NIWIH — CS2 Stats

76561198108029259[U:1:147763531]

3,942Tracked matches48%Win rate2020Tracked since

CSDB Rating6.5 SolidHybrid Rifler

Premier CS Rating25,354Top 25% of 819 CSDB-tracked playersRed band · top ~2.8% of ranked players (population est.)

CSDB Leaderboard#2484 of 19311 tracked

FaceitLevel 10 · 2,280 ELOTop 12.4% of ranked FACEIT players

WingmanThe Global Elite

Ladder ranks via Leetify

Share this profile

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim89

Positioning51

Utility61

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY51–43–6Last 10051%Win rateLLLWLWWTWW

Last 10 vs previous 10: -10pp win rate · +0.01 avg rating

Player DNA

Primary style: Hybrid Rifler — Aim-led profile without a single dominant tendency.

Aim8.9

Aggression5.8

Utility6.1

Positioning5.1

Opening Duels2.6

Clutch3.0

Sharp aimerStrong CT-side opener

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

Plays most like Twistzz 94% playstyle similarity

Most alike: opening-duel success, opening-fight frequency.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Strengths

Aim. Aim score of 89 — the mechanical foundation is a clear strength.

Areas to improve

Positioning. Positioning trails aim by 38 points — deaths here waste a strong aim profile.

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 50% on CT to 31% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim8.9

Positioning5.1

Utility6.1

Mechanics5.8

Opening Duels2.6

Win Impact4.4

Composite 6.5/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.05 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.01+0.01

first ⅓ avg -0.00 → last ⅓ avg 0.01

Reaction time464ms−78ms

first ⅓ avg 542ms → last ⅓ avg 464ms

Headshot accuracy25.9%+1.8%

first ⅓ avg 24.0% → last ⅓ avg 25.9%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.13Best rating — ancient 13–5

13–1Biggest win — mirage

5Longest win streak

L3Current streak

9–8In matches decided by ≤2 rounds

13Overtime games

Map breakdown

dust2Best map · 75% over 16cacheWeakest map · 29% over 17

Map	Grade	Played	Record	Win rate	Avg rating
ancient	B	21	11–10	52%	0.03
cache	D	17	5–12	29%	0.00
dust2	S	16	12–4	75%	0.00
mirage	S	14	10–4	71%	0.01
inferno	A	12	7–5	58%	0.01
nuke	D	10	3–7	30%	0.00
anubis	B	6	3–3	50%	-0.01
vertigo	—	2	0–2	0%	0.03
train	—	1	0–1	0%	-0.04
office	—	1	0–1	0%	-0.05

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Faceit stats

Combat

1,542Matches

51%Win rate

1.07Avg K/D

83.6ADR

50%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

35%1v1 clutch win

21%1v2 clutch win

14Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWLLWL

Map	Matches	Win rate	Avg K/D	Avg kills
Mirage	227	54%	1.07	16.5
Ancient	183	48%	1.06	16.9
Anubis	154	47%	1.06	16.2
Inferno	107	40%	1.09	17.0
Dust2	77	52%	1.06	16.1
Nuke	68	51%	1.12	18.7
Overpass	34	47%	1.14	16.7
Vertigo	34	53%	1.03	18.1

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

25.8%Headshot accuracy

37.2%Accuracy (enemy spotted)

39.8%Spray accuracy

75.9%Counter-strafing

9.0°Preaim

461msReaction time

31.0%T opening success

49.7%CT opening success

0.50Enemies flashed / flash

8.8%Flash assists

7.93HE damage / grenade

13.32Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

Grenades & Utility
Most of your flashes are blinding nobody. A handful of reliable pop-flash lineups fixes this faster than anything else.
Enemies flashed per flash 0.4993 — below the 0.5 mark we flag
Grenade Lineups →
Advanced Mechanics
You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.
T opening duels 30.9539% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Cache

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

29% win rate across 17 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Cache callouts & strategy →

Recent matches

Map	Score	Rating	HS%	Date
inferno	14–16	0.01	21%	27 Aug →
vertigo	14–16	0.00	21%	25 Aug →
anubis	1–13	-0.09	41%	25 Aug →
inferno	13–10	0.07	37%	25 Aug →
ancient	8–13	0.01	29%	20 Aug →
inferno	13–10	0.03	23%	18 Aug →
cache	13–4	0.07	25%	16 Aug →
cache	12–12	0.02	19%	16 Aug →
dust2	13–9	0.05	31%	15 Aug →
mirage	13–1	0.01	28%	15 Aug →
dust2	5–13	-0.02	31%	15 Aug →
cache	10–13	0.03	15%	15 Aug →
dust2	13–9	-0.03	18%	15 Aug →
ancient	13–10	0.02	31%	15 Aug →
cache	8–13	0.03	31%	15 Aug →
dust2	13–11	0.00	29%	15 Aug →
dust2	13–11	-0.02	26%	15 Aug →
nuke	5–13	-0.00	30%	14 Aug →
dust2	13–6	-0.02	21%	14 Aug →
dust2	13–11	0.07	38%	13 Aug →
ancient	8–13	0.05	17%	13 Aug →
ancient	13–9	0.01	22%	12 Aug →
ancient	11–13	0.01	17%	11 Aug →
inferno	16–13	0.03	36%	11 Aug →
inferno	13–9	0.06	21%	11 Aug →
nuke	9–13	-0.03	30%	9 Aug →
nuke	6–13	-0.03	41%	9 Aug →
cache	8–13	0.01	14%	9 Aug →
vertigo	15–19	0.05	24%	7 Aug →
cache	8–13	-0.10	15%	7 Aug →
mirage	13–3	-0.02	18%	28 Jul →
mirage	13–10	0.02	16%	28 Jul →
anubis	13–16	0.07	38%	28 Jul →
cache	1–13	-0.13	0%	28 Jul →
cache	13–8	-0.01	20%	23 Jul →
nuke	13–4	0.05	12%	23 Jul →
inferno	4–13	-0.02	14%	22 Jul →
dust2	13–9	0.06	18%	21 Jul →
cache	13–10	0.04	13%	19 Jul →
nuke	9–13	0.04	19%	19 Jul →
mirage	10–13	0.04	21%	19 Jul →
dust2	5–0	0.01	17%	19 Jul →
mirage	13–4	0.09	17%	19 Jul →
cache	4–13	-0.03	26%	19 Jul →
dust2	11–13	0.12	24%	19 Jul →
cache	8–13	-0.04	23%	19 Jul →
ancient	13–5	0.06	28%	18 Jul →
inferno	2–0	0.00	0%	18 Jul →
anubis	2–0	-0.10	0%	18 Jul →
dust2	16–12	-0.00	14%	18 Jul →
mirage	13–9	-0.00	20%	18 Jul →
inferno	15–15	0.03	14%	18 Jul →
ancient	15–15	0.07	32%	18 Jul →
mirage	12–16	0.01	27%	18 Jul →
ancient	11–13	0.05	16%	17 Jul →
ancient	13–11	0.01	21%	17 Jul →
cache	15–15	0.08	29%	16 Jul →
dust2	13–4	-0.08	25%	16 Jul →
nuke	9–13	0.00	17%	16 Jul →
ancient	13–11	0.08	22%	16 Jul →
ancient	13–11	-0.02	16%	15 Jul →
ancient	13–8	0.03	21%	14 Jul →
ancient	13–8	0.08	27%	14 Jul →
cache	6–13	-0.07	26%	13 Jul →
ancient	13–3	0.04	12%	13 Jul →
mirage	13–8	-0.01	19%	13 Jul →
mirage	13–6	0.07	24%	13 Jul →
nuke	9–13	-0.04	23%	13 Jul →
mirage	6–13	-0.03	24%	13 Jul →
cache	13–6	0.01	37%	13 Jul →
inferno	6–13	-0.04	18%	13 Jul →
mirage	13–10	-0.00	26%	12 Jul →
nuke	12–16	-0.04	24%	11 Jul →
cache	10–13	-0.01	23%	11 Jul →
dust2	7–13	-0.01	25%	11 Jul →
mirage	13–9	0.00	25%	11 Jul →
inferno	13–11	0.01	15%	10 Jul →
dust2	13–6	0.05	24%	10 Jul →
ancient	13–3	-0.00	29%	9 Jul →
ancient	10–13	-0.04	24%	9 Jul →
cache	13–8	0.04	25%	9 Jul →
ancient	6–13	-0.00	15%	7 Jul →
anubis	12–16	0.00	18%	7 Jul →
ancient	13–5	0.13	32%	7 Jul →
anubis	13–2	0.11	31%	4 Jul →
train	12–12	-0.04	27%	3 Jul →
nuke	13–1	0.03	12%	30 Jun →
ancient	12–12	0.02	18%	30 Jun →
mirage	13–9	0.03	31%	28 Jun →
nuke	13–10	0.02	20%	25 Jun →
inferno	13–7	-0.06	31%	20 Jun →
dust2	1–9	-0.05	13%	18 Jun →
dust2	16–13	-0.06	15%	17 Jun →
ancient	9–13	-0.01	28%	17 Jun →
anubis	13–10	-0.03	39%	13 Jun →
cache	11–13	0.08	35%	13 Jun →
office	11–13	-0.05	13%	11 Jun →
mirage	4–13	-0.07	25%	10 Jun →
inferno	8–13	-0.01	33%	10 Jun →
ancient	11–13	0.01	16%	3 Jun →