anchor

anchor — CS2 Stats

76561198160486877[U:1:200221149]Steam profile ↗

3,091Tracked matches53%Win rate2020Tracked since
CSDB Rating7.0 StrongHybrid Rifler
CSDB Leaderboard#6574 of 8372 tracked
WingmanSupreme Master First Class
Ladder ranks via Leetify

Rating over time

3,841Peak Faceit ELO on CSDB
1Days observed since 2026-08-28

Faceit ELO

  • At peak — 3,841
  • Next: 4,000 ELO at 4,000 159 to go
  • Reached: 3,500 ELO · 3,000 ELO · 2,500 ELO · Level 10
  • 3,500 ELO first seen 2026-08-28
  • 3,000 ELO first seen 2026-08-28

CSDB's own observations — this history builds from the day a profile is first viewed and cannot be backfilled.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGanchorPEAK ELO3,841csdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim95
Positioning52
Utility46

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY61381Last 10061%Win rateWWWLLLWWWL

Last 10 vs previous 10: +10pp win rate · +0.02 avg rating

Player DNA

Primary style: Hybrid RiflerAim-led profile without a single dominant tendency.

Aim9.5
Aggression4.6
Utility4.6
Positioning5.2
Opening Duels3.0
Clutch3.8

Sharp aimerStrong CT-side opener

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

NiKo

Plays most like NiKo 92% playstyle similarity

Most alike: aim profile, opening-fight frequency.

Where you differ: lower utility contribution.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Strengths

Aim. Aim score of 95 — the mechanical foundation is a clear strength.

Areas to improve

Positioning. Positioning trails aim by 43 points — deaths here waste a strong aim profile.

Utility. Utility contribution runs far behind the mechanical game — the cheapest rating gain on this profile is thrown, not aimed.

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 57% on CT to 27% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim9.5
Positioning5.2
Utility4.6
Mechanics7.4
Opening Duels3.4
Win Impact6.1

Composite 7.0/10 (Strong), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.05 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.01−0.01
first ⅓ avg 0.00 → last ⅓ avg -0.01
Reaction time426ms−54ms
first ⅓ avg 480ms → last ⅓ avg 426ms
Headshot accuracy20.5%−2.4%
first ⅓ avg 22.9% → last ⅓ avg 20.5%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.14Best rating — dust2 13–0
130Biggest win — cache
12Longest win streak
W3Current streak
62In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
13Overtime games

Map breakdown

cacheBest map · 83% over 6infernoWeakest map · 33% over 9
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
nukeB23121152%0.00
dust2S2115671%-0.00
ancientA1911858%0.00
mirageS1310377%0.02
anubisA95456%-0.01
infernoD93633%-0.00
cacheS65183%0.03

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Inferno is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (33% over 9). Start with the 6 essential Inferno lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

5,043Matches
61%Win rate
1.44Avg K/D
81.3ADR
57%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

39%1v1 clutch win
23%1v2 clutch win
17Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLWLLW

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Ancient49359%1.3716.9
Mirage40259%1.4317.6
Anubis28963%1.3516.9
Dust222257%1.3115.8
Nuke13462%1.3116.3
Vertigo6455%1.5618.3
Inferno4547%1.0815.2
Train3266%1.3818.2

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

20.8%Headshot accuracy
41.9%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
49.4%Spray accuracy
83.3%Counter-strafing
8.8°Preaim
436msReaction time
26.8%T opening success
57.5%CT opening success
0.45Enemies flashed / flash
4.3%Flash assists
5.09HE damage / grenade
6.81Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Grenades & Utility

    Most of your flashes are blinding nobody. A handful of reliable pop-flash lineups fixes this faster than anything else.

    Enemies flashed per flash 0.4465 — below the 0.5 mark we flag

    Grenade Lineups
  2. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 26.8313% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Inferno

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

33% win rate across 9 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Inferno callouts & strategyInferno grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
dust216–130.0014%27 Aug
ancient13–70.0436%27 Aug
nuke13–40.0217%27 Aug
dust22–13-0.0316%27 Aug
ancient16–19-0.0627%16 Aug
nuke4–13-0.0710%16 Aug
mirage13–6-0.0119%16 Aug
dust213–11-0.0142%16 Aug
ancient16–120.0824%16 Aug
nuke7–130.0422%16 Aug
dust213–40.0232%15 Aug
nuke4–13-0.0614%15 Aug
cache13–50.0013%15 Aug
anubis13–3-0.0120%15 Aug
dust20–1-0.080%15 Aug
dust23–13-0.087%14 Aug
ancient10–130.0322%14 Aug
cache13–30.0322%14 Aug
nuke5–13-0.0519%14 Aug
mirage13–9-0.0133%14 Aug
nuke10–130.0224%12 Aug
dust212–16-0.0422%8 Aug
ancient10–13-0.0111%8 Aug
cache13–00.1019%7 Aug
nuke13–60.0814%7 Aug
mirage3–13-0.0717%7 Aug
nuke13–100.0024%7 Aug
inferno8–13-0.0217%7 Aug
anubis13–8-0.0312%4 Aug
mirage13–70.0021%4 Aug
dust210–13-0.0336%4 Aug
ancient9–13-0.0328%4 Aug
ancient13–8-0.0325%3 Aug
mirage13–40.1225%3 Aug
ancient13–40.0523%3 Aug
cache19–170.0120%3 Aug
mirage16–14-0.0120%2 Aug
nuke13–3-0.029%2 Aug
mirage6–13-0.0331%2 Aug
cache10–130.0314%2 Aug
dust213–6-0.0232%1 Aug
mirage17–19-0.0116%31 Jul
ancient13–10-0.0024%31 Jul
dust213–20.1327%20 Jul
cache13–6-0.0121%20 Jul
dust213–00.1423%20 Jul
ancient8–130.0313%20 Jul
mirage13–30.0832%14 Jul
ancient13–4-0.0111%11 Jul
nuke13–50.0425%11 Jul
dust213–60.0328%7 Jul
nuke13–110.0021%7 Jul
ancient5–13-0.0122%7 Jul
nuke13–80.0327%1 Jul
nuke4–13-0.0732%14 Jun
inferno7–13-0.0416%14 Jun
inferno7–13-0.0416%14 Jun
nuke4–13-0.0732%14 Jun
inferno5–13-0.0020%13 Jun
anubis5–130.0318%13 Jun
inferno5–13-0.0020%13 Jun
anubis5–130.0318%13 Jun
ancient6–13-0.0314%13 Jun
anubis13–5-0.0011%13 Jun
mirage16–120.0419%13 Jun
anubis13–5-0.0011%13 Jun
ancient6–13-0.0314%13 Jun
mirage16–120.0419%13 Jun
inferno13–20.0028%13 Jun
nuke13–50.0121%13 Jun
nuke13–50.0121%13 Jun
inferno13–20.0028%13 Jun
anubis2–13-0.0317%24 May
inferno12–16-0.0029%24 May
anubis15–15-0.0311%23 May
mirage13–70.0222%23 May
dust23–13-0.0342%23 May
ancient13–7-0.0121%17 May
dust219–17-0.0115%17 May
nuke8–13-0.0519%17 May
dust219–17-0.0115%17 May
nuke8–13-0.0519%17 May
ancient13–7-0.0121%17 May
ancient13–60.0329%17 May
dust213–9-0.0315%17 May
nuke7–13-0.0131%17 May
dust213–9-0.0315%17 May
nuke7–13-0.0131%17 May
ancient13–60.0329%17 May
dust213–10-0.0216%16 May
inferno13–40.0524%16 May
dust213–10-0.0216%16 May
nuke13–80.0921%16 May
dust213–60.0338%16 May
dust213–60.0338%16 May
nuke13–80.0921%16 May
nuke13–40.0321%15 May
mirage13–40.0621%15 May
anubis13–6-0.0218%15 May
ancient13–5-0.0526%15 May

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

3K ELO Club1,000 Matches12-Win StreakAim 90+
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →