Marlon4Tilt™

Marlon4Tilt™ — CS2 Stats

76561198150954571[U:1:190688843]Steam profile ↗

1,555Tracked matches47%Win rate2021Tracked since
CSDB Rating5.9 SolidHybrid Rifler
FaceitLevel 6Top 54.0% of ranked FACEIT players
Ladder ranks via Leetify

Share this profile

CSDB.GGMarlon4Tilt™FACEITLevel 6STANDINGTop 54.0% of rankedcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim86
Positioning48
Utility48

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

COLD57394Last 10057%Win rateLLLLWLWLLL

Last 10 vs previous 10: -50pp win rate · -0.01 avg rating

Player DNA

Primary style: Hybrid RiflerAim-led profile without a single dominant tendency.

Aim8.6
Aggression5.9
Utility4.8
Positioning4.8
Opening Duels1.6
Clutch4.4

Sharp aimerStrong CT-side opener

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

NiKo

Plays most like NiKo 89% playstyle similarity

Most alike: opening-fight frequency, aim profile.

Where you differ: lower utility contribution.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Strengths

Aim. Aim score of 86 — the mechanical foundation is a clear strength.

Areas to improve

Positioning. Positioning trails aim by 39 points — deaths here waste a strong aim profile.

Utility. Utility contribution runs far behind the mechanical game — the cheapest rating gain on this profile is thrown, not aimed.

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 45% on CT to 28% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Reaction time. 609ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim8.6
Positioning4.8
Utility4.8
Mechanics7.3
Opening Duels1.9
Win Impact3.9

Composite 5.9/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.02−0.01
first ⅓ avg -0.01 → last ⅓ avg -0.02
Reaction time604ms+6ms
first ⅓ avg 598ms → last ⅓ avg 604ms
Headshot accuracy23.2%+2.4%
first ⅓ avg 20.8% → last ⅓ avg 23.2%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.09Best rating — ancient 13–4
132Biggest win — cache
9Longest win streak
L4Current streak
127In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
6Overtime games

Map breakdown

ancientBest map · 75% over 8cacheWeakest map · 45% over 29
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
cacheB29131645%-0.00
dust2S1812667%-0.02
mirageA117464%-0.03
anubisA106460%-0.00
ancientS86275%0.00
infernoB63350%-0.03
overpass42250%-0.02
vertigo41325%-0.01
train43175%-0.03
nuke32167%-0.00
office220100%-0.05
fachwerk1010%-0.09

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Faceit stats

Combat

188Matches
45%Win rate
0.84Avg K/D
84.0ADR
37%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

42%1v1 clutch win
32%1v2 clutch win
6Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWWLLW

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage1173%1.1417.4
Dust2862%1.3215.1
Anubis667%1.1016.3
Nuke650%0.9213.8
Cache3100%1.8024.0
Inferno20%0.386.5
Ancient250%0.6012.0
Vertigo250%1.3617.5

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

22.7%Headshot accuracy
36.7%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
44.9%Spray accuracy
82.7%Counter-strafing
7.8°Preaim
609msReaction time
27.9%T opening success
45.3%CT opening success
0.47Enemies flashed / flash
4.2%Flash assists
5.47HE damage / grenade
11.00Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Grenades & Utility

    Most of your flashes are blinding nobody. A handful of reliable pop-flash lineups fixes this faster than anything else.

    Enemies flashed per flash 0.4682 — below the 0.5 mark we flag

    Grenade Lineups
  2. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 27.9143% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Cache

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

45% win rate across 29 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Cache callouts & strategy

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
anubis7–13-0.0527%23 Jul
cache9–13-0.0618%19 Jul
fachwerk0–13-0.0928%19 Jul
inferno6–13-0.0631%17 Jul
inferno13–6-0.0417%17 Jul
anubis13–160.0315%4 Jul
cache13–8-0.0123%3 Jul
cache11–130.0529%3 Jul
mirage6–13-0.0236%1 Jul
anubis10–13-0.0717%30 Jun
mirage13–11-0.0124%30 Jun
dust213–11-0.0419%30 Jun
dust213–60.0116%15 Jun
overpass8–130.0020%15 Jun
ancient13–5-0.0522%15 Jun
cache13–4-0.0613%11 Jun
ancient8–130.0525%11 Jun
anubis13–5-0.0132%11 Jun
inferno7–13-0.0321%11 Jun
mirage13–5-0.0521%11 Jun
dust216–13-0.0429%11 Jun
cache13–9-0.0338%11 Jun
cache9–13-0.0523%11 Jun
dust20–13-0.0725%10 Jun
vertigo10–130.0119%6 Jun
vertigo0–5-0.0444%6 Jun
cache13–8-0.0119%4 Jun
vertigo6–13-0.0024%4 Jun
vertigo13–60.009%4 Jun
nuke19–160.0220%1 Jun
anubis13–11-0.0224%27 May
cache11–130.0224%22 May
cache9–13-0.0318%21 May
dust213–11-0.0621%21 May
dust211–13-0.0134%21 May
dust213–5-0.0040%21 May
cache4–13-0.0724%21 May
ancient13–110.0712%20 May
cache13–110.0611%20 May
cache13–60.0026%18 May
cache12–12-0.0210%18 May
cache10–13-0.0112%18 May
overpass13–110.0135%16 May
dust213–7-0.0214%16 May
ancient16–130.0023%16 May
ancient13–6-0.039%16 May
dust213–40.0325%16 May
mirage13–110.0216%16 May
cache12–120.0318%16 May
overpass6–13-0.0420%14 May
cache13–20.0611%14 May
mirage10–13-0.0913%14 May
mirage13–6-0.0110%14 May
office13–7-0.0711%13 May
office13–10-0.0417%13 May
mirage13–7-0.0611%10 May
cache13–8-0.0531%8 May
cache13–50.0324%6 May
cache13–110.0337%4 May
cache13–30.0418%3 May
cache9–13-0.0024%2 May
cache7–130.0330%1 May
dust24–13-0.0420%1 May
dust213–40.0123%1 May
dust210–13-0.0330%30 Apr
inferno13–9-0.0216%30 Apr
cache13–90.0129%30 Apr
cache13–60.0215%30 Apr
cache12–12-0.0228%30 Apr
cache8–13-0.0414%30 Apr
cache12–120.0118%30 Apr
cache11–13-0.0325%30 Apr
cache9–13-0.0021%30 Apr
mirage9–13-0.0730%26 Apr
anubis13–70.0722%26 Apr
anubis14–16-0.0316%26 Apr
dust213–9-0.0124%26 Apr
train7–13-0.0731%26 Apr
dust28–130.0113%26 Apr
inferno11–13-0.0417%26 Apr
ancient11–13-0.118%24 Apr
nuke13–110.028%24 Apr
dust213–10-0.0125%24 Apr
overpass13–3-0.0512%24 Apr
mirage6–130.0115%24 Apr
train13–80.0723%23 Apr
train13–5-0.0118%23 Apr
dust213–90.0230%23 Apr
train13–9-0.0917%23 Apr
nuke6–13-0.0433%19 Apr
dust26–13-0.0617%19 Apr
anubis16–14-0.0522%18 Apr
anubis13–60.0722%18 Apr
ancient13–5-0.0119%18 Apr
anubis13–90.0220%18 Apr
mirage13–2-0.0144%18 Apr
dust213–5-0.0611%17 Apr
inferno13–110.007%17 Apr
ancient13–40.0931%17 Apr
mirage13–90.0030%17 Apr

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →