Falxon — CS2 Stats

76561198112422939[U:1:152157211]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

546Tracked matches60%Win rate2020Tracked since

CSDB Rating7.2 StrongAggressive Rifler

Premier CS Rating18,742Purple band · top ~13.5% of ranked players (population est.)

CSDB Leaderboard#12657 of 26026 tracked

FaceitLevel 10 · 2,105 ELOTop 12.4% of ranked FACEIT players

Ladder ranks via Leetify

Share this profile

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim91

Positioning63

Utility49

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY51–48–1Last 10051%Win rateLLLWWLWWWL

Last 10 vs previous 10: -10pp win rate · -0.03 avg rating

Player DNA

Primary style: Aggressive Rifler — Takes opening fights often, backed by a strong aim profile.

Aim9.1

Aggression7.0

Utility4.9

Positioning6.3

Opening Duels4.6

Clutch3.8

Sharp aimerStrong CT-side opener

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

Plays most like ropz 97% playstyle similarity

Most alike: utility contribution, opening-fight frequency.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Strengths

Aim. Aim score of 91 — the mechanical foundation is a clear strength.

CT openings. 60% CT opening-duel success — winning the first fight on the defending side is rare and valuable.

Areas to improve

Utility. Utility contribution runs far behind the mechanical game — the cheapest rating gain on this profile is thrown, not aimed.

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 60% on CT to 36% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim9.1

Positioning6.3

Utility4.9

Mechanics8.1

Opening Duels4.6

Win Impact8.3

Composite 7.2/10 (Strong), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.01−0.00

first ⅓ avg 0.02 → last ⅓ avg 0.01

Reaction time553ms−29ms

first ⅓ avg 582ms → last ⅓ avg 553ms

Headshot accuracy26.4%−0.9%

first ⅓ avg 27.3% → last ⅓ avg 26.4%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.17Best rating — ancient 13–6

13–1Biggest win — dust2

6Longest win streak

L3Current streak

5–9In matches decided by ≤2 rounds

14Overtime games

Map breakdown

mirageBest map · 60% over 20cacheWeakest map · 45% over 11

Map	Grade	Played	Record	Win rate	Avg rating
dust2	B	35	17–18	49%	0.01
mirage	A	20	12–8	60%	0.00
ancient	B	14	7–7	50%	0.01
cache	B	11	5–6	45%	0.03
nuke	B	10	5–5	50%	-0.01
anubis	B	8	4–4	50%	0.05
inferno	—	1	0–1	0%	-0.04
vertigo	—	1	1–0	100%	0.05

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Faceit stats

Combat

868Matches

54%Win rate

1.27Avg K/D

85.3ADR

55%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

39%1v1 clutch win

25%1v2 clutch win

9Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWLWLL

Map	Matches	Win rate	Avg K/D	Avg kills
Dust2	119	62%	1.14	15.9
Ancient	100	57%	1.24	18.9
Anubis	63	63%	1.37	19.3
Mirage	46	63%	1.14	16.9
Nuke	41	54%	1.13	16.1
Inferno	31	35%	1.11	15.8
Vertigo	26	62%	1.37	19.1
Cache	12	33%	1.06	16.3

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

26.1%Headshot accuracy

37.4%Accuracy (enemy spotted)

40.0%Spray accuracy

86.7%Counter-strafing

8.3°Preaim

546msReaction time

36.5%T opening success

60.3%CT opening success

0.48Enemies flashed / flash

5.0%Flash assists

9.93HE damage / grenade

8.38Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

Grenades & Utility
Most of your flashes are blinding nobody. A handful of reliable pop-flash lineups fixes this faster than anything else.
Enemies flashed per flash 0.4812 — below the 0.5 mark we flag
Grenade Lineups →
Advanced Mechanics
You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.
T opening duels 36.4727% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Cache

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

45% win rate across 11 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Cache callouts & strategy →

Recent matches

Map	Score	Rating	HS%	Date
nuke	11–13	-0.02	21%	26 Aug →
mirage	12–16	-0.04	32%	22 Aug →
nuke	6–13	-0.06	36%	22 Aug →
nuke	13–3	0.04	22%	22 Aug →
anubis	13–9	0.13	37%	18 Aug →
inferno	4–9	-0.04	16%	18 Aug →
dust2	13–1	-0.01	29%	18 Aug →
mirage	13–10	-0.06	12%	13 Aug →
ancient	13–9	-0.00	28%	12 Aug →
cache	8–13	0.05	31%	12 Aug →
anubis	11–13	-0.01	26%	12 Aug →
dust2	11–13	0.02	27%	12 Aug →
dust2	13–4	0.12	35%	12 Aug →
dust2	11–13	-0.00	26%	12 Aug →
mirage	13–8	-0.01	32%	12 Aug →
mirage	13–2	0.08	28%	12 Aug →
mirage	13–11	0.02	36%	11 Aug →
cache	13–10	0.06	28%	11 Aug →
cache	13–8	0.07	17%	11 Aug →
mirage	13–16	-0.03	19%	11 Aug →
dust2	17–19	-0.03	18%	11 Aug →
mirage	2–13	-0.09	19%	10 Aug →
anubis	3–13	-0.03	24%	10 Aug →
dust2	13–5	0.08	31%	10 Aug →
nuke	13–8	0.04	27%	10 Aug →
dust2	13–7	0.01	14%	10 Aug →
mirage	13–10	0.01	26%	10 Aug →
dust2	16–13	0.03	25%	10 Aug →
cache	13–6	0.03	10%	10 Aug →
dust2	5–13	-0.05	43%	10 Aug →
ancient	19–16	0.06	28%	9 Aug →
dust2	3–13	0.02	46%	9 Aug →
mirage	13–4	-0.00	20%	9 Aug →
dust2	7–13	-0.03	16%	9 Aug →
dust2	13–7	-0.01	23%	8 Aug →
nuke	13–11	-0.01	23%	8 Aug →
mirage	13–1	0.07	24%	8 Aug →
anubis	6–13	0.03	22%	7 Aug →
ancient	9–13	-0.04	21%	6 Aug →
nuke	13–6	0.01	42%	6 Aug →
ancient	9–13	-0.06	18%	6 Aug →
mirage	13–7	0.03	28%	6 Aug →
dust2	7–13	-0.06	26%	6 Aug →
dust2	8–13	-0.10	24%	6 Aug →
dust2	13–16	-0.01	32%	5 Aug →
dust2	16–13	0.05	23%	5 Aug →
cache	8–13	-0.01	30%	5 Aug →
vertigo	13–6	0.05	20%	5 Aug →
ancient	9–13	0.02	16%	5 Aug →
anubis	6–13	0.09	21%	5 Aug →
mirage	11–13	0.05	15%	4 Aug →
ancient	13–9	0.05	12%	4 Aug →
anubis	13–11	0.09	17%	4 Aug →
dust2	16–14	0.05	28%	4 Aug →
ancient	13–10	0.07	20%	4 Aug →
nuke	8–13	-0.03	27%	2 Aug →
dust2	8–13	0.00	28%	2 Aug →
ancient	13–9	-0.03	25%	2 Aug →
cache	6–13	-0.06	23%	2 Aug →
ancient	10–13	0.05	16%	2 Aug →
mirage	13–11	-0.03	31%	2 Aug →
anubis	16–13	0.06	26%	2 Aug →
dust2	13–7	0.04	20%	2 Aug →
dust2	16–12	-0.00	29%	1 Aug →
ancient	7–13	-0.02	20%	1 Aug →
mirage	13–9	0.01	33%	1 Aug →
dust2	10–13	0.00	19%	1 Aug →
cache	9–13	-0.02	19%	1 Aug →
ancient	7–13	-0.06	23%	1 Aug →
nuke	15–15	-0.03	19%	1 Aug →
cache	11–13	-0.01	34%	1 Aug →
dust2	13–3	0.03	24%	1 Aug →
dust2	8–13	-0.06	16%	1 Aug →
cache	13–3	0.12	26%	31 Jul →
cache	16–13	0.04	24%	29 Jul →
mirage	6–13	-0.04	24%	29 Jul →
dust2	11–13	-0.02	19%	29 Jul →
dust2	8–13	-0.00	28%	29 Jul →
dust2	7–13	0.02	26%	28 Jul →
mirage	9–13	-0.04	30%	28 Jul →
dust2	13–6	0.03	28%	28 Jul →
dust2	4–13	-0.10	22%	28 Jul →
mirage	7–13	0.06	29%	27 Jul →
mirage	13–2	0.03	47%	27 Jul →
dust2	13–6	0.02	33%	27 Jul →
ancient	9–13	-0.02	22%	27 Jul →
nuke	13–7	0.02	21%	26 Jul →
dust2	13–16	0.02	24%	26 Jul →
dust2	8–13	-0.02	32%	26 Jul →
dust2	13–4	0.09	24%	26 Jul →
mirage	13–10	0.03	22%	26 Jul →
ancient	13–6	0.17	37%	25 Jul →
dust2	13–9	0.08	31%	25 Jul →
mirage	7–13	-0.03	42%	25 Jul →
cache	11–13	0.01	23%	25 Jul →
ancient	16–13	-0.02	27%	25 Jul →
nuke	2–13	-0.02	25%	25 Jul →
dust2	13–3	0.05	39%	25 Jul →
dust2	13–6	0.15	18%	25 Jul →
anubis	13–8	0.04	42%	23 Jul →