Naydog

Naydog — CS2 Stats

ZW76561198167396616[U:1:207130888]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

474Tracked matches52%Win rate2024Tracked since
CSDB Rating4.4 DevelopingPositional Player
Premier CS Rating4,120Grey band · top ~82.5% of ranked players (population est.)
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 14 Oct 2026 (2 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

No change since then. Play, then come back: the next observation lands here.

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 4,120 +2,695 29 Mar – 14 Oct · 17 days played
1,4034,120peak 4,12029 Mar14 Oct
4,120Peak Premier in tracked matches
33Days played since 2026-03-29

Premier CS Rating

  • At peak — 4,120
  • +1,475 over 30 days · improving
  • Next: Light Blue band at 5,000 — 880 to go

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGNaydogPREMIER4,120 · Grey bandcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim45
Positioning50
Utility47

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

HOT48–47–5Last 10048%Win rateWWTWLWTWWW

Last 10 vs previous 10: +40pp win rate · +0.11 avg rating · +3.0pp headshot accuracy · +20ms reaction

Win rate up 40pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — more than a 10-match window's normal noise (±20pp).

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 3–1–1 · 60% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.05
  • Avg headshot accuracy 13%
  • Avg reaction 597ms

Last 10

  • 7–1–2 · 70% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.07
  • Avg headshot accuracy 13%
  • Avg reaction 637ms

Last 20

  • 10–7–3 · 50% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 12%
  • Avg reaction 627ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Positional Player — Positioning stands above the rest of this profile (+1.4 against its own average).

Aim4.5
Utility4.7
Positioning5.0
Opening Duels1.2

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

ZywOo

Plays most like ZywOo 77% playstyle similarity

Most alike: positioning profile, utility contribution.

Where you differ: lower opening-duel success; lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

CT openings. Opening success drops from 50% on T to 29% on CT — first contacts on the defending side are being lost.

Reaction time. 625ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim4.5
Positioning5.0
Utility4.7
Mechanics6.7
Opening Duels2.5
Win Impact5.6

Composite 4.4/10 (Developing), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×0.90 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.02−0.01
first ⅓ avg 0.03 → last ⅓ avg 0.02
Reaction time630ms−81ms
first ⅓ avg 711ms → last ⅓ avg 630ms
Headshot accuracy11.5%−0.4%
first ⅓ avg 11.9% → last ⅓ avg 11.5%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.29Best match rating · 13–2 · inferno, 14 Apr →
25%Best headshot accuracy · 8–13 · nuke, 1 Apr →
438msFastest reaction time · 13–0 · cache, 8 Oct →
13–0Biggest win · cache, 8 Oct →

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

6Longest win streak
W2Current streak
7–3In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
2Overtime games

Map breakdown

cacheBest map · 80% over 5ancientWeakest map · 33% over 9
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
dust2B2512–1348%0.02
nukeC208–1240%0.03
mirageA2011–955%0.05
infernoC94–544%0.06
ancientD93–633%0.03
anubisC83–538%0.01
cacheS54–180%0.05
vertigo—22–0100%-0.02
overpass—21–150%0.04

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Ancient is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (33% over 9). Start with the 6 essential Ancient lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

11.6%Headshot accuracy
31.4%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
33.1%Spray accuracy
79.9%Counter-strafing
11.2°Preaim
625msReaction time
50.2%T opening success
29.0%CT opening success
0.61Enemies flashed / flash
5.8%Flash assists
9.01HE damage / grenade
5.57Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Best CS2 Crosshair

    Your shots are landing on bodies more often than heads — usually a crosshair-height and placement habit rather than raw aim.

    Headshot accuracy 11.5541% — below the 15% mark we flag

    Aim Training →
  2. Advanced Mechanics

    Losing the first CT duel repeatedly usually means holding angles that favour the peeker.

    CT opening duels 28.9759% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Ancient

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

33% win rate across 9 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Ancient callouts & strategy →Ancient grenade lineups →

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
nuke13–100.0915%14 Oct →
inferno13–110.148%14 Oct →
dust212–120.0213%10 Oct →
inferno13–8-0.0113%10 Oct →
mirage1–130.0215%10 Oct →
dust213–70.1316%10 Oct →
dust212–12-0.0614%9 Oct →
nuke13–30.1412%8 Oct →
mirage12–70.0712%8 Oct →
dust213–110.1216%8 Oct →
mirage13–8-0.034%8 Oct →
cache13–00.057%8 Oct →
nuke6–13-0.1215%4 Oct →
dust211–13-0.0314%28 Sept →
ancient9–13-0.033%28 Sept →
dust210–13-0.0910%27 Sept →
nuke4–13-0.118%27 Sept →
dust213–4-0.0318%27 Sept →
nuke12–12-0.0617%27 Sept →
dust28–13-0.016%20 Sept →
nuke13–10.117%20 Sept →
mirage4–13-0.088%20 Sept →
mirage13–60.1413%20 Sept →
cache13–50.2218%20 Sept →
cache1–13-0.0913%18 Sept →
ancient9–130.0112%15 Sept →
cache13–11-0.0210%15 Sept →
dust29–13-0.0111%15 Sept →
mirage11–13-0.039%15 Sept →
mirage5–130.0011%15 Sept →
mirage13–30.0710%15 Sept →
cache13–100.1013%8 Sept →
dust213–80.1312%8 Sept →
mirage7–130.049%8 Sept →
anubis4–130.0213%7 Sept →
nuke15–150.029%7 Sept →
ancient13–70.018%7 Sept →
nuke13–40.0714%7 Sept →
dust213–100.089%7 Sept →
dust213–6-0.028%6 Sept →
mirage13–110.1712%6 Sept →
nuke13–30.1714%6 Sept →
nuke5–130.029%6 Sept →
dust210–13-0.057%23 Aug →
dust213–5-0.085%22 Aug →
mirage10–13-0.0911%14 Aug →
dust213–7-0.019%14 Aug →
anubis7–13-0.107%27 May →
dust26–13-0.077%21 May →
inferno8–13-0.076%21 May →
dust213–110.0013%21 May →
inferno13–90.0710%9 May →
mirage13–90.0110%28 Apr →
dust213–40.0616%28 Apr →
ancient5–130.059%26 Apr →
anubis13–50.208%26 Apr →
dust24–120.1014%26 Apr →
mirage13–60.1313%26 Apr →
dust27–130.0513%26 Apr →
nuke5–130.0411%26 Apr →
nuke13–30.1013%26 Apr →
anubis13–90.0816%26 Apr →
nuke13–100.0813%26 Apr →
mirage13–10.1218%26 Apr →
ancient12–120.109%26 Apr →
ancient13–60.0515%26 Apr →
dust22–130.0023%26 Apr →
inferno2–130.0616%26 Apr →
nuke13–100.1010%26 Apr →
inferno10–130.0316%25 Apr →
mirage7–130.0610%15 Apr →
nuke11–13-0.078%15 Apr →
inferno6–13-0.0214%15 Apr →
inferno13–20.2913%14 Apr →
dust213–30.1612%12 Apr →
nuke10–130.068%12 Apr →
dust213–100.0813%12 Apr →
nuke3–130.0114%12 Apr →
nuke2–13-0.1012%11 Apr →
nuke1–9-0.010%11 Apr →
anubis10–13-0.0515%10 Apr →
mirage9–13-0.045%10 Apr →
ancient6–13-0.024%9 Apr →
dust26–13-0.0119%8 Apr →
vertigo13–8-0.0522%8 Apr →
vertigo13–30.0214%8 Apr →
inferno7–130.0113%7 Apr →
mirage13–60.1312%7 Apr →
mirage13–30.1514%2 Apr →
nuke8–130.0625%1 Apr →
mirage13–70.1214%1 Apr →
overpass7–13-0.0110%1 Apr →
anubis9–13-0.049%1 Apr →
anubis13–0-0.0112%1 Apr →
anubis1–7-0.044%1 Apr →
mirage1–130.027%29 Mar →
overpass16–140.0817%29 Mar →
dust29–13-0.0111%29 Mar →
ancient7–13-0.029%29 Mar →
ancient13–110.0613%29 Mar →

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

100 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →

This profile is built from public Steam data. If it is yours, you can remove it, or delete your CSDB account.