RaB

RaB — CS2 Stats

76561198134314399[U:1:174048671]Steam profile ↗VAC banned

329Tracked matches48%Win rate2020Tracked since
CSDB Rating6.2 SolidSupport
Premier CS Rating21,265Top 50% of 175,286 CSDB-tracked playersPink band · top ~7.1% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#57956 of 220486 tracked
FaceitLevel 6 · 1,180 ELOTop 54.0% of ranked FACEIT players
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 5 Sep 2026 (12 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

No change since then. Play, then come back: the next observation lands here.

Track this profile

CSDB reads this profile's Premier rating from its tracked match history, and records Faceit ELO once on every day the page is viewed. 56 days played since 5 Sep 2025. Come back after the next session and the change shows above.

Is this you? Sign in with Steam to claim it and connect match tracking →

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 21,265 +1,266 5 Sept5 Sept · 21 days played
19,80124,855peak 24,8555 Sept5 Sept
24,855Peak Premier in tracked matches
1,180Highest Faceit ELO seen on CSDB
56Days played since 2025-09-05

Faceit ELO

  • At peak — 1,180
  • Next: Level 6 at 1,201 21 to go
  • Reached: Level 5 · Level 4 · Level 3 · Level 2
  • Level 5 first seen 2026-09-04
  • Level 4 first seen 2026-09-04

Premier CS Rating

  • 3,590 below peak (24,855)
  • Next: Red band at 25,000 3,735 to go
  • Reached: Pink band · Purple band · Blue band · Light Blue band
  • Pink band first seen 2026-09-04
  • Purple band first seen 2026-09-04

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do. Faceit ELO is CSDB’s own observation — no feed exposes ELO per match, so that line only has the days the profile was viewed and cannot be backfilled.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGRaBFACEITLevel 6 · 1,180 ELOSTANDINGTop 54.0% of rankedPREMIER21,265 · Pink bandPEAK ELO1,180csdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim73
Positioning56
Utility57

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY51481Last 10051%Win rateWLLLWLLLWW

Last 10 vs previous 10: −10pp win rate · +0.01 avg rating · +0.1pp headshot accuracy · +37ms reaction

Win rate −10pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — within the normal variation of a 10-match window (±20pp), so no real shift yet.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 23 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.00
  • Avg headshot accuracy 20%
  • Avg reaction 609ms

Last 10

  • 46 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.03
  • Avg headshot accuracy 21%
  • Avg reaction 616ms

Last 20

  • 911 · 45% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 21%
  • Avg reaction 598ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: SupportUtility contribution stands above the rest of this profile (+1.2 against its own average).

Aim7.3
Utility5.7
Positioning5.6
Opening Duels3.7
Clutch3.2

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

NiKo

Plays most like NiKo 91% playstyle similarity

Most alike: utility contribution, opening-duel success.

Where you differ: lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 50% on CT to 29% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Reaction time. 616ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim7.3
Positioning5.6
Utility5.7
Mechanics8.0
Opening Duels2.5
Win Impact4.4

Composite 6.2/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.02 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.02+0.00
first ⅓ avg 0.01 → last ⅓ avg 0.02
Reaction time617ms−17ms
first ⅓ avg 634ms → last ⅓ avg 617ms
Headshot accuracy19.6%+4.9%
first ⅓ avg 14.7% → last ⅓ avg 19.6%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.18Best match rating · 13–9 · mirage, 11 Aug
38%Best headshot accuracy · 13–9 · mirage, 11 Aug
430msFastest reaction time · 13–3 · mirage, 15 Aug
13–1Biggest win · mirage, 4 Oct

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

8Longest win streak
115In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
9Overtime games

Map breakdown

mirageBest map · 59% over 41anubisWeakest map · 29% over 7
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
mirageA41241759%0.01
dust2A1810856%0.02
infernoB147750%0.00
ancientC135838%-0.00
anubisD72529%-0.01
nuke31233%-0.03
cache2020%-0.01
overpass220100%0.02

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Anubis is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (29% over 7). Start with the 6 essential Anubis lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

271Matches
49%Win rate
1.15Avg K/D
80.2ADR
44%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

36%1v1 clutch win
27%1v2 clutch win
10Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWWWLL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage11252%1.1517.1
Inferno4551%1.0716.3
Dust24349%1.1416.7
Ancient2348%1.2118.3
Anubis2343%1.2416.0
Overpass933%1.1317.3
Nuke956%1.1215.4
Train425%1.4221.5

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

19.7%Headshot accuracy
33.9%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
36.7%Spray accuracy
86.1%Counter-strafing
9.5°Preaim
616msReaction time
29.2%T opening success
50.4%CT opening success
0.60Enemies flashed / flash
4.8%Flash assists
8.91HE damage / grenade
8.93Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 29.1638% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Anubis

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

29% win rate across 7 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Anubis callouts & strategyAnubis grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
ancient13–80.0417%5 Sept
ancient2–60.0729%5 Sept
dust25–13-0.0315%5 Sept
mirage2–13-0.0822%2 Sept
ancient13–70.0016%2 Sept
ancient4–13-0.0817%2 Sept
mirage11–130.1424%1 Sept
dust24–130.1433%1 Sept
mirage13–80.0925%22 Aug
mirage13–5-0.048%18 Aug
mirage0–13-0.0226%17 Aug
dust213–5-0.0125%17 Aug
dust213–40.0321%16 Aug
mirage13–30.044%15 Aug
mirage1–8-0.059%15 Aug
inferno6–13-0.0323%14 Aug
inferno8–13-0.048%12 Aug
mirage13–90.1838%11 Aug
dust213–90.1033%6 Aug
ancient3–13-0.0419%6 Aug
anubis8–13-0.0118%2 Aug
cache10–130.0116%2 Aug
mirage13–6-0.0324%2 Aug
mirage25–230.0519%27 Jul
dust213–11-0.0012%24 Jul
mirage13–90.0215%24 Jul
anubis8–130.0611%22 Jul
anubis13–11-0.066%22 Jul
inferno15–15-0.0024%21 Jul
ancient8–130.0031%21 Jul
anubis9–130.0115%21 Jul
inferno13–50.1125%18 Jul
inferno7–13-0.0718%16 Jul
mirage14–16-0.0318%16 Jul
mirage13–11-0.0216%16 Jul
inferno13–3-0.0316%13 Jul
anubis13–6-0.0212%13 Jul
dust213–9-0.0617%9 Jul
cache7–13-0.0327%9 Jul
anubis0–11-0.0817%7 Jul
mirage8–13-0.0214%7 Jul
inferno13–40.0116%4 Jul
mirage13–100.0518%4 Jul
ancient16–19-0.0611%3 Jul
mirage9–13-0.0233%2 Jul
dust213–6-0.0018%2 Jul
mirage10–13-0.003%2 Jul
mirage7–13-0.0017%27 Jun
dust29–130.0221%26 Jun
dust213–80.0321%26 Jun
dust213–110.0821%26 Jun
mirage13–11-0.0118%25 Jun
ancient16–13-0.0020%24 Jun
inferno2–13-0.0419%23 Jun
mirage13–9-0.0023%23 Jun
mirage13–40.0819%23 Jun
dust29–13-0.019%23 Jun
ancient11–130.0216%23 Jun
anubis3–130.000%21 Jun
ancient7–13-0.0612%14 Jun
mirage9–130.007%14 Jun
dust211–13-0.0115%13 Jun
ancient19–220.0213%11 Jun
dust29–130.0030%8 Jun
inferno13–100.0721%31 May
mirage13–16-0.0518%23 May
mirage7–13-0.0517%19 May
mirage0–2-0.060%19 May
ancient13–30.0317%19 May
nuke13–60.0115%18 May
inferno16–12-0.0014%17 May
mirage10–13-0.0517%17 May
inferno13–11-0.0316%17 May
ancient13–10-0.006%11 May
inferno4–130.018%9 May
mirage13–9-0.0218%8 May
mirage9–13-0.039%8 May
mirage13–11-0.0314%2 May
overpass13–80.0410%1 May
dust213–110.0626%1 May
dust213–80.0216%1 May
mirage13–110.0220%1 May
mirage13–80.0415%1 May
mirage13–70.0112%1 May
inferno13–60.0814%1 May
dust24–13-0.0415%29 Apr
mirage8–130.0115%28 Apr
mirage13–30.019%28 Apr
mirage13–60.0216%28 Apr
nuke10–13-0.0414%14 Nov
nuke5–13-0.0510%20 Oct
mirage8–130.0214%18 Oct
dust26–13-0.026%17 Oct
mirage13–20.0820%4 Oct
mirage13–90.1121%4 Oct
mirage13–10.1022%4 Oct
mirage13–90.0618%1 Oct
mirage13–60.0421%28 Sept
inferno5–130.0015%9 Sept
overpass16–140.0123%5 Sept

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

100 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →