Wewhoo

Wewhoo — CS2 Stats

NE76561198210795093[U:1:250529365]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

729Tracked matches58%Win rate2024Tracked since
CSDB Rating5.6 SolidPositional Player
Premier CS Rating18,868Top 50% of 197,133 CSDB-tracked playersPurple band · top ~13% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#94733 of 244084 tracked
FaceitLevel 5 · 918 ELOTop 67.6% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanSilver III
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 24 Sep 2026 (yesterday). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

+358Premier CS Rating · 18,510 → 18,868
0Faceit ELO · 918 → 918
+4Tracked matches · now 729
+4.1ppWin rate · 53.6% → 57.7%
Track this profile

CSDB reads this profile's Premier rating from its tracked match history, and records Faceit ELO once on every day the page is viewed. 23 days played since 30 Jul 2026. Come back after the next session and the change shows above.

Is this you? Sign in with Steam to claim it and connect match tracking →

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 18,868 +1,256 30 Jul – 25 Sept · 16 days played
17,61219,999peak 19,99930 Jul25 Sept
19,999Peak Premier in tracked matches
918Highest Faceit ELO seen on CSDB
23Days played since 2026-07-30

Faceit ELO

  • At peak — 918
  • Next: Level 5 at 1,051 — 133 to go
  • Reached: Level 4 · Level 3 · Level 2
  • Level 4 first seen 2026-09-24
  • Level 3 first seen 2026-09-24

Premier CS Rating

  • 1,131 below peak (19,999)
  • +933 over 30 days · improving
  • Next: Pink band at 20,000 — 1,132 to go
  • Reached: Purple band · Blue band · Light Blue band
  • Purple band first seen 2026-09-24
  • Blue band first seen 2026-09-24

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do. Faceit ELO is CSDB’s own observation — no feed exposes ELO per match, so that line only has the days the profile was viewed and cannot be backfilled.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGWewhooFACEITLevel 5 · 918 ELOSTANDINGTop 67.6% of rankedPREMIER18,868 · Purple bandPEAK ELO918csdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim66
Positioning48
Utility47

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

COLD51–44–5Last 10051%Win rateWTTWTLLLLL

Last 10 vs previous 10: −50pp win rate · +0.02 avg rating · +2.8pp headshot accuracy · +43ms reaction

Win rate down 50pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — more than a 10-match window's normal noise (±20pp). Average match rating moved the other way (+0.02), so results shifted more than performance did.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 2–0–3 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.03
  • Avg headshot accuracy 27%
  • Avg reaction 619ms

Last 10

  • 2–5–3 · 20% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 21%
  • Avg reaction 584ms

Last 20

  • 9–8–3 · 45% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.00
  • Avg headshot accuracy 19%
  • Avg reaction 563ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Positional Player — Positioning stands above the rest of this profile (+1.3 against its own average).

Aim6.6
Utility4.7
Positioning4.8
Opening Duels1.5
Clutch3.2

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

device

Plays most like device 90% playstyle similarity

Most alike: positioning profile, utility contribution.

Where you differ: lower opening-duel success; lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Reaction time. 569ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim6.6
Positioning4.8
Utility4.7
Mechanics7.1
Opening Duels1.8
Win Impact7.6

Composite 5.6/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.01+0.01
first ⅓ avg -0.02 → last ⅓ avg -0.01
Reaction time561ms−43ms
first ⅓ avg 604ms → last ⅓ avg 561ms
Headshot accuracy17.6%+1.2%
first ⅓ avg 16.4% → last ⅓ avg 17.6%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.14Best match rating · 13–5 · dust2, 25 Sept →
42%Best headshot accuracy · 13–9 · nuke, 1 Aug →
336msFastest reaction time · 7–2 · anubis, 6 Sept →
13–1Biggest win · nuke, 1 Aug →

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

4Longest win streak
10–8In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
8Overtime games

Map breakdown

nukeBest map · 69% over 16ancientWeakest map · 22% over 9
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
mirageA2715–1256%-0.02
dust2B2512–1348%-0.02
nukeS1611–569%-0.01
infernoB105–550%-0.03
ancientD92–722%-0.02
cacheC73–443%0.01
anubis—42–250%-0.02
vertigo—10–10%-0.00
train—11–0100%-0.07

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Ancient is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (22% over 9). Start with the 6 essential Ancient lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

61Matches
56%Win rate
1.01Avg K/D
72.7ADR
50%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

36%1v1 clutch win
16%1v2 clutch win
8Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLWLWL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage1560%1.1814.1
Dust21450%1.0115.2
Ancient1050%1.0215.3
Inferno944%0.8412.3
Anubis450%1.0220.5
Nuke475%0.7111.3
Overpass3100%1.2112.3
Vertigo250%0.6511.5

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

18.5%Headshot accuracy
29.7%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
32.6%Spray accuracy
81.8%Counter-strafing
8.6°Preaim
569msReaction time
40.7%T opening success
34.0%CT opening success
0.49Enemies flashed / flash
5.6%Flash assists
6.32HE damage / grenade
8.74Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Grenades & Utility

    Most of your flashes are blinding nobody. A handful of reliable pop-flash lineups fixes this faster than anything else.

    Enemies flashed per flash 0.4945 — below the 0.5 mark we flag

    Grenade Lineups →
  2. Advanced Mechanics

    Losing the first CT duel repeatedly usually means holding angles that favour the peeker.

    CT opening duels 34.0289% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Ancient

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

22% win rate across 9 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Ancient callouts & strategy →Ancient grenade lineups →

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
dust213–50.1427%25 Sept →
vertigo12–12-0.0037%25 Sept →
dust212–12-0.0121%25 Sept →
dust213–110.0016%25 Sept →
dust212–12-0.0033%24 Sept →
inferno10–130.0515%17 Sept →
mirage5–13-0.0218%13 Sept →
dust26–13-0.043%13 Sept →
dust24–13-0.0820%13 Sept →
ancient11–130.0217%10 Sept →
cache13–100.0214%10 Sept →
cache13–70.1321%10 Sept →
mirage13–10-0.0217%10 Sept →
mirage3–13-0.0518%10 Sept →
inferno13–8-0.0527%9 Sept →
dust23–13-0.0817%7 Sept →
nuke13–50.0524%7 Sept →
cache3–13-0.0813%7 Sept →
mirage13–80.0115%7 Sept →
mirage13–8-0.0512%7 Sept →
dust215–15-0.0420%6 Sept →
inferno10–13-0.0514%6 Sept →
anubis7–2-0.010%6 Sept →
dust213–5-0.0419%6 Sept →
dust23–110.0115%6 Sept →
mirage13–10-0.0413%6 Sept →
mirage13–90.0225%6 Sept →
dust213–90.1019%2 Sept →
mirage11–130.0017%2 Sept →
nuke13–10-0.0215%2 Sept →
nuke8–13-0.0614%17 Aug →
nuke16–14-0.0513%15 Aug →
dust28–13-0.0813%15 Aug →
mirage13–11-0.047%15 Aug →
nuke13–60.0110%14 Aug →
nuke4–130.0427%12 Aug →
inferno13–9-0.0113%12 Aug →
anubis16–130.0216%12 Aug →
ancient11–13-0.0214%12 Aug →
dust213–11-0.0318%11 Aug →
mirage20–22-0.0517%11 Aug →
mirage13–110.0311%10 Aug →
dust210–130.018%10 Aug →
dust27–13-0.0016%10 Aug →
mirage8–13-0.0414%10 Aug →
mirage13–10-0.074%9 Aug →
dust213–70.0215%9 Aug →
anubis10–13-0.0512%9 Aug →
dust213–10-0.0214%9 Aug →
cache6–13-0.0210%9 Aug →
dust28–13-0.0121%9 Aug →
mirage13–70.0415%9 Aug →
cache6–130.0022%9 Aug →
mirage11–13-0.006%9 Aug →
mirage3–13-0.1312%9 Aug →
mirage13–50.018%8 Aug →
cache13–70.0315%8 Aug →
mirage8–13-0.0517%7 Aug →
inferno13–20.0032%7 Aug →
dust213–11-0.0319%7 Aug →
mirage13–7-0.0121%7 Aug →
ancient13–110.0122%7 Aug →
mirage14–16-0.0412%7 Aug →
dust213–6-0.0126%7 Aug →
cache8–13-0.0129%7 Aug →
nuke13–110.0116%7 Aug →
inferno13–7-0.0218%7 Aug →
nuke7–13-0.0823%7 Aug →
train13–8-0.0711%7 Aug →
ancient13–16-0.0213%6 Aug →
dust22–13-0.0819%6 Aug →
ancient11–13-0.039%6 Aug →
dust29–2-0.0414%6 Aug →
inferno8–13-0.047%6 Aug →
mirage13–80.0119%6 Aug →
nuke13–10-0.0018%6 Aug →
ancient6–13-0.017%6 Aug →
nuke13–10-0.0719%6 Aug →
dust28–130.0020%6 Aug →
mirage4–130.0137%5 Aug →
inferno13–8-0.0614%5 Aug →
mirage13–40.027%5 Aug →
mirage13–20.0337%5 Aug →
ancient2–13-0.087%5 Aug →
dust213–6-0.0515%5 Aug →
inferno15–15-0.055%5 Aug →
nuke13–5-0.0313%5 Aug →
anubis7–13-0.0410%5 Aug →
dust213–10-0.0010%5 Aug →
mirage13–11-0.038%5 Aug →
ancient13–100.018%5 Aug →
mirage4–13-0.0932%5 Aug →
nuke7–13-0.0721%5 Aug →
nuke2–13-0.030%2 Aug →
nuke13–90.0142%1 Aug →
nuke13–110.0227%1 Aug →
nuke13–10.1017%1 Aug →
inferno13–16-0.0415%30 Jul →
ancient11–13-0.0215%30 Jul →
mirage10–130.0320%30 Jul →

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

500 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →