pirZi

pirZi — CS2 Stats

FI76561198171003073[U:1:210737345]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

2,299Tracked matches60%Win rate2020Tracked since
CSDB Rating5.7 SolidSupport
Premier CS Rating20,695Top 50% of 175,286 CSDB-tracked playersPink band · top ~7.7% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#64518 of 222165 tracked
FaceitLevel 9 · 1,789 ELOTop 20.7% of ranked FACEIT players
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 1 Jun 2026 (108 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

No change since then. Play, then come back: the next observation lands here.

Track this profile

CSDB reads this profile's Premier rating from its tracked match history, and records Faceit ELO once on every day the page is viewed. 53 days played since 27 Jan 2026. Come back after the next session and the change shows above.

Is this you? Sign in with Steam to claim it and connect match tracking →

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 20,695 +452 3 Mar1 Jun · 5 days played
20,24321,898peak 21,8983 Mar1 Jun
21,898Peak Premier in tracked matches
1,789Highest Faceit ELO seen on CSDB
53Days played since 2026-01-27

Faceit ELO

  • At peak — 1,789
  • Next: Level 10 at 2,001 212 to go
  • Reached: Level 9 · Level 8 · Level 7 · Level 6

Premier CS Rating

  • 1,203 below peak (21,898)
  • +452 over 90 days
  • Next: Red band at 25,000 4,305 to go
  • Reached: Pink band · Purple band · Blue band · Light Blue band

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do. Faceit ELO is CSDB’s own observation — no feed exposes ELO per match, so that line only has the days the profile was viewed and cannot be backfilled.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGpirZiFACEITLevel 9 · 1,789 ELOSTANDINGTop 20.7% of rankedPREMIER20,695 · Pink bandPEAK ELO1,789csdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim61
Positioning50
Utility56

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

HOT57412Last 10057%Win rateWLLWWWWWWW

Last 10 vs previous 10: +20pp win rate · +0.00 avg rating · +1.1pp headshot accuracy · +98ms reaction

Win rate up 20pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — more than a 10-match window's normal noise (±20pp).

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 32 · 60% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 17%
  • Avg reaction 730ms

Last 10

  • 82 · 80% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.00
  • Avg headshot accuracy 15%
  • Avg reaction 680ms

Last 20

  • 146 · 70% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.00
  • Avg headshot accuracy 14%
  • Avg reaction 631ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: SupportUtility contribution stands above the rest of this profile (+1.3 against its own average).

Aim6.1
Utility5.6
Positioning5.0
Opening Duels2.7
Clutch3.8

Limited utility dependence

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

NiKo

Plays most like NiKo 84% playstyle similarity

Most alike: utility contribution, positioning profile.

Where you differ: lower opening-duel success; lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Reaction time. 619ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim6.1
Positioning5.0
Utility5.6
Mechanics5.8
Opening Duels2.0
Win Impact8.3

Composite 5.7/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.02 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.00−0.01
first ⅓ avg 0.00 → last ⅓ avg -0.00
Reaction time619ms−14ms
first ⅓ avg 634ms → last ⅓ avg 619ms
Headshot accuracy14.4%+0.2%
first ⅓ avg 14.1% → last ⅓ avg 14.4%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.15Best match rating · 13–8 · nuke, 5 Mar
36%Best headshot accuracy · 13–11 · dust2, 2 Apr
453msFastest reaction time · 13–0 · mirage, 20 Mar
13–0Biggest win · mirage, 20 Mar

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

7Longest win streak
124In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
14Overtime games

Map breakdown

overpassBest map · 80% over 5nukeWeakest map · 48% over 21
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
infernoB22111150%-0.00
mirageS2115671%-0.00
nukeB21101148%0.01
dust2A2012860%0.01
anubisB63350%0.01
overpassS54180%-0.01
cache31233%-0.02
ancient21150%0.00

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Nuke is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (48% over 21). Start with the 6 essential Nuke lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

3,917Matches
50%Win rate
0.99Avg K/D
79.1ADR
38%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

39%1v1 clutch win
20%1v2 clutch win
14Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLLWLL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage37950%0.9614.8
Dust235949%1.0015.1
Nuke24654%1.0515.6
Inferno20652%1.0215.4
Anubis15948%1.0415.6
Ancient12448%0.9915.6
Overpass4455%1.0516.7
Vertigo2748%1.0118.1

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

14.4%Headshot accuracy
34.4%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
32.7%Spray accuracy
76.1%Counter-strafing
8.0°Preaim
619msReaction time
35.0%T opening success
40.9%CT opening success
0.67Enemies flashed / flash
6.2%Flash assists
11.05HE damage / grenade
4.29Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Best CS2 Crosshair

    Your shots are landing on bodies more often than heads — usually a crosshair-height and placement habit rather than raw aim.

    Headshot accuracy 14.3545% — below the 15% mark we flag

    Aim Training
  2. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 35.0427% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Nuke

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

48% win rate across 21 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Nuke callouts & strategyNuke grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
dust210–1-0.0619%25 Jul
mirage2–13-0.0729%15 Jun
dust211–130.0313%12 Jun
mirage13–5-0.0112%10 Jun
cache13–110.0411%3 Jun
overpass13–40.0416%1 Jun
ancient16–14-0.0010%30 May
mirage13–10-0.076%30 May
dust213–80.0122%30 May
nuke13–40.1313%30 May
nuke4–13-0.0615%26 May
overpass13–9-0.0116%26 May
nuke10–13-0.0314%25 May
nuke16–140.0211%25 May
mirage13–10.0817%25 May
mirage13–90.0814%21 May
mirage10–00.083%18 May
nuke4–13-0.0420%14 May
dust213–3-0.0615%14 May
cache7–13-0.0513%14 May
overpass11–13-0.0811%14 May
dust29–130.0519%14 May
overpass13–110.058%12 May
inferno7–13-0.0114%12 May
inferno16–14-0.009%12 May
nuke16–14-0.0418%7 May
cache10–13-0.0418%7 May
dust25–13-0.0310%6 May
overpass13–10-0.0315%5 May
mirage10–13-0.0726%5 May
ancient6–130.0115%5 May
dust213–50.029%3 May
nuke20–220.0212%3 May
nuke7–130.0317%28 Apr
mirage13–80.0517%27 Apr
inferno10–13-0.0320%25 Apr
nuke3–13-0.0118%22 Apr
nuke13–110.0325%20 Apr
mirage13–8-0.0422%20 Apr
mirage19–15-0.0114%19 Apr
nuke13–30.1325%13 Apr
mirage13–110.0422%4 Apr
dust213–110.0136%2 Apr
mirage13–9-0.0515%27 Mar
nuke2–13-0.107%26 Mar
anubis7–130.0015%25 Mar
anubis13–70.0612%25 Mar
mirage13–10-0.0316%23 Mar
mirage13–00.020%20 Mar
inferno16–13-0.0311%19 Mar
mirage13–100.0515%16 Mar
inferno6–130.009%16 Mar
inferno13–9-0.0411%15 Mar
nuke10–13-0.0116%14 Mar
anubis13–100.0418%11 Mar
inferno5–130.0313%9 Mar
anubis14–16-0.0410%8 Mar
inferno10–30.0314%7 Mar
nuke13–80.1511%5 Mar
inferno13–8-0.0226%5 Mar
inferno7–13-0.0524%5 Mar
nuke16–140.0416%5 Mar
dust213–50.0713%5 Mar
nuke8–13-0.0414%5 Mar
mirage8–13-0.0214%5 Mar
nuke4–9-0.0827%5 Mar
inferno16–120.0116%4 Mar
nuke13–7-0.0015%4 Mar
mirage13–80.0111%4 Mar
mirage9–13-0.0215%4 Mar
mirage13–6-0.028%4 Mar
dust29–13-0.0216%4 Mar
dust213–40.0617%4 Mar
inferno16–130.0712%3 Mar
anubis3–13-0.036%3 Mar
dust21–11-0.0011%3 Mar
dust23–13-0.0219%3 Mar
dust213–100.0612%3 Mar
dust213–50.0123%3 Mar
dust213–70.0313%2 Mar
inferno13–100.0319%2 Mar
inferno15–150.0512%2 Mar
inferno6–13-0.0114%2 Mar
nuke13–90.0516%2 Mar
mirage7–13-0.0117%1 Mar
dust213–110.0319%1 Mar
dust27–130.0417%1 Mar
nuke15–150.019%1 Mar
dust25–13-0.0628%27 Feb
inferno9–13-0.019%27 Feb
inferno9–130.0516%26 Feb
inferno13–5-0.0429%25 Feb
mirage4–13-0.027%25 Feb
inferno16–140.0110%22 Feb
inferno13–10-0.0212%22 Feb
nuke13–1-0.0113%7 Feb
inferno8–130.0014%30 Jan
anubis13–60.0211%29 Jan
dust213–5-0.033%28 Jan
inferno1–13-0.0512%27 Jan

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →