SnogzZzz

SnogzZzz — CS2 Stats

ZA76561198153600784[U:1:193335056]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

794Tracked matches60%Win rate2020Tracked since
CSDB Rating5.0 DevelopingSupport
Premier CS Rating18,965Top 50% of 175,286 CSDB-tracked playersPurple band · top ~12.6% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#86783 of 222646 tracked
FaceitLevel 2Top 97.9% of ranked FACEIT players
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 9 Sep 2026 (8 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

No change since then. Play, then come back: the next observation lands here.

Track this profile

CSDB reads this profile's Premier rating from its tracked match history, and records Faceit ELO once on every day the page is viewed. 23 days played since 1 Jun 2026. Come back after the next session and the change shows above.

Is this you? Sign in with Steam to claim it and connect match tracking →

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 18,965 +1,817 1 Jun9 Sept · 18 days played
14,07619,762peak 19,7621 Jun9 Sept
19,981Peak Premier in tracked matches
23Days played since 2026-06-01

Premier CS Rating

  • 797 below peak (19,762)
  • +2,736 over 90 days
  • Next: Pink band at 20,000 1,035 to go
  • Reached: Purple band · Blue band · Light Blue band
  • Purple band first seen 2026-09-01
  • Blue band first seen 2026-09-01

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do. Faceit ELO is CSDB’s own observation — no feed exposes ELO per match, so that line only has the days the profile was viewed and cannot be backfilled.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGSnogzZzzFACEITLevel 2STANDINGTop 97.9% of rankedPREMIER18,965 · Purple bandcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim52
Positioning43
Utility56

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

COLD56404Last 10056%Win rateLWLLLLLLWW

Last 10 vs previous 10: −40pp win rate · −0.02 avg rating · −5.3pp headshot accuracy · +46ms reaction

Win rate down 40pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — more than a 10-match window's normal noise (±20pp).

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 14 · 20% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.03
  • Avg headshot accuracy 13%
  • Avg reaction 627ms

Last 10

  • 37 · 30% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.03
  • Avg headshot accuracy 14%
  • Avg reaction 618ms

Last 20

  • 1010 · 50% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 17%
  • Avg reaction 595ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: SupportUtility contribution stands above the rest of this profile (+1.8 against its own average).

Aim5.2
Utility5.6
Positioning4.3
Opening Duels1.5

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

NiKo

Plays most like NiKo 76% playstyle similarity

Most alike: utility contribution, positioning profile.

Where you differ: lower opening-duel success; lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 38% on CT to 21% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Reaction time. 607ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim5.2
Positioning4.3
Utility5.6
Mechanics5.1
Opening Duels1.1
Win Impact8.3

Composite 5.0/10 (Developing), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.01+0.00
first ⅓ avg -0.01 → last ⅓ avg -0.01
Reaction time607ms−4ms
first ⅓ avg 611ms → last ⅓ avg 607ms
Headshot accuracy16.5%+1.2%
first ⅓ avg 15.3% → last ⅓ avg 16.5%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.09Best match rating · 13–4 · cache, 10 Jul
34%Best headshot accuracy · 13–8 · anubis, 12 Jun
367msFastest reaction time · 4–13 · dust2, 20 Jul
13–1Biggest win · dust2, 9 Sept

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

8Longest win streak
46In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
10Overtime games

Map breakdown

anubisBest map · 83% over 6dust2Weakest map · 34% over 29
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
dust2D29101934%-0.01
mirageB21101148%-0.02
nukeB147750%-0.02
infernoS119282%-0.02
ancientS97278%-0.02
cacheS86275%-0.02
anubisS65183%0.03
vertigo220100%0.01

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Dust 2 is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (34% over 29). Start with the 6 essential Dust 2 lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

15.9%Headshot accuracy
32.5%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
33.9%Spray accuracy
73.2%Counter-strafing
10.6°Preaim
607msReaction time
21.2%T opening success
38.5%CT opening success
0.59Enemies flashed / flash
4.1%Flash assists
8.15HE damage / grenade
16.22Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 21.2359% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Dust 2

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

34% win rate across 29 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Dust 2 callouts & strategyDust 2 grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
mirage13–16-0.039%9 Sept
dust213–1-0.0014%9 Sept
dust27–13-0.0615%9 Sept
inferno6–13-0.0514%7 Sept
dust211–13-0.0014%7 Sept
mirage7–13-0.109%3 Sept
dust27–13-0.0112%1 Sept
ancient5–13-0.0120%1 Sept
mirage16–14-0.0119%1 Sept
ancient13–10-0.0518%31 Aug
dust213–10-0.0217%31 Aug
mirage13–50.0517%31 Aug
nuke13–11-0.0221%31 Aug
anubis13–80.0215%31 Aug
dust211–13-0.0016%31 Aug
inferno16–13-0.0414%27 Aug
dust213–30.0130%27 Aug
ancient13–7-0.0521%27 Aug
nuke8–130.0133%27 Aug
mirage11–13-0.0714%27 Aug
inferno13–60.0324%27 Aug
mirage16–12-0.068%1 Aug
mirage13–9-0.0214%1 Aug
dust28–13-0.0415%1 Aug
mirage8–130.0216%29 Jul
nuke13–10-0.0413%29 Jul
dust213–20.0817%28 Jul
ancient13–7-0.0021%28 Jul
mirage16–14-0.025%25 Jul
ancient13–9-0.0114%25 Jul
anubis13–30.0717%25 Jul
dust213–80.0116%25 Jul
mirage13–60.0520%25 Jul
nuke11–13-0.0314%25 Jul
cache13–80.0121%25 Jul
dust213–50.0516%25 Jul
dust212–120.0511%24 Jul
dust214–16-0.0412%24 Jul
inferno13–100.0818%24 Jul
mirage7–13-0.0022%24 Jul
dust29–130.0223%24 Jul
mirage13–80.0122%24 Jul
dust24–13-0.1020%20 Jul
dust210–13-0.0016%20 Jul
mirage13–10-0.0316%20 Jul
dust214–16-0.0423%20 Jul
inferno16–12-0.0116%20 Jul
nuke13–10-0.056%18 Jul
dust25–13-0.107%18 Jul
ancient13–80.0121%18 Jul
cache9–13-0.0223%18 Jul
inferno13–9-0.0516%18 Jul
mirage2–13-0.0422%18 Jul
dust29–13-0.0425%17 Jul
nuke13–100.0527%17 Jul
anubis13–30.0114%17 Jul
dust25–13-0.0927%17 Jul
cache13–10-0.0415%15 Jul
dust213–8-0.0414%15 Jul
ancient10–13-0.0513%15 Jul
mirage8–130.029%15 Jul
mirage10–13-0.0211%14 Jul
cache13–6-0.068%14 Jul
nuke5–13-0.0713%14 Jul
dust24–130.0319%10 Jul
cache13–6-0.054%10 Jul
nuke5–13-0.077%10 Jul
cache15–15-0.0517%10 Jul
dust213–10-0.037%10 Jul
ancient13–6-0.0220%10 Jul
cache13–9-0.0613%10 Jul
mirage4–13-0.089%10 Jul
dust24–13-0.0015%10 Jul
cache13–40.096%10 Jul
mirage13–5-0.015%10 Jul
dust24–13-0.028%10 Jul
mirage7–13-0.0418%10 Jul
nuke9–13-0.036%10 Jul
nuke9–130.0123%4 Jul
anubis3–130.0223%4 Jul
inferno13–30.009%3 Jul
dust215–15-0.0218%3 Jul
nuke13–60.0019%3 Jul
anubis13–80.0334%12 Jun
nuke13–6-0.0414%12 Jun
mirage13–7-0.0413%12 Jun
inferno13–50.0516%12 Jun
dust213–11-0.0425%12 Jun
dust25–130.0218%6 Jun
nuke10–130.0112%6 Jun
nuke13–20.0333%6 Jun
vertigo13–7-0.0224%6 Jun
inferno13–3-0.065%6 Jun
mirage12–120.0315%5 Jun
vertigo13–50.0412%5 Jun
anubis13–70.0416%5 Jun
inferno4–13-0.1121%1 Jun
dust213–30.0113%1 Jun
ancient13–8-0.028%1 Jun
inferno13–8-0.0310%1 Jun

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

500 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →