Makzwell

Makzwell — CS2 Stats

US76561198107371885[U:1:147106157]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

1,999Tracked matches48%Win rate2020Tracked since
CSDB Rating6.7 SolidPositional Player
Premier CS Rating14,062Blue band · top ~33.4% of ranked players (population est.)
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 19 Sep 2026 (yesterday). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

No change since then. Play, then come back: the next observation lands here.

Track this profile

CSDB reads this profile's Premier rating from its tracked match history, and records Faceit ELO once on every day the page is viewed. 50 days played since 28 Mar 2026. Come back after the next session and the change shows above.

Is this you? Sign in with Steam to claim it and connect match tracking →

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 14,062 -5,361 2 Apr20 Sept · 25 days played
12,98019,423peak 19,4232 Apr20 Sept
Faceit ELO: 2,206 +0 28 Aug20 Sept · 4 observations
2,2062,206peak 2,20628 Aug20 Sept
19,423Peak Premier in tracked matches
2,206Highest Faceit ELO seen on CSDB
50Days played since 2026-03-28

Faceit ELO

  • At peak — 2,206
  • 0 over 30 days · steady
  • Next: 2,500 ELO at 2,500 294 to go
  • Reached: Level 10 · Level 9 · Level 8 · Level 7
  • Level 10 first seen 2026-08-28
  • Level 9 first seen 2026-08-28

Premier CS Rating

  • 5,361 below peak (19,423)
  • -1,614 over 90 days
  • Next: Purple band at 15,000 938 to go
  • Reached: Purple band · Blue band · Light Blue band
  • Blue band first seen 2026-09-20
  • Light Blue band first seen 2026-09-20

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do. Faceit ELO is CSDB’s own observation — no feed exposes ELO per match, so that line only has the days the profile was viewed and cannot be backfilled.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGMakzwellPREMIER14,062 · Blue band30 DAYS0 ELOPEAK ELO2,206csdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim86
Positioning68
Utility59

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

HOT36595Last 10036%Win rateLWLLWWWWWW

Last 10 vs previous 10: +40pp win rate · −0.02 avg rating · −0.1pp headshot accuracy · +90ms reaction

Win rate up 40pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — more than a 10-match window's normal noise (±20pp). Average match rating moved the other way (−0.02), so results shifted more than performance did.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 23 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 25%
  • Avg reaction 674ms

Last 10

  • 73 · 70% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 28%
  • Avg reaction 685ms

Last 20

  • 1010 · 50% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 28%
  • Avg reaction 640ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Positional PlayerPositioning stands above the rest of this profile (+1.6 against its own average).

Aim8.6
Utility5.9
Positioning6.8
Opening Duels5.6
Clutch2.6

Sharp aimerExcellent counter-strafing

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

iM

Plays most like iM 92% playstyle similarity

Most alike: positioning profile, utility contribution.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Strengths

Aim. Aim score of 86 — the mechanical foundation is a clear strength.

Areas to improve

Reaction time. 651ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim8.6
Positioning6.8
Utility5.9
Mechanics8.7
Opening Duels5.1
Win Impact4.4

Composite 6.7/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×0.95 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.02+0.02
first ⅓ avg 0.00 → last ⅓ avg 0.02
Reaction time661ms−38ms
first ⅓ avg 699ms → last ⅓ avg 661ms
Headshot accuracy30.1%−3.1%
first ⅓ avg 33.2% → last ⅓ avg 30.1%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.17Best match rating · 13–8 · inferno, 1 Apr
83%Best headshot accuracy · 3–13 · nuke, 3 Apr
453msFastest reaction time · 13–9 · office, 7 Sept
13–2Biggest win · dust2, 2 Apr

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

6Longest win streak
106In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
7Overtime games

Map breakdown

mirageBest map · 67% over 15ancientWeakest map · 7% over 14
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
dust2D1961332%-0.02
mirageS1510567%0.02
nukeD1541127%-0.02
ancientD141137%-0.00
infernoS96367%0.02
anubisA85363%0.02
overpassD72529%-0.02
cacheD61517%-0.01
office31233%0.02
train2020%-0.02
vertigo1010%0.01
shelter1010%-0.10

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Ancient is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (7% over 14). Start with the 6 essential Ancient lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

1,545Matches
55%Win rate
1.23Avg K/D
65.8ADR
48%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

33%1v1 clutch win
16%1v2 clutch win
9Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWLLLL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Ancient3336%0.7011.4
Dust23142%0.8814.0
Mirage2941%0.7613.5
Anubis2343%0.7911.7
Inferno1457%0.7611.4
Nuke1346%0.8511.2
Overpass119%0.7512.2
Vertigo825%1.0113.8

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

29.4%Headshot accuracy
39.2%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
34.7%Spray accuracy
89.1%Counter-strafing
9.6°Preaim
651msReaction time
44.6%T opening success
56.3%CT opening success
0.65Enemies flashed / flash
8.5%Flash assists
9.15HE damage / grenade
12.06Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Spend your practice time on Ancient

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

7% win rate across 14 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Ancient callouts & strategyAncient grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
inferno11–130.0221%19 Sept
cache13–50.1336%19 Sept
ancient4–13-0.0310%19 Sept
ancient11–13-0.0329%14 Sept
mirage13–50.0129%14 Sept
inferno13–11-0.0231%14 Sept
mirage13–80.0118%13 Sept
anubis13–10-0.0526%13 Sept
inferno13–100.0222%13 Sept
office13–90.0461%7 Sept
nuke7–130.0118%3 Sept
inferno9–130.0333%3 Sept
office10–130.0428%2 Sept
dust29–13-0.0724%2 Sept
ancient11–130.0331%26 Aug
ancient9–13-0.0133%26 Aug
anubis16–140.0433%26 Aug
nuke13–100.0524%19 Aug
ancient6–130.0114%15 Aug
mirage13–80.1245%15 Aug
ancient13–160.0228%15 Aug
cache12–16-0.0226%10 Aug
mirage4–13-0.0136%10 Aug
train9–130.0138%10 Aug
vertigo12–120.0129%10 Aug
anubis13–110.0752%9 Aug
mirage13–50.0535%9 Aug
cache4–130.0433%7 Aug
mirage16–120.0927%4 Aug
nuke13–110.1311%4 Aug
mirage8–130.0836%27 Jul
dust25–13-0.0330%27 Jul
nuke10–130.0146%25 Jul
ancient8–130.0528%18 Jul
nuke4–13-0.0850%18 Jul
nuke12–12-0.0540%15 Jul
shelter5–13-0.1032%9 Jul
nuke4–13-0.0232%9 Jul
dust23–130.0133%9 Jul
dust29–13-0.0723%9 Jul
nuke13–90.0133%9 Jul
cache10–13-0.0825%8 Jul
dust216–120.0439%26 Jun
dust212–120.0039%8 Jun
cache6–13-0.0663%3 Jun
dust28–130.0233%3 Jun
cache9–13-0.0967%28 May
office5–13-0.0233%28 May
nuke3–13-0.0757%24 May
nuke4–3-0.050%18 May
dust213–11-0.0343%18 May
mirage13–5-0.0438%14 May
dust28–13-0.0350%14 May
overpass10–13-0.0519%12 May
mirage13–70.0150%9 May
nuke5–13-0.0250%9 May
dust26–13-0.0719%7 May
dust22–13-0.0727%5 May
overpass8–13-0.0235%5 May
anubis7–13-0.0047%30 Apr
nuke8–13-0.0138%28 Apr
inferno5–13-0.0338%28 Apr
anubis13–5-0.0125%28 Apr
anubis12–120.0020%26 Apr
nuke2–13-0.0830%26 Apr
nuke4–13-0.0933%24 Apr
dust24–13-0.0330%23 Apr
inferno13–100.0121%21 Apr
mirage8–10.0457%21 Apr
overpass10–13-0.0125%21 Apr
ancient9–13-0.0437%20 Apr
dust211–130.0730%17 Apr
overpass5–13-0.0023%17 Apr
train3–13-0.0547%15 Apr
mirage4–13-0.0348%15 Apr
anubis13–80.0339%15 Apr
ancient11–13-0.0328%15 Apr
ancient7–13-0.0419%14 Apr
anubis15–150.0627%14 Apr
dust213–10-0.0217%14 Apr
overpass13–50.0313%13 Apr
dust213–7-0.0427%13 Apr
ancient13–80.0154%10 Apr
overpass16–14-0.0519%10 Apr
dust24–13-0.0433%10 Apr
overpass8–13-0.0447%9 Apr
ancient11–130.1227%7 Apr
dust28–13-0.0331%7 Apr
mirage6–130.0232%7 Apr
ancient6–13-0.0324%6 Apr
mirage13–80.0626%4 Apr
ancient8–13-0.0327%4 Apr
nuke3–13-0.0583%3 Apr
dust213–80.0130%2 Apr
dust213–20.0731%2 Apr
inferno4–20.0040%2 Apr
mirage13–11-0.0424%2 Apr
mirage5–13-0.0335%1 Apr
inferno13–80.1733%1 Apr
inferno13–110.0240%28 Mar

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

2K ELO1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →