Mr Boobs

Mr Boobs — CS2 Stats

76561198195577458[U:1:235311730]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

587Tracked matches33%Win rate2020Tracked since
CSDB Rating4.3 DevelopingPositional Player
Premier CS Rating8,750Light Blue band · top ~60.9% of ranked players (population est.)
FaceitLevel 4Top 81.0% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanMaster Guardian II
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 19 Sep 2026 (yesterday). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

No change since then. Play, then come back: the next observation lands here.

Track this profile

CSDB reads this profile's Premier rating from its tracked match history, and records Faceit ELO once on every day the page is viewed. 43 days played since 17 Apr 2026. Come back after the next session and the change shows above.

Is this you? Sign in with Steam to claim it and connect match tracking →

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 8,750 -3,621 17 Apr19 Sept · 24 days played
8,45513,342peak 13,34217 Apr19 Sept
13,342Peak Premier in tracked matches
43Days played since 2026-04-17

Premier CS Rating

  • 4,592 below peak (13,342)
  • -3,068 over 30 days · declining
  • Next: Blue band at 10,000 1,250 to go
  • Reached: Blue band · Light Blue band

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGMr BoobsFACEITLevel 4STANDINGTop 81.0% of rankedPREMIER8,750 · Light Blue bandcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim75
Positioning44
Utility36

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

COLD42571Last 10042%Win rateWLWLLLLLWL

Last 10 vs previous 10: 0pp win rate · −0.02 avg rating · +1.5pp headshot accuracy · +44ms reaction

Win rate 0pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — within the normal variation of a 10-match window (±20pp), so no real shift yet.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 23 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.06
  • Avg headshot accuracy 14%
  • Avg reaction 639ms

Last 10

  • 37 · 30% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.03
  • Avg headshot accuracy 19%
  • Avg reaction 640ms

Last 20

  • 614 · 30% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 18%
  • Avg reaction 618ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Positional PlayerPositioning stands above the rest of this profile (+1.2 against its own average).

Aim7.5
Utility3.6
Positioning4.4
Opening Duels0.5
Clutch4.2

Limited utility dependence

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

sh1ro

Plays most like sh1ro 95% playstyle similarity

Most alike: aim profile, positioning profile.

Where you differ: lower utility contribution; lower opening-duel success.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Positioning. Positioning trails aim by 31 points — deaths here waste a strong aim profile.

Utility. Utility contribution runs far behind the mechanical game — the cheapest rating gain on this profile is thrown, not aimed.

CT openings. Opening success drops from 48% on T to 29% on CT — first contacts on the defending side are being lost.

Reaction time. 616ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim7.5
Positioning4.4
Utility3.6
Mechanics6.1
Opening Duels2.2
Win Impact0.0

Composite 4.3/10 (Developing), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×0.90 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.02−0.02
first ⅓ avg 0.00 → last ⅓ avg -0.02
Reaction time618ms−17ms
first ⅓ avg 635ms → last ⅓ avg 618ms
Headshot accuracy17.7%−0.3%
first ⅓ avg 18.0% → last ⅓ avg 17.7%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.24Best match rating · 9–1 · inferno, 15 Aug
67%Best headshot accuracy · 6–2 · ancient, 10 May
375msFastest reaction time · 9–2 · inferno, 16 Aug
13–1Biggest win · vertigo, 3 Jun

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

3Longest win streak
84In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
9Overtime games

Map breakdown

dust2Best map · 44% over 16ancientWeakest map · 33% over 15
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
dust2C167944%-0.02
infernoC167944%-0.02
ancientD1551033%-0.00
anubisD1551033%-0.01
mirageC114736%0.01
cacheC94544%0.02
nukeC73443%-0.03
office32167%0.02
overpass32167%0.04
train21150%0.00
vertigo220100%0.03
warden1010%-0.02

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Ancient is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (33% over 15). Start with the 6 essential Ancient lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

183Matches
47%Win rate
0.99Avg K/D
79.4ADR
41%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

41%1v1 clutch win
24%1v2 clutch win
5Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLLLLW

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Dust24852%1.0915.9
Mirage2450%1.1216.2
Inferno1872%1.0814.1
Ancient1323%0.8314.5
Anubis1233%1.0214.3
Nuke1127%0.9113.1
Cache650%1.0414.3
Overpass250%1.2023.0

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

18.5%Headshot accuracy
38.0%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
39.4%Spray accuracy
77.4%Counter-strafing
8.7°Preaim
616msReaction time
47.7%T opening success
28.6%CT opening success
0.49Enemies flashed / flash
2.3%Flash assists
7.04HE damage / grenade
4.25Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Grenades & Utility

    Most of your flashes are blinding nobody. A handful of reliable pop-flash lineups fixes this faster than anything else.

    Enemies flashed per flash 0.4898 — below the 0.5 mark we flag

    Grenade Lineups
  2. Advanced Mechanics

    Losing the first CT duel repeatedly usually means holding angles that favour the peeker.

    CT opening duels 28.6266% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Ancient

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

33% win rate across 15 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Ancient callouts & strategyAncient grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
dust213–9-0.0319%19 Sept
ancient8–13-0.037%16 Sept
dust213–110.0318%16 Sept
inferno3–9-0.244%15 Sept
train3–13-0.0420%15 Sept
nuke5–13-0.0538%15 Sept
mirage10–130.0421%15 Sept
nuke10–130.076%14 Sept
ancient16–130.0139%14 Sept
dust28–13-0.0713%14 Sept
inferno10–30.0313%14 Sept
cache11–130.0829%11 Sept
anubis2–13-0.0916%10 Sept
inferno13–9-0.0129%10 Sept
mirage8–13-0.0210%10 Sept
cache13–5-0.0110%10 Sept
inferno7–9-0.0622%10 Sept
ancient4–13-0.0116%10 Sept
ancient0–6-0.070%10 Sept
dust26–130.0426%10 Sept
anubis9–13-0.0420%8 Sept
office7–13-0.069%7 Sept
cache8–13-0.0329%6 Sept
inferno9–13-0.0116%6 Sept
ancient10–130.0615%27 Aug
anubis13–11-0.0113%27 Aug
anubis13–3-0.0219%24 Aug
mirage13–110.0216%18 Aug
inferno4–130.0216%18 Aug
anubis5–13-0.0121%17 Aug
dust28–13-0.0418%17 Aug
nuke13–9-0.057%17 Aug
cache13–50.0625%17 Aug
anubis9–13-0.0125%17 Aug
cache13–50.0135%17 Aug
ancient3–13-0.0219%17 Aug
dust213–60.0632%17 Aug
ancient8–20.0924%17 Aug
anubis13–70.0221%17 Aug
dust25–13-0.0610%17 Aug
ancient13–3-0.0218%17 Aug
mirage8–130.0417%17 Aug
mirage10–130.0412%16 Aug
anubis8–13-0.029%16 Aug
dust213–16-0.0910%16 Aug
anubis9–13-0.0919%16 Aug
ancient8–13-0.0318%16 Aug
inferno2–9-0.1710%16 Aug
inferno9–2-0.1614%16 Aug
dust216–130.0218%15 Aug
ancient10–13-0.0017%15 Aug
dust29–13-0.0113%15 Aug
inferno9–10.247%15 Aug
nuke9–70.0725%15 Aug
nuke13–40.0212%15 Aug
mirage8–130.0213%14 Aug
inferno8–80.0821%11 Aug
anubis13–70.0220%11 Aug
cache9–13-0.053%19 Jul
dust216–14-0.0229%19 Jul
mirage13–16-0.0118%28 Jun
dust28–13-0.025%15 Jun
dust210–13-0.0317%4 Jun
vertigo13–10.019%3 Jun
anubis9–130.0315%2 Jun
ancient11–13-0.0410%30 May
mirage13–6-0.0421%27 May
mirage9–13-0.027%23 May
mirage16–14-0.0517%21 May
mirage13–60.0618%17 May
ancient16–14-0.0010%17 May
nuke5–9-0.139%15 May
office13–50.1119%15 May
office13–70.008%15 May
anubis8–130.0520%14 May
vertigo13–80.0620%10 May
cache13–90.0615%10 May
dust29–130.0412%10 May
dust213–8-0.0514%10 May
ancient6–20.0667%10 May
inferno9–30.1419%7 May
nuke5–9-0.105%7 May
cache10–130.0718%6 May
dust216–14-0.0114%5 May
cache8–13-0.0113%3 May
overpass13–100.0512%3 May
inferno13–8-0.0420%3 May
inferno13–70.0619%2 May
anubis10–13-0.0321%1 May
overpass16–130.0418%25 Apr
inferno1–9-0.2140%25 Apr
inferno11–13-0.0224%24 Apr
ancient10–13-0.0316%23 Apr
inferno6–9-0.035%23 Apr
train13–70.0511%23 Apr
ancient5–13-0.0321%20 Apr
overpass9–130.0321%20 Apr
warden2–13-0.0229%18 Apr
anubis13–10-0.0423%18 Apr
anubis6–130.0314%17 Apr

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

500 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →