143-23042314r310432 — CS2 Stats
76561198149557471[U:1:189291743]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans
What changed since last observed
CSDB last observed this profile on 28 Aug 2026 (21 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.
CSDB reads this profile's Premier rating from its tracked match history, and records Faceit ELO once on every day the page is viewed. 47 days played since 26 Jun 2026. Come back after the next session and the change shows above.
Is this you? Sign in with Steam to claim it and connect match tracking →
Rating over time
Faceit ELO
- At peak — 2,594
- Next: 3,000 ELO at 3,000 — 406 to go
- Reached: 2,500 ELO · Level 10 · Level 9 · Level 8
- 2,500 ELO first seen 2026-08-28
- Level 10 first seen 2026-08-28
CSDB’s own observations — this history builds from the day a profile is first viewed and cannot be backfilled.
Share this profile
The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.
Performance scores
0–100 skill scores via Leetify.
Recent form
Last 10 vs previous 10: −40pp win rate · −0.02 avg rating · −1.0pp headshot accuracy · +11ms reaction
Win rate down 40pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — more than a 10-match window's normal noise (±20pp).
Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches
Last 5
- 3–2 · 60% win rate
- Avg rating -0.00
- Avg headshot accuracy 26%
- Avg reaction 522ms
Last 10
- 3–7 · 30% win rate
- Avg rating -0.01
- Avg headshot accuracy 27%
- Avg reaction 526ms
Last 20
- 10–10 · 50% win rate
- Avg rating 0.00
- Avg headshot accuracy 27%
- Avg reaction 520ms
Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.
Player DNA
Primary style: Positional Player — Positioning stands above the rest of this profile (+1.1 against its own average).
Sharp aimerStrong CT-side opener
Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.
What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.
Your pro match
Plays most like donk 93% playstyle similarity
Most alike: aim profile, positioning profile.
Where you differ: lower opening-duel success; lower utility contribution.
Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →
Strengths & areas to improve
Strengths
Aim. Aim score of 87 — the mechanical foundation is a clear strength.
CT openings. 62% CT opening-duel success — winning the first fight on the defending side is rare and valuable.
Areas to improve
Utility. Utility contribution runs far behind the mechanical game — the cheapest rating gain on this profile is thrown, not aimed.
T-side openings. Opening success drops from 62% on CT to 29% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.
Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.
CSDB Rating breakdown
Composite 6.3/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.02 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.
Trends
Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.
Personal bests
Across the last 100 tracked matches.
Highlights
Map breakdown
| Map | Grade | Played | Record | Win rate | Avg rating |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
 mirage | S | 40 | 29–11 | 73% | 0.01 |
 dust2 | A | 24 | 14–10 | 58% | -0.00 |
 ancient | C | 18 | 7–11 | 39% | -0.00 |
 nuke | D | 6 | 2–4 | 33% | -0.01 |
 inferno | D | 5 | 1–4 | 20% | 0.02 |
 cache | A | 5 | 3–2 | 60% | 0.00 |
 anubis | — | 2 | 1–1 | 50% | 0.01 |
Across the last 100 tracked matches.
Inferno is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (20% over 5). Start with the 6 essential Inferno lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.
Faceit stats
Combat
Clutches & streaks
Recent Faceit resultsLLWWL
| Map | Matches | Win rate | Avg K/D | Avg kills |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mirage | 1874 | 53% | 1.11 | 17.1 |
| Ancient | 790 | 52% | 1.07 | 16.4 |
| Dust2 | 740 | 53% | 1.12 | 17.2 |
| Anubis | 412 | 49% | 1.09 | 17.1 |
| Vertigo | 185 | 51% | 1.07 | 17.2 |
| Nuke | 174 | 44% | 0.97 | 16.0 |
| Inferno | 100 | 43% | 1.18 | 18.1 |
| Cache | 94 | 61% | 1.22 | 18.5 |
Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.
Skill profile
Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.
Recommended for you
Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.
- Advanced Mechanics
You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.
T opening duels 28.8393% — below the 40% mark we flag
Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.
20% win rate across 5 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.
Recent matches
| Map | Score | Rating | HS% | Date | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ancient | 26–28 | 0.00 | 21% | 9 Sept → | |
| ancient | 13–9 | -0.02 | 25% | 6 Sept → | |
| dust2 | 6–13 | -0.03 | 40% | 6 Sept → | |
| dust2 | 13–10 | -0.07 | 26% | 5 Sept → | |
| dust2 | 13–2 | 0.12 | 17% | 4 Sept → | |
| inferno | 10–13 | -0.00 | 44% | 3 Sept → | |
| cache | 7–13 | -0.04 | 27% | 2 Sept → | |
| mirage | 10–13 | -0.01 | 29% | 2 Sept → | |
| ancient | 4–13 | -0.04 | 19% | 2 Sept → | |
| ancient | 10–13 | -0.02 | 23% | 1 Sept → | |
| mirage | 13–9 | 0.01 | 33% | 31 Aug → | |
| dust2 | 13–3 | -0.03 | 22% | 31 Aug → | |
| mirage | 13–8 | 0.02 | 28% | 30 Aug → | |
| nuke | 13–8 | -0.02 | 42% | 30 Aug → | |
| mirage | 13–3 | 0.03 | 29% | 29 Aug → | |
| mirage | 9–13 | -0.02 | 35% | 27 Aug → | |
| mirage | 5–13 | -0.08 | 19% | 27 Aug → | |
| ancient | 12–16 | 0.03 | 20% | 27 Aug → | |
| dust2 | 13–7 | 0.09 | 36% | 26 Aug → | |
| inferno | 13–3 | 0.09 | 16% | 24 Aug → | |
| dust2 | 20–22 | -0.04 | 25% | 22 Aug → | |
| cache | 11–13 | -0.01 | 22% | 22 Aug → | |
| cache | 13–6 | -0.04 | 25% | 20 Aug → | |
| mirage | 2–13 | -0.06 | 21% | 20 Aug → | |
| dust2 | 13–6 | 0.01 | 30% | 20 Aug → | |
| nuke | 11–13 | -0.04 | 33% | 19 Aug → | |
| mirage | 13–6 | -0.00 | 44% | 18 Aug → | |
| ancient | 13–3 | 0.01 | 27% | 18 Aug → | |
| ancient | 2–13 | -0.07 | 17% | 18 Aug → | |
| nuke | 11–13 | 0.00 | 42% | 16 Aug → | |
| dust2 | 13–11 | -0.07 | 19% | 16 Aug → | |
| nuke | 13–11 | 0.04 | 39% | 15 Aug → | |
| dust2 | 8–13 | -0.05 | 32% | 14 Aug → | |
| mirage | 7–13 | -0.03 | 29% | 14 Aug → | |
| dust2 | 10–13 | -0.03 | 27% | 14 Aug → | |
| mirage | 13–3 | -0.05 | 33% | 14 Aug → | |
| dust2 | 13–11 | -0.03 | 34% | 13 Aug → | |
| dust2 | 5–13 | -0.04 | 25% | 12 Aug → | |
| mirage | 13–10 | 0.01 | 21% | 11 Aug → | |
| mirage | 16–13 | 0.01 | 28% | 11 Aug → | |
| mirage | 13–3 | -0.01 | 19% | 11 Aug → | |
| mirage | 13–7 | 0.17 | 20% | 11 Aug → | |
| mirage | 16–14 | 0.02 | 25% | 11 Aug → | |
| mirage | 9–13 | -0.01 | 30% | 9 Aug → | |
| mirage | 13–7 | -0.03 | 36% | 9 Aug → | |
| ancient | 13–11 | 0.00 | 28% | 9 Aug → | |
| mirage | 13–9 | 0.05 | 27% | 8 Aug → | |
| mirage | 13–5 | 0.01 | 16% | 8 Aug → | |
| dust2 | 5–13 | 0.00 | 12% | 8 Aug → | |
| dust2 | 13–6 | -0.07 | 28% | 6 Aug → | |
| dust2 | 13–3 | 0.01 | 17% | 1 Aug → | |
| ancient | 13–6 | 0.01 | 38% | 1 Aug → | |
| mirage | 13–8 | -0.00 | 50% | 1 Aug → | |
| nuke | 6–13 | -0.03 | 23% | 31 Jul → | |
| mirage | 13–9 | 0.02 | 26% | 31 Jul → | |
| cache | 13–8 | 0.08 | 28% | 30 Jul → | |
| ancient | 7–13 | -0.08 | 46% | 30 Jul → | |
| mirage | 7–13 | -0.00 | 34% | 30 Jul → | |
| mirage | 13–3 | 0.03 | 14% | 30 Jul → | |
| mirage | 13–7 | 0.01 | 19% | 29 Jul → | |
| dust2 | 13–6 | 0.01 | 44% | 29 Jul → | |
| ancient | 10–13 | -0.04 | 43% | 29 Jul → | |
| dust2 | 13–7 | -0.00 | 19% | 25 Jul → | |
| inferno | 8–13 | 0.02 | 20% | 24 Jul → | |
| mirage | 13–8 | 0.09 | 27% | 24 Jul → | |
| ancient | 13–8 | 0.11 | 21% | 24 Jul → | |
| mirage | 13–10 | 0.08 | 35% | 23 Jul → | |
| mirage | 13–6 | 0.02 | 33% | 23 Jul → | |
| dust2 | 10–13 | -0.01 | 33% | 22 Jul → | |
| dust2 | 10–13 | 0.03 | 17% | 22 Jul → | |
| anubis | 3–13 | -0.00 | 19% | 22 Jul → | |
| mirage | 13–9 | 0.07 | 24% | 21 Jul → | |
| mirage | 13–4 | 0.09 | 38% | 19 Jul → | |
| dust2 | 25–21 | -0.04 | 30% | 19 Jul → | |
| cache | 13–10 | 0.04 | 26% | 18 Jul → | |
| mirage | 13–8 | 0.10 | 35% | 18 Jul → | |
| inferno | 11–13 | 0.04 | 24% | 18 Jul → | |
| ancient | 10–13 | -0.01 | 18% | 18 Jul → | |
| ancient | 13–10 | -0.01 | 38% | 18 Jul → | |
| ancient | 3–13 | 0.00 | 30% | 17 Jul → | |
| dust2 | 8–13 | 0.01 | 29% | 17 Jul → | |
| nuke | 10–13 | -0.03 | 29% | 15 Jul → | |
| mirage | 13–11 | 0.04 | 17% | 12 Jul → | |
| mirage | 13–11 | -0.01 | 15% | 12 Jul → | |
| dust2 | 13–8 | 0.10 | 30% | 11 Jul → | |
| dust2 | 13–4 | 0.09 | 29% | 11 Jul → | |
| mirage | 13–9 | 0.03 | 23% | 11 Jul → | |
| mirage | 13–8 | 0.05 | 15% | 10 Jul → | |
| mirage | 13–10 | -0.03 | 23% | 4 Jul → | |
| mirage | 11–13 | -0.00 | 26% | 4 Jul → | |
| anubis | 16–13 | 0.03 | 22% | 4 Jul → | |
| ancient | 7–13 | -0.01 | 23% | 3 Jul → | |
| mirage | 4–13 | 0.04 | 33% | 3 Jul → | |
| inferno | 10–13 | -0.02 | 23% | 3 Jul → | |
| dust2 | 1–13 | 0.01 | 44% | 28 Jun → | |
| mirage | 10–13 | 0.06 | 35% | 28 Jun → | |
| mirage | 13–8 | -0.04 | 18% | 27 Jun → | |
| mirage | 4–13 | -0.09 | 25% | 26 Jun → | |
| ancient | 5–13 | 0.03 | 20% | 26 Jun → | |
| ancient | 13–11 | 0.07 | 36% | 26 Jun → |
Match data via Leetify.
