Redd — CS2 Stats

76561198193748682[U:1:233482954]

2,546Tracked matches60%Win rate2020Tracked since
CSDB Rating6.5 SolidPassive Rifler
Premier CS Rating24,357Top 50% of 819 CSDB-tracked playersPink band · top ~3.7% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#975 of 5292 tracked
FaceitLevel 5Top 67.6% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanSupreme Master First Class
Ladder ranks via Leetify

Share this profile

CSDB.GGReddFACEITLevel 5STANDINGTop 67.6% of rankedPREMIER24,357 · Pink bandcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim86
Positioning42
Utility48

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY533512Last 10053%Win rateLWLWWLWTTT

Last 10 vs previous 10: -20pp win rate · +0.00 avg rating

Player DNA

Primary style: Passive RiflerAim-led profile without a single dominant tendency.

Aim8.6
Aggression3.3
Utility4.8
Positioning4.2
Opening Duels0.7

Sharp aimerStrong CT-side opener

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

NiKo

Plays most like NiKo 90% playstyle similarity

Most alike: opening-duel success, opening-fight frequency.

Where you differ: lower utility contribution; lower positioning profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Strengths

Aim. Aim score of 86 — the mechanical foundation is a clear strength.

Areas to improve

Positioning. Positioning trails aim by 45 points — deaths here waste a strong aim profile.

Utility. Utility contribution runs far behind the mechanical game — the cheapest rating gain on this profile is thrown, not aimed.

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 52% on CT to 14% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim8.6
Positioning4.2
Utility4.8
Mechanics7.5
Opening Duels2.7
Win Impact8.3

Composite 6.5/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.02 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.00−0.01
first ⅓ avg 0.01 → last ⅓ avg 0.00
Reaction time497ms−42ms
first ⅓ avg 539ms → last ⅓ avg 497ms
Headshot accuracy13.2%−2.5%
first ⅓ avg 15.7% → last ⅓ avg 13.2%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.16Best rating — cache 13–8
131Biggest win — nuke
5Longest win streak
65In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
5Overtime games

Map breakdown

infernoBest map · 60% over 15ancientWeakest map · 45% over 11
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
mirageA25141156%0.03
cacheB179853%0.03
infernoA159660%-0.01
nukeB147750%-0.01
ancientB115645%-0.02
dust2B105550%0.01
anubisA74357%-0.00
vertigo1010%-0.03

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Ancient is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (45% over 11). Start with the 6 essential Ancient lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

251Matches
52%Win rate
1.06Avg K/D
ADR
42%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

1v1 clutch win
1v2 clutch win
7Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWWLLL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage8256%1.0616.9
Vertigo4344%1.1417.9
Anubis3348%1.2415.8
Dust21839%0.9316.6
Ancient1861%0.9214.4
Inferno1346%0.9714.8
Overpass1354%0.9614.9
Nuke333%0.9115.7

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

13.1%Headshot accuracy
37.9%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
44.3%Spray accuracy
83.6%Counter-strafing
7.8°Preaim
496msReaction time
14.2%T opening success
51.6%CT opening success
0.49Enemies flashed / flash
2.3%Flash assists
7.36HE damage / grenade
8.87Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Best CS2 Crosshair

    Your shots are landing on bodies more often than heads — usually a crosshair-height and placement habit rather than raw aim.

    Headshot accuracy 13.0879% — below the 15% mark we flag

    Aim Training
  2. Grenades & Utility

    Most of your flashes are blinding nobody. A handful of reliable pop-flash lineups fixes this faster than anything else.

    Enemies flashed per flash 0.4861 — below the 0.5 mark we flag

    Grenade Lineups
  3. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 14.2421% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Ancient

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

45% win rate across 11 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Ancient callouts & strategyAncient grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
inferno9–13-0.018%27 Aug
cache13–50.115%27 Aug
dust211–13-0.058%27 Aug
ancient13–9-0.0113%27 Aug
nuke13–10-0.0415%26 Aug
mirage5–130.0417%26 Aug
dust213–90.0426%26 Aug
cache12–12-0.009%26 Aug
nuke12–12-0.067%19 Aug
inferno12–120.029%19 Aug
mirage13–70.0912%19 Aug
anubis9–13-0.0716%18 Aug
mirage13–90.0918%18 Aug
inferno13–100.0216%18 Aug
mirage13–80.0210%17 Aug
nuke6–13-0.0517%17 Aug
inferno1–13-0.076%17 Aug
nuke13–100.0211%16 Aug
mirage13–110.0112%16 Aug
anubis4–13-0.0128%16 Aug
inferno13–11-0.0210%16 Aug
inferno13–90.0115%16 Aug
cache5–130.049%16 Aug
mirage13–6-0.0215%16 Aug
mirage8–13-0.0511%15 Aug
dust212–12-0.0014%15 Aug
inferno13–3-0.0215%15 Aug
ancient6–13-0.0613%15 Aug
nuke12–120.0017%15 Aug
cache13–30.0513%15 Aug
ancient13–110.0012%15 Aug
mirage13–100.0417%14 Aug
mirage4–13-0.0412%14 Aug
vertigo9–13-0.0325%14 Aug
mirage8–130.0113%14 Aug
inferno13–7-0.016%14 Aug
ancient11–130.0122%14 Aug
dust29–13-0.1122%14 Aug
nuke12–12-0.0421%14 Aug
ancient12–120.0210%13 Aug
mirage8–130.0619%13 Aug
nuke13–50.0520%13 Aug
cache13–50.079%13 Aug
inferno13–7-0.0427%13 Aug
cache2–13-0.0417%11 Aug
nuke13–10.0516%11 Aug
inferno11–13-0.0011%11 Aug
dust213–90.0210%11 Aug
inferno9–13-0.0114%26 Jul
dust212–120.0612%26 Jul
mirage13–60.0813%26 Jul
cache12–12-0.0313%26 Jul
nuke12–12-0.0217%26 Jul
anubis13–70.0512%26 Jul
mirage13–50.089%25 Jul
nuke13–70.088%25 Jul
dust213–40.0527%25 Jul
anubis13–110.0719%25 Jul
ancient2–13-0.0618%25 Jul
cache5–13-0.026%25 Jul
inferno13–10.0217%24 Jul
dust213–6-0.0218%24 Jul
cache13–80.0221%24 Jul
cache6–130.0513%24 Jul
nuke13–3-0.0213%23 Jul
mirage13–20.149%23 Jul
inferno1–13-0.0813%23 Jul
mirage0–7-0.010%23 Jul
mirage13–6-0.0113%21 Jul
ancient10–13-0.045%21 Jul
inferno13–80.0312%21 Jul
anubis13–6-0.0312%21 Jul
cache11–13-0.0316%21 Jul
nuke0–3-0.050%20 Jul
mirage15–15-0.0213%20 Jul
ancient13–10-0.0614%20 Jul
anubis13–70.0617%19 Jul
cache13–70.0523%19 Jul
mirage10–13-0.0022%19 Jul
ancient12–3-0.0224%19 Jul
cache13–80.0115%19 Jul
mirage10–13-0.0119%18 Jul
cache13–90.0624%18 Jul
cache13–80.1625%18 Jul
ancient13–110.0527%18 Jul
mirage14–160.0316%18 Jul
nuke9–13-0.0423%18 Jul
inferno13–9-0.039%17 Jul
cache13–30.0131%17 Jul
mirage16–13-0.0213%17 Jul
mirage13–9-0.0117%17 Jul
nuke13–11-0.0117%16 Jul
cache2–130.0025%16 Jul
mirage13–90.0317%16 Jul
anubis5–13-0.099%15 Jul
mirage13–50.137%15 Jul
dust212–160.0212%15 Jul
dust213–50.0718%15 Jul
ancient7–13-0.0410%15 Jul
mirage15–150.0412%15 Jul

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →