brit

brit — CS2 Stats

76561198162091702[U:1:201825974]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

365Tracked matches57%Win rate2024Tracked since
CSDB Rating4.4 DevelopingPositional Player
Premier CS Rating13,335Blue band · top ~37.2% of ranked players (population est.)
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 20 Sep 2026 (3 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

No change since then. Play, then come back: the next observation lands here.

Track this profile

CSDB reads this profile's Premier rating from its tracked match history, and records Faceit ELO once on every day the page is viewed. 37 days played since 13 Jul 2026. Come back after the next session and the change shows above.

Is this you? Sign in with Steam to claim it and connect match tracking →

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 13,335 +3,703 17 Jul20 Sept · 35 days played
9,11514,723peak 14,72317 Jul20 Sept
14,999Peak Premier in tracked matches
916Highest Faceit ELO seen on CSDB
37Days played since 2026-07-13

Faceit ELO

  • At peak — 916
  • Next: Level 5 at 1,051 135 to go
  • Reached: Level 4 · Level 3 · Level 2
  • Level 4 first seen 2026-09-09
  • Level 3 first seen 2026-09-09

Premier CS Rating

  • 1,388 below peak (14,723)
  • +2,825 over 30 days · improving
  • Next: Purple band at 15,000 1,665 to go
  • Reached: Blue band · Light Blue band
  • Blue band first seen 2026-09-09
  • Light Blue band first seen 2026-09-09

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do. Faceit ELO is CSDB’s own observation — no feed exposes ELO per match, so that line only has the days the profile was viewed and cannot be backfilled.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGbritPREMIER13,335 · Blue bandPEAK ELO916csdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim54
Positioning46
Utility33

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY53461Last 10053%Win rateWLWLLLLLWW

Last 10 vs previous 10: −20pp win rate · −0.01 avg rating · −4.8pp headshot accuracy · −31ms reaction

Win rate down 20pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — more than a 10-match window's normal noise (±20pp).

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 23 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 11%
  • Avg reaction 637ms

Last 10

  • 46 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.03
  • Avg headshot accuracy 14%
  • Avg reaction 600ms

Last 20

  • 1010 · 50% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.03
  • Avg headshot accuracy 16%
  • Avg reaction 616ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Positional PlayerPositioning stands above the rest of this profile (+2.3 against its own average).

Aim5.4
Utility3.3
Positioning4.6
Opening Duels1.3
Clutch0.0

Strong T-side opener

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

NiKo

Plays most like NiKo 87% playstyle similarity

Most alike: positioning profile, utility contribution.

Where you differ: lower opening-duel success; lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

CT openings. Opening success drops from 43% on T to 27% on CT — first contacts on the defending side are being lost.

Reaction time. 629ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Counter-strafing. Only 70% of shots are taken properly stopped — moving-shot inaccuracy is quietly taxing every duel.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim5.4
Positioning4.6
Utility3.3
Mechanics4.4
Opening Duels1.7
Win Impact7.2

Composite 4.4/10 (Developing), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×0.95 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.02−0.01
first ⅓ avg -0.01 → last ⅓ avg -0.02
Reaction time620ms−56ms
first ⅓ avg 676ms → last ⅓ avg 620ms
Headshot accuracy16.0%+2.0%
first ⅓ avg 13.9% → last ⅓ avg 16.0%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.11Best match rating · 13–3 · ancient, 29 Aug
42%Best headshot accuracy · 13–7 · dust2, 19 Sept
469msFastest reaction time · 13–10 · nuke, 24 Aug
13–0Biggest win · dust2, 4 Aug

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

6Longest win streak
76In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
10Overtime games

Map breakdown

nukeBest map · 67% over 15mirageWeakest map · 43% over 30
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
mirageC30131743%-0.02
nukeS1510567%0.01
cacheA159660%-0.01
dust2B158753%-0.02
ancientA116555%-0.01
infernoA106460%-0.03
anubis41325%-0.02

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Mirage is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (43% over 30). Start with the 6 essential Mirage lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

13Matches
38%Win rate
0.85Avg K/D
60.7ADR
39%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

20%1v1 clutch win
29%1v2 clutch win
1Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLLLLW

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage70%0.7213.3
Ancient4100%1.1818.8
Dust210%0.539.0
Overpass1100%0.6911.0

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

16.1%Headshot accuracy
35.8%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
37.4%Spray accuracy
69.9%Counter-strafing
11.1°Preaim
629msReaction time
43.4%T opening success
26.7%CT opening success
0.62Enemies flashed / flash
2.8%Flash assists
4.71HE damage / grenade
6.26Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    Losing the first CT duel repeatedly usually means holding angles that favour the peeker.

    CT opening duels 26.6883% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Mirage

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

43% win rate across 30 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Mirage callouts & strategyMirage grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
nuke13–40.0210%20 Sept
inferno10–13-0.0214%20 Sept
mirage13–2-0.019%20 Sept
anubis10–130.0213%20 Sept
nuke6–13-0.087%19 Sept
mirage0–13-0.067%19 Sept
nuke8–13-0.0114%19 Sept
cache8–13-0.0312%19 Sept
dust213–7-0.0942%19 Sept
nuke13–11-0.0310%18 Sept
mirage13–50.0522%18 Sept
dust213–9-0.0124%17 Sept
dust210–13-0.0712%17 Sept
mirage12–16-0.079%12 Sept
dust213–9-0.0810%12 Sept
mirage13–70.0421%12 Sept
dust210–130.0220%11 Sept
nuke13–70.0532%11 Sept
mirage13–5-0.0717%11 Sept
ancient4–13-0.0819%11 Sept
anubis13–160.0116%11 Sept
cache13–110.0313%10 Sept
nuke13–10-0.036%8 Sept
mirage13–100.0126%8 Sept
anubis13–9-0.0515%8 Sept
mirage9–13-0.0423%7 Sept
mirage13–100.0122%6 Sept
nuke13–3-0.0312%6 Sept
ancient4–13-0.097%6 Sept
mirage13–6-0.0417%6 Sept
mirage13–6-0.0219%5 Sept
cache16–13-0.0118%5 Sept
ancient13–30.119%29 Aug
ancient13–8-0.0325%28 Aug
dust213–3-0.0114%28 Aug
mirage15–15-0.0110%26 Aug
dust213–16-0.0330%25 Aug
cache10–13-0.086%24 Aug
nuke13–100.0111%24 Aug
inferno4–13-0.0911%22 Aug
ancient13–60.0417%22 Aug
mirage13–9-0.028%22 Aug
mirage8–13-0.0424%20 Aug
mirage13–20.0527%20 Aug
ancient13–100.017%20 Aug
nuke13–8-0.0411%20 Aug
dust214–16-0.0117%20 Aug
cache10–13-0.0312%19 Aug
ancient16–14-0.0130%19 Aug
mirage6–13-0.0224%19 Aug
cache16–13-0.0320%18 Aug
ancient9–13-0.0415%18 Aug
mirage6–13-0.0220%17 Aug
nuke13–70.0831%14 Aug
ancient5–13-0.0424%14 Aug
dust213–11-0.0316%14 Aug
mirage4–13-0.0514%14 Aug
nuke8–130.0518%13 Aug
cache7–13-0.0613%13 Aug
cache13–6-0.0117%13 Aug
inferno13–90.000%12 Aug
mirage16–140.0118%12 Aug
dust210–13-0.0513%11 Aug
mirage10–130.0115%7 Aug
dust213–50.0114%5 Aug
cache13–110.052%5 Aug
inferno13–20.0927%5 Aug
dust23–13-0.0321%5 Aug
cache13–7-0.0015%4 Aug
dust213–00.0618%4 Aug
mirage7–13-0.0810%3 Aug
inferno9–0-0.090%3 Aug
ancient13–20.0421%3 Aug
nuke13–20.0719%2 Aug
mirage13–5-0.0727%2 Aug
mirage2–13-0.0515%1 Aug
inferno5–130.0112%1 Aug
mirage13–10.0624%1 Aug
cache13–90.1015%1 Aug
mirage9–130.0215%1 Aug
ancient11–13-0.0610%1 Aug
nuke5–13-0.0110%1 Aug
dust213–0-0.0125%1 Aug
mirage2–13-0.076%1 Aug
cache4–13-0.0912%1 Aug
inferno13–4-0.035%19 Jul
mirage6–13-0.0718%18 Jul
mirage4–13-0.045%18 Jul
cache13–70.075%17 Jul
mirage11–130.0013%17 Jul
dust211–13-0.029%17 Jul
nuke13–110.0314%17 Jul
cache13–20.0425%17 Jul
nuke11–130.038%16 Jul
inferno11–13-0.0416%15 Jul
anubis8–13-0.067%15 Jul
inferno13–9-0.0714%15 Jul
mirage7–13-0.0014%13 Jul
cache9–13-0.0613%13 Jul
inferno16–13-0.0120%13 Jul

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

100 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →