ZAHEED

ZAHEED — CS2 Stats

76561198219317073[U:1:259051345]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

1,727Tracked matches40%Win rate2020Tracked since
CSDB Rating5.4 DevelopingPositional Player
Premier CS Rating16,356Purple band · top ~23% of ranked players (population est.)
FaceitLevel 7 · 1,430 ELOTop 42.3% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanSilver Elite Master
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 19 Sep 2026 (yesterday). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

No change since then — still 1,727 tracked matches. Play, then come back: the next observation lands here.

Track this profile

CSDB reads this profile's Premier rating from its tracked match history, and records Faceit ELO once on every day the page is viewed. 20 days played since 31 May 2026. Come back after the next session and the change shows above.

Is this you? Sign in with Steam to claim it and connect match tracking →

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 16,356 -2,938 31 May19 Sept · 21 days played
16,35619,860peak 19,86031 May19 Sept
Faceit ELO: 1,430 +0 4 Sept19 Sept · 2 observations
1,4301,430peak 1,4304 Sept19 Sept
19,984Peak Premier in tracked matches
1,430Highest Faceit ELO seen on CSDB
20Days played since 2026-05-31

Faceit ELO

  • At peak — 1,430
  • Next: Level 8 at 1,531 101 to go
  • Reached: Level 7 · Level 6 · Level 5 · Level 4
  • Level 7 first seen 2026-09-04
  • Level 6 first seen 2026-09-04

Premier CS Rating

  • 3,504 below peak (19,860)
  • -1,180 over 30 days · declining
  • -2,628 over 90 days
  • Next: Pink band at 20,000 3,644 to go
  • Reached: Purple band · Blue band · Light Blue band
  • Purple band first seen 2026-09-04
  • Blue band first seen 2026-09-04

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do. Faceit ELO is CSDB’s own observation — no feed exposes ELO per match, so that line only has the days the profile was viewed and cannot be backfilled.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGZAHEEDFACEITLevel 7 · 1,430 ELOSTANDINGTop 42.3% of rankedPREMIER16,356 · Purple bandPEAK ELO1,430csdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim67
Positioning58
Utility54

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY46504Last 10046%Win rateLWWLLWLLWL

Last 10 vs previous 10: +20pp win rate · +0.01 avg rating · +0.9pp headshot accuracy · −88ms reaction

Win rate up 20pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — more than a 10-match window's normal noise (±20pp).

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 23 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 17%
  • Avg reaction 459ms

Last 10

  • 46 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 18%
  • Avg reaction 470ms

Last 20

  • 614 · 30% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 17%
  • Avg reaction 514ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Positional PlayerPositioning stands above the rest of this profile (+2 against its own average).

Aim6.7
Utility5.4
Positioning5.8
Opening Duels4.0
Clutch0.0

Strong CT-side opener

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

jL

Plays most like jL 88% playstyle similarity

Most alike: utility contribution, positioning profile.

Where you differ: lower opening-duel success; lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 54% on CT to 30% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim6.7
Positioning5.8
Utility5.4
Mechanics6.3
Opening Duels3.0
Win Impact1.7

Composite 5.4/10 (Developing), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.01−0.03
first ⅓ avg 0.02 → last ⅓ avg -0.01
Reaction time538ms−53ms
first ⅓ avg 591ms → last ⅓ avg 538ms
Headshot accuracy17.5%−1.1%
first ⅓ avg 18.6% → last ⅓ avg 17.5%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.14Best match rating · 13–1 · anubis, 21 Jul
39%Best headshot accuracy · 13–7 · nuke, 16 Jul
336msFastest reaction time · 13–6 · nuke, 1 Sept
13–1Biggest win · anubis, 21 Jul

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

5Longest win streak
56In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
8Overtime games

Map breakdown

nukeBest map · 68% over 19infernoWeakest map · 25% over 8
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
nukeS1913668%0.00
mirageB179853%0.01
ancientB168850%-0.00
cacheD1551033%0.00
anubisD134931%0.01
dust2B115645%-0.01
infernoD82625%-0.00
overpass1010%-0.01

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Inferno is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (25% over 8). Start with the 6 essential Inferno lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

5Matches
40%Win rate
0.61Avg K/D
90.5ADR
35%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

0%1v1 clutch win
0%1v2 clutch win
1Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLLWLW

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

18.3%Headshot accuracy
33.7%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
39.2%Spray accuracy
78.3%Counter-strafing
12.1°Preaim
531msReaction time
29.7%T opening success
54.0%CT opening success
0.68Enemies flashed / flash
7.1%Flash assists
11.37HE damage / grenade
11.26Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    Your crosshair sits further from where enemies appear than it needs to. Crosshair placement is the cheapest accuracy you can buy.

    Preaim 12.1252° — above the 12° mark we flag

    Aim Training
Spend your practice time on Inferno

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

25% win rate across 8 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Inferno callouts & strategyInferno grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
inferno10–13-0.056%8 Sept
nuke13–5-0.0621%8 Sept
dust213–6-0.0117%8 Sept
anubis7–13-0.0219%8 Sept
mirage9–130.0421%7 Sept
nuke13–100.0218%7 Sept
anubis2–13-0.0127%7 Sept
ancient10–13-0.0510%7 Sept
cache13–110.0325%7 Sept
nuke9–13-0.0015%5 Sept
dust29–13-0.1118%5 Sept
inferno8–13-0.0326%5 Sept
nuke13–11-0.0112%5 Sept
mirage11–13-0.0114%5 Sept
nuke11–13-0.0221%3 Sept
anubis6–13-0.0629%3 Sept
ancient13–60.0418%3 Sept
mirage10–13-0.0113%3 Sept
cache7–13-0.0716%3 Sept
anubis6–130.042%1 Sept
nuke13–60.0211%1 Sept
cache10–2-0.029%1 Sept
mirage11–130.0319%1 Sept
ancient9–130.0423%1 Sept
inferno13–8-0.0220%31 Aug
anubis9–13-0.0819%31 Aug
cache13–11-0.0033%31 Aug
mirage13–50.0818%31 Aug
ancient13–50.0117%31 Aug
nuke5–13-0.0232%31 Aug
nuke8–1-0.040%31 Aug
dust213–3-0.0313%31 Aug
cache11–130.0318%13 Aug
inferno13–70.0119%13 Aug
mirage1–13-0.1031%13 Aug
anubis15–150.0421%13 Aug
nuke15–15-0.0125%11 Aug
anubis11–130.0110%11 Aug
cache8–130.0019%11 Aug
inferno8–130.0322%11 Aug
ancient13–9-0.0712%11 Aug
cache9–130.0516%22 Jul
anubis13–10.1422%21 Jul
anubis5–13-0.0826%21 Jul
nuke13–9-0.0413%21 Jul
dust28–13-0.0715%21 Jul
nuke13–70.0918%20 Jul
mirage13–50.0624%20 Jul
ancient8–13-0.0414%20 Jul
dust215–150.0133%17 Jul
inferno7–13-0.0120%17 Jul
ancient13–70.0227%17 Jul
mirage6–13-0.0622%17 Jul
cache11–130.0320%17 Jul
dust25–130.0117%17 Jul
mirage4–13-0.1318%17 Jul
cache13–11-0.0110%16 Jul
mirage13–50.0724%16 Jul
ancient13–9-0.056%16 Jul
nuke13–7-0.0339%16 Jul
mirage13–100.0823%16 Jul
anubis5–13-0.0235%15 Jul
cache13–80.0113%15 Jul
mirage3–13-0.0715%15 Jul
nuke1–13-0.0626%15 Jul
dust212–160.0218%15 Jul
ancient15–150.0115%15 Jul
inferno9–13-0.009%15 Jul
dust213–110.0113%14 Jul
nuke13–90.0227%14 Jul
cache8–130.0411%14 Jul
anubis13–70.0315%14 Jul
cache10–130.0218%14 Jul
inferno10–130.0422%14 Jul
ancient16–130.0423%13 Jul
cache8–13-0.0414%13 Jul
nuke13–10-0.0128%13 Jul
ancient13–6-0.0517%13 Jul
nuke13–80.0926%13 Jul
anubis13–50.0826%13 Jul
cache7–13-0.0121%13 Jul
mirage16–120.0923%13 Jul
dust28–13-0.0220%13 Jul
ancient4–13-0.0825%13 Jul
cache6–13-0.035%13 Jul
dust213–70.0624%13 Jul
ancient10–130.078%13 Jul
nuke5–130.0426%16 Jun
mirage13–50.0819%16 Jun
mirage13–9-0.0324%15 Jun
ancient13–60.0231%15 Jun
nuke13–90.0621%15 Jun
ancient10–130.0722%1 Jun
mirage13–9-0.0016%1 Jun
dust213–3-0.0316%1 Jun
ancient7–13-0.025%1 Jun
overpass10–13-0.0116%1 Jun
nuke16–13-0.0215%1 Jun
anubis13–100.089%31 May
mirage13–80.0423%31 May

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →