OWNER — CS2 Stats

PRO“iceiceice”Basement BoysUkraineIGLSettings & gear profile →

76561198096933265[U:1:136667537]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

3,038Tracked matches53%Win rate2020Tracked since

CSDB Rating6.7 SolidPassive Rifler

Premier CS Rating27,342Top 10% of 819 CSDB-tracked playersRed band · top ~1.9% of ranked players (population est.)

CSDB Leaderboard#567 of 12650 tracked

FaceitLevel 10 · 3,850 ELOTop 12.4% of ranked FACEIT players

WingmanThe Global Elite

Ladder ranks via Leetify

Rating over time

27,342Peak Premier on CSDB

3,850Peak Faceit ELO on CSDB

1Days observed since 2026-08-28

Faceit ELO

At peak — 3,850
Next: 4,000 ELO at 4,000 — 150 to go
Reached: 3,500 ELO · 3,000 ELO · 2,500 ELO · Level 10
3,500 ELO first seen 2026-08-28
3,000 ELO first seen 2026-08-28

Premier CS Rating

At peak — 27,342
Next: Gold band at 30,000 — 2,658 to go
Reached: Red band · Pink band · Purple band · Blue band
Red band first seen 2026-08-28
Pink band first seen 2026-08-28

CSDB's own observations — this history builds from the day a profile is first viewed and cannot be backfilled.

Share this profile

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim88

Positioning50

Utility54

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY60–39–1Last 10060%Win rateWWWLLLWWWL

Last 10 vs previous 10: +10pp win rate · -0.02 avg rating

Player DNA

Primary style: Passive Rifler — Aim-led profile without a single dominant tendency.

Aim8.8

Aggression4.0

Utility5.4

Positioning5.0

Opening Duels1.1

Clutch3.4

Sharp aimerStrong CT-side opener

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

Plays most like NiKo 92% playstyle similarity

Most alike: aim profile, opening-fight frequency.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Strengths

Aim. Aim score of 88 — the mechanical foundation is a clear strength.

Areas to improve

Preaim. Mechanical aim is strong but the crosshair sits 10.2° off target when enemies appear — placement, not flicking, is the bigger win available.

Positioning. Positioning trails aim by 38 points — deaths here waste a strong aim profile.

Utility. Utility contribution runs far behind the mechanical game — the cheapest rating gain on this profile is thrown, not aimed.

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 53% on CT to 16% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim8.8

Positioning5.0

Utility5.4

Mechanics6.7

Opening Duels2.9

Win Impact6.1

Composite 6.7/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.05 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.00−0.01

first ⅓ avg 0.01 → last ⅓ avg -0.00

Reaction time439ms−62ms

first ⅓ avg 501ms → last ⅓ avg 439ms

Headshot accuracy19.3%−2.0%

first ⅓ avg 21.3% → last ⅓ avg 19.3%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.12Best rating — ancient 13–5

13–0Biggest win — cache

13Longest win streak

W3Current streak

7–4In matches decided by ≤2 rounds

13Overtime games

Map breakdown

cacheBest map · 80% over 5infernoWeakest map · 33% over 9

Map	Grade	Played	Record	Win rate	Avg rating
nuke	A	24	14–10	58%	0.00
dust2	S	20	13–7	65%	0.01
ancient	A	18	11–7	61%	0.01
mirage	S	13	10–3	77%	-0.00
anubis	B	11	5–6	45%	0.00
inferno	D	9	3–6	33%	-0.01
cache	S	5	4–1	80%	0.06

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Inferno is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (33% over 9). Start with the 6 essential Inferno lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

8,600Matches

55%Win rate

1.28Avg K/D

86.2ADR

49%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

37%1v1 clutch win

24%1v2 clutch win

16Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLWLWL

Map	Matches	Win rate	Avg K/D	Avg kills
Mirage	636	59%	1.25	17.8
Ancient	346	55%	1.23	17.4
Dust2	279	57%	1.29	17.2
Anubis	274	59%	1.29	17.5
Nuke	152	56%	1.25	17.3
Train	59	44%	1.18	16.7
Inferno	33	48%	1.06	14.4
Vertigo	31	61%	1.24	18.9

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Inventory

$443Inventory value45ItemsFull inventory breakdown →

$300

$52

$34

$24

$19

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

19.5%Headshot accuracy

38.9%Accuracy (enemy spotted)

42.9%Spray accuracy

80.2%Counter-strafing

10.2°Preaim

453msReaction time

15.9%T opening success

52.8%CT opening success

0.60Enemies flashed / flash

5.7%Flash assists

6.39HE damage / grenade

13.34Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

Advanced Mechanics
You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.
T opening duels 15.8944% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Inferno

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

33% win rate across 9 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Inferno callouts & strategy →Inferno grenade lineups →

Recent matches

Map	Score	Rating	HS%	Date
dust2	16–13	0.02	16%	27 Aug →
ancient	13–7	-0.01	19%	27 Aug →
nuke	13–4	-0.06	13%	27 Aug →
dust2	2–13	-0.06	26%	27 Aug →
ancient	16–19	-0.05	12%	16 Aug →
nuke	4–13	-0.09	12%	16 Aug →
mirage	13–6	0.01	33%	16 Aug →
dust2	13–11	0.07	16%	16 Aug →
ancient	16–12	0.04	25%	16 Aug →
nuke	7–13	-0.08	7%	16 Aug →
dust2	13–4	0.09	22%	15 Aug →
nuke	4–13	-0.02	20%	15 Aug →
cache	13–5	0.09	24%	15 Aug →
anubis	13–3	-0.03	11%	15 Aug →
dust2	0–1	-0.04	0%	15 Aug →
dust2	3–13	-0.08	32%	14 Aug →
ancient	10–13	-0.01	14%	14 Aug →
cache	13–3	0.03	19%	14 Aug →
nuke	5–13	0.01	25%	14 Aug →
mirage	13–9	-0.03	11%	14 Aug →
dust2	12–16	-0.01	13%	8 Aug →
ancient	10–13	0.02	15%	8 Aug →
cache	13–0	0.10	13%	7 Aug →
nuke	13–6	0.01	33%	7 Aug →
mirage	3–13	-0.00	35%	7 Aug →
nuke	13–10	0.02	19%	7 Aug →
inferno	8–13	-0.00	26%	7 Aug →
anubis	13–8	0.03	29%	4 Aug →
mirage	13–7	-0.02	18%	4 Aug →
dust2	10–13	0.00	19%	4 Aug →
ancient	9–13	-0.02	18%	4 Aug →
ancient	13–8	0.04	16%	3 Aug →
mirage	13–4	0.00	24%	3 Aug →
ancient	13–4	0.00	28%	3 Aug →
cache	19–17	0.07	23%	3 Aug →
mirage	16–14	0.01	34%	2 Aug →
nuke	13–3	0.12	37%	2 Aug →
mirage	6–13	0.00	10%	2 Aug →
cache	10–13	0.01	18%	2 Aug →
mirage	17–19	-0.02	20%	31 Jul →
ancient	13–10	0.03	26%	31 Jul →
nuke	13–11	0.10	24%	27 Jul →
dust2	13–10	0.02	24%	23 Jul →
anubis	11–13	0.04	21%	22 Jul →
anubis	2–13	0.05	29%	22 Jul →
ancient	13–4	0.10	26%	11 Jul →
nuke	13–5	0.04	15%	11 Jul →
dust2	13–6	0.10	23%	7 Jul →
nuke	13–11	0.01	23%	7 Jul →
ancient	5–13	-0.02	19%	7 Jul →
nuke	13–8	-0.08	11%	1 Jul →
nuke	4–13	-0.03	14%	14 Jun →
inferno	7–13	-0.03	16%	14 Jun →
inferno	7–13	-0.03	16%	14 Jun →
nuke	4–13	-0.03	14%	14 Jun →
inferno	5–13	-0.03	19%	13 Jun →
anubis	5–13	-0.05	19%	13 Jun →
inferno	5–13	-0.03	19%	13 Jun →
anubis	5–13	-0.05	19%	13 Jun →
ancient	6–13	-0.04	9%	13 Jun →
anubis	13–5	0.05	21%	13 Jun →
mirage	16–12	0.02	26%	13 Jun →
anubis	13–5	0.05	21%	13 Jun →
ancient	6–13	-0.04	9%	13 Jun →
mirage	16–12	0.02	26%	13 Jun →
inferno	13–2	0.06	23%	13 Jun →
nuke	13–5	0.06	28%	13 Jun →
nuke	13–5	0.06	28%	13 Jun →
inferno	13–2	0.06	23%	13 Jun →
dust2	11–13	0.07	17%	28 May →
mirage	13–8	0.02	14%	26 May →
anubis	2–13	-0.03	50%	24 May →
inferno	12–16	-0.08	25%	24 May →
anubis	15–15	0.00	11%	23 May →
mirage	13–7	0.01	19%	23 May →
dust2	3–13	-0.03	12%	23 May →
ancient	13–7	0.04	20%	17 May →
dust2	19–17	0.01	15%	17 May →
nuke	8–13	0.02	18%	17 May →
dust2	19–17	0.01	15%	17 May →
nuke	8–13	0.02	18%	17 May →
ancient	13–7	0.04	20%	17 May →
ancient	13–6	0.00	25%	17 May →
dust2	13–9	0.01	23%	17 May →
nuke	7–13	-0.05	20%	17 May →
dust2	13–9	0.01	23%	17 May →
nuke	7–13	-0.05	20%	17 May →
ancient	13–6	0.00	25%	17 May →
dust2	13–10	0.01	10%	16 May →
inferno	13–4	-0.02	27%	16 May →
dust2	13–10	0.01	10%	16 May →
nuke	13–8	0.05	22%	16 May →
dust2	13–6	-0.00	23%	16 May →
dust2	13–6	-0.00	23%	16 May →
nuke	13–8	0.05	22%	16 May →
nuke	13–4	-0.00	23%	15 May →
mirage	13–4	-0.03	27%	15 May →
anubis	13–6	-0.06	38%	15 May →
ancient	13–5	0.12	18%	15 May →
nuke	13–6	0.01	20%	15 May →

Show all 100 matchesShow fewer

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

Faceit Level 103K ELO Club1,000 Matches13-Win Streak

Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →

Explore CSDB.gg

Sensitivity ConverterConvert sensitivity between CS2 and other games eDPI CalculatorCalculate your effective DPI cm/360 CalculatorMouse distance per full turn Resolution CalculatorCompare aspect ratios and resolutions Crosshair GeneratorBuild and preview custom crosshairs

Tools

Sticker Craft MakerPlan and price a CS2 sticker craft with live prices on every piece CS2 Stats TrackerLook up any player: Premier rating, Faceit level, matches and skill breakdown Trust Factor CheckerEstimate your CS2 Trust Factor from the signals Valve has acknowledged

Learn & Explore

Most Traded CS2 SkinsRanked by completed sales — transaction data, not listings Cheapest Knives in CS2Every knife type ranked by its cheapest live price Cheapest Gloves in CS2Every glove model ranked by its cheapest live price