Mikkel

Mikkel — CS2 Stats

76561198158312324[U:1:198046596]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

1,230Tracked matches48%Win rate2020Tracked since
CSDB Rating6.4 SolidPositional Player
Premier CS Rating19,503Top 50% of 190,010 CSDB-tracked playersPurple band · top ~10.5% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#85521 of 238003 tracked
WingmanLegendary Eagle Master
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 13 Sep 2026 (9 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

0Premier CS Rating · 19,503 → 19,503
+3Tracked matches · now 1,230
+3.7ppWin rate · 44.4% → 48.1%
Track this profile

CSDB reads this profile's Premier rating from its tracked match history, and records Faceit ELO once on every day the page is viewed. 28 days played since 24 Jul 2026. Come back after the next session and the change shows above.

Is this you? Sign in with Steam to claim it and connect match tracking →

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 19,503 -1,886 24 Jul13 Sept · 29 days played
18,17721,389peak 21,38924 Jul13 Sept
21,389Peak Premier in tracked matches
28Days played since 2026-07-24

Premier CS Rating

  • 1,886 below peak (21,389)
  • -651 over 30 days · declining
  • Next: Pink band at 20,000 497 to go
  • Reached: Pink band · Purple band · Blue band · Light Blue band
  • Purple band first seen 2026-08-28
  • Blue band first seen 2026-08-28

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGMikkelPREMIER19,503 · Purple bandcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim88
Positioning61
Utility54

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY44524Last 10044%Win rateWLLWWWLTLL

Last 10 vs previous 10: −20pp win rate · −0.02 avg rating · −3.9pp headshot accuracy · +14ms reaction

Win rate down 20pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — more than a 10-match window's normal noise (±20pp).

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 32 · 60% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.03
  • Avg headshot accuracy 21%
  • Avg reaction 569ms

Last 10

  • 451 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 23%
  • Avg reaction 546ms

Last 20

  • 1091 · 50% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.00
  • Avg headshot accuracy 25%
  • Avg reaction 539ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Positional PlayerPositioning stands above the rest of this profile (+2 against its own average).

Aim8.8
Utility5.4
Positioning6.1
Opening Duels4.2
Clutch0.6

Sharp aimer

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

iM

Plays most like iM 95% playstyle similarity

Most alike: aim profile, utility contribution.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Strengths

Aim. Aim score of 88 — the mechanical foundation is a clear strength.

Areas to improve

Utility. Utility contribution runs far behind the mechanical game — the cheapest rating gain on this profile is thrown, not aimed.

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 52% on CT to 33% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim8.8
Positioning6.1
Utility5.4
Mechanics6.8
Opening Duels3.1
Win Impact4.4

Composite 6.4/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.01−0.01
first ⅓ avg 0.00 → last ⅓ avg -0.01
Reaction time547ms−14ms
first ⅓ avg 562ms → last ⅓ avg 547ms
Headshot accuracy24.5%−0.0%
first ⅓ avg 24.6% → last ⅓ avg 24.5%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.12Best match rating · 13–3 · ancient, 30 Jul
52%Best headshot accuracy · 11–13 · cache, 30 Aug
359msFastest reaction time · 13–11 · mirage, 7 Sept
13–2Biggest win · ancient, 4 Sept

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

6Longest win streak
107In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
13Overtime games

Map breakdown

cacheBest map · 67% over 15nukeWeakest map · 23% over 13
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
ancientC2071335%0.01
infernoB1910953%-0.01
mirageC1761135%-0.00
cacheS1510567%-0.01
nukeD1331023%-0.02
dust2B126650%0.02
anubis42250%0.02

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Nuke is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (23% over 13). Start with the 6 essential Nuke lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

433Matches
52%Win rate
1.11Avg K/D
72.7ADR
35%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

23%1v1 clutch win
22%1v2 clutch win
10Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLWLWW

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage5551%0.9915.6
Inferno4650%1.0816.3
Ancient3339%1.0415.8
Dust22931%0.9316.0
Anubis2348%1.0015.9
Nuke1560%1.1116.8
Vertigo1080%0.9616.4
Overpass5100%1.0517.4

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

24.7%Headshot accuracy
36.3%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
39.6%Spray accuracy
80.4%Counter-strafing
7.7°Preaim
545msReaction time
33.3%T opening success
51.6%CT opening success
0.62Enemies flashed / flash
9.0%Flash assists
9.56HE damage / grenade
6.47Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 33.2677% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Nuke

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

23% win rate across 13 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Nuke callouts & strategyNuke grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
inferno13–10-0.0524%20 Sept
nuke8–13-0.0417%9 Sept
inferno6–13-0.0314%9 Sept
cache13–60.0025%9 Sept
cache13–7-0.0225%7 Sept
mirage13–110.0319%7 Sept
ancient10–13-0.0217%7 Sept
inferno15–15-0.0218%6 Sept
mirage11–130.0128%6 Sept
mirage5–13-0.0140%6 Sept
cache6–130.0224%4 Sept
dust213–90.0625%4 Sept
ancient13–20.0240%4 Sept
cache13–5-0.0324%4 Sept
inferno13–5-0.0120%2 Sept
dust216–140.0126%2 Sept
inferno13–90.0719%2 Sept
nuke7–13-0.0133%2 Sept
mirage8–13-0.0524%31 Aug
ancient7–130.0130%31 Aug
inferno13–70.0521%31 Aug
mirage13–9-0.0115%30 Aug
dust213–10-0.0242%30 Aug
cache11–130.0152%30 Aug
ancient15–150.0225%30 Aug
mirage5–13-0.0415%25 Aug
nuke9–13-0.0235%25 Aug
ancient11–13-0.0515%25 Aug
ancient6–13-0.0420%23 Aug
dust215–150.0117%21 Aug
inferno7–13-0.0023%21 Aug
ancient7–130.0116%21 Aug
inferno13–11-0.0425%19 Aug
nuke8–13-0.0222%19 Aug
inferno7–13-0.0119%19 Aug
inferno3–13-0.0833%12 Aug
cache13–40.0043%12 Aug
anubis9–130.0127%12 Aug
dust213–20.0321%12 Aug
nuke7–13-0.0214%12 Aug
mirage11–130.0333%12 Aug
nuke13–60.026%11 Aug
dust29–130.0224%11 Aug
cache16–14-0.0430%11 Aug
mirage6–13-0.0024%11 Aug
anubis13–70.0412%11 Aug
ancient13–30.0832%11 Aug
inferno16–14-0.0018%11 Aug
ancient16–140.0326%11 Aug
mirage13–10-0.0317%10 Aug
dust213–90.0250%10 Aug
nuke7–13-0.0828%9 Aug
dust213–90.0548%9 Aug
ancient13–70.0322%9 Aug
cache8–13-0.0123%9 Aug
anubis10–13-0.0320%6 Aug
nuke10–13-0.0731%6 Aug
cache16–140.0320%6 Aug
ancient9–130.0420%6 Aug
inferno11–13-0.0515%5 Aug
cache13–5-0.0325%5 Aug
inferno13–20.0526%5 Aug
mirage13–4-0.0211%5 Aug
dust29–13-0.0015%5 Aug
cache13–5-0.0117%3 Aug
mirage10–130.0124%3 Aug
ancient11–13-0.0324%3 Aug
inferno13–10-0.0330%3 Aug
dust28–130.0017%3 Aug
inferno12–160.0323%2 Aug
mirage15–15-0.0230%2 Aug
ancient13–30.1218%2 Aug
mirage13–70.1119%1 Aug
inferno13–11-0.0138%1 Aug
ancient8–130.0531%1 Aug
mirage13–110.0325%1 Aug
cache13–16-0.0618%1 Aug
mirage10–13-0.0415%31 Jul
inferno8–13-0.0226%31 Jul
inferno13–100.0426%31 Jul
dust29–130.0623%31 Jul
inferno14–16-0.0041%30 Jul
ancient13–30.1219%30 Jul
cache13–6-0.0015%30 Jul
nuke13–7-0.0230%30 Jul
ancient8–13-0.0723%29 Jul
anubis13–50.0524%29 Jul
cache13–20.0133%29 Jul
nuke10–13-0.0726%29 Jul
ancient13–80.0523%29 Jul
nuke9–13-0.0534%28 Jul
ancient2–13-0.088%28 Jul
dust25–13-0.0317%26 Jul
mirage10–13-0.0321%26 Jul
nuke9–130.0529%26 Jul
cache6–13-0.0512%25 Jul
nuke16–140.0543%25 Jul
mirage7–13-0.0626%25 Jul
ancient8–13-0.0022%25 Jul
ancient10–13-0.0126%24 Jul

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →