Macce

Macce — CS2 Stats

FI76561198201726643[U:1:241460915]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

1,908Tracked matches45%Win rate2020Tracked since
CSDB Rating5.6 SolidSupport
FaceitLevel 9 · 2,197 ELOTop 20.7% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanDistinguished Master Guardian
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 1 Sep 2026 (19 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

0Faceit ELO · 2,197 → 2,197
+18Tracked matches · now 1,908
−3.5ppWin rate · 48.3% → 44.8%
Track this profile

CSDB reads this profile's Premier rating from its tracked match history, and records Faceit ELO once on every day the page is viewed. 57 days played since 15 Feb 2026. Come back after the next session and the change shows above.

Is this you? Sign in with Steam to claim it and connect match tracking →

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 20,904 -2,628 20 Mar2 Jul · 4 days played
20,42623,627peak 23,62720 Mar2 Jul
23,979Peak Premier in tracked matches
2,197Highest Faceit ELO seen on CSDB
57Days played since 2026-02-15

Faceit ELO

  • At peak — 2,197
  • Next: 2,500 ELO at 2,500 303 to go
  • Reached: Level 10 · Level 9 · Level 8 · Level 7
  • Level 10 first seen 2026-09-01
  • Level 9 first seen 2026-09-01

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do. Faceit ELO is CSDB’s own observation — no feed exposes ELO per match, so that line only has the days the profile was viewed and cannot be backfilled.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGMacceFACEITLevel 9 · 2,197 ELOSTANDINGTop 20.7% of rankedPEAK ELO2,197csdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim80
Positioning51
Utility55

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

COLD45514Last 10045%Win rateLWLLWLWLLL

Last 10 vs previous 10: 0pp win rate · +0.02 avg rating · +2.8pp headshot accuracy · −9ms reaction

Win rate 0pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — within the normal variation of a 10-match window (±20pp), so no real shift yet.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 23 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 16%
  • Avg reaction 484ms

Last 10

  • 37 · 30% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 19%
  • Avg reaction 527ms

Last 20

  • 6131 · 30% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 18%
  • Avg reaction 531ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: SupportUtility contribution stands above the rest of this profile (+1.3 against its own average).

Aim8.0
Utility5.5
Positioning5.1
Opening Duels2.7
Clutch3.6

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

device

Plays most like device 95% playstyle similarity

Most alike: positioning profile, utility contribution.

Where you differ: lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim8.0
Positioning5.1
Utility5.5
Mechanics4.9
Opening Duels2.5
Win Impact3.3

Composite 5.6/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.01−0.00
first ⅓ avg 0.01 → last ⅓ avg 0.01
Reaction time544ms−46ms
first ⅓ avg 589ms → last ⅓ avg 544ms
Headshot accuracy16.1%+0.9%
first ⅓ avg 15.3% → last ⅓ avg 16.1%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.17Best match rating · 13–4 · nuke, 8 Mar
41%Best headshot accuracy · 9–13 · ancient, 20 Mar
383msFastest reaction time · 13–2 · ancient, 8 Sept
13–0Biggest win · ancient, 29 Jun

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

5Longest win streak
79In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
17Overtime games

Map breakdown

nukeBest map · 63% over 19ancientWeakest map · 36% over 14
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
mirageC29121741%-0.01
nukeA1912763%0.03
ancientC145936%0.01
infernoA106460%0.03
cacheC83538%0.01
anubisC73443%0.01
overpassA53260%-0.02
dust24040%0.01
train31233%0.01
vertigo1010%0.02

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Ancient is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (36% over 14). Start with the 6 essential Ancient lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

1,027Matches
50%Win rate
1.16Avg K/D
84.7ADR
39%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

38%1v1 clutch win
22%1v2 clutch win
8Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLWWWL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Nuke22259%1.2216.8
Mirage21247%1.1517.0
Ancient18547%1.1416.7
Anubis10954%1.1517.7
Inferno6439%1.0515.6
Train6456%1.1316.7
Dust24844%1.0716.0
Overpass3043%1.0817.6

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

15.7%Headshot accuracy
40.7%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
48.2%Spray accuracy
72.0%Counter-strafing
9.8°Preaim
548msReaction time
40.0%T opening success
39.7%CT opening success
0.52Enemies flashed / flash
5.2%Flash assists
9.39HE damage / grenade
10.47Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    Losing the first CT duel repeatedly usually means holding angles that favour the peeker.

    CT opening duels 39.7074% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Ancient

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

36% win rate across 14 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Ancient callouts & strategyAncient grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
inferno4–13-0.0322%15 Sept
mirage13–60.0121%12 Sept
mirage4–130.1123%12 Sept
cache10–130.014%12 Sept
ancient13–2-0.049%8 Sept
ancient2–130.0721%6 Sept
anubis13–100.0518%4 Sept
cache11–130.0422%2 Sept
ancient10–13-0.0214%2 Sept
train6–13-0.0038%22 Aug
vertigo10–130.0220%22 Aug
dust212–12-0.0413%22 Aug
cache10–130.0020%22 Aug
mirage5–13-0.0132%22 Aug
inferno13–90.0416%22 Aug
cache13–100.0420%22 Aug
cache3–130.067%15 Aug
ancient13–20.0316%12 Aug
cache10–13-0.0613%5 Aug
anubis13–16-0.066%5 Aug
mirage13–80.0513%5 Aug
mirage13–60.0615%27 Jul
mirage19–150.0314%26 Jul
mirage16–13-0.0418%16 Jul
cache13–50.026%16 Jul
inferno12–16-0.0011%16 Jul
mirage13–100.0213%16 Jul
nuke5–13-0.0813%4 Jul
mirage4–13-0.026%3 Jul
mirage13–8-0.0013%2 Jul
ancient13–00.067%29 Jun
anubis4–13-0.0529%28 Jun
ancient13–4-0.0520%28 Jun
inferno9–70.1524%27 Jun
ancient9–130.0817%14 Jun
anubis17–190.0111%6 Jun
nuke13–60.0611%6 Jun
dust23–130.0418%5 Jun
dust212–160.0413%5 Jun
cache13–100.0010%5 Jun
nuke13–110.0311%4 Jun
overpass16–14-0.0213%20 May
nuke11–13-0.0412%15 May
mirage1–13-0.0821%15 May
nuke6–13-0.0115%15 May
dust23–13-0.0232%13 May
inferno13–8-0.0414%8 May
ancient13–40.0620%6 May
nuke13–40.0710%3 May
mirage8–13-0.064%22 Apr
mirage15–150.0311%20 Apr
mirage13–90.0413%19 Apr
mirage13–60.0917%18 Apr
mirage13–90.0513%18 Apr
mirage6–13-0.0212%17 Apr
inferno6–130.0916%14 Apr
ancient11–130.0311%13 Apr
nuke13–50.0716%9 Apr
train13–40.0724%2 Apr
inferno6–13-0.0518%21 Mar
mirage5–13-0.0110%21 Mar
mirage9–13-0.0811%21 Mar
nuke13–3-0.029%21 Mar
overpass13–11-0.0416%20 Mar
anubis13–11-0.0314%20 Mar
mirage16–13-0.0617%20 Mar
ancient9–13-0.0741%20 Mar
inferno13–60.0535%20 Mar
mirage11–13-0.0510%20 Mar
nuke16–130.0213%19 Mar
ancient6–13-0.0013%18 Mar
anubis12–120.029%18 Mar
mirage10–130.0211%17 Mar
ancient6–13-0.0115%16 Mar
nuke10–130.0223%16 Mar
train5–13-0.048%15 Mar
inferno13–70.0422%13 Mar
anubis13–90.128%13 Mar
overpass4–1-0.029%13 Mar
nuke13–40.1717%8 Mar
mirage11–13-0.310%6 Mar
ancient12–16-0.0015%5 Mar
nuke13–90.0111%2 Mar
nuke13–80.0014%1 Mar
nuke14–160.058%1 Mar
overpass14–16-0.0310%28 Feb
nuke12–120.0713%28 Feb
overpass7–13-0.0029%27 Feb
nuke16–130.0624%27 Feb
mirage4–13-0.0717%27 Feb
inferno13–60.0227%27 Feb
mirage10–13-0.0112%27 Feb
mirage13–100.0612%27 Feb
nuke13–110.0412%27 Feb
mirage2–13-0.0127%27 Feb
mirage15–190.0213%22 Feb
nuke10–130.0225%20 Feb
mirage13–16-0.0713%18 Feb
ancient11–130.0312%15 Feb
nuke16–140.0115%15 Feb

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

2K ELO1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →