tObs69

tObs69 — CS2 Stats

76561198177995233[U:1:217729505]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

4,924Tracked matches50%Win rate2020Tracked since
CSDB Rating6.2 SolidSupport
Premier CS Rating25,413Top 10% of 212,133 CSDB-tracked playersRed band · top ~2.8% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#18106 of 259059 tracked
FaceitLevel 10 · 2,362 ELOTop 12.4% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanLegendary Eagle Master
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 20 Sep 2026 (41 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

0Premier CS Rating · 25,413 → 25,413
0Faceit ELO · 2,362 → 2,362
+171Tracked matches · now 4,924
+3.3ppWin rate · 46.7% → 50.0%

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 25,413 +0 29 Aug – 20 Sept · 7 observations
25,41325,413peak 25,41329 Aug20 Sept
Faceit ELO: 2,362 +0 29 Aug – 20 Sept · 7 observations
2,3622,362peak 2,36229 Aug20 Sept
25,413Peak Premier on CSDB
2,362Highest Faceit ELO seen on CSDB
36Days played since 2026-08-24

Faceit ELO

  • At peak — 2,362
  • Next: 2,500 ELO at 2,500 — 138 to go
  • Reached: Level 10 · Level 9 · Level 8 · Level 7
  • Level 10 first seen 2026-08-29
  • Level 9 first seen 2026-08-29

Premier CS Rating

  • At peak — 25,413
  • Next: Gold band at 30,000 — 4,587 to go
  • Reached: Red band · Pink band · Purple band · Blue band
  • Red band first seen 2026-08-29
  • Pink band first seen 2026-08-29

Premier is CSDB’s own observation — it builds from the day a profile is first viewed and cannot be backfilled. Faceit ELO is CSDB’s own observation — no feed exposes ELO per match, so that line only has the days the profile was viewed and cannot be backfilled.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGtObs69FACEITLevel 10 · 2,362 ELOSTANDINGTop 12.4% of rankedPREMIER25,413 · Red bandPEAK ELO2,362csdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim66
Positioning59
Utility75

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY47–53Last 10047%Win rateLLWLLWLWWL

Last 10 vs previous 10: 0pp win rate · −0.01 avg rating · −5.0pp headshot accuracy · −8ms reaction

Win rate 0pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — within the normal variation of a 10-match window (±20pp), so no real shift yet.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 1–4 · 20% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 15%
  • Avg reaction 541ms

Last 10

  • 4–6 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 17%
  • Avg reaction 542ms

Last 20

  • 8–12 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 19%
  • Avg reaction 545ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Support — Utility contribution stands above the rest of this profile (+2.6 against its own average).

Aim6.6
Utility7.5
Positioning5.9
Opening Duels2.5
Clutch3.6

Effective flashesHigh utility contribution

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

b1t

Plays most like b1t 73% playstyle similarity

Most alike: opening-duel success, positioning profile.

Where you differ: higher utility contribution; lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

CT openings. Opening success drops from 51% on T to 34% on CT — first contacts on the defending side are being lost.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim6.6
Positioning5.9
Utility7.5
Mechanics5.1
Opening Duels3.1
Win Impact5.0

Composite 6.2/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.05 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.01−0.01
first ⅓ avg -0.00 → last ⅓ avg -0.01
Reaction time546ms−8ms
first ⅓ avg 554ms → last ⅓ avg 546ms
Headshot accuracy19.9%−1.9%
first ⅓ avg 21.8% → last ⅓ avg 19.9%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.13Best match rating · 13–4 · inferno, 28 Aug →
38%Best headshot accuracy · 13–8 · ancient, 12 Oct →
391msFastest reaction time · 7–13 · inferno, 7 Oct →
13–2Biggest win · ancient, 29 Oct →

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

5Longest win streak
L2Current streak
5–7In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
13Overtime games

Map breakdown

infernoBest map · 58% over 33ancientWeakest map · 33% over 18
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
infernoA3319–1458%0.00
dust2B3217–1553%0.00
ancientD186–1233%0.01
cacheC145–936%-0.03
nuke—20–20%-0.03
anubis—10–10%-0.04

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Ancient is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (33% over 18). Start with the 6 essential Ancient lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

4,921Matches
52%Win rate
1.19Avg K/D
81.8ADR
50%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

38%1v1 clutch win
23%1v2 clutch win
13Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLWLWW

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Dust289153%1.1816.4
Ancient82852%1.1717.5
Inferno75758%1.2816.9
Nuke23044%1.1416.8
Anubis20442%1.0816.3
Cache8046%1.0315.1
Overpass5151%1.2117.4
Mirage3361%1.2016.3

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

19.7%Headshot accuracy
31.8%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
31.2%Spray accuracy
73.2%Counter-strafing
8.6°Preaim
543msReaction time
51.1%T opening success
33.8%CT opening success
0.75Enemies flashed / flash
21.9%Flash assists
10.49HE damage / grenade
6.31Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    Losing the first CT duel repeatedly usually means holding angles that favour the peeker.

    CT opening duels 33.843% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Ancient

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

33% win rate across 18 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Ancient callouts & strategy →Ancient grenade lineups →

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
inferno9–13-0.0615%29 Oct →
dust28–13-0.0120%29 Oct →
ancient13–20.0824%29 Oct →
ancient5–130.0011%28 Oct →
inferno7–13-0.074%28 Oct →
inferno13–80.0020%28 Oct →
inferno14–16-0.0518%28 Oct →
cache13–8-0.0613%27 Oct →
ancient19–150.0024%27 Oct →
dust26–13-0.0520%26 Oct →
cache5–13-0.0422%26 Oct →
inferno13–90.0129%26 Oct →
inferno11–13-0.0126%23 Oct →
inferno6–130.0029%22 Oct →
dust213–10-0.0319%22 Oct →
inferno13–20.0317%20 Oct →
cache8–130.0028%20 Oct →
cache3–13-0.0619%19 Oct →
inferno13–10-0.0018%19 Oct →
dust210–130.0111%19 Oct →
inferno13–90.0319%19 Oct →
dust213–60.0424%19 Oct →
cache13–4-0.0224%19 Oct →
ancient8–13-0.0313%19 Oct →
dust213–50.0020%19 Oct →
inferno13–90.0630%18 Oct →
dust213–50.0429%18 Oct →
inferno22–18-0.049%18 Oct →
ancient9–130.0124%18 Oct →
dust211–130.0122%16 Oct →
inferno13–90.0124%16 Oct →
cache13–16-0.0316%16 Oct →
ancient16–14-0.0415%16 Oct →
inferno13–70.0814%16 Oct →
inferno22–200.0224%16 Oct →
dust25–13-0.0329%16 Oct →
ancient13–40.0721%16 Oct →
cache14–16-0.0218%15 Oct →
ancient16–12-0.0324%15 Oct →
cache9–13-0.0216%14 Oct →
inferno8–13-0.0120%12 Oct →
inferno13–9-0.0214%12 Oct →
ancient13–80.0038%12 Oct →
inferno7–130.0121%12 Oct →
dust213–60.0522%12 Oct →
cache13–60.0023%12 Oct →
cache13–5-0.0320%12 Oct →
dust24–13-0.0120%12 Oct →
ancient7–130.0319%9 Oct →
inferno22–190.0313%8 Oct →
inferno10–130.0215%7 Oct →
inferno7–13-0.0232%7 Oct →
anubis8–13-0.0420%6 Oct →
ancient10–130.0821%5 Oct →
dust24–13-0.0425%5 Oct →
ancient9–130.0617%3 Oct →
dust213–90.0533%3 Oct →
dust213–60.0014%3 Oct →
inferno13–110.0819%3 Oct →
dust210–130.0221%3 Oct →
cache4–130.0023%3 Oct →
dust213–11-0.0213%2 Oct →
nuke9–13-0.0124%2 Oct →
dust211–13-0.0319%2 Oct →
inferno6–13-0.0534%2 Oct →
dust213–70.0821%1 Oct →
ancient8–13-0.0326%1 Oct →
cache13–7-0.0221%1 Oct →
dust22–13-0.0815%1 Oct →
dust213–100.0124%1 Oct →
dust217–19-0.016%30 Sept →
inferno13–80.0124%30 Sept →
dust213–80.0117%29 Sept →
inferno13–11-0.0028%29 Sept →
inferno13–50.0220%20 Sept →
inferno13–20.0329%12 Sept →
dust211–13-0.0421%12 Sept →
dust28–130.0215%12 Sept →
dust210–130.0328%12 Sept →
inferno8–13-0.0425%11 Sept →
dust213–50.0818%11 Sept →
inferno9–13-0.0320%7 Sept →
ancient4–13-0.0218%6 Sept →
ancient6–13-0.0416%4 Sept →
ancient5–130.0127%1 Sept →
dust213–90.0636%31 Aug →
cache9–130.0125%28 Aug →
dust28–13-0.0325%28 Aug →
inferno5–13-0.0421%28 Aug →
inferno13–40.1330%28 Aug →
ancient7–130.0425%28 Aug →
inferno9–13-0.0319%27 Aug →
dust216–13-0.0130%26 Aug →
inferno13–5-0.0123%25 Aug →
nuke13–16-0.0515%25 Aug →
dust213–10-0.0611%25 Aug →
dust213–40.0725%25 Aug →
ancient5–130.0120%24 Aug →
cache8–13-0.1019%24 Aug →
dust216–12-0.0222%24 Aug →

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

Faceit Level 102K ELO1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →

This profile is built from public Steam data. If it is yours, you can remove it, or delete your CSDB account.