Rabpe

Rabpe — CS2 Stats

DK76561198202498069[U:1:242232341]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

871Tracked matches53%Win rate2020Tracked since
CSDB Rating6.0 SolidSupport
Premier CS Rating23,882Top 25% of 192,959 CSDB-tracked playersPink band · top ~4.2% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#31147 of 239058 tracked
FaceitLevel 10 · 2,050 ELOTop 12.4% of ranked FACEIT players
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 15 Sep 2026 (8 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

No change since then. Play, then come back: the next observation lands here.

Track this profile

CSDB reads this profile's Premier rating from its tracked match history, and records Faceit ELO once on every day the page is viewed. 50 days played since 29 Mar 2026. Come back after the next session and the change shows above.

Is this you? Sign in with Steam to claim it and connect match tracking →

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 23,882 +4,315 29 Mar15 Sept · 31 days played
18,82324,442peak 24,44229 Mar15 Sept
24,442Peak Premier in tracked matches
2,050Highest Faceit ELO seen on CSDB
50Days played since 2026-03-29

Faceit ELO

  • At peak — 2,050
  • Next: 2,500 ELO at 2,500 450 to go
  • Reached: Level 10 · Level 9 · Level 8 · Level 7
  • Level 10 first seen 2026-09-11
  • Level 9 first seen 2026-09-11

Premier CS Rating

  • 560 below peak (24,442)
  • -28 over 90 days
  • Next: Red band at 25,000 1,118 to go
  • Reached: Pink band · Purple band · Blue band · Light Blue band
  • Pink band first seen 2026-09-11
  • Purple band first seen 2026-09-11

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do. Faceit ELO is CSDB’s own observation — no feed exposes ELO per match, so that line only has the days the profile was viewed and cannot be backfilled.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGRabpeFACEITLevel 10 · 2,050 ELOSTANDINGTop 12.4% of rankedPREMIER23,882 · Pink bandPEAK ELO2,050csdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim68
Positioning58
Utility64

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY56431Last 10056%Win rateWLLWLWWWLL

Last 10 vs previous 10: −30pp win rate · +0.00 avg rating · −0.0pp headshot accuracy · +12ms reaction

Win rate down 30pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — more than a 10-match window's normal noise (±20pp). Average match rating moved the other way (+0.00), so results shifted more than performance did.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 23 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 20%
  • Avg reaction 534ms

Last 10

  • 55 · 50% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 18%
  • Avg reaction 503ms

Last 20

  • 137 · 65% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 18%
  • Avg reaction 497ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: SupportUtility contribution stands above the rest of this profile (+1.2 against its own average).

Aim6.8
Utility6.4
Positioning5.8
Opening Duels4.9
Clutch3.6

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

ZywOo

Plays most like ZywOo 81% playstyle similarity

Most alike: utility contribution, opening-duel success.

Where you differ: lower positioning profile; lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 55% on CT to 38% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Counter-strafing. Only 70% of shots are taken properly stopped — moving-shot inaccuracy is quietly taxing every duel.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim6.8
Positioning5.8
Utility6.4
Mechanics4.4
Opening Duels4.1
Win Impact6.1

Composite 6.0/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.02 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.01+0.00
first ⅓ avg 0.01 → last ⅓ avg 0.01
Reaction time492ms−60ms
first ⅓ avg 552ms → last ⅓ avg 492ms
Headshot accuracy17.4%−0.3%
first ⅓ avg 17.7% → last ⅓ avg 17.4%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.20Best match rating · 9–4 · nuke, 22 Aug
39%Best headshot accuracy · 10–13 · dust2, 7 Sept
336msFastest reaction time · 7–1 · ancient, 4 Sept
13–2Biggest win · mirage, 11 Apr

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

6Longest win streak
1011In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
12Overtime games

Map breakdown

overpassBest map · 80% over 5mirageWeakest map · 38% over 21
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
mirageC2181338%0.01
infernoS1813572%-0.00
dust2B178947%-0.01
ancientA159660%-0.01
nukeB137654%0.04
overpassS54180%0.01
anubisS54180%0.01
cache42250%-0.01
vertigo21150%-0.04

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Mirage is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (38% over 21). Start with the 6 essential Mirage lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

603Matches
53%Win rate
1.06Avg K/D
79.3ADR
43%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

38%1v1 clutch win
24%1v2 clutch win
9Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWLLWL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage6954%1.1415.2
Ancient2737%1.1715.9
Nuke2654%1.0915.9
Inferno2352%1.2518.3
Overpass1650%1.0916.3
Dust21644%1.1517.0
Vertigo450%1.3818.3
Train10%0.508.0

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

17.5%Headshot accuracy
33.9%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
34.7%Spray accuracy
69.9%Counter-strafing
9.9°Preaim
484msReaction time
37.6%T opening success
54.9%CT opening success
0.68Enemies flashed / flash
2.7%Flash assists
7.01HE damage / grenade
14.04Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 37.5801% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Mirage

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

38% win rate across 21 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Mirage callouts & strategyMirage grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
ancient13–50.0519%15 Sept
cache8–13-0.0814%14 Sept
overpass14–160.0714%13 Sept
dust213–70.0015%13 Sept
dust210–130.0139%7 Sept
cache13–40.0213%7 Sept
inferno13–110.0816%7 Sept
vertigo13–100.0920%6 Sept
cache11–13-0.0711%6 Sept
mirage8–13-0.0317%6 Sept
inferno13–8-0.008%4 Sept
dust22–13-0.0415%4 Sept
nuke13–80.0816%4 Sept
inferno13–9-0.0217%4 Sept
ancient7–1-0.0221%4 Sept
nuke9–13-0.0133%3 Sept
dust213–70.049%3 Sept
nuke13–110.0920%3 Sept
inferno13–10-0.0223%3 Sept
mirage13–50.0218%3 Sept
nuke11–130.0219%3 Sept
inferno16–13-0.0122%3 Sept
anubis13–30.0220%2 Sept
dust27–13-0.0810%22 Aug
nuke9–40.2021%22 Aug
vertigo3–9-0.1724%22 Aug
inferno5–130.0516%21 Aug
anubis13–80.0415%21 Aug
dust25–130.0415%21 Aug
mirage3–13-0.0219%20 Aug
dust28–13-0.0313%20 Aug
dust211–13-0.1213%13 Aug
mirage8–13-0.047%8 Aug
dust27–13-0.0524%8 Aug
inferno13–11-0.0515%6 Aug
dust213–110.0023%6 Aug
nuke13–110.0021%6 Aug
cache13–80.0728%6 Aug
inferno13–9-0.0232%6 Aug
mirage13–16-0.0019%29 Jul
ancient6–13-0.0819%29 Jul
inferno16–130.0020%15 Jul
ancient13–80.0523%15 Jul
nuke6–130.0420%14 Jul
ancient13–50.0520%11 Jul
mirage11–130.0220%5 Jul
dust29–130.0123%5 Jul
mirage13–100.0318%4 Jul
mirage14–16-0.0523%2 Jul
dust213–30.1111%17 Jun
inferno13–90.0116%17 Jun
mirage4–13-0.0620%17 Jun
mirage8–13-0.0424%11 Jun
mirage13–50.0716%7 Jun
ancient13–100.0022%7 Jun
overpass13–11-0.0613%31 May
dust26–13-0.0423%25 May
anubis15–15-0.0124%25 May
mirage2–13-0.0423%25 May
anubis16–120.0118%24 May
nuke13–70.0019%24 May
mirage3–13-0.0313%22 May
ancient6–13-0.0312%22 May
inferno5–4-0.0214%21 May
overpass13–120.0516%20 May
dust216–130.0327%18 May
ancient13–3-0.0613%18 May
inferno13–9-0.0320%12 May
anubis16–12-0.0212%3 May
ancient11–13-0.0321%3 May
ancient14–16-0.0413%3 May
inferno13–100.0524%25 Apr
mirage13–80.0228%25 Apr
dust213–9-0.0327%25 Apr
nuke13–80.0420%24 Apr
dust213–70.0017%19 Apr
ancient13–60.037%19 Apr
ancient11–130.0010%15 Apr
nuke13–110.0122%14 Apr
ancient13–80.0016%14 Apr
mirage9–13-0.0514%14 Apr
ancient9–13-0.0611%13 Apr
inferno10–130.0423%12 Apr
mirage13–70.0413%11 Apr
ancient13–6-0.037%11 Apr
mirage4–13-0.0121%11 Apr
mirage13–20.1723%11 Apr
nuke17–190.0316%10 Apr
nuke5–13-0.0327%9 Apr
inferno13–110.0116%8 Apr
overpass13–70.0213%8 Apr
inferno6–13-0.0431%8 Apr
overpass13–6-0.0110%7 Apr
mirage13–30.066%4 Apr
mirage13–80.0524%2 Apr
nuke11–13-0.0117%1 Apr
inferno6–13-0.0319%1 Apr
inferno12–16-0.0320%31 Mar
dust213–100.0120%31 Mar
mirage8–130.0216%29 Mar

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

Faceit Level 102K ELO500 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →