racc — CS2 Stats

76561198123904391[U:1:163638663]

2,265Tracked matches46%Win rate2023Tracked since
1,954Hours in CS12Hrs last 2 wks
CSDB Rating5.0 DevelopingHybrid Rifler
WingmanGold Nova Master
Ladder ranks via Leetify

Performance scores

Aim65
Positioning50
Utility31

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY50428Last 10050%Win rateTWWLLLLWWW

Last 10 vs previous 10: +10pp win rate · +0.01 avg rating

Player DNA

Primary style: Hybrid RiflerAim-led profile without a single dominant tendency.

Aim6.5
Aggression6.1
Utility3.1
Positioning5.0
Opening Duels2.2

Strong CT-side openerLimited utility dependence

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

Twistzz

Plays most like Twistzz 84% playstyle similarity

Most alike: opening-fight frequency, opening-duel success.

Where you differ: lower aim profile; lower utility contribution.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Utility. Utility contribution runs far behind the mechanical game — the cheapest rating gain on this profile is thrown, not aimed.

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 49% on CT to 29% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Reaction time. 639ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim6.5
Positioning5.0
Utility3.1
Mechanics6.4
Opening Duels2.3
Win Impact3.8

Composite 5.0/10 (Developing), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.01−0.02
first ⅓ avg 0.03 → last ⅓ avg 0.01
Reaction time623ms−10ms
first ⅓ avg 633ms → last ⅓ avg 623ms
Headshot accuracy14.7%−3.5%
first ⅓ avg 18.2% → last ⅓ avg 14.7%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.16Best rating — boulder 13–3
131Biggest win — fachwerk
6Longest win streak
92In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
1Overtime games

Map breakdown

nukeBest map · 59% over 17anubisWeakest map · 20% over 5
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
nukeA1710759%0.05
mirageC1661038%0.01
cacheA148657%0.02
ancientA116555%0.02
infernoC73443%0.01
shelterA74357%0.01
anubisD51420%0.07
boulderC52340%0.07
vertigo42250%0.04
overpass31233%0.00
dust231233%0.00
office21150%0.03
poseidon1010%-0.11
debris110100%0.09
italy110100%0.08
train110100%0.14
fachwerk110100%0.03
warden110100%0.03

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Anubis is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (20% over 5). Start with the 6 essential Anubis lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

46,285Lifetime kills
1.07K/D · Top 50% of tracked players
2,996Matches
46.3%Match win rate · Top 50% of tracked players
37.0%Headshot %
5.1%Shot accuracy
6,829MVPs
921Hours (in match)
1,580Bombs planted
541Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

Lifetime map wins

4,232nuke
3,221inferno
1,622vertigo
1,581dust2
1,239train
1,213office
395italy
61lake

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

14.7%Headshot accuracy
39.6%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
36.5%Spray accuracy
78.6%Counter-strafing
10.6°Preaim
639msReaction time
28.9%T opening success
48.6%CT opening success
0.41Enemies flashed / flash
3.1%Flash assists
9.54HE damage / grenade
3.49Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Best CS2 Crosshair

    Your shots are landing on bodies more often than heads — usually a crosshair-height and placement habit rather than raw aim.

    Headshot accuracy 14.7115% — below the 15% mark we flag

    Aim Training
  2. Grenades & Utility

    Most of your flashes are blinding nobody. A handful of reliable pop-flash lineups fixes this faster than anything else.

    Enemies flashed per flash 0.4127 — below the 0.5 mark we flag

    Grenade Lineups
  3. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 28.8659% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Anubis

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

20% win rate across 5 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Anubis callouts & strategyAnubis grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
poseidon8–8-0.116%27 Aug
inferno13–9-0.0313%25 Aug
cache13–110.0613%25 Aug
mirage4–13-0.0819%25 Aug
anubis8–130.066%24 Aug
ancient2–13-0.0738%24 Aug
vertigo6–130.039%24 Aug
nuke9–40.0719%23 Aug
nuke9–10.1414%23 Aug
nuke9–10.114%23 Aug
debris9–60.0916%23 Aug
ancient13–50.1541%21 Aug
cache10–13-0.010%21 Aug
nuke8–13-0.017%21 Aug
ancient13–40.0112%21 Aug
nuke7–130.0319%19 Aug
overpass6–9-0.0516%19 Aug
ancient3–13-0.0710%19 Aug
nuke13–7-0.0212%19 Aug
inferno5–13-0.028%19 Aug
italy13–50.087%19 Aug
inferno9–70.166%19 Aug
mirage6–13-0.0511%17 Aug
cache4–13-0.034%15 Aug
cache10–130.0520%13 Aug
vertigo13–90.0819%13 Aug
inferno12–12-0.0324%13 Aug
mirage13–70.0013%12 Aug
overpass13–10-0.0213%12 Aug
shelter13–40.058%11 Aug
nuke3–7-0.0242%11 Aug
mirage5–13-0.0526%11 Aug
boulder2–13-0.0413%10 Aug
cache13–30.025%10 Aug
nuke12–12-0.1010%10 Aug
mirage13–80.135%10 Aug
nuke13–50.0236%9 Aug
ancient16–130.089%9 Aug
nuke13–40.0925%7 Aug
vertigo5–90.0215%7 Aug
cache13–60.007%7 Aug
inferno8–130.029%5 Aug
cache8–130.0014%4 Aug
anubis7–130.0619%3 Aug
nuke13–100.039%3 Aug
ancient1–130.0012%2 Aug
mirage7–130.0331%2 Aug
anubis13–60.1615%1 Aug
mirage7–130.0611%1 Aug
cache5–13-0.0222%1 Aug
overpass12–120.0819%1 Aug
mirage11–13-0.0619%1 Aug
nuke13–70.1110%1 Aug
boulder13–30.1629%1 Aug
cache13–60.1317%31 Jul
office3–130.0118%31 Jul
train13–60.1424%31 Jul
cache4–6-0.0116%30 Jul
mirage8–13-0.0613%28 Jul
shelter2–130.0227%28 Jul
boulder8–130.1112%27 Jul
dust213–80.0214%27 Jul
nuke6–9-0.018%25 Jul
ancient0–13-0.0211%25 Jul
mirage13–90.0621%25 Jul
dust26–130.0512%22 Jul
mirage3–130.0224%22 Jul
ancient13–30.077%19 Jul
vertigo13–50.0228%19 Jul
cache13–110.0215%19 Jul
nuke13–30.1323%19 Jul
nuke12–120.1216%19 Jul
mirage13–110.0911%19 Jul
anubis6–130.0324%18 Jul
cache13–80.0224%16 Jul
cache12–120.1024%16 Jul
office13–60.0531%15 Jul
shelter13–40.0619%15 Jul
ancient13–11-0.0312%14 Jul
boulder11–40.0611%14 Jul
shelter4–10.0427%14 Jul
mirage13–60.0911%13 Jul
shelter11–13-0.0236%13 Jul
dust210–13-0.0627%13 Jul
fachwerk13–10.0326%13 Jul
ancient7–130.0410%13 Jul
mirage4–13-0.0318%12 Jul
inferno13–11-0.0211%11 Jul
shelter13–50.0219%11 Jul
nuke13–90.049%11 Jul
shelter4–13-0.0913%10 Jul
boulder12–120.0524%9 Jul
anubis12–120.069%8 Jul
warden13–60.0320%8 Jul
cache13–110.0114%8 Jul
nuke9–130.0612%8 Jul
mirage9–130.0121%8 Jul
mirage13–110.0121%3 Jul
inferno0–6-0.0011%3 Jul
ancient13–100.0617%3 Jul

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →