Willy Wortel

Willy Wortel — CS2 Stats

76561198050997151[U:1:90731423]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

1,997Tracked matches48%Win rate2020Tracked since
CSDB Rating6.9 SolidPositional Player
Premier CS Rating20,997Top 50% of 194,975 CSDB-tracked playersPink band · top ~7.4% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#65298 of 241707 tracked
WingmanMaster Guardian Elite
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 23 Sep 2026 (yesterday). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

No change since then. Play, then come back: the next observation lands here.

Track this profile

CSDB reads this profile's Premier rating from its tracked match history, and records Faceit ELO once on every day the page is viewed. 45 days played since 4 Jul 2026. Come back after the next session and the change shows above.

Is this you? Sign in with Steam to claim it and connect match tracking →

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 20,997 -1,336 4 Jul23 Sept · 23 days played
19,51122,333peak 22,3334 Jul23 Sept
22,684Peak Premier in tracked matches
1,436Highest Faceit ELO seen on CSDB
45Days played since 2026-07-04

Faceit ELO

  • At peak — 1,436
  • Next: Level 8 at 1,531 95 to go
  • Reached: Level 7 · Level 6 · Level 5 · Level 4
  • Level 7 first seen 2026-09-01
  • Level 6 first seen 2026-09-01

Premier CS Rating

  • 1,336 below peak (22,333)
  • -1,022 over 30 days · declining
  • -1,336 over 90 days
  • Next: Red band at 25,000 4,003 to go
  • Reached: Pink band · Purple band · Blue band · Light Blue band
  • Pink band first seen 2026-09-01
  • Purple band first seen 2026-09-01

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do. Faceit ELO is CSDB’s own observation — no feed exposes ELO per match, so that line only has the days the profile was viewed and cannot be backfilled.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGWilly WortelPREMIER20,997 · Pink bandPEAK ELO1,436csdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim85
Positioning69
Utility49

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY45487Last 10045%Win rateLWLWLWLLLW

Last 10 vs previous 10: −20pp win rate · +0.03 avg rating · −4.4pp headshot accuracy · +15ms reaction

Win rate down 20pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — more than a 10-match window's normal noise (±20pp). Average match rating moved the other way (+0.03), so results shifted more than performance did.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 23 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.05
  • Avg headshot accuracy 23%
  • Avg reaction 561ms

Last 10

  • 46 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.03
  • Avg headshot accuracy 23%
  • Avg reaction 591ms

Last 20

  • 1010 · 50% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 25%
  • Avg reaction 584ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Positional PlayerPositioning stands above the rest of this profile (+1.8 against its own average).

Aim8.5
Utility4.9
Positioning6.9
Opening Duels5.1
Clutch3.4

Sharp aimerLimited utility dependence

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

s1mple

Plays most like s1mple 89% playstyle similarity

Most alike: utility contribution, positioning profile.

Where you differ: lower opening-duel success.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Strengths

Aim. Aim score of 85 — the mechanical foundation is a clear strength.

Areas to improve

Utility. Utility contribution runs far behind the mechanical game — the cheapest rating gain on this profile is thrown, not aimed.

Reaction time. 569ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim8.5
Positioning6.9
Utility4.9
Mechanics6.7
Opening Duels6.4
Win Impact4.4

Composite 6.9/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.02 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.03+0.01
first ⅓ avg 0.01 → last ⅓ avg 0.03
Reaction time575ms−22ms
first ⅓ avg 598ms → last ⅓ avg 575ms
Headshot accuracy25.6%+1.9%
first ⅓ avg 23.7% → last ⅓ avg 25.6%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.23Best match rating · 9–2 · nuke, 11 Sept
57%Best headshot accuracy · 13–6 · mirage, 19 Jul
406msFastest reaction time · 13–2 · anubis, 6 Sept
13–1Biggest win · ancient, 23 Aug

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

5Longest win streak
88In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
8Overtime games

Map breakdown

nukeBest map · 61% over 18cacheWeakest map · 33% over 12
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
mirageC32141844%0.01
nukeA1811761%0.05
cacheD124833%-0.02
ancientB115645%0.01
anubisC104640%0.04
dust2B84450%0.02
infernoD62433%0.02
debris1010%0.05
vertigo110100%0.05
overpass1010%0.07

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Faceit stats

Combat

402Matches
53%Win rate
1.15Avg K/D
80.3ADR
49%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

37%1v1 clutch win
18%1v2 clutch win
7Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWLWLW

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage12247%1.0115.7
Nuke5163%1.2717.6
Ancient5153%1.1916.6
Dust24445%1.0817.2
Anubis3650%1.1118.0
Inferno3050%1.0715.8
Overpass2962%1.5718.2
Cache757%1.1518.0

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

24.4%Headshot accuracy
36.5%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
37.6%Spray accuracy
80.2%Counter-strafing
7.7°Preaim
569msReaction time
56.8%T opening success
54.2%CT opening success
0.56Enemies flashed / flash
3.5%Flash assists
9.54HE damage / grenade
4.87Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Spend your practice time on Cache

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

33% win rate across 12 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Cache callouts & strategy

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
inferno9–130.0624%23 Sept
dust213–80.1321%22 Sept
mirage11–130.0022%22 Sept
inferno16–120.0320%21 Sept
nuke11–130.0428%20 Sept
mirage13–90.0617%20 Sept
mirage8–130.0835%19 Sept
cache11–13-0.0028%19 Sept
anubis7–13-0.0614%18 Sept
mirage13–7-0.0222%18 Sept
nuke13–50.1156%18 Sept
nuke13–7-0.0429%18 Sept
dust213–7-0.0122%18 Sept
inferno13–100.0621%17 Sept
ancient10–130.0124%17 Sept
dust22–13-0.0424%16 Sept
ancient13–110.0222%15 Sept
mirage1–13-0.0221%15 Sept
nuke13–9-0.0022%13 Sept
inferno3–9-0.0833%12 Sept
debris5–90.0543%12 Sept
nuke9–60.1332%12 Sept
dust28–13-0.0026%11 Sept
mirage9–130.0126%11 Sept
ancient13–2-0.0032%11 Sept
nuke9–20.2326%11 Sept
mirage7–13-0.0413%10 Sept
nuke9–13-0.0012%9 Sept
dust210–13-0.0024%9 Sept
mirage15–150.0836%8 Sept
mirage15–150.0117%8 Sept
nuke13–110.0416%6 Sept
anubis13–20.0538%6 Sept
mirage15–150.0030%6 Sept
dust211–130.0743%3 Sept
ancient13–50.0329%1 Sept
mirage10–13-0.0036%1 Sept
cache9–13-0.0542%30 Aug
mirage9–130.0115%30 Aug
mirage13–160.0128%30 Aug
cache13–10-0.0613%26 Aug
cache3–13-0.0313%25 Aug
mirage13–70.0516%25 Aug
anubis15–150.0819%25 Aug
nuke8–130.0623%25 Aug
cache3–13-0.0037%24 Aug
nuke13–100.0537%24 Aug
mirage13–20.0820%24 Aug
ancient10–13-0.0230%24 Aug
anubis13–80.0424%23 Aug
dust213–110.0435%23 Aug
nuke5–00.0633%23 Aug
anubis7–130.0229%23 Aug
cache13–60.0630%23 Aug
mirage13–60.1020%23 Aug
ancient13–10.0640%23 Aug
mirage13–60.0317%3 Aug
ancient11–130.0226%2 Aug
cache9–130.0127%2 Aug
mirage5–13-0.1133%2 Aug
ancient13–11-0.0118%2 Aug
nuke15–15-0.0114%1 Aug
cache5–13-0.0125%1 Aug
anubis11–13-0.0722%1 Aug
mirage13–110.0825%1 Aug
anubis13–100.1515%1 Aug
cache13–8-0.0219%31 Jul
dust213–3-0.0127%31 Jul
cache13–11-0.0321%30 Jul
inferno5–130.0027%28 Jul
mirage13–110.0120%27 Jul
mirage6–13-0.0414%27 Jul
anubis11–130.0216%27 Jul
mirage8–130.0525%24 Jul
mirage13–6-0.0341%22 Jul
anubis11–13-0.0122%20 Jul
nuke8–130.0818%20 Jul
mirage13–10-0.0312%20 Jul
nuke6–130.0043%19 Jul
mirage13–60.0657%19 Jul
inferno12–120.0822%17 Jul
vertigo13–10.0531%17 Jul
ancient7–13-0.0521%16 Jul
nuke13–5-0.0135%15 Jul
mirage5–13-0.0715%15 Jul
anubis13–10.1524%15 Jul
ancient7–130.0217%14 Jul
mirage4–13-0.018%13 Jul
mirage13–50.0915%10 Jul
nuke13–60.0115%10 Jul
cache6–13-0.078%9 Jul
mirage9–13-0.0513%9 Jul
cache12–12-0.0238%8 Jul
mirage16–140.0233%6 Jul
mirage9–13-0.0030%6 Jul
nuke10–130.0437%5 Jul
ancient7–13-0.0012%5 Jul
mirage13–5-0.0519%5 Jul
nuke13–70.1028%4 Jul
overpass9–130.0718%4 Jul

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →