Puffeltoff

Puffeltoff — CS2 Stats

76561198106837363[U:1:146571635]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

1,299Tracked matches52%Win rate2020Tracked since
CSDB Rating5.1 DevelopingAll-Rounder
Premier CS Rating19,170Top 50% of 194,975 CSDB-tracked playersPurple band · top ~11.8% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#90467 of 241707 tracked
FaceitLevel 7 · 1,258 ELOTop 42.3% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanMaster Guardian Elite
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 23 Sep 2026 (yesterday). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

No change since then. Play, then come back: the next observation lands here.

Track this profile

CSDB reads this profile's Premier rating from its tracked match history, and records Faceit ELO once on every day the page is viewed. 36 days played since 31 Jul 2026. Come back after the next session and the change shows above.

Is this you? Sign in with Steam to claim it and connect match tracking →

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 19,170 +1,023 1 Aug23 Sept · 34 days played
16,34219,806peak 19,8061 Aug23 Sept
Faceit ELO: 1,258 +0 29 Aug4 Sept · 3 observations
1,2581,258peak 1,25829 Aug4 Sept
19,999Peak Premier in tracked matches
1,258Highest Faceit ELO seen on CSDB
36Days played since 2026-07-31

Faceit ELO

  • At peak — 1,258
  • Next: Level 7 at 1,351 93 to go
  • Reached: Level 6 · Level 5 · Level 4 · Level 3
  • Level 6 first seen 2026-08-29
  • Level 5 first seen 2026-08-29

Premier CS Rating

  • 636 below peak (19,806)
  • +533 over 30 days · improving
  • Next: Pink band at 20,000 830 to go
  • Reached: Purple band · Blue band · Light Blue band
  • Purple band first seen 2026-08-29
  • Blue band first seen 2026-08-29

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do. Faceit ELO is CSDB’s own observation — no feed exposes ELO per match, so that line only has the days the profile was viewed and cannot be backfilled.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGPuffeltoffFACEITLevel 7 · 1,258 ELOSTANDINGTop 42.3% of rankedPREMIER19,170 · Purple bandPEAK ELO1,258csdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim59
Positioning53
Utility56

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY49456Last 10049%Win rateLWLWWLWLLL

Last 10 vs previous 10: −10pp win rate · +0.01 avg rating · −1.8pp headshot accuracy · +66ms reaction

Win rate −10pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — within the normal variation of a 10-match window (±20pp), so no real shift yet.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 32 · 60% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 17%
  • Avg reaction 583ms

Last 10

  • 46 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 14%
  • Avg reaction 592ms

Last 20

  • 992 · 45% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 15%
  • Avg reaction 560ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: All-RounderNo style dimension stands clear of the others in this profile.

Aim5.9
Utility5.6
Positioning5.3
Opening Duels3.2
Clutch5.6

Effective flashes

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

jL

Plays most like jL 82% playstyle similarity

Most alike: utility contribution, positioning profile.

Where you differ: lower opening-duel success; lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Reaction time. 552ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Counter-strafing. Only 70% of shots are taken properly stopped — moving-shot inaccuracy is quietly taxing every duel.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim5.9
Positioning5.3
Utility5.6
Mechanics4.4
Opening Duels2.6
Win Impact5.6

Composite 5.1/10 (Developing), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.01−0.01
first ⅓ avg 0.02 → last ⅓ avg 0.01
Reaction time550ms−10ms
first ⅓ avg 561ms → last ⅓ avg 550ms
Headshot accuracy16.2%+1.5%
first ⅓ avg 14.7% → last ⅓ avg 16.2%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.18Best match rating · 13–9 · mirage, 20 Sept
29%Best headshot accuracy · 13–6 · cache, 23 Aug
391msFastest reaction time · 9–13 · inferno, 23 Sept
13–1Biggest win · ancient, 23 Aug

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

4Longest win streak
69In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
12Overtime games

Map breakdown

anubisBest map · 63% over 8cacheWeakest map · 38% over 13
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
mirageB27131448%0.01
ancientC1981142%0.00
dust2B136746%0.01
nukeA138562%0.03
cacheC135838%0.01
anubisA85363%0.05
infernoA74357%0.04

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Faceit stats

Combat

142Matches
52%Win rate
0.98Avg K/D
74.8ADR
42%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

48%1v1 clutch win
26%1v2 clutch win
6Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWLLLW

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage3639%1.0415.6
Anubis2045%0.9615.8
Dust21958%0.9014.4
Nuke1669%0.9214.5
Overpass729%1.1918.9
Ancient667%0.8614.2
Cache580%1.2817.0
Inferno1100%0.707.0

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

15.2%Headshot accuracy
33.0%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
35.5%Spray accuracy
69.8%Counter-strafing
9.5°Preaim
552msReaction time
42.3%T opening success
38.7%CT opening success
0.73Enemies flashed / flash
4.6%Flash assists
13.07HE damage / grenade
5.31Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    Losing the first CT duel repeatedly usually means holding angles that favour the peeker.

    CT opening duels 38.7299% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Cache

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

38% win rate across 13 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Cache callouts & strategy

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
inferno9–13-0.0618%23 Sept
dust213–80.0021%22 Sept
mirage11–130.0213%22 Sept
inferno16–120.0115%21 Sept
mirage13–7-0.0016%21 Sept
nuke11–13-0.0116%20 Sept
mirage13–90.1811%20 Sept
mirage8–13-0.069%19 Sept
cache11–130.0312%19 Sept
anubis7–130.0311%18 Sept
mirage13–70.0117%18 Sept
nuke13–70.0718%18 Sept
dust213–70.0725%18 Sept
inferno13–100.0722%17 Sept
ancient10–13-0.084%17 Sept
cache4–13-0.0216%9 Sept
mirage15–15-0.0416%8 Sept
mirage15–150.0418%8 Sept
ancient9–13-0.0711%8 Sept
nuke13–11-0.0013%7 Sept
mirage11–13-0.0222%6 Sept
nuke13–11-0.0112%6 Sept
anubis13–20.1217%6 Sept
mirage15–150.0115%6 Sept
cache4–13-0.0218%4 Sept
ancient4–13-0.0414%4 Sept
mirage13–60.0318%4 Sept
dust211–130.0310%3 Sept
anubis13–90.0613%3 Sept
ancient13–50.0317%1 Sept
mirage10–13-0.0128%1 Sept
dust28–13-0.0123%31 Aug
mirage13–40.0326%31 Aug
ancient13–110.0219%31 Aug
cache9–13-0.0716%30 Aug
mirage9–130.0315%30 Aug
mirage13–16-0.0312%30 Aug
mirage10–130.0019%30 Aug
dust23–130.0111%29 Aug
dust213–30.0818%29 Aug
cache3–130.018%29 Aug
ancient12–120.0126%29 Aug
cache16–140.0817%28 Aug
inferno13–100.0412%28 Aug
mirage13–10-0.0814%28 Aug
mirage13–7-0.0714%25 Aug
anubis15–15-0.0216%25 Aug
nuke8–13-0.0217%25 Aug
cache3–130.0126%24 Aug
nuke13–10-0.0217%24 Aug
mirage13–20.0211%24 Aug
ancient10–130.0116%24 Aug
anubis13–80.0519%23 Aug
dust213–11-0.0015%23 Aug
nuke5–00.0823%23 Aug
anubis7–13-0.0511%23 Aug
cache13–60.0529%23 Aug
mirage13–60.0419%23 Aug
ancient13–10.0814%23 Aug
mirage4–130.0327%23 Aug
nuke13–100.1214%21 Aug
dust27–13-0.028%21 Aug
ancient13–50.0523%21 Aug
dust24–13-0.0222%20 Aug
ancient14–160.0213%20 Aug
cache13–70.0112%19 Aug
nuke10–13-0.0421%19 Aug
dust29–13-0.0513%18 Aug
anubis13–10.1319%18 Aug
cache13–30.029%18 Aug
ancient13–160.0014%18 Aug
cache10–130.0012%17 Aug
inferno11–130.1315%17 Aug
ancient3–13-0.106%17 Aug
inferno5–130.0524%17 Aug
dust213–80.039%17 Aug
ancient13–60.0219%17 Aug
mirage9–130.078%17 Aug
mirage13–16-0.0613%16 Aug
ancient10–13-0.0212%16 Aug
nuke13–50.1312%16 Aug
mirage13–90.0717%16 Aug
mirage7–13-0.067%15 Aug
dust211–13-0.0619%15 Aug
ancient12–160.0218%14 Aug
nuke13–70.1018%14 Aug
ancient13–100.0414%14 Aug
inferno13–60.0616%14 Aug
ancient13–80.0315%11 Aug
nuke6–13-0.0419%11 Aug
mirage13–90.0216%9 Aug
ancient13–8-0.0114%6 Aug
mirage13–60.0426%3 Aug
ancient11–130.0010%2 Aug
cache9–130.0214%2 Aug
nuke15–150.0818%1 Aug
mirage13–110.0519%1 Aug
anubis13–100.0411%1 Aug
cache13–8-0.0211%31 Jul
dust213–30.0620%31 Jul

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →