xxyz

xxyz — CS2 Stats

DE76561198179732070[U:1:219466342]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

4,162Tracked matches57%Win rate2020Tracked since
CSDB Rating7.5 StrongPositional Player
FaceitLevel 10 · 2,730 ELOTop 12.4% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanSupreme Master First Class
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 5 Sep 2026 (18 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

0Faceit ELO · 2,730 → 2,730
+30Tracked matches · now 4,162
0.0ppWin rate · 56.7% → 56.7%
Track this profile

CSDB reads this profile's Premier rating from its tracked match history, and records Faceit ELO once on every day the page is viewed. 41 days played since 28 Feb 2026. Come back after the next session and the change shows above.

Is this you? Sign in with Steam to claim it and connect match tracking →

Rating over time

Faceit ELO: 2,730 +0 31 Aug5 Sept · 3 observations
2,7302,730peak 2,73031 Aug5 Sept
2,730Highest Faceit ELO seen on CSDB
41Days played since 2026-02-28

Faceit ELO

  • At peak — 2,730
  • Next: 3,000 ELO at 3,000 270 to go
  • Reached: 2,500 ELO · Level 10 · Level 9 · Level 8
  • 2,500 ELO first seen 2026-08-31
  • Level 10 first seen 2026-08-31

Premier is CSDB’s own observation — it builds from the day a profile is first viewed and cannot be backfilled. Faceit ELO is CSDB’s own observation — no feed exposes ELO per match, so that line only has the days the profile was viewed and cannot be backfilled.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGxxyzFACEITLevel 10 · 2,730 ELOSTANDINGTop 12.4% of rankedPEAK ELO2,730csdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim91
Positioning72
Utility63

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY5842Last 10058%Win rateWLLWLWLWLW

Last 10 vs previous 10: 0pp win rate · −0.01 avg rating · +3.6pp headshot accuracy · −75ms reaction

Win rate 0pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — within the normal variation of a 10-match window (±20pp), so no real shift yet.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 23 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 25%
  • Avg reaction 464ms

Last 10

  • 55 · 50% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.00
  • Avg headshot accuracy 27%
  • Avg reaction 459ms

Last 20

  • 1010 · 50% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.00
  • Avg headshot accuracy 25%
  • Avg reaction 497ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Positional PlayerPositioning stands above the rest of this profile (+1 against its own average).

Aim9.1
Utility6.3
Positioning7.2
Opening Duels6.7
Clutch4.4

Sharp aimerStrong CT-side opener

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

ZywOo

Plays most like ZywOo 90% playstyle similarity

Most alike: positioning profile, utility contribution.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Strengths

Aim. Aim score of 91 — the mechanical foundation is a clear strength.

CT openings. 66% CT opening-duel success — winning the first fight on the defending side is rare and valuable.

Areas to improve

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 66% on CT to 39% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim9.1
Positioning7.2
Utility6.3
Mechanics6.2
Opening Duels5.7
Win Impact7.2

Composite 7.5/10 (Strong), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.02 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.01−0.01
first ⅓ avg 0.02 → last ⅓ avg 0.01
Reaction time533ms−34ms
first ⅓ avg 566ms → last ⅓ avg 533ms
Headshot accuracy25.0%+1.3%
first ⅓ avg 23.7% → last ⅓ avg 25.0%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.13Best match rating · 13–2 · inferno, 28 Mar
50%Best headshot accuracy · 13–10 · inferno, 20 Aug
359msFastest reaction time · 11–13 · inferno, 1 Sept
13–2Biggest win · cache, 1 Sept

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

5Longest win streak
126In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
10Overtime games

Map breakdown

nukeBest map · 63% over 19dust2Weakest map · 48% over 29
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
dust2B29141548%-0.01
nukeA1912763%0.00
infernoA1811761%0.01
ancientA127558%0.04
anubisA95456%0.02
cacheB63350%0.02
overpass43175%0.06
mirage330100%0.02

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Dust 2 is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (48% over 29). Start with the 6 essential Dust 2 lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

4,905Matches
51%Win rate
1.15Avg K/D
83.1ADR
47%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

42%1v1 clutch win
23%1v2 clutch win
16Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWWLWW

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Ancient42453%1.1217.1
Inferno40651%1.1717.1
Anubis38646%1.0817.2
Nuke32757%1.2017.9
Dust228551%1.0617.2
Train8054%1.3817.7
Overpass6954%1.1517.2
Vertigo6847%1.0416.7

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

25.5%Headshot accuracy
40.2%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
42.9%Spray accuracy
77.8%Counter-strafing
8.4°Preaim
532msReaction time
39.2%T opening success
66.2%CT opening success
0.61Enemies flashed / flash
7.1%Flash assists
8.80HE damage / grenade
8.28Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 39.1622% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Dust 2

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

48% win rate across 29 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Dust 2 callouts & strategyDust 2 grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
anubis13–60.0819%15 Sept
cache9–13-0.0638%14 Sept
inferno11–13-0.0116%1 Sept
cache13–20.0528%1 Sept
dust26–13-0.1022%30 Aug
inferno13–10-0.0150%20 Aug
inferno5–13-0.0329%15 Aug
nuke13–5-0.0026%31 Jul
dust29–130.0320%21 Jul
nuke13–9-0.0022%17 Jul
dust216–12-0.0619%17 Jul
nuke16–14-0.0427%5 Jul
inferno4–13-0.0420%5 Jul
ancient6–130.0029%5 Jul
ancient11–130.0216%11 Jun
ancient13–50.0424%28 May
nuke9–50.1221%18 May
nuke22–200.0225%17 May
nuke5–13-0.0526%17 May
ancient7–130.0228%7 May
inferno13–10-0.0218%5 May
cache9–13-0.0215%5 May
mirage13–90.0027%4 May
nuke13–110.0327%29 Apr
dust213–110.0227%29 Apr
nuke8–13-0.0223%29 Apr
cache13–40.0847%29 Apr
cache9–13-0.0021%28 Apr
inferno13–110.0224%28 Apr
mirage13–50.0328%27 Apr
cache13–50.0730%27 Apr
dust25–13-0.0616%27 Apr
ancient13–70.0917%23 Apr
overpass8–130.0621%23 Apr
dust213–110.0526%21 Apr
dust25–13-0.0914%21 Apr
inferno13–90.0623%21 Apr
anubis4–13-0.0728%16 Apr
nuke16–130.0433%13 Apr
dust213–80.0314%13 Apr
inferno13–30.0626%31 Mar
dust26–13-0.0822%30 Mar
inferno8–13-0.0021%30 Mar
ancient7–130.0429%30 Mar
nuke11–13-0.0919%30 Mar
nuke5–13-0.0223%30 Mar
inferno13–20.1333%28 Mar
dust213–80.1029%28 Mar
ancient13–100.0924%28 Mar
nuke13–50.0024%27 Mar
ancient13–11-0.0126%27 Mar
dust28–13-0.0223%27 Mar
dust28–130.0332%18 Mar
nuke13–90.0717%18 Mar
dust219–150.0125%18 Mar
nuke9–13-0.0519%17 Mar
inferno13–4-0.0320%17 Mar
overpass13–30.0822%17 Mar
dust213–70.0419%17 Mar
inferno13–3-0.0215%17 Mar
anubis13–50.099%16 Mar
dust210–13-0.0420%16 Mar
inferno9–130.0231%16 Mar
inferno19–17-0.0121%16 Mar
dust211–13-0.0217%16 Mar
dust25–13-0.0210%16 Mar
dust26–13-0.0425%15 Mar
inferno16–140.0428%15 Mar
dust213–9-0.0518%13 Mar
anubis10–130.0337%13 Mar
overpass13–80.0619%13 Mar
ancient11–130.0219%12 Mar
dust210–130.0426%12 Mar
dust213–11-0.0012%12 Mar
dust216–130.0022%10 Mar
dust213–70.0732%9 Mar
inferno13–70.0440%9 Mar
dust211–13-0.0136%9 Mar
overpass16–130.0519%6 Mar
nuke13–90.0624%5 Mar
anubis13–7-0.0412%3 Mar
nuke16–130.0527%3 Mar
inferno5–13-0.0128%3 Mar
ancient13–80.0419%3 Mar
anubis4–13-0.0126%3 Mar
dust27–130.0025%1 Mar
dust213–8-0.0520%1 Mar
anubis13–11-0.0018%1 Mar
mirage13–90.0432%28 Feb
inferno9–130.0123%28 Feb
dust213–110.0125%28 Feb
ancient13–60.0626%28 Feb
nuke9–130.0014%28 Feb
anubis4–130.0518%28 Feb
dust213–60.0940%28 Feb
nuke2–13-0.0530%28 Feb
ancient13–100.1214%28 Feb
nuke13–100.0111%28 Feb
anubis13–100.0413%28 Feb
dust28–13-0.0429%28 Feb

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

Faceit Level 102.5K ELO1,000 MatchesAim 90+
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →