cero — CS2 Stats

76561198244186460[U:1:283920732]

2,227Tracked matches66%Win rate2020Tracked since

CSDB Rating7.9 StrongAggressive Rifler

Premier CS Rating24,690Top 50% of 819 CSDB-tracked playersPink band · top ~3.3% of ranked players (population est.)

CSDB Leaderboard#2477 of 13501 tracked

FaceitLevel 10 · 2,515 ELOTop 12.4% of ranked FACEIT players

WingmanMaster Guardian I

Ladder ranks via Leetify

Share this profile

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim95

Positioning65

Utility54

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY50–45–5Last 10050%Win rateWWLWWLWWWL

Last 10 vs previous 10: -10pp win rate · -0.04 avg rating

Player DNA

Primary style: Aggressive Rifler — Takes opening fights often, backed by a strong aim profile.

Aim9.5

Aggression10.0

Utility5.4

Positioning6.5

Opening Duels5.7

Sharp aimerStrong CT-side opener

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

Plays most like sh1ro 95% playstyle similarity

Most alike: opening-fight frequency, aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Strengths

Aim. Aim score of 95 — the mechanical foundation is a clear strength.

CT openings. 67% CT opening-duel success — winning the first fight on the defending side is rare and valuable.

Areas to improve

Positioning. Positioning trails aim by 30 points — deaths here waste a strong aim profile.

Utility. Utility contribution runs far behind the mechanical game — the cheapest rating gain on this profile is thrown, not aimed.

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 67% on CT to 38% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Reaction time. 552ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim9.5

Positioning6.5

Utility5.4

Mechanics8.1

Opening Duels5.7

Win Impact10.0

Composite 7.9/10 (Strong), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.02 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.04+0.03

first ⅓ avg 0.01 → last ⅓ avg 0.04

Reaction time562ms−23ms

first ⅓ avg 584ms → last ⅓ avg 562ms

Headshot accuracy37.3%+4.8%

first ⅓ avg 32.5% → last ⅓ avg 37.3%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.18Best rating — anubis 13–2

13–0Biggest win — anubis

6Longest win streak

W2Current streak

9–7In matches decided by ≤2 rounds

6Overtime games

Map breakdown

cacheBest map · 75% over 8dust2Weakest map · 25% over 8

Map	Grade	Played	Record	Win rate	Avg rating
mirage	B	33	15–18	45%	0.02
nuke	S	14	10–4	71%	0.02
anubis	A	14	8–6	57%	0.02
inferno	C	9	4–5	44%	0.07
ancient	A	9	5–4	56%	0.02
dust2	D	8	2–6	25%	0.01
cache	S	8	6–2	75%	0.05
vertigo	—	4	0–4	0%	-0.02
fachwerk	—	1	0–1	0%	0.15

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Dust 2 is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (25% over 8). Start with the 6 essential Dust 2 lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

37.4%Headshot accuracy

36.2%Accuracy (enemy spotted)

38.9%Spray accuracy

86.4%Counter-strafing

8.2°Preaim

552msReaction time

38.1%T opening success

67.4%CT opening success

0.60Enemies flashed / flash

7.7%Flash assists

8.70HE damage / grenade

8.72Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

Advanced Mechanics
You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.
T opening duels 38.1202% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Dust 2

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

25% win rate across 8 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Dust 2 callouts & strategy →Dust 2 grenade lineups →

Recent matches

Map	Score	Rating	HS%	Date
nuke	13–11	0.12	38%	28 Aug →
nuke	16–14	-0.02	35%	28 Aug →
anubis	3–13	-0.05	40%	27 Aug →
nuke	13–11	0.03	47%	27 Aug →
mirage	13–11	-0.04	23%	27 Aug →
nuke	3–13	-0.05	40%	27 Aug →
mirage	13–3	0.09	21%	27 Aug →
nuke	13–7	0.03	22%	27 Aug →
mirage	13–9	0.06	30%	27 Aug →
anubis	10–13	0.00	33%	26 Aug →
mirage	13–3	0.12	36%	26 Aug →
inferno	13–1	0.08	35%	26 Aug →
mirage	13–4	0.05	47%	26 Aug →
anubis	13–10	0.02	38%	26 Aug →
dust2	12–12	-0.03	48%	26 Aug →
nuke	13–7	0.03	37%	26 Aug →
nuke	13–6	0.06	30%	25 Aug →
inferno	11–13	0.12	44%	25 Aug →
cache	13–11	0.14	30%	25 Aug →
anubis	13–10	-0.00	26%	25 Aug →
anubis	9–13	0.02	43%	25 Aug →
mirage	9–13	-0.03	35%	24 Aug →
nuke	13–11	0.04	50%	24 Aug →
ancient	13–2	0.06	36%	24 Aug →
dust2	11–13	0.08	32%	24 Aug →
anubis	13–4	0.03	56%	23 Aug →
mirage	10–13	-0.02	44%	22 Aug →
nuke	8–13	0.08	43%	22 Aug →
inferno	13–6	0.11	46%	22 Aug →
anubis	0–4	-0.01	50%	22 Aug →
mirage	13–4	-0.00	25%	21 Aug →
cache	13–7	-0.00	29%	21 Aug →
anubis	13–2	0.18	45%	21 Aug →
ancient	8–13	-0.05	24%	21 Aug →
mirage	14–16	0.01	34%	21 Aug →
fachwerk	12–12	0.15	36%	20 Aug →
dust2	12–12	0.09	25%	20 Aug →
mirage	7–13	0.06	18%	20 Aug →
mirage	13–10	0.01	31%	20 Aug →
anubis	13–4	-0.01	52%	19 Aug →
ancient	5–13	0.02	23%	19 Aug →
mirage	13–7	0.08	50%	19 Aug →
vertigo	4–13	0.02	29%	18 Aug →
mirage	13–11	0.02	27%	18 Aug →
mirage	5–0	0.03	50%	18 Aug →
dust2	13–6	0.06	46%	18 Aug →
anubis	13–9	0.07	29%	16 Aug →
cache	11–13	0.16	28%	14 Aug →
ancient	13–5	0.12	32%	14 Aug →
nuke	9–13	-0.04	39%	14 Aug →
mirage	4–13	0.11	32%	14 Aug →
ancient	13–4	0.09	26%	14 Aug →
inferno	10–13	0.01	41%	14 Aug →
dust2	13–3	0.00	33%	13 Aug →
cache	13–6	0.03	61%	13 Aug →
nuke	13–5	0.04	40%	5 Aug →
inferno	9–13	0.06	29%	4 Aug →
mirage	10–13	0.10	34%	4 Aug →
ancient	8–13	-0.06	11%	4 Aug →
dust2	0–7	-0.10	0%	4 Aug →
dust2	2–13	0.03	38%	4 Aug →
mirage	3–13	-0.14	9%	4 Aug →
mirage	1–5	-0.02	38%	4 Aug →
mirage	13–5	-0.03	29%	4 Aug →
mirage	11–13	0.00	10%	3 Aug →
cache	5–13	-0.01	19%	3 Aug →
mirage	9–13	-0.00	32%	31 Jul →
mirage	7–13	-0.00	23%	31 Jul →
mirage	8–13	0.02	41%	31 Jul →
ancient	16–14	0.02	35%	31 Jul →
vertigo	8–8	0.02	20%	31 Jul →
anubis	13–0	0.06	29%	31 Jul →
mirage	8–13	-0.03	46%	30 Jul →
anubis	11–13	0.02	35%	30 Jul →
mirage	12–16	0.01	34%	29 Jul →
vertigo	4–13	-0.08	33%	29 Jul →
mirage	6–13	0.06	20%	29 Jul →
anubis	15–15	0.01	27%	28 Jul →
inferno	13–2	0.13	37%	28 Jul →
mirage	7–13	0.06	29%	27 Jul →
cache	13–9	-0.01	21%	27 Jul →
nuke	6–13	-0.05	63%	27 Jul →
cache	16–14	-0.00	28%	27 Jul →
inferno	11–13	-0.01	43%	27 Jul →
dust2	7–13	-0.02	42%	26 Jul →
anubis	13–5	-0.02	31%	24 Jul →
ancient	1–13	-0.06	23%	24 Jul →
inferno	13–2	0.15	45%	24 Jul →
ancient	13–10	0.03	29%	23 Jul →
nuke	13–3	-0.07	25%	23 Jul →
cache	13–1	0.12	38%	23 Jul →
nuke	13–10	0.06	37%	22 Jul →
mirage	13–10	0.01	26%	22 Jul →
mirage	8–13	-0.02	31%	22 Jul →
mirage	13–10	-0.04	23%	22 Jul →
mirage	8–1	0.13	41%	22 Jul →
mirage	13–3	0.01	33%	20 Jul →
inferno	6–13	-0.00	28%	20 Jul →
mirage	8–13	-0.01	35%	19 Jul →
vertigo	8–13	-0.04	20%	19 Jul →