yams

yams — CS2 Stats

US76561198207237879[U:1:246972151]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

2,126Tracked matches57%Win rate2020Tracked since
CSDB Rating6.5 SolidPositional Player
Premier CS Rating22,160Top 50% of 180,525 CSDB-tracked playersPink band · top ~6.1% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#48133 of 225014 tracked
FaceitLevel 8 · 1,401 ELOTop 31.2% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanDistinguished Master Guardian
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 17 Sep 2026 (yesterday). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

−1106Premier CS Rating · 23,266 → 22,160
Track this profile

CSDB reads this profile's Premier rating from its tracked match history, and records Faceit ELO once on every day the page is viewed. 26 days played since 19 Aug 2026. Come back after the next session and the change shows above.

Is this you? Sign in with Steam to claim it and connect match tracking →

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 22,160 +3,346 19 Aug18 Sept · 25 days played
18,81423,266peak 23,26619 Aug18 Sept
Faceit ELO: 1,401 +0 2 Sept3 Sept · 2 observations
1,4011,401peak 1,4012 Sept3 Sept
23,519Peak Premier in tracked matches
1,401Highest Faceit ELO seen on CSDB
26Days played since 2026-08-19

Faceit ELO

  • At peak — 1,401
  • Next: Level 8 at 1,531 130 to go
  • Reached: Level 7 · Level 6 · Level 5 · Level 4
  • Level 7 first seen 2026-09-02
  • Level 6 first seen 2026-09-02

Premier CS Rating

  • 1,106 below peak (23,266)
  • +3,346 over 30 days · improving
  • Next: Red band at 25,000 2,840 to go
  • Reached: Pink band · Purple band · Blue band · Light Blue band
  • Pink band first seen 2026-09-03
  • Purple band first seen 2026-09-02

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do. Faceit ELO is CSDB’s own observation — no feed exposes ELO per match, so that line only has the days the profile was viewed and cannot be backfilled.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGyamsFACEITLevel 8 · 1,401 ELOSTANDINGTop 31.2% of rankedPREMIER22,160 · Pink bandPEAK ELO1,401csdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim76
Positioning58
Utility57

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY55432Last 10055%Win rateLLLWWWLWWW

Last 10 vs previous 10: 0pp win rate · −0.00 avg rating · −1.8pp headshot accuracy · +21ms reaction

Win rate 0pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — within the normal variation of a 10-match window (±20pp), so no real shift yet.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 23 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 28%
  • Avg reaction 639ms

Last 10

  • 64 · 60% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.00
  • Avg headshot accuracy 24%
  • Avg reaction 579ms

Last 20

  • 128 · 60% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.00
  • Avg headshot accuracy 25%
  • Avg reaction 568ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Positional PlayerPositioning stands above the rest of this profile (+1.3 against its own average).

Aim7.6
Utility5.7
Positioning5.8
Opening Duels2.3
Clutch4.0

Strong CT-side openerEffective flashes

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

sh1ro

Plays most like sh1ro 87% playstyle similarity

Most alike: utility contribution, positioning profile.

Where you differ: lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Strengths

Flashes. 0.76 enemies blinded per flash — utility that consistently lands.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim7.6
Positioning5.8
Utility5.7
Mechanics6.7
Opening Duels3.8
Win Impact7.2

Composite 6.5/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.02 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.01+0.00
first ⅓ avg 0.01 → last ⅓ avg 0.01
Reaction time550ms+25ms
first ⅓ avg 525ms → last ⅓ avg 550ms
Headshot accuracy21.9%+5.7%
first ⅓ avg 16.2% → last ⅓ avg 21.9%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.15Best match rating · 13–3 · anubis, 2 Sept
100%Best headshot accuracy · 0–5 · mirage, 13 Sept
313msFastest reaction time · 13–6 · ancient, 19 Aug
13–2Biggest win · mirage, 31 Aug

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

7Longest win streak
L3Current streak
39In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
11Overtime games

Map breakdown

anubisBest map · 79% over 14infernoWeakest map · 40% over 5
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
mirageB29151452%0.01
dust2C2191243%0.01
anubisS1411379%0.00
nukeB115645%0.00
cacheS107370%0.03
ancientA106460%-0.02
infernoC52340%-0.01

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Inferno is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (40% over 5). Start with the 6 essential Inferno lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

1,072Matches
51%Win rate
1.22Avg K/D
80.9ADR
35%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

40%1v1 clutch win
25%1v2 clutch win
12Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLLWWW

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage24453%1.1216.1
Anubis14550%1.2217.0
Ancient12359%1.1616.9
Inferno9455%1.2516.5
Dust25347%1.1315.1
Nuke3537%1.2316.5
Vertigo2857%1.3817.8
Train2352%0.9414.7

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

19.0%Headshot accuracy
34.3%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
36.3%Spray accuracy
80.2%Counter-strafing
8.9°Preaim
546msReaction time
38.7%T opening success
51.4%CT opening success
0.76Enemies flashed / flash
6.1%Flash assists
7.90HE damage / grenade
10.69Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 38.7211% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Inferno

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

40% win rate across 5 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Inferno callouts & strategyInferno grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
mirage10–13-0.0417%18 Sept
nuke14–160.0314%18 Sept
dust28–130.0150%18 Sept
dust213–80.0227%17 Sept
mirage13–30.0330%17 Sept
nuke13–50.0333%17 Sept
mirage14–160.0210%15 Sept
mirage13–10-0.059%15 Sept
mirage13–8-0.0033%15 Sept
anubis13–7-0.0215%15 Sept
mirage13–70.0821%15 Sept
anubis16–130.0215%15 Sept
dust216–13-0.0124%14 Sept
mirage13–9-0.0215%14 Sept
mirage10–13-0.0417%13 Sept
dust28–130.0619%13 Sept
mirage0–5-0.11100%13 Sept
cache13–10-0.0217%13 Sept
mirage14–16-0.039%12 Sept
mirage13–70.1021%12 Sept
dust213–16-0.086%12 Sept
ancient13–40.0821%11 Sept
nuke13–90.0419%11 Sept
mirage9–130.0214%11 Sept
ancient13–7-0.0212%10 Sept
anubis6–13-0.0119%10 Sept
cache13–80.0516%10 Sept
mirage13–8-0.0313%10 Sept
dust210–130.0319%10 Sept
nuke11–130.0123%10 Sept
anubis13–60.0114%10 Sept
mirage4–70.1135%10 Sept
mirage13–90.0518%9 Sept
dust210–13-0.0015%9 Sept
mirage5–13-0.0542%9 Sept
dust212–160.0223%8 Sept
mirage13–30.0327%8 Sept
cache13–60.0721%8 Sept
mirage3–130.0127%8 Sept
nuke8–130.0419%8 Sept
dust211–13-0.014%8 Sept
mirage7–130.0421%8 Sept
inferno13–8-0.0010%8 Sept
mirage13–80.0325%8 Sept
mirage13–90.0320%8 Sept
cache10–13-0.0210%8 Sept
mirage11–13-0.0016%8 Sept
anubis13–5-0.0129%8 Sept
inferno10–13-0.0216%7 Sept
dust26–13-0.0621%7 Sept
cache13–100.1213%7 Sept
cache13–50.1030%7 Sept
ancient10–13-0.0620%6 Sept
ancient8–13-0.0710%5 Sept
anubis5–13-0.0326%5 Sept
cache13–7-0.0013%5 Sept
anubis13–9-0.028%4 Sept
mirage8–13-0.0812%4 Sept
nuke6–11-0.0422%4 Sept
dust215–150.0426%4 Sept
ancient13–60.0129%4 Sept
anubis13–9-0.0513%3 Sept
dust213–9-0.0315%3 Sept
mirage13–6-0.0430%2 Sept
nuke13–7-0.059%2 Sept
ancient16–120.0610%2 Sept
dust213–50.0827%2 Sept
dust20–13-0.0623%2 Sept
cache8–130.0021%2 Sept
anubis13–10-0.0117%2 Sept
anubis13–30.159%2 Sept
inferno1–6-0.0225%1 Sept
mirage13–11-0.0233%1 Sept
mirage13–20.0921%31 Aug
dust213–60.0524%31 Aug
anubis6–13-0.0217%31 Aug
inferno13–100.0310%31 Aug
cache13–110.0225%31 Aug
nuke5–130.0514%31 Aug
cache11–130.0122%31 Aug
mirage13–70.089%31 Aug
ancient1–13-0.076%30 Aug
mirage9–130.039%30 Aug
inferno11–13-0.0214%30 Aug
dust28–13-0.0513%29 Aug
nuke13–6-0.0118%27 Aug
anubis13–60.0911%27 Aug
dust213–40.0418%25 Aug
dust213–90.0829%25 Aug
anubis13–4-0.0113%25 Aug
dust213–60.0313%25 Aug
mirage15–15-0.0310%24 Aug
ancient14–16-0.059%22 Aug
dust26–13-0.0618%21 Aug
nuke13–40.0111%21 Aug
anubis13–5-0.027%21 Aug
dust213–60.0220%21 Aug
ancient13–60.0219%19 Aug
ancient13–11-0.0714%19 Aug
nuke7–13-0.0914%19 Aug

Match data via Leetify.

Milestones

1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →