3.6

Strong CT-side opener

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

iM

Plays most like iM 91% playstyle similarity

Most alike: utility contribution, positioning profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Strengths

T openings. 63% T opening-duel success — entries that actually open the round.

Areas to improve

Reaction time. 563ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim8.3
Positioning7.0
Utility5.7
Mechanics7.8
Opening Duels7.1
Win Impact6.1

Composite 7.2/10 (Strong), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.03−0.01
first ⅓ avg 0.03 → last ⅓ avg 0.03
Reaction time563ms+28ms
first ⅓ avg 535ms → last ⅓ avg 563ms
Headshot accuracy23.2%+0.0%
first ⅓ avg 23.2% → last ⅓ avg 23.2%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.42Best match rating · 9–1 · vertigo, 14 Aug →
44%Best headshot accuracy · 4–13 · nuke, 18 Sept →
422msFastest reaction time · 4–13 · nuke, 18 Sept →
13–1Biggest win · cache, 6 Sept →

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

8Longest win streak
13–5In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
7Overtime games

Map breakdown

cacheBest map · 71% over 14nukeWeakest map · 36% over 11
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
ancientB168–850%0.01
cacheS1410–471%0.02
mirageB136–746%0.02
infernoB115–645%0.01
nukeC114–736%0.00
anubisA116–555%0.02
dust2B105–550%0.02
vertigoA106–460%0.08
poseidon—21–150%0.13
eldorado—11–0100%0.13
train—10–10%0.02

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Nuke is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (36% over 11). Start with the 6 essential Nuke lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

851Matches
50%Win rate
1.05Avg K/D
81.6ADR
54%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

38%1v1 clutch win
22%1v2 clutch win
7Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWWLLL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Ancient15850%1.0715.5
Mirage15443%0.9914.7
Anubis14754%1.0916.0
Vertigo10761%1.1516.7
Inferno9446%1.0215.6
Dust25954%1.0515.0
Nuke5551%1.0715.4
Cache2744%1.0016.8

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

22.9%Headshot accuracy
35.0%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
34.3%Spray accuracy
85.0%Counter-strafing
7.8°Preaim
563msReaction time
62.8%T opening success
54.1%CT opening success
0.50Enemies flashed / flash
4.7%Flash assists
8.71HE damage / grenade
15.06Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Spend your practice time on Nuke

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

36% win rate across 11 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Nuke callouts & strategy →Nuke grenade lineups →

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
cache19–15-0.0419%24 Sept →
inferno9–13-0.0110%23 Sept →
nuke1–13-0.100%23 Sept →
dust213–9-0.0023%23 Sept →
vertigo13–80.0415%23 Sept →
nuke13–40.0624%23 Sept →
ancient13–110.0540%21 Sept →
nuke7–13-0.0033%21 Sept →
anubis13–70.0233%21 Sept →
anubis13–110.0918%20 Sept →
ancient13–110.0824%20 Sept →
dust27–13-0.0024%20 Sept →
vertigo9–70.0732%20 Sept →
nuke4–13-0.0544%18 Sept →
cache16–190.0127%17 Sept →
dust210–130.0223%17 Sept →
vertigo8–130.0322%17 Sept →
mirage28–260.0422%16 Sept →
cache10–13-0.0315%16 Sept →
anubis13–100.0418%16 Sept →
vertigo9–13-0.0118%16 Sept →
inferno9–130.0434%16 Sept →
vertigo9–30.2122%16 Sept →
cache8–13-0.0124%13 Sept →
anubis13–90.0621%13 Sept →
vertigo9–70.1326%13 Sept →
mirage13–8-0.0725%13 Sept →
nuke6–130.0226%13 Sept →
cache13–80.0622%13 Sept →
inferno9–130.1124%13 Sept →
ancient13–11-0.0217%13 Sept →
cache13–50.0321%12 Sept →
ancient13–90.0221%12 Sept →
nuke7–13-0.0618%11 Sept →
ancient10–3-0.0040%11 Sept →
mirage10–130.0318%11 Sept →
dust211–130.0131%11 Sept →
nuke13–90.0325%11 Sept →
mirage13–10-0.0230%11 Sept →
inferno13–20.0027%11 Sept →
mirage10–130.0023%11 Sept →
anubis6–13-0.0627%10 Sept →
dust216–140.0423%7 Sept →
ancient6–130.0525%7 Sept →
vertigo9–10.0320%7 Sept →
ancient11–13-0.029%7 Sept →
mirage13–80.0824%7 Sept →
dust213–10-0.0422%6 Sept →
dust213–90.1329%6 Sept →
cache13–10.0939%6 Sept →
nuke13–110.0630%6 Sept →
ancient13–8-0.0118%5 Sept →
mirage13–100.0421%5 Sept →
cache16–120.0426%4 Sept →
anubis4–13-0.0019%4 Sept →
anubis1–13-0.0130%2 Sept →
ancient11–130.0124%2 Sept →
inferno2–13-0.1024%2 Sept →
poseidon5–90.0927%1 Sept →
vertigo6–9-0.0416%1 Sept →
vertigo6–9-0.0421%1 Sept →
mirage11–130.0327%27 Aug →
ancient7–130.0322%25 Aug →
poseidon9–60.1713%25 Aug →
mirage2–13-0.0718%25 Aug →
inferno3–9-0.1023%25 Aug →
eldorado9–60.1330%23 Aug →
dust216–190.0317%21 Aug →
inferno8–00.1414%21 Aug →
inferno8–8-0.1127%21 Aug →
ancient3–130.0120%21 Aug →
ancient13–110.0226%21 Aug →
inferno13–11-0.0019%21 Aug →
cache13–90.0830%20 Aug →
anubis13–70.1226%20 Aug →
cache5–13-0.0327%20 Aug →
ancient11–13-0.0314%20 Aug →
mirage12–120.0117%20 Aug →
nuke13–30.0422%20 Aug →
mirage7–130.0014%18 Aug →
train5–130.0238%18 Aug →
dust213–50.0337%18 Aug →
cache13–100.0241%18 Aug →
cache13–80.0229%18 Aug →
anubis13–80.0129%18 Aug →
mirage13–50.1717%18 Aug →
inferno9–40.1030%18 Aug →
ancient15–15-0.0717%17 Aug →
cache13–70.0111%17 Aug →
anubis6–130.0719%16 Aug →
dust25–130.0044%16 Aug →
nuke8–13-0.0116%15 Aug →
cache13–110.0213%15 Aug →
anubis4–13-0.089%15 Aug →
ancient1–130.0016%15 Aug →
inferno13–4-0.0120%15 Aug →
ancient13–110.0324%15 Aug →
vertigo9–10.4237%14 Aug →
nuke12–120.0324%12 Aug →
mirage9–130.0126%12 Aug →

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →