EastH1ll

EastH1ll — CS2 Stats

76561198155523670[U:1:195257942]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

1,092Tracked matches50%Win rate2020Tracked since
CSDB Rating5.4 DevelopingSupport
Premier CS Rating13,164Blue band · top ~38.1% of ranked players (population est.)
WingmanGold Nova Master
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 16 Sep 2026 (2 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

No change since then. Play, then come back: the next observation lands here.

Track this profile

CSDB reads this profile's Premier rating from its tracked match history, and records Faceit ELO once on every day the page is viewed. 30 days played since 15 Apr 2026. Come back after the next session and the change shows above.

Is this you? Sign in with Steam to claim it and connect match tracking →

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 13,164 -1,803 20 Apr16 Sept · 8 days played
11,91314,999peak 14,99920 Apr16 Sept
14,999Peak Premier in tracked matches
763Highest Faceit ELO seen on CSDB
30Days played since 2026-04-15

Faceit ELO

  • At peak — 763
  • Next: Level 4 at 901 138 to go
  • Reached: Level 3 · Level 2

Premier CS Rating

  • 1,835 below peak (14,999)
  • +1,149 over 90 days
  • Next: Purple band at 15,000 1,836 to go
  • Reached: Blue band · Light Blue band

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do. Faceit ELO is CSDB’s own observation — no feed exposes ELO per match, so that line only has the days the profile was viewed and cannot be backfilled.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGEastH1llPREMIER13,164 · Blue bandPEAK ELO763csdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim74
Positioning48
Utility65

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY454411Last 10045%Win rateWLWWLWTLWW

Last 10 vs previous 10: +30pp win rate · −0.01 avg rating · −1.4pp headshot accuracy · −31ms reaction

Win rate up 30pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — more than a 10-match window's normal noise (±20pp). Average match rating moved the other way (−0.01), so results shifted more than performance did.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 32 · 60% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.04
  • Avg headshot accuracy 22%
  • Avg reaction 586ms

Last 10

  • 631 · 60% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.03
  • Avg headshot accuracy 20%
  • Avg reaction 544ms

Last 20

  • 974 · 45% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 20%
  • Avg reaction 560ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: SupportUtility contribution stands above the rest of this profile (+2.9 against its own average).

Aim7.4
Utility6.5
Positioning4.8
Opening Duels2.0
Clutch1.0

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

Twistzz

Plays most like Twistzz 90% playstyle similarity

Most alike: positioning profile, opening-duel success.

Where you differ: lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim7.4
Positioning4.8
Utility6.5
Mechanics5.6
Opening Duels1.5
Win Impact5.0

Composite 5.4/10 (Developing), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×0.95 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.02−0.03
first ⅓ avg 0.01 → last ⅓ avg -0.02
Reaction time568ms−63ms
first ⅓ avg 631ms → last ⅓ avg 568ms
Headshot accuracy21.3%−0.3%
first ⅓ avg 21.6% → last ⅓ avg 21.3%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.19Best match rating · 13–4 · cache, 5 May
54%Best headshot accuracy · 10–13 · inferno, 16 Sept
406msFastest reaction time · 15–15 · inferno, 15 Sept
13–1Biggest win · cache, 20 May

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

4Longest win streak
77In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
6Overtime games

Map breakdown

cacheBest map · 58% over 36ancientWeakest map · 25% over 12
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
cacheA36211558%0.02
infernoC1771041%0.00
ancientD123925%-0.02
nukeB115645%-0.03
anubisC83538%-0.04
dust2D62433%-0.03
vertigo41325%-0.00
overpass31233%-0.09
mirage32167%-0.03

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Ancient is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (25% over 12). Start with the 6 essential Ancient lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

116Matches
53%Win rate
1.06Avg K/D
70.7ADR
41%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

25%1v1 clutch win
20%1v2 clutch win
7Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWWLWL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Ancient1275%0.9413.4
Inferno967%0.7111.6
Nuke757%0.9011.4
Anubis771%0.8311.3
Train475%1.1019.8
Mirage367%0.8211.3
Dust22100%0.6411.0
Cache10%1.1515.0

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

20.5%Headshot accuracy
33.8%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
34.1%Spray accuracy
75.3%Counter-strafing
8.7°Preaim
535msReaction time
31.7%T opening success
40.7%CT opening success
0.66Enemies flashed / flash
6.7%Flash assists
10.72HE damage / grenade
7.11Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 31.6913% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Ancient

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

25% win rate across 12 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Ancient callouts & strategyAncient grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
nuke13–8-0.0221%16 Sept
anubis5–13-0.123%16 Sept
ancient13–50.0128%16 Sept
dust213–8-0.066%16 Sept
inferno10–13-0.0354%16 Sept
ancient13–6-0.0211%15 Sept
inferno15–15-0.0319%15 Sept
ancient9–13-0.0022%15 Sept
anubis13–110.0215%15 Sept
nuke13–10-0.0717%15 Sept
inferno4–9-0.0819%15 Sept
nuke5–9-0.0512%15 Sept
nuke13–10-0.0210%14 Sept
ancient5–130.0326%14 Sept
inferno13–8-0.0218%14 Sept
vertigo5–9-0.0634%14 Sept
inferno8–80.0726%14 Sept
overpass9–10.0525%14 Sept
nuke8–8-0.0321%14 Sept
vertigo8–8-0.0720%14 Sept
inferno9–5-0.0736%14 Sept
anubis7–13-0.0321%2 Sept
dust29–13-0.0030%2 Sept
vertigo13–6-0.0433%2 Sept
ancient10–13-0.0517%1 Sept
cache13–6-0.0129%1 Sept
nuke13–160.0124%1 Sept
inferno9–50.0118%1 Sept
inferno14–16-0.0016%30 Aug
cache13–110.0324%26 Aug
nuke15–150.0220%26 Aug
nuke8–8-0.0519%26 Aug
inferno5–9-0.059%26 Aug
ancient6–13-0.0525%26 Aug
inferno8–8-0.0225%26 Aug
ancient13–16-0.0417%25 Aug
inferno13–30.0222%25 Aug
dust213–70.0317%25 Aug
anubis10–13-0.0124%25 Aug
cache13–11-0.0418%25 Aug
inferno11–13-0.0815%27 Jul
inferno6–9-0.0331%7 Jul
cache9–13-0.0317%7 Jul
ancient8–13-0.0425%6 Jul
nuke4–9-0.1127%24 Jun
mirage16–140.0320%24 Jun
inferno13–80.1120%24 Jun
vertigo8–80.1622%24 Jun
inferno9–40.1520%24 Jun
overpass0–9-0.290%24 Jun
cache12–12-0.0716%15 Jun
cache3–130.0120%15 Jun
cache13–6-0.019%27 May
cache13–4-0.0521%27 May
inferno11–130.0217%25 May
dust211–13-0.0116%25 May
ancient10–130.0117%25 May
ancient2–13-0.107%25 May
cache13–40.1550%22 May
cache9–0-0.0533%22 May
cache13–7-0.0223%22 May
cache13–40.0229%21 May
cache12–12-0.0126%20 May
cache13–10.1139%20 May
cache13–60.0232%20 May
cache10–13-0.0418%17 May
cache9–130.0422%17 May
cache11–13-0.0122%14 May
cache13–60.0133%14 May
cache7–130.0128%14 May
cache12–120.0526%14 May
cache13–7-0.0027%14 May
cache4–130.0515%13 May
cache13–9-0.0217%13 May
cache13–40.1329%13 May
cache6–13-0.0118%13 May
cache8–130.0421%13 May
cache13–70.0529%6 May
cache13–60.0216%6 May
cache13–110.1331%6 May
cache10–130.0731%5 May
cache13–40.1935%5 May
cache13–90.0613%5 May
cache13–11-0.0223%5 May
cache5–130.0325%5 May
cache6–13-0.039%29 Apr
anubis6–13-0.0514%27 Apr
mirage13–10-0.0520%27 Apr
anubis13–6-0.0710%23 Apr
mirage6–13-0.0814%22 Apr
dust27–13-0.0813%22 Apr
inferno13–30.0121%22 Apr
nuke13–5-0.0114%21 Apr
dust211–13-0.0713%21 Apr
overpass11–13-0.0222%21 Apr
ancient13–11-0.0133%21 Apr
nuke13–9-0.0120%20 Apr
anubis1–13-0.0921%20 Apr
anubis13–80.0127%20 Apr
ancient10–13-0.0124%15 Apr

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →