TrunkS

TrunkS — CS2 Stats

76561198216641919[U:1:256376191]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

1,414Tracked matches39%Win rate2020Tracked since
CSDB Rating5.6 SolidSupport
Premier CS Rating16,144Purple band · top ~23.8% of ranked players (population est.)
FaceitLevel 5Top 67.6% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanMaster Guardian II
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 1 Oct 2026 (yesterday). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

No change since then. Play, then come back: the next observation lands here.

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 16,144 -1,075 26 Jul – 1 Oct · 28 days played
16,14419,849peak 19,84926 Jul1 Oct
19,999Peak Premier in tracked matches
32Days played since 2026-07-25

Premier CS Rating

  • 3,705 below peak (19,849)
  • -3,006 over 30 days · declining
  • Next: Pink band at 20,000 — 3,856 to go
  • Reached: Purple band · Blue band · Light Blue band
  • Purple band first seen 2026-09-01
  • Blue band first seen 2026-09-01

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGTrunkSFACEITLevel 5STANDINGTop 67.6% of rankedPREMIER16,144 · Purple bandcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim81
Positioning47
Utility52

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

COLD47–47–6Last 10047%Win rateLLWWLLLLWT

Last 10 vs previous 10: −20pp win rate · −0.01 avg rating · +3.5pp headshot accuracy · −16ms reaction

Win rate down 20pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — more than a 10-match window's normal noise (±20pp).

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 2–3 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.00
  • Avg headshot accuracy 28%
  • Avg reaction 569ms

Last 10

  • 3–6–1 · 30% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 25%
  • Avg reaction 564ms

Last 20

  • 8–11–1 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 23%
  • Avg reaction 572ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Support — Utility contribution stands above the rest of this profile (+2.4 against its own average).

Aim8.1
Utility5.2
Positioning4.7
Opening Duels1.4
Clutch0.0

Limited utility dependence

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

Twistzz

Plays most like Twistzz 90% playstyle similarity

Most alike: positioning profile, aim profile.

Where you differ: lower opening-duel success; lower utility contribution.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Positioning. Positioning trails aim by 34 points — deaths here waste a strong aim profile.

Reaction time. 571ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim8.1
Positioning4.7
Utility5.2
Mechanics7.5
Opening Duels2.1
Win Impact1.4

Composite 5.6/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.01−0.03
first ⅓ avg 0.02 → last ⅓ avg -0.01
Reaction time574ms−49ms
first ⅓ avg 623ms → last ⅓ avg 574ms
Headshot accuracy22.2%+0.4%
first ⅓ avg 21.8% → last ⅓ avg 22.2%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.12Best match rating · 9–2 · cache, 29 Jul →
43%Best headshot accuracy · 9–7 · eldorado, 30 Jul →
391msFastest reaction time · 8–13 · anubis, 8 Sept →
13–0Biggest win · cache, 30 Jul →

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

6Longest win streak
L2Current streak
8–7In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
16Overtime games

Map breakdown

cacheBest map · 55% over 20anubisWeakest map · 33% over 21
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
anubisD217–1433%-0.00
cacheA2011–955%0.01
mirageB158–753%-0.01
infernoC156–940%-0.01
nukeB105–550%0.01
dust2C94–544%-0.01
ancientB63–350%0.00
office—10–10%0.03
train—11–0100%0.09
vertigo—11–0100%0.08
eldorado—11–0100%0.06

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Anubis is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (33% over 21). Start with the 6 essential Anubis lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

106Matches
54%Win rate
0.92Avg K/D
68.3ADR
46%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

0%1v1 clutch win
30%1v2 clutch win
7Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLWWWW

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Anubis3563%0.8813.0
Mirage3250%0.8311.2
Dust21225%0.8311.3
Vertigo875%1.5913.6
Ancient757%0.9614.0
Inferno540%0.9712.4
Nuke367%0.8211.3
Overpass1100%0.8214.0

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

22.2%Headshot accuracy
35.2%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
36.9%Spray accuracy
83.5%Counter-strafing
8.9°Preaim
571msReaction time
36.9%T opening success
40.0%CT opening success
0.54Enemies flashed / flash
4.6%Flash assists
9.91HE damage / grenade
4.52Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 36.8852% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Anubis

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

33% win rate across 21 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Anubis callouts & strategy →Anubis grenade lineups →

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
anubis8–13-0.0328%1 Oct →
ancient12–160.0218%29 Sept →
dust213–7-0.0525%29 Sept →
ancient13–10.0933%29 Sept →
mirage9–13-0.0338%27 Sept →
dust212–16-0.0730%27 Sept →
dust29–13-0.0620%27 Sept →
cache8–13-0.0615%26 Sept →
mirage13–11-0.0129%26 Sept →
anubis15–150.0116%26 Sept →
inferno2–13-0.0712%26 Sept →
inferno13–16-0.0527%21 Sept →
mirage10–13-0.0623%21 Sept →
inferno13–90.0341%21 Sept →
mirage13–50.0315%21 Sept →
anubis10–13-0.0521%18 Sept →
cache13–60.0424%18 Sept →
anubis13–8-0.0315%18 Sept →
anubis10–13-0.0114%18 Sept →
anubis13–80.0927%17 Sept →
anubis15–15-0.0513%17 Sept →
mirage13–40.0224%16 Sept →
anubis14–16-0.0220%16 Sept →
inferno8–130.0225%16 Sept →
nuke13–30.0317%15 Sept →
nuke13–100.0126%15 Sept →
anubis8–13-0.0120%8 Sept →
anubis11–130.0312%8 Sept →
cache8–13-0.0519%8 Sept →
anubis11–13-0.0322%6 Sept →
inferno7–13-0.0917%6 Sept →
cache12–16-0.0322%6 Sept →
nuke4–130.0628%5 Sept →
mirage5–130.0128%4 Sept →
dust210–130.0117%4 Sept →
office3–130.0325%4 Sept →
mirage11–13-0.0320%30 Aug →
dust213–90.0519%30 Aug →
mirage13–1-0.0035%30 Aug →
inferno9–130.049%28 Aug →
cache13–90.0827%28 Aug →
ancient10–130.0119%24 Aug →
mirage5–13-0.0422%24 Aug →
cache14–16-0.0420%23 Aug →
inferno13–70.0621%23 Aug →
mirage13–8-0.0314%23 Aug →
anubis13–3-0.0126%23 Aug →
nuke12–120.0224%21 Aug →
mirage6–13-0.0435%21 Aug →
ancient2–13-0.0820%18 Aug →
ancient13–10-0.0120%18 Aug →
cache13–80.0220%17 Aug →
mirage8–13-0.0417%17 Aug →
anubis13–6-0.0015%17 Aug →
cache3–13-0.0731%17 Aug →
dust216–130.0117%17 Aug →
nuke8–13-0.0323%15 Aug →
anubis13–70.0320%15 Aug →
cache13–80.0319%15 Aug →
dust27–13-0.0324%15 Aug →
mirage13–7-0.0320%15 Aug →
nuke14–160.0212%15 Aug →
anubis13–110.0513%15 Aug →
inferno7–13-0.0319%12 Aug →
cache13–60.0423%12 Aug →
nuke10–130.0226%12 Aug →
inferno13–30.0213%11 Aug →
train13–40.0924%10 Aug →
cache13–30.0917%10 Aug →
anubis2–13-0.0310%9 Aug →
vertigo13–110.0826%9 Aug →
dust213–100.1123%9 Aug →
anubis12–16-0.0115%3 Aug →
cache10–13-0.0322%3 Aug →
inferno13–70.0831%2 Aug →
inferno13–110.0311%2 Aug →
anubis11–13-0.038%2 Aug →
cache15–150.0225%2 Aug →
dust26–13-0.0323%1 Aug →
inferno15–15-0.0317%1 Aug →
mirage13–11-0.0419%1 Aug →
inferno16–14-0.0916%1 Aug →
eldorado9–70.0643%30 Jul →
cache13–6-0.0220%30 Jul →
ancient13–110.0133%30 Jul →
cache13–00.0819%30 Jul →
anubis8–13-0.0127%30 Jul →
inferno3–130.0331%30 Jul →
cache9–20.1211%29 Jul →
cache13–100.1034%29 Jul →
cache13–40.0518%29 Jul →
anubis16–120.0617%29 Jul →
cache15–15-0.0224%26 Jul →
mirage13–40.0814%26 Jul →
anubis6–13-0.0123%26 Jul →
nuke13–2-0.0023%26 Jul →
nuke13–9-0.0316%26 Jul →
inferno4–13-0.0438%26 Jul →
cache7–13-0.0930%25 Jul →
nuke13–7-0.0312%25 Jul →

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →

This profile is built from public Steam data. If it is yours, you can remove it, or delete your CSDB account.