Majin — CS2 Stats

76561198167338622[U:1:207072894]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

721Tracked matches52%Win rate2024Tracked since

CSDB Rating5.6 SolidAggressive Rifler

Premier CS Rating19,994Purple band · top ~8.5% of ranked players (population est.)

CSDB Leaderboard#18812 of 47500 tracked

FaceitLevel 8Top 31.2% of ranked FACEIT players

Ladder ranks via Leetify

Share this profile

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim75

Positioning59

Utility28

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY46–52–2Last 10046%Win rateWLLLLLWWWW

Last 10 vs previous 10: +10pp win rate · -0.02 avg rating

Player DNA

Primary style: Aggressive Rifler — Takes opening fights often, backed by a strong aim profile.

Aim7.5

Aggression8.4

Utility2.8

Positioning5.9

Opening Duels3.8

Clutch4.8

Limited utility dependence

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

Plays most like ropz 86% playstyle similarity

Most alike: positioning profile, opening-duel success.

Where you differ: lower utility contribution; lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Utility. Utility contribution runs far behind the mechanical game — the cheapest rating gain on this profile is thrown, not aimed.

Reaction time. 621ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim7.5

Positioning5.9

Utility2.8

Mechanics5.3

Opening Duels3.8

Win Impact5.6

Composite 5.6/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.02+0.04

first ⅓ avg -0.02 → last ⅓ avg 0.02

Reaction time619ms−39ms

first ⅓ avg 658ms → last ⅓ avg 619ms

Headshot accuracy24.3%+3.3%

first ⅓ avg 21.1% → last ⅓ avg 24.3%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.12Best rating — ancient 13–11

13–1Biggest win — ancient

5Longest win streak

5–2In matches decided by ≤2 rounds

5Overtime games

Map breakdown

cacheBest map · 79% over 14mirageWeakest map · 17% over 6

Map	Grade	Played	Record	Win rate	Avg rating
dust2	B	29	15–14	52%	-0.00
anubis	B	15	8–7	53%	0.00
nuke	D	14	4–10	29%	0.00
cache	S	14	11–3	79%	-0.01
ancient	C	12	5–7	42%	0.00
inferno	D	9	2–7	22%	0.00
mirage	D	6	1–5	17%	0.00
office	—	1	0–1	0%	0.01

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Mirage is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (17% over 6). Start with the 6 essential Mirage lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

127Matches

55%Win rate

1.21Avg K/D

87.7ADR

58%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

44%1v1 clutch win

26%1v2 clutch win

5Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWLWWW

Map	Matches	Win rate	Avg K/D	Avg kills
Dust2	35	51%	1.01	16.0
Mirage	31	58%	1.42	17.6
Anubis	17	65%	1.24	18.6
Ancient	17	59%	1.28	17.6
Inferno	11	45%	1.00	15.9
Nuke	9	56%	1.23	21.4
Cache	4	75%	1.35	17.3
Train	2	0%	1.50	25.5

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

24.2%Headshot accuracy

36.4%Accuracy (enemy spotted)

37.7%Spray accuracy

74.1%Counter-strafing

9.2°Preaim

621msReaction time

39.7%T opening success

50.8%CT opening success

0.29Enemies flashed / flash

3.1%Flash assists

10.31HE damage / grenade

1.37Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

Grenades & Utility
Most of your flashes are blinding nobody. A handful of reliable pop-flash lineups fixes this faster than anything else.
Enemies flashed per flash 0.2887 — below the 0.5 mark we flag
Grenade Lineups →
Advanced Mechanics
You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.
T opening duels 39.6762% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Mirage

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

17% win rate across 6 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Mirage callouts & strategy →Mirage grenade lineups →

Recent matches

Map	Score	Rating	HS%	Date
dust2	13–5	0.05	34%	30 Aug →
ancient	11–13	0.03	24%	30 Aug →
nuke	8–13	-0.04	19%	30 Aug →
inferno	8–13	-0.03	27%	29 Aug →
anubis	10–13	0.06	23%	29 Aug →
nuke	8–9	-0.01	12%	28 Aug →
dust2	13–4	-0.03	20%	28 Aug →
cache	13–8	0.04	21%	27 Aug →
dust2	13–10	-0.02	15%	27 Aug →
mirage	13–10	-0.00	26%	26 Aug →
inferno	13–11	0.01	22%	26 Aug →
cache	7–13	0.02	21%	26 Aug →
dust2	13–7	0.06	25%	25 Aug →
anubis	10–13	-0.05	14%	25 Aug →
inferno	7–13	0.01	23%	24 Aug →
ancient	13–10	0.07	27%	24 Aug →
dust2	13–7	0.10	36%	24 Aug →
mirage	9–13	0.01	17%	24 Aug →
ancient	5–13	0.03	38%	23 Aug →
nuke	10–13	-0.01	30%	23 Aug →
cache	13–10	-0.04	25%	23 Aug →
inferno	7–13	0.04	25%	23 Aug →
ancient	8–1	0.05	32%	23 Aug →
anubis	13–7	0.05	17%	23 Aug →
inferno	9–13	-0.05	33%	22 Aug →
nuke	10–13	0.04	21%	22 Aug →
ancient	13–11	0.12	23%	22 Aug →
nuke	12–12	0.01	26%	22 Aug →
nuke	13–9	0.00	30%	21 Aug →
anubis	13–7	-0.01	27%	21 Aug →
dust2	6–13	-0.04	32%	20 Aug →
nuke	10–13	0.01	16%	20 Aug →
dust2	13–6	0.11	23%	20 Aug →
anubis	13–10	0.04	24%	19 Aug →
nuke	7–13	-0.04	18%	19 Aug →
cache	13–10	-0.00	30%	18 Aug →
ancient	13–1	0.04	29%	18 Aug →
mirage	10–13	-0.07	15%	17 Aug →
cache	15–15	0.01	22%	16 Aug →
mirage	8–13	0.06	19%	15 Aug →
dust2	13–8	-0.00	24%	15 Aug →
mirage	7–13	0.02	29%	14 Aug →
anubis	3–13	-0.02	31%	14 Aug →
mirage	6–13	-0.02	19%	14 Aug →
cache	13–9	-0.04	17%	13 Aug →
anubis	13–16	-0.07	15%	13 Aug →
dust2	3–13	-0.08	35%	13 Aug →
nuke	8–13	-0.00	37%	13 Aug →
nuke	6–2	0.04	19%	13 Aug →
inferno	13–6	-0.01	29%	12 Aug →
dust2	13–10	-0.01	25%	12 Aug →
dust2	5–13	-0.02	32%	11 Aug →
dust2	13–7	-0.03	28%	11 Aug →
dust2	13–3	-0.02	27%	11 Aug →
anubis	4–13	-0.03	19%	11 Aug →
dust2	6–13	-0.06	14%	11 Aug →
dust2	13–11	-0.03	21%	10 Aug →
anubis	1–13	-0.07	21%	10 Aug →
dust2	13–8	0.07	23%	10 Aug →
ancient	4–13	-0.15	13%	10 Aug →
dust2	10–13	0.01	30%	10 Aug →
dust2	13–5	0.09	26%	10 Aug →
anubis	16–13	0.02	16%	8 Aug →
nuke	9–13	0.00	24%	8 Aug →
dust2	7–13	-0.00	31%	8 Aug →
nuke	13–7	0.10	26%	7 Aug →
cache	13–6	0.01	36%	7 Aug →
inferno	5–13	-0.04	17%	7 Aug →
cache	13–7	-0.03	27%	7 Aug →
dust2	8–13	-0.07	28%	7 Aug →
nuke	7–13	-0.06	20%	7 Aug →
anubis	13–16	0.03	22%	6 Aug →
ancient	16–12	-0.00	23%	5 Aug →
cache	13–11	-0.02	24%	5 Aug →
dust2	13–11	0.00	21%	4 Aug →
ancient	7–13	-0.07	18%	4 Aug →
cache	13–5	-0.06	26%	4 Aug →
dust2	10–13	-0.07	18%	3 Aug →
anubis	13–9	0.04	15%	2 Aug →
dust2	6–13	-0.07	16%	2 Aug →
anubis	13–8	0.04	22%	2 Aug →
inferno	10–13	0.06	26%	2 Aug →
office	0–13	0.01	31%	1 Aug →
dust2	10–13	-0.00	25%	1 Aug →
cache	5–13	-0.06	26%	31 Jul →
cache	13–10	0.01	22%	30 Jul →
nuke	13–9	0.00	22%	30 Jul →
ancient	6–13	-0.06	22%	30 Jul →
dust2	7–13	-0.04	26%	30 Jul →
dust2	13–5	-0.02	18%	30 Jul →
anubis	13–10	0.01	23%	29 Jul →
dust2	10–13	-0.01	20%	29 Jul →
ancient	9–13	-0.00	13%	29 Jul →
inferno	10–13	0.02	30%	29 Jul →
dust2	5–13	-0.02	19%	28 Jul →
cache	13–7	-0.04	9%	28 Jul →
dust2	7–13	0.00	13%	28 Jul →
ancient	7–13	-0.04	21%	27 Jul →
cache	13–7	0.02	19%	27 Jul →
anubis	13–7	0.00	12%	26 Jul →