Acrux

Acrux — CS2 Stats

76561198217768403[U:1:257502675]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

478Tracked matches70%Win rate2020Tracked since
CSDB Rating7.5 StrongPositional Player
Premier CS Rating19,999Top 50% of 204,793 CSDB-tracked playersPurple band · top ~8.5% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#82572 of 252097 tracked
FaceitLevel 8Top 31.2% of ranked FACEIT players
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 13 May 2026 (156 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

No change since then. Play, then come back: the next observation lands here.

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 19,999 +3,946 2 Feb – 13 May · 20 days played
15,42219,999peak 19,9992 Feb13 May
19,999Peak Premier in tracked matches
45Days played since 2026-02-01

Premier CS Rating

  • At peak — 19,999
  • +1,945 over 90 days
  • Next: Pink band at 20,000 — 1 to go
  • Reached: Purple band · Blue band · Light Blue band

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGAcruxFACEITLevel 8STANDINGTop 31.2% of rankedPREMIER19,999 · Purple bandcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim87
Positioning64
Utility50

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY60–35–5Last 10060%Win rateWWWLLWLWLW

Last 10 vs previous 10: −20pp win rate · −0.03 avg rating · −0.7pp headshot accuracy · −35ms reaction

Win rate down 20pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — more than a 10-match window's normal noise (±20pp).

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 3–2 · 60% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 25%
  • Avg reaction 516ms

Last 10

  • 6–4 · 60% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 21%
  • Avg reaction 534ms

Last 20

  • 14–6 · 70% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 22%
  • Avg reaction 551ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Positional Player — Positioning stands above the rest of this profile (+1.5 against its own average).

Aim8.7
Utility5.0
Positioning6.4
Opening Duels4.3
Clutch3.8

Sharp aimerExcellent counter-strafingStrong CT-side opener

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

sh1ro

Plays most like sh1ro 93% playstyle similarity

Most alike: opening-duel success, positioning profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Strengths

Aim. Aim score of 87 — the mechanical foundation is a clear strength.

Counter-strafing. 93% of shots taken properly stopped — movement discipline most players never reach.

Areas to improve

Preaim. Mechanical aim is strong but the crosshair sits 10.7° off target when enemies appear — placement, not flicking, is the bigger win available.

Utility. Utility contribution runs far behind the mechanical game — the cheapest rating gain on this profile is thrown, not aimed.

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 57% on CT to 37% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Reaction time. 565ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim8.7
Positioning6.4
Utility5.0
Mechanics9.6
Opening Duels4.2
Win Impact10.0

Composite 7.5/10 (Strong), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.01−0.05
first ⅓ avg 0.06 → last ⅓ avg 0.01
Reaction time567ms−56ms
first ⅓ avg 623ms → last ⅓ avg 567ms
Headshot accuracy23.9%−5.7%
first ⅓ avg 29.6% → last ⅓ avg 23.9%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.24Best match rating · 9–6 · inferno, 21 Apr →
47%Best headshot accuracy · 13–5 · dust2, 2 Feb →
422msFastest reaction time · 13–6 · mirage, 7 Oct →
13–2Biggest win · overpass, 7 Feb →

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

7Longest win streak
W3Current streak
8–6In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
16Overtime games

Map breakdown

infernoBest map · 75% over 16ancientWeakest map · 50% over 12
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
mirageB3519–1654%0.04
infernoS1612–475%0.05
ancientB126–650%0.03
nukeA116–555%0.03
dust2S96–367%0.02
anubisS96–367%-0.01
overpassB63–350%0.02
cache—22–0100%0.09

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Ancient is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (50% over 12). Start with the 6 essential Ancient lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

413Matches
57%Win rate
1.42Avg K/D
83.8ADR
56%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

39%1v1 clutch win
20%1v2 clutch win
7Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLLWWW

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage3759%1.3217.6
Inferno2060%1.2118.4
Anubis1443%1.0116.1
Dust21275%1.2117.9
Ancient922%1.0417.9
Nuke743%1.0114.3
Cache450%1.2814.0
Overpass250%1.2215.5

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

23.0%Headshot accuracy
38.3%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
40.3%Spray accuracy
93.2%Counter-strafing
10.7°Preaim
565msReaction time
36.9%T opening success
56.5%CT opening success
0.51Enemies flashed / flash
6.4%Flash assists
7.75HE damage / grenade
13.47Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 36.893% — below the 40% mark we flag

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
dust213–110.0031%14 Oct →
mirage13–10-0.0321%9 Oct →
mirage13–60.0619%7 Oct →
ancient7–13-0.0130%30 Sept →
mirage11–13-0.0523%24 Sept →
mirage13–8-0.0421%23 Sept →
anubis11–13-0.0410%21 Sept →
dust213–60.0627%21 Sept →
anubis7–13-0.0718%17 Sept →
anubis13–10-0.0811%17 Sept →
inferno13–10-0.0324%16 Sept →
dust219–17-0.0111%8 Sept →
inferno8–13-0.0116%7 Sept →
cache13–100.0430%2 Sept →
mirage13–8-0.0117%2 Sept →
dust213–9-0.0328%28 Aug →
inferno5–9-0.0611%26 Aug →
inferno19–150.0428%26 Aug →
mirage13–40.1030%26 Aug →
mirage16–140.0626%25 Aug →
anubis13–30.0027%3 Jun →
mirage13–10-0.0321%31 May →
inferno5–13-0.0131%14 May →
mirage13–90.0321%13 May →
nuke13–60.0229%13 May →
cache13–70.1425%5 May →
mirage6–13-0.0723%28 Apr →
inferno9–60.2433%21 Apr →
anubis11–13-0.0219%12 Apr →
dust213–10-0.0426%1 Apr →
mirage8–130.0727%23 Mar →
anubis16–14-0.0128%23 Mar →
mirage9–130.0346%23 Mar →
anubis13–60.0637%22 Mar →
ancient13–6-0.0227%17 Mar →
mirage13–100.0317%14 Mar →
nuke9–130.0121%14 Mar →
ancient7–13-0.0027%14 Mar →
ancient10–13-0.0213%11 Mar →
inferno16–12-0.0126%10 Mar →
nuke16–140.0411%8 Mar →
mirage13–100.0423%8 Mar →
nuke9–130.0835%7 Mar →
nuke15–15-0.0025%7 Mar →
inferno16–120.0144%7 Mar →
ancient13–9-0.0032%7 Mar →
mirage13–60.1023%27 Feb →
nuke13–11-0.0125%27 Feb →
overpass7–13-0.0616%26 Feb →
inferno13–7-0.0219%25 Feb →
overpass13–80.0532%25 Feb →
inferno15–150.0423%20 Feb →
mirage11–130.0524%20 Feb →
ancient13–70.1824%12 Feb →
anubis13–50.0640%12 Feb →
mirage10–130.0418%12 Feb →
ancient6–130.0333%12 Feb →
mirage13–40.0827%12 Feb →
nuke13–60.0138%11 Feb →
ancient13–80.0238%11 Feb →
nuke16–140.1128%11 Feb →
mirage13–80.0425%10 Feb →
mirage16–130.1022%10 Feb →
ancient13–70.0714%10 Feb →
overpass4–130.0224%10 Feb →
mirage15–150.1023%10 Feb →
nuke10–13-0.0030%7 Feb →
mirage4–130.0424%7 Feb →
overpass13–20.0519%7 Feb →
inferno13–70.0539%7 Feb →
mirage13–50.0927%7 Feb →
ancient6–130.0524%7 Feb →
mirage9–130.0437%7 Feb →
inferno13–80.0728%7 Feb →
ancient15–150.0531%5 Feb →
overpass8–130.0527%5 Feb →
inferno13–40.1435%5 Feb →
dust212–120.0725%5 Feb →
inferno13–40.1635%5 Feb →
dust28–130.0018%5 Feb →
inferno13–40.1535%5 Feb →
nuke10–70.0424%4 Feb →
mirage13–30.1335%4 Feb →
mirage13–160.0223%4 Feb →
ancient13–60.0826%4 Feb →
mirage7–130.0738%4 Feb →
nuke11–130.0330%4 Feb →
mirage13–30.0734%3 Feb →
mirage6–130.0041%3 Feb →
mirage7–130.0520%2 Feb →
dust29–130.0323%2 Feb →
mirage7–130.0114%2 Feb →
mirage8–130.0630%2 Feb →
dust213–50.1347%2 Feb →
mirage13–80.0136%2 Feb →
mirage16–130.0729%2 Feb →
inferno13–50.0528%2 Feb →
anubis13–7-0.0240%1 Feb →
mirage14–160.0229%1 Feb →
overpass13–11-0.0026%1 Feb →

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

100 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →

This profile is built from public Steam data. If it is yours, you can remove it, or delete your CSDB account.