墨尔本MP9战神

墨尔本MP9战神 — CS2 Stats

76561198107003644[U:1:146737916]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

809Tracked matches72%Win rate2020Tracked since
CSDB Rating6.8 SolidSupport
Premier CS Rating25,883Top 10% of 175,286 CSDB-tracked playersRed band · top ~2.6% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#12540 of 221277 tracked
FaceitLevel 9 · 1,911 ELOTop 20.7% of ranked FACEIT players
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 16 Sep 2026 (yesterday). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

No change since then. Play, then come back: the next observation lands here.

Track this profile

CSDB reads this profile's Premier rating from its tracked match history, and records Faceit ELO once on every day the page is viewed. 45 days played since 4 Jul 2026. Come back after the next session and the change shows above.

Is this you? Sign in with Steam to claim it and connect match tracking →

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 25,883 +772 4 Jul16 Sept · 17 days played
21,74025,883peak 25,8834 Jul16 Sept
25,883Peak Premier in tracked matches
1,911Highest Faceit ELO seen on CSDB
45Days played since 2026-07-04

Faceit ELO

  • At peak — 1,911
  • Next: Level 10 at 2,001 90 to go
  • Reached: Level 9 · Level 8 · Level 7 · Level 6

Premier CS Rating

  • At peak — 25,883
  • +3,245 over 30 days · improving
  • Next: Gold band at 30,000 4,117 to go
  • Reached: Red band · Pink band · Purple band · Blue band

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do. Faceit ELO is CSDB’s own observation — no feed exposes ELO per match, so that line only has the days the profile was viewed and cannot be backfilled.

Share this profile

CSDB.GG墨尔本MP9战神FACEITLevel 9 · 1,911 ELOSTANDINGTop 20.7% of rankedPREMIER25,883 · Red bandPEAK ELO1,911csdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim82
Positioning49
Utility59

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY64351Last 10064%Win rateWWWWLLLWWL

Last 10 vs previous 10: −20pp win rate · −0.01 avg rating · +0.3pp headshot accuracy · +25ms reaction

Win rate down 20pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — more than a 10-match window's normal noise (±20pp).

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 41 · 80% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.04
  • Avg headshot accuracy 21%
  • Avg reaction 542ms

Last 10

  • 64 · 60% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 26%
  • Avg reaction 573ms

Last 20

  • 146 · 70% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.03
  • Avg headshot accuracy 26%
  • Avg reaction 560ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: SupportUtility contribution stands above the rest of this profile (+1.6 against its own average).

Aim8.2
Utility5.9
Positioning4.9
Opening Duels2.9
Clutch3.4

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

device

Plays most like device 93% playstyle similarity

Most alike: opening-duel success, utility contribution.

Where you differ: lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Positioning. Positioning trails aim by 33 points — deaths here waste a strong aim profile.

Reaction time. 556ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim8.2
Positioning4.9
Utility5.9
Mechanics6.6
Opening Duels1.4
Win Impact10.0

Composite 6.8/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.05 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.02−0.00
first ⅓ avg 0.03 → last ⅓ avg 0.02
Reaction time552ms−62ms
first ⅓ avg 614ms → last ⅓ avg 552ms
Headshot accuracy26.3%+0.3%
first ⅓ avg 26.0% → last ⅓ avg 26.3%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.18Best match rating · 13–4 · anubis, 1 Aug
50%Best headshot accuracy · 0–13 · mirage, 26 Jul
422msFastest reaction time · 8–13 · cache, 12 Sept
13–0Biggest win · anubis, 25 Jul

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

8Longest win streak
W4Current streak
84In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
11Overtime games

Map breakdown

anubisBest map · 80% over 10ancientWeakest map · 55% over 11
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
dust2A36231364%0.02
mirageS2013765%0.03
infernoS128467%0.02
ancientA116555%0.00
anubisS108280%0.03
cacheA95456%-0.00
nuke21150%-0.01

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Ancient is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (55% over 11). Start with the 6 essential Ancient lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

1,086Matches
53%Win rate
1.21Avg K/D
83.2ADR
55%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

37%1v1 clutch win
27%1v2 clutch win
8Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWWLWW

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Dust210756%1.1716.6
Inferno5551%1.2217.4
Mirage5553%1.2017.2
Ancient4659%1.1815.9
Cache1567%1.2818.2
Anubis1127%0.9314.8
Nuke1070%1.2513.8
Train450%1.2117.3

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

25.3%Headshot accuracy
34.3%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
39.8%Spray accuracy
79.9%Counter-strafing
9.5°Preaim
556msReaction time
30.7%T opening success
40.8%CT opening success
0.61Enemies flashed / flash
6.0%Flash assists
7.77HE damage / grenade
13.25Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 30.7073% — below the 40% mark we flag

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
anubis13–8-0.0324%16 Sept
ancient13–8-0.0122%13 Sept
cache13–110.1024%13 Sept
mirage13–50.0513%13 Sept
dust210–130.1020%13 Sept
mirage1–13-0.0342%13 Sept
cache8–13-0.0533%12 Sept
dust213–10-0.0328%8 Sept
dust213–70.1319%6 Sept
mirage3–130.0033%6 Sept
mirage9–13-0.0140%4 Sept
inferno13–60.0321%3 Sept
nuke13–11-0.0236%3 Sept
dust216–14-0.0121%3 Sept
ancient19–150.0518%2 Sept
dust216–130.0426%28 Aug
anubis13–30.1237%28 Aug
cache13–100.0619%27 Aug
anubis13–80.0317%27 Aug
ancient11–130.0121%27 Aug
dust213–30.0211%27 Aug
cache13–3-0.0415%26 Aug
mirage13–70.0630%26 Aug
dust216–140.0121%24 Aug
dust26–13-0.0415%23 Aug
dust213–80.0529%23 Aug
dust213–50.0434%22 Aug
dust215–15-0.0124%20 Aug
inferno13–70.0845%20 Aug
anubis3–13-0.0336%19 Aug
anubis13–110.0138%18 Aug
inferno13–5-0.0143%16 Aug
dust213–70.0116%10 Aug
inferno10–13-0.0024%5 Aug
inferno13–10-0.0120%4 Aug
dust213–10-0.0615%2 Aug
dust213–9-0.0635%2 Aug
dust213–60.1623%2 Aug
anubis13–40.1830%1 Aug
mirage13–80.0532%31 Jul
mirage13–40.0935%30 Jul
mirage3–40.1840%30 Jul
dust213–50.0222%30 Jul
mirage13–7-0.0317%26 Jul
dust20–13-0.060%26 Jul
mirage0–13-0.0550%26 Jul
mirage13–70.0233%26 Jul
anubis13–0-0.0125%25 Jul
cache12–16-0.0417%25 Jul
mirage10–40.0239%25 Jul
inferno13–110.0425%24 Jul
dust210–13-0.0622%24 Jul
dust213–20.1334%24 Jul
ancient9–13-0.0540%23 Jul
ancient13–11-0.0231%23 Jul
ancient14–16-0.0024%22 Jul
dust212–160.0123%21 Jul
cache13–50.0416%21 Jul
inferno4–13-0.0523%20 Jul
dust213–160.0425%19 Jul
ancient13–20.0213%19 Jul
dust25–13-0.0026%18 Jul
dust213–9-0.0228%18 Jul
inferno10–130.0231%18 Jul
ancient1–13-0.040%18 Jul
dust213–30.0820%18 Jul
mirage7–13-0.0426%18 Jul
mirage13–6-0.0029%18 Jul
dust213–80.0232%18 Jul
inferno10–130.0116%17 Jul
inferno16–130.0522%17 Jul
dust213–60.0322%17 Jul
nuke9–130.0138%16 Jul
cache4–13-0.0423%16 Jul
ancient13–20.0317%15 Jul
dust210–13-0.0013%15 Jul
ancient6–13-0.0132%14 Jul
mirage13–70.0118%14 Jul
cache7–13-0.0222%12 Jul
dust213–60.0722%12 Jul
mirage6–13-0.0421%12 Jul
mirage16–140.0217%12 Jul
dust213–10.0422%12 Jul
dust213–60.0632%12 Jul
dust29–13-0.0145%11 Jul
inferno13–50.0416%11 Jul
dust28–130.0326%10 Jul
mirage13–90.1821%10 Jul
dust213–70.0019%9 Jul
cache13–50.0036%7 Jul
dust213–80.0132%7 Jul
dust211–130.0128%5 Jul
anubis13–40.0515%5 Jul
anubis3–13-0.0629%5 Jul
anubis13–80.0225%5 Jul
dust210–130.0448%5 Jul
mirage13–90.0240%4 Jul
inferno13–70.0526%4 Jul
mirage13–10.1725%4 Jul
ancient13–70.0531%4 Jul

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

500 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →