♥ MilkedCow ♥ — CS2 Stats

76561199210350986[U:1:1250085258]

907Tracked matches69%Win rate2025Tracked since

CSDB Rating6.3 SolidAggressive Rifler

Premier CS Rating13,353Blue band · top ~37.1% of ranked players (population est.)

WingmanGold Nova Master

Ladder ranks via Leetify

Share this profile

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim71

Positioning67

Utility37

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY54–35–11Last 10054%Win rateLWWWWLLWLL

Last 10 vs previous 10: -20pp win rate · +0.00 avg rating

Player DNA

Primary style: Aggressive Rifler — Takes opening fights often, backed by a strong aim profile.

Aim7.1

Aggression10.0

Utility3.7

Positioning6.7

Opening Duels5.5

Strong CT-side opener

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

Plays most like sh1ro 86% playstyle similarity

Most alike: positioning profile, opening-fight frequency.

Where you differ: lower utility contribution; lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Strengths

CT openings. 61% CT opening-duel success — winning the first fight on the defending side is rare and valuable.

Areas to improve

Utility. Utility contribution runs far behind the mechanical game — the cheapest rating gain on this profile is thrown, not aimed.

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 61% on CT to 43% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Reaction time. 571ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim7.1

Positioning6.7

Utility3.7

Mechanics7.0

Opening Duels5.5

Win Impact10.0

Composite 6.3/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×0.95 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.03+0.02

first ⅓ avg 0.01 → last ⅓ avg 0.03

Reaction time573ms−43ms

first ⅓ avg 616ms → last ⅓ avg 573ms

Headshot accuracy16.1%+0.7%

first ⅓ avg 15.4% → last ⅓ avg 16.1%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.21Best rating — cache 13–2

13–0Biggest win — shelter

6Longest win streak

5–4In matches decided by ≤2 rounds

Map breakdown

vertigoBest map · 80% over 5mirageWeakest map · 32% over 19

Map	Grade	Played	Record	Win rate	Avg rating
mirage	D	19	6–13	32%	-0.00
cache	A	19	11–8	58%	0.01
nuke	S	14	10–4	71%	0.03
dust2	B	13	6–7	46%	0.04
ancient	B	6	3–3	50%	0.04
anubis	S	6	4–2	67%	0.04
inferno	C	5	2–3	40%	0.03
vertigo	S	5	4–1	80%	0.07
shelter	—	4	3–1	75%	0.03
boulder	—	3	1–2	33%	0.02
office	—	1	1–0	100%	-0.04
fachwerk	—	1	1–0	100%	0.05
stronghold	—	1	1–0	100%	0.07
overpass	—	1	0–1	0%	-0.06
alpine	—	1	1–0	100%	0.07
train	—	1	0–1	0%	-0.07

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Mirage is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (32% over 19). Start with the 6 essential Mirage lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

15.2%Headshot accuracy

36.7%Accuracy (enemy spotted)

36.1%Spray accuracy

81.7%Counter-strafing

10.1°Preaim

571msReaction time

43.0%T opening success

61.2%CT opening success

0.30Enemies flashed / flash

2.9%Flash assists

9.14HE damage / grenade

6.48Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

Grenades & Utility
Most of your flashes are blinding nobody. A handful of reliable pop-flash lineups fixes this faster than anything else.
Enemies flashed per flash 0.2983 — below the 0.5 mark we flag
Grenade Lineups →

Spend your practice time on Mirage

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

32% win rate across 19 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Mirage callouts & strategy →Mirage grenade lineups →

Recent matches

Map	Score	Rating	HS%	Date
ancient	9–13	0.05	16%	27 Aug →
dust2	13–4	0.15	16%	27 Aug →
inferno	13–9	0.10	18%	25 Aug →
mirage	13–8	0.06	16%	10 Aug →
nuke	13–5	0.02	15%	9 Aug →
inferno	8–13	-0.03	15%	5 Aug →
cache	8–13	-0.01	8%	4 Aug →
dust2	13–8	0.04	11%	30 Jul →
mirage	4–13	-0.04	11%	30 Jul →
mirage	8–13	0.08	14%	28 Jul →
vertigo	0–4	-0.01	50%	27 Jul →
cache	13–7	0.01	24%	27 Jul →
ancient	13–3	0.06	12%	19 Jul →
vertigo	13–5	0.09	8%	19 Jul →
cache	13–11	0.11	17%	19 Jul →
nuke	13–3	0.11	16%	19 Jul →
mirage	11–13	0.02	18%	16 Jul →
cache	12–12	-0.03	16%	16 Jul →
office	13–6	-0.04	13%	15 Jul →
shelter	13–4	0.07	20%	15 Jul →
cache	13–9	0.07	12%	15 Jul →
ancient	13–11	0.09	21%	14 Jul →
boulder	11–4	0.09	7%	14 Jul →
shelter	4–1	-0.05	25%	14 Jul →
boulder	10–13	0.04	9%	14 Jul →
shelter	13–0	0.07	24%	14 Jul →
dust2	10–13	0.02	27%	13 Jul →
fachwerk	13–1	0.05	8%	13 Jul →
cache	13–11	-0.03	9%	13 Jul →
nuke	13–9	-0.02	13%	11 Jul →
dust2	5–13	-0.03	22%	10 Jul →
mirage	11–13	0.04	18%	10 Jul →
boulder	12–12	-0.08	4%	9 Jul →
shelter	12–12	0.01	5%	9 Jul →
dust2	1–9	-0.02	19%	7 Jul →
cache	13–2	0.03	19%	29 Jun →
dust2	13–4	0.05	16%	29 Jun →
anubis	13–11	0.06	16%	29 Jun →
dust2	7–13	-0.01	16%	29 Jun →
cache	13–7	-0.03	4%	29 Jun →
vertigo	13–9	0.03	11%	28 Jun →
cache	9–3	0.02	11%	28 Jun →
stronghold	10–0	0.07	26%	28 Jun →
ancient	13–5	-0.00	16%	28 Jun →
inferno	7–13	0.04	14%	25 Jun →
nuke	10–13	0.06	18%	22 Jun →
cache	8–1	0.01	5%	22 Jun →
cache	10–13	-0.07	19%	22 Jun →
mirage	4–13	-0.10	19%	22 Jun →
vertigo	13–9	0.09	14%	18 Jun →
ancient	9–13	0.09	7%	15 Jun →
anubis	13–5	0.07	13%	15 Jun →
dust2	11–13	0.04	10%	15 Jun →
mirage	13–1	0.06	21%	15 Jun →
vertigo	13–8	0.17	10%	14 Jun →
nuke	6–13	0.07	5%	14 Jun →
cache	12–12	-0.00	12%	14 Jun →
cache	12–12	-0.02	11%	11 Jun →
nuke	12–12	0.01	15%	10 Jun →
inferno	7–13	0.06	19%	9 Jun →
mirage	10–13	-0.01	26%	9 Jun →
dust2	12–12	-0.01	15%	9 Jun →
dust2	13–6	0.13	28%	9 Jun →
overpass	12–12	-0.06	18%	9 Jun →
alpine	12–4	0.07	10%	9 Jun →
anubis	13–9	0.08	11%	8 Jun →
mirage	13–5	-0.01	11%	8 Jun →
mirage	2–13	-0.02	26%	7 Jun →
mirage	0–13	-0.05	0%	7 Jun →
mirage	13–3	0.01	10%	7 Jun →
nuke	13–6	-0.00	14%	6 Jun →
dust2	6–2	0.06	10%	6 Jun →
anubis	12–12	0.03	9%	5 Jun →
dust2	13–1	0.10	14%	5 Jun →
mirage	1–9	-0.06	8%	5 Jun →
anubis	13–4	0.02	8%	4 Jun →
cache	12–12	0.03	13%	4 Jun →
mirage	10–13	-0.04	15%	4 Jun →
nuke	13–11	0.01	15%	4 Jun →
cache	4–13	-0.05	15%	4 Jun →
mirage	7–13	0.05	15%	3 Jun →
train	6–13	-0.07	10%	2 Jun →
nuke	11–13	0.06	21%	2 Jun →
inferno	13–5	-0.01	9%	2 Jun →
dust2	4–13	0.03	18%	2 Jun →
mirage	12–12	-0.04	13%	1 Jun →
cache	13–2	0.21	8%	1 Jun →
nuke	13–5	0.00	13%	31 May →
mirage	13–4	0.07	19%	31 May →
nuke	13–7	0.08	25%	30 May →
cache	13–8	0.05	13%	30 May →
ancient	10–13	-0.03	13%	28 May →
mirage	3–13	-0.08	29%	27 May →
nuke	13–6	-0.01	22%	27 May →
nuke	13–7	0.01	25%	25 May →
mirage	6–0	0.04	33%	25 May →
anubis	6–13	-0.01	18%	25 May →
nuke	13–5	0.05	15%	25 May →
cache	13–7	-0.02	13%	25 May →
cache	3–13	0.00	18%	25 May →