SundrE

SundrE — CS2 Stats

76561198102259866[U:1:141994138]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

942Tracked matches52%Win rate2020Tracked since
CSDB Rating5.7 SolidSupport
FaceitLevel 8Top 31.2% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanGold Nova II
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 21 Sep 2026 (24 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

+6Tracked matches · now 942
−3.7ppWin rate · 55.6% → 51.8%

Rating over time

37Days played since 2024-08-29

Premier is CSDB’s own observation — it builds from the day a profile is first viewed and cannot be backfilled.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGSundrEFACEITLevel 8STANDINGTop 31.2% of rankedcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim75
Positioning43
Utility44

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

HOT50–44–6Last 10050%Win rateLWWLWWWWWL

Last 10 vs previous 10: +30pp win rate · +0.02 avg rating · +7.8pp headshot accuracy · −144ms reaction

Win rate up 30pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — more than a 10-match window's normal noise (±20pp).

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 3–2 · 60% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.00
  • Avg headshot accuracy 21%
  • Avg reaction 572ms

Last 10

  • 7–3 · 70% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.00
  • Avg headshot accuracy 25%
  • Avg reaction 554ms

Last 20

  • 11–7–2 · 55% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 21%
  • Avg reaction 626ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Support — Utility contribution stands above the rest of this profile (+1.1 against its own average).

Aim7.5
Utility4.4
Positioning4.3
Opening Duels0.8
Clutch3.6

Limited utility dependence

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

b1t

Plays most like b1t 96% playstyle similarity

Most alike: utility contribution, opening-duel success.

Where you differ: lower aim profile; lower positioning profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Positioning. Positioning trails aim by 32 points — deaths here waste a strong aim profile.

Utility. Utility contribution runs far behind the mechanical game — the cheapest rating gain on this profile is thrown, not aimed.

Reaction time. 649ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim7.5
Positioning4.3
Utility4.4
Mechanics8.2
Opening Duels1.3
Win Impact5.6

Composite 5.7/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.00−0.02
first ⅓ avg 0.02 → last ⅓ avg -0.00
Reaction time662ms+12ms
first ⅓ avg 649ms → last ⅓ avg 662ms
Headshot accuracy20.1%+0.1%
first ⅓ avg 20.0% → last ⅓ avg 20.1%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.25Best match rating · 9–2 · vertigo, 15 Dec →
60%Best headshot accuracy · 7–0 · mirage, 16 May →
438msFastest reaction time · 5–13 · dust2, 2 Sept →
13–0Biggest win · mirage, 29 Jan →

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

8Longest win streak
7–1In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
2Overtime games

Map breakdown

nukeBest map · 59% over 17ancientWeakest map · 30% over 10
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
dust2A2011–955%-0.02
mirageB209–1145%-0.02
nukeA1710–759%0.00
infernoB115–645%0.00
ancientD103–730%-0.00
overpassC83–538%0.05
cacheB63–350%-0.02
anubis—44–0100%0.02
train—21–150%-0.02
vertigo—11–0100%0.25
palais—10–10%-0.14

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Ancient is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (30% over 10). Start with the 6 essential Ancient lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

942Matches
51%Win rate
1.16Avg K/D
69.9ADR
43%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

38%1v1 clutch win
19%1v2 clutch win
7Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWWWLL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage3956%1.0414.0
Ancient2959%1.0214.7
Dust22568%1.1814.8
Nuke1947%1.1916.1
Inferno1953%1.0715.3
Anubis1258%1.0113.0
Vertigo1242%0.9713.9

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

19.9%Headshot accuracy
34.1%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
39.0%Spray accuracy
87.1%Counter-strafing
9.0°Preaim
649msReaction time
33.3%T opening success
37.2%CT opening success
0.63Enemies flashed / flash
3.0%Flash assists
10.16HE damage / grenade
4.26Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 33.3054% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Ancient

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

30% win rate across 10 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Ancient callouts & strategy →Ancient grenade lineups →

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
nuke10–130.0227%4 Oct →
dust213–11-0.0214%4 Oct →
inferno13–40.0917%27 Sept →
dust23–13-0.0618%27 Sept →
ancient13–10-0.0329%26 Sept →
dust29–10.0250%26 Sept →
nuke11–4-0.0025%12 Sept →
dust213–60.0231%12 Sept →
mirage13–11-0.0514%12 Sept →
cache5–13-0.0125%7 Sept →
mirage12–12-0.0643%7 Sept →
mirage13–4-0.050%23 Aug →
nuke13–9-0.0514%23 Aug →
nuke6–13-0.0319%23 Aug →
dust212–12-0.0015%23 Aug →
cache13–10.0511%23 Aug →
ancient13–30.0217%23 Aug →
dust27–13-0.0313%23 Aug →
dust28–13-0.0524%15 Aug →
inferno9–13-0.0616%2 Aug →
ancient9–130.0112%2 Aug →
mirage13–11-0.0427%2 Aug →
mirage5–130.0114%2 Aug →
dust213–40.0327%2 Aug →
mirage10–13-0.0211%21 Jun →
nuke3–13-0.0230%21 Jun →
overpass9–130.068%21 Jun →
nuke9–50.1421%21 Jun →
inferno12–12-0.0318%20 Jun →
dust213–90.0123%14 Jun →
overpass3–13-0.0017%7 Jun →
inferno3–13-0.0117%7 Jun →
mirage16–12-0.0016%7 Jun →
nuke13–90.0123%7 Jun →
nuke13–8-0.0713%6 Jun →
cache13–8-0.0714%6 Jun →
overpass13–5-0.0721%6 Jun →
mirage13–2-0.0120%6 Jun →
dust25–13-0.0520%6 Jun →
mirage8–13-0.0531%29 May →
nuke8–13-0.059%29 May →
dust213–6-0.0350%28 May →
ancient10–13-0.0319%28 May →
nuke13–110.0517%27 May →
cache13–90.0021%25 May →
dust23–13-0.0117%25 May →
anubis16–14-0.049%25 May →
mirage8–13-0.0823%25 May →
cache8–13-0.1225%25 May →
inferno6–13-0.0626%24 May →
mirage5–13-0.0427%24 May →
anubis13–40.0110%24 May →
ancient12–120.0124%24 May →
overpass2–130.0623%24 May →
mirage2–130.009%24 May →
dust213–5-0.0019%16 May →
cache12–12-0.0120%16 May →
mirage6–13-0.0821%16 May →
dust213–8-0.0025%16 May →
mirage7–0-0.0160%16 May →
mirage10–13-0.0411%16 May →
nuke10–13-0.028%15 May →
mirage3–13-0.0344%1 Feb →
dust29–13-0.0345%1 Feb →
overpass6–13-0.0021%25 Jan →
ancient13–90.0215%25 Jan →
inferno13–40.0118%25 Jan →
overpass4–13-0.0331%24 Jan →
nuke6–9-0.026%24 Jan →
inferno5–90.0310%24 Jan →
nuke9–50.0612%24 Jan →
dust28–13-0.036%25 Dec →
ancient5–13-0.0512%25 Dec →
inferno8–13-0.0529%25 Dec →
ancient8–130.0123%10 Apr →
dust213–90.0129%10 Apr →
nuke13–60.0215%19 Feb →
mirage13–80.0120%19 Feb →
mirage13–00.1032%29 Jan →
inferno13–6-0.0021%29 Jan →
overpass9–20.1521%22 Jan →
inferno13–100.0322%20 Jan →
train13–70.0321%20 Jan →
ancient11–13-0.0311%20 Jan →
train5–13-0.0721%20 Jan →
overpass9–60.2224%20 Jan →
inferno9–40.0835%20 Jan →
anubis13–10.0932%19 Jan →
nuke4–90.0323%19 Jan →
vertigo9–20.2526%15 Dec →
palais5–9-0.1411%3 Dec →
mirage13–90.0621%24 Sept →
ancient12–120.0524%24 Sept →
nuke13–110.0113%24 Sept →
dust213–6-0.0223%4 Sept →
nuke13–70.0216%3 Sept →
dust213–60.0125%3 Sept →
anubis13–110.0215%2 Sept →
dust25–13-0.0712%2 Sept →
mirage1–13-0.0917%29 Aug →

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

500 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →

This profile is built from public Steam data. If it is yours, you can remove it, or delete your CSDB account.