Fabicky

Fabicky — CS2 Stats

76561198250256658[U:1:289990930]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

1,156Tracked matches67%Win rate2021Tracked since
CSDB Rating3.9 LearningPositional Player
FaceitLevel 5 · 1,215 ELOTop 67.6% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanLegendary Eagle
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 18 Sep 2026 (yesterday). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

No change since then — still 1,156 tracked matches. Play, then come back: the next observation lands here.

Track this profile

CSDB reads this profile's Premier rating from its tracked match history, and records Faceit ELO once on every day the page is viewed. 38 days played since 30 Jun 2025. Come back after the next session and the change shows above.

Is this you? Sign in with Steam to claim it and connect match tracking →

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 18,559 +3,560 30 Jun28 Sept · 18 days played
13,00818,964peak 18,96430 Jun28 Sept
Faceit ELO: 1,215 +0 14 Sept18 Sept · 2 observations
1,2151,215peak 1,21514 Sept18 Sept
19,132Peak Premier in tracked matches
1,215Highest Faceit ELO seen on CSDB
38Days played since 2025-06-30

Faceit ELO

  • At peak — 1,215
  • Next: Level 7 at 1,351 136 to go
  • Reached: Level 6 · Level 5 · Level 4 · Level 3
  • Level 6 first seen 2026-09-14
  • Level 5 first seen 2026-09-14

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do. Faceit ELO is CSDB’s own observation — no feed exposes ELO per match, so that line only has the days the profile was viewed and cannot be backfilled.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGFabickyFACEITLevel 5 · 1,215 ELOSTANDINGTop 67.6% of rankedPEAK ELO1,215csdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim31
Positioning56
Utility34

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY53425Last 10053%Win rateTLWWLLWLWW

Last 10 vs previous 10: −20pp win rate · −0.03 avg rating · +0.2pp headshot accuracy · −63ms reaction

Win rate down 20pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — more than a 10-match window's normal noise (±20pp).

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 221 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.03
  • Avg headshot accuracy 17%
  • Avg reaction 583ms

Last 10

  • 541 · 50% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.00
  • Avg headshot accuracy 18%
  • Avg reaction 617ms

Last 20

  • 1262 · 60% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 18%
  • Avg reaction 649ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Positional PlayerPositioning stands above the rest of this profile (+1.6 against its own average).

Aim3.1
Utility3.4
Positioning5.6
Opening Duels3.2
Clutch3.8

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

ZywOo

Plays most like ZywOo 64% playstyle similarity

Most alike: positioning profile, utility contribution.

Where you differ: lower opening-duel success; lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Reaction time. 658ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Counter-strafing. Only 67% of shots are taken properly stopped — moving-shot inaccuracy is quietly taxing every duel.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim3.1
Positioning5.6
Utility3.4
Mechanics3.7
Opening Duels2.5
Win Impact10.0

Composite 3.9/10 (Learning), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×0.90 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.03+0.02
first ⅓ avg 0.01 → last ⅓ avg 0.03
Reaction time662ms−17ms
first ⅓ avg 679ms → last ⅓ avg 662ms
Headshot accuracy17.2%+1.9%
first ⅓ avg 15.4% → last ⅓ avg 17.2%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.25Best match rating · 9–0 · nuke, 24 Aug
44%Best headshot accuracy · 1–9 · nuke, 29 Sept
422msFastest reaction time · 15–15 · inferno, 12 Jul
13–2Biggest win · overpass, 19 Aug

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

6Longest win streak
154In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
8Overtime games

Map breakdown

vertigoBest map · 80% over 5anubisWeakest map · 20% over 5
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
infernoA2012860%0.01
dust2B2091145%0.01
nukeB168850%0.02
overpassS1410471%0.04
mirageA116555%0.02
vertigoS54180%0.01
anubisD51420%-0.01
ancientC52340%0.00
train31233%-0.01
rooftop1010%-0.03

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Anubis is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (20% over 5). Start with the 6 essential Anubis lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

477Matches
52%Win rate
0.89Avg K/D
70.6ADR
43%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

39%1v1 clutch win
19%1v2 clutch win
7Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLWLLL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage10352%0.9213.8
Dust29645%0.9213.2
Inferno7655%0.8712.9
Anubis7061%0.7812.0
Nuke5254%0.9314.0
Ancient2040%0.7913.1
Vertigo1747%0.7312.8
Overpass1457%1.1417.4

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

15.6%Headshot accuracy
31.7%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
33.8%Spray accuracy
66.7%Counter-strafing
13.4°Preaim
658msReaction time
40.6%T opening success
39.6%CT opening success
0.51Enemies flashed / flash
8.0%Flash assists
7.23HE damage / grenade
8.70Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    Your crosshair sits further from where enemies appear than it needs to. Crosshair placement is the cheapest accuracy you can buy.

    Preaim 13.4046° — above the 12° mark we flag

    Aim Training
Spend your practice time on Anubis

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

20% win rate across 5 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Anubis callouts & strategyAnubis grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
inferno15–15-0.0617%12 Jul
inferno4–9-0.0514%19 Feb
vertigo9–7-0.0922%19 Feb
dust216–14-0.0319%16 Feb
dust29–130.0613%3 Feb
anubis9–130.0114%17 Jan
vertigo9–6-0.0119%11 Jan
rooftop5–9-0.0328%11 Jan
nuke9–7-0.0118%11 Jan
nuke9–30.2216%4 Jan
inferno9–60.0730%4 Jan
mirage13–110.0221%26 Nov
inferno13–90.0710%19 Nov
overpass9–30.188%29 Sept
nuke1–9-0.2244%29 Sept
overpass16–140.0416%28 Sept
vertigo8–80.146%25 Sept
inferno7–9-0.077%25 Sept
inferno9–70.0614%8 Sept
inferno13–7-0.0122%5 Sept
dust213–90.0213%31 Aug
nuke6–9-0.0017%26 Aug
vertigo9–50.0321%26 Aug
overpass9–10.1112%26 Aug
inferno9–50.0723%26 Aug
vertigo9–7-0.0324%24 Aug
nuke9–00.2511%24 Aug
inferno9–40.0714%24 Aug
inferno7–130.0221%19 Aug
mirage13–5-0.0010%19 Aug
overpass13–20.1117%19 Aug
dust25–130.0318%13 Aug
overpass15–15-0.039%13 Aug
nuke13–10-0.0017%13 Aug
inferno13–90.0210%13 Aug
mirage5–13-0.0414%13 Aug
overpass9–13-0.028%13 Aug
dust25–130.0518%13 Aug
mirage8–130.019%9 Aug
inferno13–4-0.0115%4 Aug
overpass16–140.0221%4 Aug
mirage13–30.0823%4 Aug
mirage15–15-0.0216%3 Aug
ancient10–2-0.0118%3 Aug
nuke13–11-0.0326%3 Aug
overpass13–110.019%3 Aug
mirage13–7-0.0319%3 Aug
dust213–9-0.0413%3 Aug
nuke11–130.0416%3 Aug
nuke8–13-0.0211%2 Aug
overpass7–130.0217%2 Aug
inferno13–80.0311%2 Aug
train10–13-0.0019%2 Aug
nuke13–50.0615%2 Aug
overpass13–110.059%2 Aug
dust29–130.0118%2 Aug
ancient2–13-0.0840%29 Jul
dust213–60.0513%29 Jul
nuke13–80.0527%29 Jul
overpass13–6-0.038%29 Jul
inferno3–13-0.039%29 Jul
ancient7–130.0311%29 Jul
dust21–13-0.0416%29 Jul
mirage11–130.0418%27 Jul
overpass13–80.0421%27 Jul
inferno7–130.0413%27 Jul
nuke10–13-0.049%27 Jul
dust213–30.059%27 Jul
dust213–50.0322%27 Jul
inferno13–8-0.0114%24 Jul
mirage13–30.0822%24 Jul
overpass16–120.019%22 Jul
inferno13–8-0.0020%22 Jul
dust211–13-0.046%22 Jul
ancient5–130.0113%17 Jul
dust213–90.0610%17 Jul
inferno5–13-0.0117%15 Jul
dust210–13-0.0117%15 Jul
overpass12–120.0616%15 Jul
mirage13–110.0619%15 Jul
dust213–110.0417%14 Jul
dust26–13-0.0424%14 Jul
dust29–130.0310%13 Jul
anubis13–11-0.0118%11 Jul
dust26–13-0.0413%11 Jul
inferno7–130.0013%10 Jul
anubis4–130.0118%10 Jul
train6–13-0.058%10 Jul
ancient13–90.078%10 Jul
nuke5–130.0422%10 Jul
anubis6–13-0.0411%10 Jul
train13–100.0221%9 Jul
nuke13–9-0.0317%8 Jul
anubis6–13-0.0217%8 Jul
mirage7–130.0118%7 Jul
dust213–11-0.0017%7 Jul
nuke8–130.0614%7 Jul
nuke13–160.0118%3 Jul
inferno13–70.0424%30 Jun
dust20–13-0.026%30 Jun

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →