Kalevski

Kalevski — CS2 Stats

FI76561198145407382[U:1:185141654]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

2,684Tracked matches69%Win rate2020Tracked since
CSDB Rating6.9 SolidSupport
Premier CS Rating23,331Top 25% of 185,711 CSDB-tracked playersPink band · top ~4.8% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#36389 of 232597 tracked
FaceitLevel 10 · 2,101 ELOTop 12.4% of ranked FACEIT players
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 10 Sep 2026 (10 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

No change since then. Play, then come back: the next observation lands here.

Track this profile

CSDB reads this profile's Premier rating from its tracked match history, and records Faceit ELO once on every day the page is viewed. 13 days played since 10 Jul 2026. Come back after the next session and the change shows above.

Is this you? Sign in with Steam to claim it and connect match tracking →

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 23,331 +774 10 Jul10 Sept · 14 days played
17,88923,331peak 23,33110 Jul10 Sept
23,568Peak Premier in tracked matches
2,101Highest Faceit ELO seen on CSDB
13Days played since 2026-07-10

Faceit ELO

  • At peak — 2,101
  • Next: 2,500 ELO at 2,500 399 to go
  • Reached: Level 10 · Level 9 · Level 8 · Level 7
  • Level 10 first seen 2026-08-30
  • Level 9 first seen 2026-08-30

Premier CS Rating

  • At peak — 23,331
  • Next: Red band at 25,000 1,669 to go
  • Reached: Pink band · Purple band · Blue band · Light Blue band
  • Purple band first seen 2026-08-30
  • Blue band first seen 2026-08-30

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do. Faceit ELO is CSDB’s own observation — no feed exposes ELO per match, so that line only has the days the profile was viewed and cannot be backfilled.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGKalevskiFACEITLevel 10 · 2,101 ELOSTANDINGTop 12.4% of rankedPREMIER23,331 · Pink bandPEAK ELO2,101csdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim86
Positioning48
Utility58

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY50455Last 10050%Win rateLWWWTWWLLW

Last 10 vs previous 10: −10pp win rate · −0.04 avg rating · −6.8pp headshot accuracy · +10ms reaction

Win rate −10pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — within the normal variation of a 10-match window (±20pp), so no real shift yet.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 311 · 60% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 12%
  • Avg reaction 556ms

Last 10

  • 631 · 60% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 15%
  • Avg reaction 552ms

Last 20

  • 1361 · 65% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.00
  • Avg headshot accuracy 19%
  • Avg reaction 547ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: SupportUtility contribution stands above the rest of this profile (+1.3 against its own average).

Aim8.6
Utility5.8
Positioning4.8
Opening Duels2.5
Clutch4.8

Sharp aimer

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

device

Plays most like device 96% playstyle similarity

Most alike: utility contribution, aim profile.

Where you differ: lower opening-duel success.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Strengths

Aim. Aim score of 86 — the mechanical foundation is a clear strength.

Areas to improve

Positioning. Positioning trails aim by 39 points — deaths here waste a strong aim profile.

Reaction time. 555ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim8.6
Positioning4.8
Utility5.8
Mechanics7.8
Opening Duels2.0
Win Impact10.0

Composite 6.9/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.02 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.01−0.02
first ⅓ avg 0.01 → last ⅓ avg -0.01
Reaction time557ms−69ms
first ⅓ avg 627ms → last ⅓ avg 557ms
Headshot accuracy20.5%+2.3%
first ⅓ avg 18.2% → last ⅓ avg 20.5%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.11Best match rating · 13–6 · nuke, 6 Sept
50%Best headshot accuracy · 4–13 · cache, 6 Sept
375msFastest reaction time · 13–8 · dust2, 5 Sept
13–1Biggest win · mirage, 3 Sept

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

5Longest win streak
810In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
17Overtime games

Map breakdown

nukeBest map · 57% over 14dust2Weakest map · 43% over 23
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
mirageA27151256%-0.00
dust2C23101343%-0.00
cacheB189950%0.00
nukeA148657%-0.00
ancientB105550%-0.00
anubisC73443%-0.01
inferno1010%-0.11

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Dust 2 is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (43% over 23). Start with the 6 essential Dust 2 lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

1,476Matches
51%Win rate
1.14Avg K/D
81.9ADR
48%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

44%1v1 clutch win
23%1v2 clutch win
10Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLLWLW

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage17749%1.1116.8
Dust210047%1.1916.6
Anubis7756%1.2818.4
Nuke6856%1.3518.7
Ancient4852%1.2917.4
Inferno2236%1.0613.9
Train967%1.2014.3
Vertigo875%1.1415.5

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

19.8%Headshot accuracy
36.9%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
39.4%Spray accuracy
85.0%Counter-strafing
7.5°Preaim
555msReaction time
31.8%T opening success
44.2%CT opening success
0.58Enemies flashed / flash
7.0%Flash assists
5.73HE damage / grenade
13.00Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 31.7993% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Dust 2

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

43% win rate across 23 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Dust 2 callouts & strategyDust 2 grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
mirage14–16-0.084%10 Sept
nuke13–8-0.019%10 Sept
mirage13–100.0113%10 Sept
cache13–30.0722%9 Sept
ancient15–15-0.0612%9 Sept
cache13–5-0.0327%9 Sept
mirage16–120.0522%9 Sept
mirage4–13-0.0523%9 Sept
mirage0–13-0.090%8 Sept
cache16–14-0.0521%8 Sept
nuke13–11-0.0316%8 Sept
mirage13–70.0711%8 Sept
anubis5–13-0.0724%8 Sept
nuke13–5-0.0130%8 Sept
ancient13–11-0.0113%8 Sept
mirage13–60.0924%7 Sept
dust210–13-0.0517%7 Sept
anubis9–130.0625%7 Sept
cache13–70.0725%7 Sept
dust213–110.0638%7 Sept
mirage6–13-0.1211%7 Sept
cache4–13-0.0350%6 Sept
dust213–50.0125%6 Sept
anubis16–140.0117%6 Sept
nuke7–13-0.0619%6 Sept
mirage13–7-0.0133%6 Sept
cache13–4-0.0212%6 Sept
mirage13–110.0112%6 Sept
nuke13–60.1119%6 Sept
dust213–6-0.0633%6 Sept
anubis15–15-0.0225%5 Sept
cache3–13-0.0224%5 Sept
dust213–40.0121%5 Sept
mirage13–30.0618%5 Sept
inferno4–13-0.1120%5 Sept
cache13–6-0.0124%5 Sept
dust213–8-0.0417%5 Sept
mirage13–7-0.0217%5 Sept
mirage13–20.0224%5 Sept
nuke8–13-0.0316%5 Sept
mirage13–2-0.0610%5 Sept
ancient7–13-0.0112%5 Sept
nuke4–13-0.0519%4 Sept
ancient13–9-0.0025%4 Sept
mirage13–70.0815%4 Sept
ancient13–80.0521%4 Sept
nuke13–10-0.0219%4 Sept
mirage13–10-0.0421%4 Sept
dust211–13-0.0326%4 Sept
anubis15–15-0.0113%4 Sept
dust215–150.0421%4 Sept
cache13–160.0626%4 Sept
anubis13–11-0.0326%4 Sept
cache7–130.019%4 Sept
cache9–13-0.0324%4 Sept
mirage7–13-0.0126%4 Sept
dust213–100.0322%4 Sept
dust21–13-0.0424%4 Sept
dust216–14-0.0435%3 Sept
ancient16–120.0116%3 Sept
mirage13–10.0419%3 Sept
cache13–9-0.0016%3 Sept
dust29–13-0.0424%3 Sept
nuke4–13-0.0522%14 Jul
mirage5–130.0520%14 Jul
nuke5–13-0.0414%13 Jul
dust213–100.0727%13 Jul
cache14–160.049%13 Jul
ancient10–13-0.0415%13 Jul
dust26–13-0.0013%13 Jul
mirage1–130.039%13 Jul
nuke10–130.0112%13 Jul
ancient14–16-0.049%12 Jul
mirage13–16-0.0618%12 Jul
cache8–130.0032%12 Jul
dust21–130.0114%12 Jul
dust215–150.0018%12 Jul
dust211–130.0124%12 Jul
dust211–13-0.0214%12 Jul
anubis13–70.0120%11 Jul
nuke13–90.0516%11 Jul
dust212–160.0018%11 Jul
cache10–13-0.0413%11 Jul
ancient11–130.0018%11 Jul
cache13–70.0023%11 Jul
mirage13–5-0.028%11 Jul
nuke13–40.0618%11 Jul
mirage5–130.0520%11 Jul
dust216–130.0519%11 Jul
mirage10–13-0.0621%11 Jul
mirage4–13-0.0323%11 Jul
cache11–130.0413%11 Jul
dust210–13-0.0713%11 Jul
mirage13–60.0234%10 Jul
ancient13–60.0923%10 Jul
dust213–8-0.0131%10 Jul
nuke13–70.0522%10 Jul
cache13–30.0326%10 Jul
mirage11–130.0312%10 Jul
dust211–130.0621%10 Jul

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

Faceit Level 102K ELO1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →