Lars Olaf

Lars Olaf — CS2 Stats

76561198101039053[U:1:140773325]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

969Tracked matches54%Win rate2022Tracked since
CSDB Rating6.4 SolidPositional Player
Premier CS Rating22,358Top 50% of 210,832 CSDB-tracked playersPink band · top ~5.9% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#51437 of 258136 tracked
FaceitLevel 5Top 67.6% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanLegendary Eagle
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 20 Oct 2026 (7 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

−678Premier CS Rating · 23,036 → 22,358

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 22,358 +2,359 8 Aug – 27 Oct · 10 days played
19,73423,036peak 23,0368 Aug27 Oct
23,365Peak Premier in tracked matches
1,189Highest Faceit ELO seen on CSDB
17Days played since 2026-07-09

Premier CS Rating

  • 678 below peak (23,036)
  • +770 over 30 days · improving
  • +2,359 over 90 days
  • Next: Red band at 25,000 — 2,642 to go
  • Reached: Pink band · Purple band · Blue band · Light Blue band
  • Pink band first seen 2026-09-01
  • Purple band first seen 2026-09-01

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do. Faceit ELO is CSDB’s own observation — no feed exposes ELO per match, so that line only has the days the profile was viewed and cannot be backfilled.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGLars OlafFACEITLevel 5STANDINGTop 67.6% of rankedPREMIER22,358 · Pink bandPEAK ELO1,189csdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim72
Positioning57
Utility54

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY48–49–3Last 10048%Win rateWLLWWLWLLL

Last 10 vs previous 10: −20pp win rate · +0.00 avg rating · +2.3pp headshot accuracy · +83ms reaction

Win rate down 20pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — more than a 10-match window's normal noise (±20pp). Average match rating moved the other way (+0.00), so results shifted more than performance did.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 3–2 · 60% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 20%
  • Avg reaction 735ms

Last 10

  • 4–6 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.03
  • Avg headshot accuracy 18%
  • Avg reaction 707ms

Last 20

  • 10–9–1 · 50% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.03
  • Avg headshot accuracy 17%
  • Avg reaction 666ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Positional Player — Positioning stands above the rest of this profile (+2.1 against its own average).

Aim7.2
Utility5.4
Positioning5.7
Opening Duels2.4
Clutch1.0

Effective flashes

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

ZywOo

Plays most like ZywOo 89% playstyle similarity

Most alike: positioning profile, utility contribution.

Where you differ: lower aim profile; lower opening-duel success.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Strengths

T openings. 62% T opening-duel success — entries that actually open the round.

Flashes. 0.87 enemies blinded per flash — utility that consistently lands.

Areas to improve

CT openings. Opening success drops from 62% on T to 39% on CT — first contacts on the defending side are being lost.

Reaction time. 653ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim7.2
Positioning5.7
Utility5.4
Mechanics7.0
Opening Duels5.1
Win Impact6.2

Composite 6.4/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.02 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.03−0.01
first ⅓ avg -0.02 → last ⅓ avg -0.03
Reaction time657ms−32ms
first ⅓ avg 689ms → last ⅓ avg 657ms
Headshot accuracy16.0%+0.1%
first ⅓ avg 15.9% → last ⅓ avg 16.0%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.15Best match rating · 13–2 · mirage, 21 Jul →
36%Best headshot accuracy · 5–13 · cache, 27 Oct →
406msFastest reaction time · 13–0 · anubis, 8 Aug →
13–0Biggest win · anubis, 8 Aug →

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

6Longest win streak
11–9In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
15Overtime games

Map breakdown

infernoBest map · 83% over 12cacheWeakest map · 14% over 14
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
mirageB199–1047%-0.02
nukeA1710–759%-0.02
cacheD142–1214%-0.04
ancientA148–657%0.02
dust2C135–838%-0.04
infernoS1210–283%-0.02
anubisD93–633%-0.03
vertigo—21–150%0.04

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Faceit stats

Combat

547Matches
50%Win rate
0.93Avg K/D
72.5ADR
42%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

25%1v1 clutch win
21%1v2 clutch win
11Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLLWLW

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage10559%1.0214.8
Anubis8651%1.0714.9
Vertigo7449%0.9614.4
Inferno7239%0.8513.3
Ancient6951%0.8613.0
Nuke5139%0.8014.1
Dust23956%0.7911.7
Train1872%0.8611.8

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

15.7%Headshot accuracy
38.1%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
42.2%Spray accuracy
81.5%Counter-strafing
9.5°Preaim
653msReaction time
61.6%T opening success
39.2%CT opening success
0.87Enemies flashed / flash
4.5%Flash assists
9.88HE damage / grenade
6.11Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    Losing the first CT duel repeatedly usually means holding angles that favour the peeker.

    CT opening duels 39.198% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Cache

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

14% win rate across 14 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Cache callouts & strategy →

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
dust213–80.0516%27 Oct →
cache5–13-0.0536%27 Oct →
mirage12–16-0.0314%27 Oct →
inferno13–8-0.0520%27 Oct →
nuke13–11-0.0213%27 Oct →
dust26–13-0.0913%27 Oct →
ancient11–00.0020%27 Oct →
mirage9–13-0.0415%27 Oct →
mirage5–13-0.0719%27 Oct →
cache6–130.0013%27 Oct →
nuke6–13-0.0612%20 Oct →
mirage13–70.0111%20 Oct →
anubis14–16-0.0710%20 Oct →
cache15–15-0.059%20 Oct →
inferno13–11-0.0330%20 Oct →
dust210–13-0.0612%6 Oct →
mirage13–11-0.0118%6 Oct →
dust213–50.0117%6 Oct →
inferno13–7-0.0620%6 Oct →
cache13–90.0019%6 Oct →
inferno13–7-0.0033%6 Oct →
mirage9–13-0.0925%6 Oct →
ancient13–100.043%22 Sept →
anubis15–150.0110%22 Sept →
inferno13–11-0.019%22 Sept →
nuke13–10-0.0716%22 Sept →
cache8–13-0.085%18 Sept →
nuke13–80.0322%18 Sept →
nuke5–13-0.0320%18 Sept →
ancient14–16-0.039%18 Sept →
mirage13–9-0.0310%18 Sept →
dust27–13-0.0618%18 Sept →
ancient9–13-0.0413%18 Sept →
nuke13–100.0311%18 Sept →
cache4–13-0.0123%18 Sept →
inferno13–9-0.0022%18 Sept →
anubis13–2-0.0914%18 Sept →
mirage13–10-0.0426%18 Sept →
dust216–13-0.0518%15 Sept →
ancient6–13-0.0213%15 Sept →
nuke14–16-0.0520%15 Sept →
mirage7–13-0.0919%25 Aug →
dust210–13-0.0614%25 Aug →
ancient13–50.0618%25 Aug →
nuke13–70.027%25 Aug →
cache9–13-0.0315%25 Aug →
inferno16–14-0.0412%25 Aug →
mirage13–11-0.018%20 Aug →
nuke13–100.083%20 Aug →
anubis13–70.038%16 Aug →
ancient7–130.0714%16 Aug →
vertigo13–90.1118%16 Aug →
dust213–11-0.0313%16 Aug →
ancient13–30.0519%13 Aug →
cache14–160.0511%13 Aug →
nuke13–6-0.0517%13 Aug →
inferno13–10-0.0325%8 Aug →
ancient13–50.069%8 Aug →
anubis13–00.0314%8 Aug →
mirage6–13-0.0315%8 Aug →
dust27–13-0.0213%8 Aug →
ancient13–30.0415%8 Aug →
anubis6–13-0.0313%8 Aug →
nuke8–13-0.0213%8 Aug →
ancient15–15-0.0316%8 Aug →
mirage2–13-0.0035%8 Aug →
anubis0–13-0.0414%8 Aug →
inferno3–13-0.0710%8 Aug →
cache10–13-0.0918%8 Aug →
dust210–13-0.0614%8 Aug →
inferno9–130.0116%8 Aug →
nuke16–14-0.0916%8 Aug →
cache13–8-0.0530%8 Aug →
mirage13–10-0.0124%8 Aug →
ancient13–70.0423%8 Aug →
mirage13–8-0.0315%8 Aug →
nuke13–50.036%8 Aug →
cache5–13-0.053%7 Aug →
nuke14–16-0.076%7 Aug →
mirage2–50.0629%7 Aug →
anubis6–13-0.038%7 Aug →
mirage4–13-0.0535%7 Aug →
dust26–13-0.069%7 Aug →
ancient7–13-0.0113%7 Aug →
nuke13–16-0.0320%7 Aug →
cache8–13-0.038%7 Aug →
mirage9–13-0.0310%7 Aug →
nuke17–190.0210%30 Jul →
dust211–130.0018%30 Jul →
ancient13–100.0417%30 Jul →
vertigo10–13-0.0313%30 Jul →
inferno13–110.0223%21 Jul →
anubis11–13-0.0419%21 Jul →
mirage13–20.1522%21 Jul →
dust213–9-0.048%21 Jul →
cache14–16-0.0815%21 Jul →
cache3–13-0.0825%20 Jul →
mirage13–11-0.0020%18 Jul →
nuke13–11-0.058%18 Jul →
inferno13–50.0112%9 Jul →

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

500 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →

This profile is built from public Steam data. If it is yours, you can remove it, or delete your CSDB account.